Bug#1033519: debootstrap: Fails to bootstrap wheezy (please symlink script as 'archived', like squeeze)

2023-03-26 Thread Stephan Sürken
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.128+nmu2
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

wheezy is archived, but script (unlike, f.e. squeeze) still links to sid:

---
ls -l /usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/wheezy 
/usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/squeeze
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Oct 19 00:49 /usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/squeeze -> 
etch
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Oct 19 00:49 /usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/wheezy -> 
sid
---

[i.e., bootstrap w/o special parameters for mirror (archived) and key file 
(removed) will fail.]

Please symlink wheezy like squeeze.

Thx!

Stephan

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.0
  APT prefers testing-security
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-security'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.0.0-0.deb11.6-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to C.UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: unable to detect

Versions of packages debootstrap depends on:
ii  wget  1.21.3-1+b2

Versions of packages debootstrap recommends:
ii  arch-test   0.20-1
ii  debian-archive-keyring  2023.2
ii  gnupg   2.2.40-1

Versions of packages debootstrap suggests:
ii  binutils 2.40-2
pn  squid-deb-proxy-client   
ii  ubuntu-keyring [ubuntu-archive-keyring]  2020.06.17.1-1
ii  xz-utils 5.4.1-0.2
ii  zstd 1.5.4+dfsg2-5

-- no debconf information



Bug#639713: marked as done (debian-installer: grub-install fails during squeeze install if /boot is on raid and mdadm was not installed)

2021-10-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Oct 2021 18:30:54 +0200
with message-id <20211030183054.906cb9aac22395d0f32a6...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Mass-closing old grub-installer bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #639713,
regarding debian-installer: grub-install fails during squeeze install if /boot 
is on raid and mdadm was not installed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
639713: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639713
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debian-installer

It may require a preseed file to get this to happen. Regardless, something
should have added mdadm to the list of packages to install if raid devices
were used.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

similar to the installation-reports bugs, I'm closing the grub-installer 
reports 
below.

These are reports for Debian 4 / 6 / 7 / 9 where grub-installer fails (for 
various reasons).


There have been numerous changes/improvements on this topics in the past, and 
also because of the age of the reports we should consider these problems as 
being fixed (or it is even reported in the bugs that they are fixed).
They are most likely of no use anymore for recent releases.

If you know, that the issue you reported (and gets closed here) is still 
existing in recent installation images, please file a new report for that with 
up-to-date details!

Thank you for filing these bug reports, they have been very useful at the time 
they were filed!


https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785149
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=489005
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610116
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611713
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612420
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621923
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647267
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659116
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665856
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666552
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668923
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686955
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690515
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690592
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702731
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729411
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=771467
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=780115
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=806164
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=806849
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=416986
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=252009
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292513
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=310798
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=391489
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=489006
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=578338
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=582367
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=229128
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=463842
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=497168
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=500079
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=516392
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=520361
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=544949
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549703
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=557242
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580461
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587699
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588670
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596877
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612025
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618498
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639713
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666559
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699456
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703901
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707604
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=711330
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609939
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=498831


Cheers
Holger


-- 
Holger Wansing 
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508  3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076--- End Message ---


Bug#612420: marked as done (installation-reports: Grub install error when installing from USB (Debian Squeeze))

2021-10-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Oct 2021 18:30:54 +0200
with message-id <20211030183054.906cb9aac22395d0f32a6...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Mass-closing old grub-installer bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #612420,
regarding installation-reports: Grub install error when installing from USB 
(Debian Squeeze)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
612420: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612420
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important

I used "unetbootin" for installing Debian from USB.

In the final step of the installation, Grub wants to use the USB I'm using to
install Debian. It doesn't let me to choose the hard disk until I remove the
usb from the laptop, then I can install Grub properly in the hard disk.



-- Package-specific info:

Boot method: usb
Image version: debian 6 Stable (32 bits) netinstall
Date: 

Machine: Toshiba NB200
Partitions: 


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [ ]
Detect network card:[ ]
Configure network:  [ ]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Clock/timezone setup:   [ ]
User/password setup:[ ]
Install tasks:  [ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Overall install:[ ]

Comments/Problems:




-- 

Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other
installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this
report. Please compress large files using gzip.

Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org.

==
Installer lsb-release:
==
DISTRIB_ID=Debian
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Debian GNU/Linux installer"
DISTRIB_RELEASE="6.0 (squeeze) - installer build 20091104-00:01"
X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom

==
Installer hardware-summary:
==
uname -a: Linux MPB 2.6.30-2-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Sep 25 22:16:56 UTC 2009 x86_64 
GNU/Linux
lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Mobile 
PM965/GM965/GL960 Memory Controller Hub [8086:2a00] (rev 03)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:0121]
lspci -knn: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Mobile 
GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2a02] (rev 03)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:0121]
lspci -knn: 00:02.1 Display controller [0380]: Intel Corporation Mobile 
GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2a03] (rev 03)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:0121]
lspci -knn: 00:1a.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 
Family) USB UHCI Controller #4 [8086:2834] (rev 03)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:0121]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:1a.1 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 
Family) USB UHCI Controller #5 [8086:2835] (rev 03)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:0121]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:1a.7 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 
Family) USB2 EHCI Controller #2 [8086:283a] (rev 03)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:0121]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) 
HD Audio Controller [8086:284b] (rev 03)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:0121]
lspci -knn: 00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) 
PCI Express Port 1 [8086:283f] (rev 03)
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver
lspci -knn: 00:1c.3 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) 
PCI Express Port 4 [8086:2845] (rev 03)
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver
lspci -knn: 00:1c.5 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) 
PCI Express Port 6 [8086:2849] (rev 03)
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver
lspci -knn: 00:1d.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 
Family) USB UHCI Controller #1 [8086:2830] (rev 03)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:0121]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:1d.1 USB Control

