Re: latest testing netinst missing network driver modules?
Well I saw http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/; mentioned somewhere and netinst/i386/ seemed the relevant sub-directory hierarchy under that for what I wanted. That used to be the old place for things, but we have reorganized things around and now it is not, I had left symlinks in place so that the old urls were not broken while we changed the web pages, but I think now it should be about time we had that solved, so I have removed the old netinst and jigdo-area symlinks. Currently things look like this: cd dvd sarge_d-i sid_d-i daily - sid_d-i cd and dvd have full cd and dvd images, based on sarge packages, sarge_d-i and sid_d-i have netinst and businesscard images based in sarge and sid udebs respectively. It seems that sarge udebs don't work with current d-i, so one should expect right now that everything but sid_d-i to be broken (I haven't tested this though). The daily symlink, now pointing to sid_d-i will be always pointing to the images that people should be testing. So, the recommended download for testing the Debian Installer will always be: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/ Joey, should I be building the cds and dvds against sid for now? Any other changes? Regards... -- Manty/BestiaTester - http://manty.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: latest testing netinst missing network driver modules?
Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote: Joey, should I be building the cds and dvds against sid for now? Any other changes? If we can only build one set, they should be built against sid's d-i for now, I think. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: latest testing netinst missing network driver modules?
If we can only build one set, they should be built against sid's d-i for now, I think. We could build against the two, but it takes a really long time to build because of jigdo, so I think it is better to build just for the one we wan't people to test, besides, if we provide several, people tends to get confused not knowing what to download. Regards... -- Manty/BestiaTester - http://manty.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: latest testing netinst missing network driver modules?
Dermot Bradley wrote: I just downloaded sarge netinst 23/02/04 and booted my Nforce2 system. From exactly what URL, please? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: latest testing netinst missing network driver modules?
Dermot Bradley wrote: Dermot Bradley wrote: I just downloaded sarge netinst 23/02/04 and booted my Nforce2 system. From exactly what URL, please? http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/20040223/sarge-i386-netinst.iso The correct url is under here: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/ The ones you used are known to be broken at this stage in the release cycle. Where did you come across the url you used? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: latest testing netinst missing network driver modules?
Dermot Bradley wrote: I just downloaded sarge netinst 23/02/04 and booted my Nforce2 system. From exactly what URL, please? http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/20040223/sarge-i386-netinst.iso -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: latest testing netinst missing network driver modules?
The correct url is under here: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/ The ones you used are known to be broken at this stage in the release cycle. Where did you come across the url you used? Well I saw http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/; mentioned somewhere and netinst/i386/ seemed the relevant sub-directory hierarchy under that for what I wanted. I'm downloading the relevant file from http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/ currently to test. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