Bug#609939: marked as done (base: squeeze beta2 amd64 install fail in Acer3820: grub can't be installed)

2021-10-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Oct 2021 18:30:54 +0200
with message-id <20211030183054.906cb9aac22395d0f32a6...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Mass-closing old grub-installer bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #609939,
regarding base: squeeze beta2 amd64 install fail in Acer3820: grub can't be 
installed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
609939: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609939
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: base
Severity: important



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.7
  APT prefers proposed-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Hello,
squeeze beta2 amd64 install fail.
my computer is Acer3820tg.
the last stage of installing grub, error occors
so the system boot up into a grub safemode with command line while I restart it 
after fininshing the install.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

similar to the installation-reports bugs, I'm closing the grub-installer 
reports 
below.

These are reports for Debian 4 / 6 / 7 / 9 where grub-installer fails (for 
various reasons).


There have been numerous changes/improvements on this topics in the past, and 
also because of the age of the reports we should consider these problems as 
being fixed (or it is even reported in the bugs that they are fixed).
They are most likely of no use anymore for recent releases.

If you know, that the issue you reported (and gets closed here) is still 
existing in recent installation images, please file a new report for that with 
up-to-date details!

Thank you for filing these bug reports, they have been very useful at the time 
they were filed!


https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785149
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=489005
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610116
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611713
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612420
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621923
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647267
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659116
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665856
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666552
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668923
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686955
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690515
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690592
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702731
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729411
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=771467
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=780115
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=806164
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=806849
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=416986
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=252009
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292513
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=310798
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=391489
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=489006
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=578338
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=582367
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=229128
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=463842
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=497168
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=500079
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=516392
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=520361
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=544949
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549703
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=557242
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580461
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587699
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588670
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596877
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612025
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618498
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639713
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666559
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699456
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703901

Bug#580461: marked as done (squeeze Alpha1 + GRUB1: Error 23. Error while parsing number)

2021-10-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Oct 2021 18:30:54 +0200
with message-id <20211030183054.906cb9aac22395d0f32a6...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Mass-closing old grub-installer bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #580461,
regarding squeeze Alpha1 + GRUB1: Error 23. Error while parsing number
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
580461: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580461
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-reports

Boot method:
Downloaded netinst iso, burned on CD, booted from it, expert install.

Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_alpha1/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso

Date: 2010-05-04 22:30 CET

Machine: Custom
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPUQ9550  @ 2.83GHz
Memory: MemTotal: 8163284 kB
Partitions:
$ df -Tl
FilesystemType   1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/md0  ext319228180637108  17614328   4% /
tmpfstmpfs 4081640 0   4081640   0% /lib/init/rw
udev tmpfs   10240   224 10016   3% /dev
tmpfstmpfs 4081640 0   4081640   0% /dev/shm
/dev/md1  ext3   878796568205024 834646148   1% /srv

$ sudo fdisk -l /dev/sda

Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x0009c8eb

   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   1243219535008+  fd  Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sda22433  114283   898443157+   5  Extended
/dev/sda52433  111851   878908086   fd  Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sda6  111852  11428319535008+  fd  Linux raid autodetect

$ sudo fdisk -l /dev/sdb

Disk /dev/sdb: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x000a7bee

   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sdb1   1243219535008+  fd  Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sdb22433  114283   898443157+   5  Extended
/dev/sdb52433  111851   878908086   fd  Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sdb6  111852  11428319535008+  fd  Linux raid autodetect


Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn):
$ lspci -knn
00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 4 Series Chipset DRAM Controller 
[8086:2e20] (rev 03)
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:8336]
Kernel driver in use: agpgart-intel
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation 4 Series Chipset 
Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2e22] (rev 03)
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:8336]
00:02.1 Display controller [0380]: Intel Corporation 4 Series Chipset 
Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2e23] (rev 03)
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:8336]
00:1a.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB 
UHCI Controller #4 [8086:3a37]
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:82d4]
Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
00:1a.1 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB 
UHCI Controller #5 [8086:3a38]
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:82d4]
Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
00:1a.2 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB 
UHCI Controller #6 [8086:3a39]
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:82d4]
Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
00:1a.7 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB2 
EHCI Controller #2 [8086:3a3c]
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:82d4]
Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd
00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) HD Audio 
Controller [8086:3a3e]
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:837b]
Kernel driver in use: HDA Intel
00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) PCI Express 
Root Port 1 [8086:3a40]
Kernel driver in use: pcieport
00:1c.4 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) PCI Express 
Root Port 5 [8086:3a48]
Kernel driver in use: pcieport
00:1c.5 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) PCI Express 
Root Port 6 [8086:3a4a]
Kernel driver in use: pcieport
00:1d.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB 
UHCI Controller #1 [8086:3a34]
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Co

Bug#557242: marked as done (debian-installer: current daily squeeze installer installs grub to mbr without asking the user)

2021-10-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Oct 2021 18:30:54 +0200
with message-id <20211030183054.906cb9aac22395d0f32a6...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Mass-closing old grub-installer bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #557242,
regarding debian-installer: current daily squeeze installer installs grub to 
mbr without asking the user
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
557242: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=557242
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal

just tested the daily netboot installer
it installed grub to the mbr without asking me


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

similar to the installation-reports bugs, I'm closing the grub-installer 
reports 
below.

These are reports for Debian 4 / 6 / 7 / 9 where grub-installer fails (for 
various reasons).


There have been numerous changes/improvements on this topics in the past, and 
also because of the age of the reports we should consider these problems as 
being fixed (or it is even reported in the bugs that they are fixed).
They are most likely of no use anymore for recent releases.

If you know, that the issue you reported (and gets closed here) is still 
existing in recent installation images, please file a new report for that with 
up-to-date details!

Thank you for filing these bug reports, they have been very useful at the time 
they were filed!


https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785149
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=489005
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610116
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611713
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612420
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621923
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647267
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659116
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665856
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666552
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668923
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686955
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690515
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690592
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702731
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729411
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=771467
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=780115
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=806164
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=806849
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=416986
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=252009
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292513
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=310798
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=391489
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=489006
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=578338
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=582367
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=229128
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=463842
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=497168
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=500079
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=516392
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=520361
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=544949
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549703
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=557242
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580461
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587699
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588670
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596877
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612025
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618498
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639713
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666559
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699456
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703901
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707604
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=711330
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609939
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=498831


Cheers
Holger


-- 
Holger Wansing 
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508  3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076--- End Message ---


Re: debian squeeze live xfce4 - restart

2018-10-22 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 14:41 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hello C.Mielech!
> 
> On 10/22/18 2:17 PM, miel...@t-online.de wrote:
> > I downloaded a debian squeeze live xfce4 dvd and booted the
> > iso-file with unetbootin. There is one (small) thing, I wanted to
> > tell you:
> 
> unetbootin is known to create broken installation media, please see [1].
> This is why unetbootin was removed from Debian.

Also squeeze is long out of support.

Ben.

> Adrian
> 
> > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775689
-- 
Ben Hutchings
Knowledge is power.  France is bacon.




Re: debian squeeze live xfce4 - restart

2018-10-22 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hello C.Mielech!

On 10/22/18 2:17 PM, miel...@t-online.de wrote:
> I downloaded a debian squeeze live xfce4 dvd and booted the
> iso-file with unetbootin. There is one (small) thing, I wanted to
> tell you:

unetbootin is known to create broken installation media, please see [1].
This is why unetbootin was removed from Debian.

Adrian

> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775689

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913



debian squeeze live xfce4 - restart

2018-10-22 Thread miel...@t-online.de

Dear ladies and gentlemen,

I downloaded a debian squeeze live xfce4 dvd and booted the
iso-file with unetbootin. There is one (small) thing, I wanted to
tell you:

when you restart, the system does not reboot in the boot-sequence
like other operation systems (os), but it only restarts itself. In other os
when you boot from a burnt cd/dvd, at reboot the cd rom drive opens,
you can take out the cd/dvd and reboot continues. In squeeze the
cd rom drive opens only for 2 seconds and is closed again.

I know, that this is an old version. Possibly this is no longer of any 
interest.

But I wanted to inform you.

Yours sincerely
C.Mielech



Bug#675328: marked as done (debootstrap: Debootsrap warning during Squeeze install : corrupt deb with XFS)

2018-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 25 Jun 2018 13:57:51 +0900
with message-id <20180625135751.0e1c1f56fe674171b2811...@iijmio-mail.jp>
and subject line Re: debootstrap: Debootsrap warning during Squeeze install : 
corrupt deb with XFS
has caused the Debian Bug report #675328,
regarding debootstrap: Debootsrap warning during Squeeze install : corrupt deb 
with XFS
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
675328: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675328
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.40
Severity: normal

I can not install a Debian Squeeze on a PC, from a businesscard CD, with XFS
filesystem.
When I format the whole disk with one XFS partition I have some warnings during
the base system install (debootstrap) :
"http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/pool/main/o//x_amd64.deb was corrupt"

However, when I format the whole disk with one EXT3 partition I have not these
warnings and the system installs without problem.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.5
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
control: tags -1 +unreproducible

Hi,

On Thu, 31 May 2012 11:07:39 +0200 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lo=EFc?=  
wrote:
> Package: debootstrap
> Version: 1.0.40
> Severity: normal
> 
> I can not install a Debian Squeeze on a PC, from a businesscard CD, with XFS
> filesystem.
> When I format the whole disk with one XFS partition I have some warnings 
> during
> the base system install (debootstrap) :
> "http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/pool/main/o//x_amd64.deb was corrupt"

 I cannot get such error with 6.0.10 business card ISO, with XFS filesystem.
 Got authentication error with expired GPG keyring but it's not issue for
 debootstrap.

 Cannot reproduce and it's archived release, so let's close it.


-- 
Regards,

 Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.org/iijmio-mail.jp--- End Message ---


Re: lilo removal in squeeze (or, "please test grub2")

2017-04-24 Thread Stephen Powell
On Sun, 23 May 2010 16:11:30 -0400 (EDT), William Pitcock wrote:
> "Stephen Powell" <zlinux...@wowway.com> wrote:
>> (blah blah blah blah)
>
> Nobody cares if you are opposed to it.  Unless you are offering to become
> lilo upstream, it's going away.
> 
> William

I do understand why a Debian package maintainer does not wish to become
"upstream".  And I hope that someone who is both willing and able to do
so steps up to the plate.  But withdrawing it from the distribution seems
like overkill to me, especially since you want to withdraw it from Squeeze
and not Squeeze+1.  Lilo, as it exists today, works just fine for my
purposes.  And apparently it works just fine for a lot of other people too.

The Lord bless you, William.

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powell
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1170680188.363342.1274662130640.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com




Bug#855008: marked as done (Squeeze writable thumb drive goes into infinite loop)

2017-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 20 Mar 2017 18:08:15 + (UTC)
with message-id <alpine.deb.2.02.1703201807380.26...@nyx.feedle.net>
and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #855008,
regarding Squeeze writable thumb drive goes into infinite loop
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
855008: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855008
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-reports
Version: Stretch RC 2
Severity: normal

Boot method: Writable USB thumb drive
Image version: 
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: Sun Feb 12 23:12:53 PST 2017

Machine: QEMU
Processor:
Memory:
Partitions:


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [O]
Detect network card:[O]
Configure network:  [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [E]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Clock/timezone setup:   [ ]
User/password setup:[ ]
Install tasks:  [ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Overall install:[ ]

Comments/Problems:

The process described in 
https://www.debian.org/releases/stretch/amd64/ch04s03.html.en, 
specifically section 4.3.3, to create a writable thumb drive for 
installing Debian Stretch does not work as described.

I added these and only these files to the drive:
debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso[1]
initrd.gz
syslinux.cfg
vmlinuz

initrd.gz and vmlinuz were taken from 
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/stretch/main/installer-amd64/current/images/hd-media/

syslinux.cfg contains this:
default vmlinuz initrd=initrd.gz

I dismounted the thumb drive and typed "sudo syslinux /dev/sdX1".  Then 
I booted with "sudo qemu-system-x86_64 -hdb /dev/sdX".  The resulting 
drive booted up until the point the "Loading additional components"[2] 
progressed to mentioning "netcfg".  The console turns black with a grey 
bar along the bottom.  A few seconds later, the bar disappears.  A few 
seconds after that, the screen briefly turns grey.  The cycle then 
repeats.

Calling to mind #853918, I did try syslinux version 4.06 and 4.07 and 
the old grammar for syslinux.cfg to see if the change to 5.00 broke 
something that only the Stretch installer is tickling.  This made no 
difference.


[1] I also tried debian-stretch-DI-rc2-amd64-DVD-1.iso to no effect.

[2] The complete sequence until buggy behavior is "Configure the 
keyboard", "Detecting hardware", "Searching drives for an installer ISO 
image", and "Loading addional components".
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---


Closing this mistake of mine.--- End Message ---


Bug#855008: Squeeze writable thumb drive goes into infinite loop

2017-02-12 Thread David Griffith
Package: installation-reports
Version: Stretch RC 2
Severity: normal

Boot method: Writable USB thumb drive
Image version: 
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: Sun Feb 12 23:12:53 PST 2017

Machine: QEMU
Processor:
Memory:
Partitions:


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [O]
Detect network card:[O]
Configure network:  [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [E]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Clock/timezone setup:   [ ]
User/password setup:[ ]
Install tasks:  [ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Overall install:[ ]

Comments/Problems:

The process described in 
https://www.debian.org/releases/stretch/amd64/ch04s03.html.en, 
specifically section 4.3.3, to create a writable thumb drive for 
installing Debian Stretch does not work as described.

I added these and only these files to the drive:
debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso[1]
initrd.gz
syslinux.cfg
vmlinuz

initrd.gz and vmlinuz were taken from 
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/stretch/main/installer-amd64/current/images/hd-media/

syslinux.cfg contains this:
default vmlinuz initrd=initrd.gz

I dismounted the thumb drive and typed "sudo syslinux /dev/sdX1".  Then 
I booted with "sudo qemu-system-x86_64 -hdb /dev/sdX".  The resulting 
drive booted up until the point the "Loading additional components"[2] 
progressed to mentioning "netcfg".  The console turns black with a grey 
bar along the bottom.  A few seconds later, the bar disappears.  A few 
seconds after that, the screen briefly turns grey.  The cycle then 
repeats.

Calling to mind #853918, I did try syslinux version 4.06 and 4.07 and 
the old grammar for syslinux.cfg to see if the change to 5.00 broke 
something that only the Stretch installer is tickling.  This made no 
difference.


[1] I also tried debian-stretch-DI-rc2-amd64-DVD-1.iso to no effect.

[2] The complete sequence until buggy behavior is "Configure the 
keyboard", "Detecting hardware", "Searching drives for an installer ISO 
image", and "Loading addional components".



Bug#838388: marked as done (debootstrap: Fails to strap squeeze since 1.0.83)

2016-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Oct 2016 19:49:01 +
with message-id <e1bxfol-00021v...@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#838388: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.85
has caused the Debian Bug report #838388,
regarding debootstrap: Fails to strap squeeze since 1.0.83
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
838388: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838388
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.83
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainers,

since 1.0.83 (1.0.82 tested successfully), deboostrap fails to
strap (at least) squeeze. For example:

---
sudo /usr/sbin/debootstrap --variant buildd --arch amd64 squeeze 
./squeeze-amd64-83 http://archive.debian.org/debian
(...)
I: Extracting bash...
I: Extracting libbz2-1.0...
I: Extracting coreutils...
I: Extracting dash...
---

It always exits here with exit code 2, without any further error
message (not even when using --verbose).

Hth!

S

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages debootstrap depends on:
ii  wget  1.18-2+b1

Versions of packages debootstrap recommends:
ii  debian-archive-keyring  2014.3
ii  gnupg   2.1.15-3

debootstrap suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: debootstrap
Source-Version: 1.0.85

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
debootstrap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 838...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> (supplier of updated debootstrap package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 20:22:49 +0200
Source: debootstrap
Binary: debootstrap debootstrap-udeb
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.85
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org>
Description:
 debootstrap - Bootstrap a basic Debian system
 debootstrap-udeb - Bootstrap the Debian system (udeb)
Closes: 548880 792734 825034 838388 839046
Changes:
 debootstrap (1.0.85) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Julien Cristau ]
   * Add support for downloading and validating InRelease files, by splitting
 up detached signature from signed data.
   * Switch default mirror to deb.debian.org.
 .
   [ Colin Watson ]
   * Add (Ubuntu) zesty as a symlink to gutsy.
 .
   [ Ansgar Burchardt ]
   * Add jessie-kfreebsd to merged-/usr blacklist.
   * No longer Build-Depend on makedev. The code using it was already
 removed in debootstrap 1.0.82.
   * Do not use `tar -k` for older releases which might have file
 conflicts between the packages to be installed. (Closes: #838388)
   * Error out when seeing short options. (Closes: #548880)
   * Add oldoldstable -> sid script symlink. (Closes: #792734)
   * Add buster -> sid and bullseye -> sid script symlinks.
   * Only unpack and configure the base system when there are actually
 packages to install. (Closes: #825034)
   * debootstrap.8: Use stretch instead of wheezy in examples.
 .
   [ Marco d'Itri ]
   * Enable merged-/usr by default. (Closes: #839046)
Checksums-Sha1:
 05407803c70ab59d581090702eedb783ff699b91 1759 debootstrap_1.0.85.dsc
 b6748d7d7dd068f7f6a033603b2fc2187d3b3d3c 65743 debootstrap_1.0.85.tar.gz
Checksums-Sha256:
 83e23fdff82c53fab6c0e83dc1bc254c9844bf53cb0fde71ea2090caa6f04728 1759 
debootstrap_1.0.85.dsc
 134b937991effdddfd2de57de615dc0f59bef27ec684ca0a26e4887ea49ef576 65743 
debootstrap_1.0.85.tar.gz
Files:
 0ac72f4434257e675ca347140baa6d48 1759 admin extra debootstrap_1.0.85.dsc
 d521f0b18e77555c1663981e6733a7a4 65743 admin extra debootstrap_1.0.85.tar.gz

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYCm2sAAoJEJ2wI1V

Bug#838388: debootstrap: Fails to strap squeeze since 1.0.83

2016-09-21 Thread Stephan Sürken
Hi Ansgar,

On Mi, 2016-09-21 at 00:18 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:

(...)

> Ansgar Burchardt writes:

(...)

> > Only adding -k for newer distributions (i.e. the ones that merged-
> > /usr
> > supports) should work around the problem.
> I pushed a patch implementing this to my debootstrap
> repository[2].  It

great, thanks!

> worked for Squeeze (w/o merged-/usr) and Stretch (w/ merged-/usr).

While i am at it anyway, I did bulk-test this for

stretch,sid,jessie,wheezy,squeeze,lenny,etch X i368,amd64:

1.0.83 vanilla:

* All work except squeeze (i386+amd64). 

1.0.83+5bb1da69596828821fe43b3ee63f733e4b8672e7(your patch):

* All work fine.

So I really think your patch is fine ;).

Hth,

S



Processed: Re: Bug#838388: debootstrap: Fails to strap squeeze since 1.0.83

2016-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 838388 + patch
Bug #838388 [debootstrap] debootstrap: Fails to strap squeeze since 1.0.83
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
838388: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838388
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#838388: debootstrap: Fails to strap squeeze since 1.0.83

2016-09-20 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
tag 838388 + patch
thanks

Ansgar Burchardt writes:
> Ah, I'm to blame for that.  [1] added `-k` to the options passed to tar
> in order to avoid replacing the new symlinks from / to /usr with real
> directories.  However it looks like tar returns an error when there are
> actual file conflicts (as opposed to just symlink vs. directory).
>
> Only adding -k for newer distributions (i.e. the ones that merged-/usr
> supports) should work around the problem.

I pushed a patch implementing this to my debootstrap repository[2].  It
worked for Squeeze (w/o merged-/usr) and Stretch (w/ merged-/usr).

Ansgar

  [2] 
https://github.com/aburch/debootstrap/commit/5bb1da69596828821fe43b3ee63f733e4b8672e7



Bug#838388: debootstrap: Fails to strap squeeze since 1.0.83

2016-09-20 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Stephan Sürken writes:
> On Di, 2016-09-20 at 21:09 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> > It always exits here with exit code 2, without any further error
>> > message (not even when using --verbose).
>> >
>> There should be a log inside the target directory.
>
> ah, sure ;).
>
> debootstrap/debootstrap.log says:
>
> ---
> gpgv: Signature made Sat Apr 25 13:01:30 2015 CEST
> gpgv:using RSA key AED4B06F473041FA
> gpgv: Good signature from "Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (6.0/squeeze) 
> <ftpmas...@debian.org>"
> gpgv: Signature made Sat Apr 25 13:05:42 2015 CEST
> gpgv:using RSA key 64481591B98321F9
> gpgv: Good signature from "Squeeze Stable Release Key 
> <debian-rele...@lists.debian.org>"
> tar: ./usr/share/man/man1/sh.1.gz: Cannot create symlink to 'dash.1.gz': File 
> exists
> tar: ./bin/sh: Cannot create symlink to 'dash': File exists
> tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors

Ah, I'm to blame for that.  [1] added `-k` to the options passed to tar
in order to avoid replacing the new symlinks from / to /usr with real
directories.  However it looks like tar returns an error when there are
actual file conflicts (as opposed to just symlink vs. directory).

Only adding -k for newer distributions (i.e. the ones that merged-/usr
supports) should work around the problem.

Just --keep-directory-symlink would of course be ideal, but I doubt it
is supported everywhere (being a long option to start with).

Ansgar

  [1] 
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/debootstrap.git/commit/?id=6b79352a205a96cee441ae0c6247c4616097a517



Bug#838388: debootstrap: Fails to strap squeeze since 1.0.83

2016-09-20 Thread Stephan Sürken
Hi Julien,

On Di, 2016-09-20 at 21:09 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:

(...)

> > It always exits here with exit code 2, without any further error
> > message (not even when using --verbose).
> > 
> There should be a log inside the target directory.

ah, sure ;).

debootstrap/debootstrap.log says:

---
gpgv: Signature made Sat Apr 25 13:01:30 2015 CEST
gpgv:using RSA key AED4B06F473041FA
gpgv: Good signature from "Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (6.0/squeeze) 
<ftpmas...@debian.org>"
gpgv: Signature made Sat Apr 25 13:05:42 2015 CEST
gpgv:using RSA key 64481591B98321F9
gpgv: Good signature from "Squeeze Stable Release Key 
<debian-rele...@lists.debian.org>"
tar: ./usr/share/man/man1/sh.1.gz: Cannot create symlink to 'dash.1.gz': File 
exists
tar: ./bin/sh: Cannot create symlink to 'dash': File exists
tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors
gpgv: Signature made Sat Apr 25 13:01:30 2015 CEST
gpgv:using RSA key AED4B06F473041FA
gpgv: Good signature from "Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (6.0/squeeze) 
<ftpmas...@debian.org>"
gpgv: Signature made Sat Apr 25 13:05:42 2015 CEST
gpgv:    using RSA key 64481591B98321F9
gpgv: Good signature from "Squeeze Stable Release Key 
<debian-rele...@lists.debian.org>"
tar: ./lib/libacl.so.1.1.0: Cannot open: File exists
tar: ./usr/share/doc/libacl1/copyright: Cannot open: File exists
tar: ./usr/share/doc/libacl1/changelog.Debian.gz: Cannot open: File exists
tar: ./usr/share/doc/libacl1/changelog.gz: Cannot open: File exists
tar: ./lib/libacl.so.1: Cannot create symlink to 'libacl.so.1.1.0': File exists
tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors
---

Hth!

S



Bug#838388: debootstrap: Fails to strap squeeze since 1.0.83

2016-09-20 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 19:00:20 +, Stephan Suerken wrote:

> Package: debootstrap
> Version: 1.0.83
> Severity: normal
> 
> Dear Maintainers,
> 
> since 1.0.83 (1.0.82 tested successfully), deboostrap fails to
> strap (at least) squeeze. For example:
> 
> ---
> sudo /usr/sbin/debootstrap --variant buildd --arch amd64 squeeze 
> ./squeeze-amd64-83 http://archive.debian.org/debian
> (...)
> I: Extracting bash...
> I: Extracting libbz2-1.0...
> I: Extracting coreutils...
> I: Extracting dash...
> ---
> 
> It always exits here with exit code 2, without any further error
> message (not even when using --verbose).
> 
There should be a log inside the target directory.

Cheers,
Julien



Bug#838388: debootstrap: Fails to strap squeeze since 1.0.83

2016-09-20 Thread Stephan Suerken
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.83
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainers,

since 1.0.83 (1.0.82 tested successfully), deboostrap fails to
strap (at least) squeeze. For example:

---
sudo /usr/sbin/debootstrap --variant buildd --arch amd64 squeeze 
./squeeze-amd64-83 http://archive.debian.org/debian
(...)
I: Extracting bash...
I: Extracting libbz2-1.0...
I: Extracting coreutils...
I: Extracting dash...
---

It always exits here with exit code 2, without any further error
message (not even when using --verbose).

Hth!

S

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages debootstrap depends on:
ii  wget  1.18-2+b1

Versions of packages debootstrap recommends:
ii  debian-archive-keyring  2014.3
ii  gnupg   2.1.15-3

debootstrap suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



busybox_1.17.1-8+deb6u11_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into squeeze-lts

2015-10-30 Thread Debian FTP Masters


Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 04:39:59 +
Source: busybox
Binary: busybox busybox-static busybox-udeb busybox-syslogd udhcpc udhcpd
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1:1.17.1-8+deb6u11
Distribution: squeeze-lts
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Chris Lamb <la...@debian.org>
Description: 
 busybox- Tiny utilities for small and embedded systems
 busybox-static - Standalone rescue shell with tons of builtin utilities
 busybox-syslogd - Provides syslogd and klogd using busybox
 busybox-udeb - Tiny utilities for the debian-installer (udeb)
 udhcpc - Provides the busybox DHCP client implementation
 udhcpd - Provides the busybox DHCP server implementation
Closes: 803097
Changes: 
 busybox (1:1.17.1-8+deb6u11) squeeze-lts; urgency=high
 .
   * Fix segmentation fault while unzipping bad archive (Closes: #803097)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 f91687e67c197caced447b5ef6f3f85d460ea810 1792 busybox_1.17.1-8+deb6u11.dsc
 40c3f45830c936235e3086b584cd63935cff7f75 66759 
busybox_1.17.1-8+deb6u11.debian.tar.gz
 59bc4752ea751d4c1a592aad3395f58fd86f919c 13590 
busybox-syslogd_1.17.1-8+deb6u11_all.deb
 eea447ab967afb9eb5bd9ba464b6c04783bca959 11214 udhcpc_1.17.1-8+deb6u11_all.deb
 6fac1b5219b86ae593b5a6535b670955fcd584c3 14526 udhcpd_1.17.1-8+deb6u11_all.deb
 25db472490d4ec8bea9cb582187a22e1724b 336554 
busybox_1.17.1-8+deb6u11_amd64.deb
 654d8ba6c1fcd83ef1a19aab74660b9d37567da6 959082 
busybox-static_1.17.1-8+deb6u11_amd64.deb
 ce80c4a42f28ac55e89c2a69341db2b5fbdde071 160216 
busybox-udeb_1.17.1-8+deb6u11_amd64.udeb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 292502ef4f97da7070b7c8940f2ff6ccc0877cb0c341e68519b6b0433733652c 1792 
busybox_1.17.1-8+deb6u11.dsc
 e1d75aaa6323f9735e1ed35862fa34099e10aa40823d740039b6ebcd86a7053f 66759 
busybox_1.17.1-8+deb6u11.debian.tar.gz
 cdf3a689407c5bd707ddec369ed54056a0ae8df1a110ef6ece9792e1de9c2229 13590 
busybox-syslogd_1.17.1-8+deb6u11_all.deb
 6f7a1ba33ae906ea5c99c2c349bacedb34bf7e01d8c59948e37cb7ad91043f92 11214 
udhcpc_1.17.1-8+deb6u11_all.deb
 f26849dee5c31e3ccee9eb7c90f73203087e7a98a9328030eff1bfd5da83e324 14526 
udhcpd_1.17.1-8+deb6u11_all.deb
 4305684d6ea2a3fe230b9094bcf2676a6f9f01b740b7742967a346bedf4d0d6a 336554 
busybox_1.17.1-8+deb6u11_amd64.deb
 02d9e424fb7a62c03acb16675c1244e1ef12cd6b086f1f27d570a4869ac60c35 959082 
busybox-static_1.17.1-8+deb6u11_amd64.deb
 c82946c33d1c66eba33261e6e8a579d8f112a6bf23e587e98cff06e27dc134b8 160216 
busybox-udeb_1.17.1-8+deb6u11_amd64.udeb
Files: 
 51a69f10195dd5c9d3decd0f6307a0b0 1792 utils optional 
busybox_1.17.1-8+deb6u11.dsc
 9d698b439286cfcfe1d0a5a431315b7d 66759 utils optional 
busybox_1.17.1-8+deb6u11.debian.tar.gz
 cac65a68920eb6d6b2a3528f3c5dec04 13590 utils optional 
busybox-syslogd_1.17.1-8+deb6u11_all.deb
 e104409343fbaab779b5e5bb61f6db4a 11214 net optional 
udhcpc_1.17.1-8+deb6u11_all.deb
 6d673ff48defbda3bcc16683f40231eb 14526 net optional 
udhcpd_1.17.1-8+deb6u11_all.deb
 efa900cdf381287b38b02c01236b018d 336554 utils optional 
busybox_1.17.1-8+deb6u11_amd64.deb
 9b248b5c3b43a54a290709b8bec5961f 959082 shells extra 
busybox-static_1.17.1-8+deb6u11_amd64.deb
 73732e188feed6730aca35335d8bbc04 160216 debian-installer extra 
busybox-udeb_1.17.1-8+deb6u11_amd64.udeb
Package-Type: udeb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
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=OWH+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.



netboot squeeze reject new archive signing key 473041FA

2015-07-15 Thread Oliver Riesener

Hi,

my squeeze netboot installation failed on the new
Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key from Apr 25.

error: Bad signature on /tmp/net-retriever-3630-Release.

please fix this

Sheers

Oliver



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55a65082.2010...@hs-bremen.de



Bug#730441: release-notes: Debian requires an i586 since at least squeeze

2014-12-22 Thread Samuel Bronson
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 18:24:23 +0100 Baptiste Jammet bapti...@mailoo.org wrote:
 Hi,

 As already said, this was fixed with commits r69410-69412.

 I can close this
 bug in few days, unless someone do it before or tell me to not do it.

 No news, so I'm closing it now.

Any idea when the release notes get rebuilt? (Maybe reassigning the
bug back to that package would make sense?)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CAJYzjmeFyAxpr-9xNRqBKgVmh=PRu0ECXgYg2qPw_Cz=bgv...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#730441: marked as done (release-notes: Debian requires an i586 since at least squeeze)

2014-12-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 Dec 2014 18:24:23 +0100
with message-id 20141216182423.7734313d.bapti...@mailoo.org
and subject line Re: Bug#730441: release-notes: Debian requires an i586 since 
at least squeeze
has caused the Debian Bug report #730441,
regarding release-notes: Debian requires an i586 since at least squeeze
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
730441: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=730441
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

Looking at http://bugs.debian.org/609690, it seems that gcc has been
defaulting to -march=i586 at least since squeeze, or r4557 in the GCC
packaging SVN [1].

This would seem to indicate that you now need at least a 586 to run
Debian.

However, section 2.1.2.1 CPU of the release notes still says:

 However, Debian GNU/Linux wheezy will not run on 386 or earlier
 processors. Despite the architecture name i386, support for actual
 80386 processors (and their clones) was dropped with the Sarge
 (r3.1) release of Debian[2]. (No version of Linux has ever supported
 the 286 or earlier chips in the series.) All i486 and later
 processors are still supported[3].

This should be updated.

[1]: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/gcccvs?view=revisionrevision=4557

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.9-1-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Hi, 

As already said, this was fixed with commits r69410-69412.

I can close this
bug in few days, unless someone do it before or tell me to not do it.

No news, so I'm closing it now.

Thanks.

Baptiste


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
---End Message---


Bug#730441: release-notes: Debian requires an i586 since at least squeeze

2014-12-07 Thread Baptiste Jammet
Hi all, 

Dixit Samuel Bronson, le 24/11/2013 :
This would seem to indicate that you now need at least a 586 to run
Debian.

Similar words were added to the installation-guide by Ben in
commits r69410-69412, so I think we can close this bug now.

Dixit Cyril Brulebois, le 11/03/2014 :
We could probably update the squeeze section, but it might make sense
to keep that open until jessie's fate is decided; tagging moreinfo
accordingly.
(If someone wants to commit and close this bug report, please clone it
first to keep track of jessie's future.)

I don't understand the need to clone it now, so I can close this
bug in few days, unless someone do it before or tell me to not do it.

Baptiste


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Build squeeze debian-installer with 3.2 kernel from backports

2014-09-05 Thread gianluca

On 09/04/2014 06:14 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:

Anyway I'm obliged to install squeeze because the software stack I will use
has not been ported and tested on wheezy yet.




As far as I remember udev (squeeze based) will not work with a kernel 
3.2 as a deeply changes in ioctl in the kernel API.

Maybe you will need a newer udev too...

The revert is true: if you will use a 2.6.36 kernel in a Wheezy distro, 
udev simply fail so any other script which need devpts, shm, and other 
delights... In few words ALMOST EVERYTHING IS BROKEN.



Regards
--
   ,,,
  (o o)
==oOO==(_)==OOo==

Gianluca Renzi
RD
phone: +39.0542.609120
fax:   +39.0542.609212

  .oooO  Oooo.
==(   )==(   )===
   \ () /
\_)  (_/

===
| I would like to |
| fix the world,  |
| but they're not |
| giving me the   |
 \ source code!  /
  ---
¯\_(.)_/¯


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/540960c1.9030...@eurekelettronica.it



Re: Build squeeze debian-installer with 3.2 kernel from backports

2014-09-05 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 09:05 +0200, gianluca wrote:
 On 09/04/2014 06:14 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
  Anyway I'm obliged to install squeeze because the software stack I will use
  has not been ported and tested on wheezy yet.
 
 
 As far as I remember udev (squeeze based) will not work with a kernel 
 3.2 as a deeply changes in ioctl in the kernel API.
 Maybe you will need a newer udev too...

You remember wrongly.

 The revert is true: if you will use a 2.6.36 kernel in a Wheezy distro, 
 udev simply fail so any other script which need devpts, shm, and other 
 delights... In few words ALMOST EVERYTHING IS BROKEN.

So far as I am aware, this is not true for Debian's kernel packages.

The last time we had a udev/kernel incompatibility across releases was
between lenny and squeeze:
https://www.debian.org/releases/squeeze/amd64/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#upgrading-udev

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Experience is directly proportional to the value of equipment destroyed.
 - Carolyn Scheppner


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Build squeeze debian-installer with 3.2 kernel from backports

2014-09-04 Thread Sylvain Rabot
Hi,

I'm trying to setup a PXE with netboot install of squeeze for some HP
hardware that uses broadcom 10G cards.

Those broadcom cards are only correctly detected with the 3.2 kernel from
the backports (and with an additional non-free driver).

In order to do a netboot install I need debian-install to use a 3.2 kernel
instead of the regular 2.6.32.

I tried to adapt this
https://developer.rackspace.com/blog/using-a-custom-kernel-with-cloud-servers/
but had no chance so far because the following packages do not exist in
squeeze-backports

E: Unable to locate package acpi-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'acpi-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
E: Unable to locate package fat-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'fat-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
E: Unable to locate package fb-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'fb-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
E: Unable to locate package floppy-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
E: Couldn't find any package by regex
'floppy-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
E: Unable to locate package input-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'input-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
E: Unable to locate package kernel-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'kernel-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
E: Unable to locate package nic-extra-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
E: Couldn't find any package by regex
'nic-extra-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
E: Unable to locate package nic-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'nic-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
E: Unable to locate package nic-pcmcia-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
E: Couldn't find any package by regex
'nic-pcmcia-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
E: Unable to locate package nic-usb-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
E: Couldn't find any package by regex
'nic-usb-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
E: Unable to locate package nic-wireless-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
E: Couldn't find any package by regex
'nic-wireless-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
E: Unable to locate package pcmcia-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
E: Couldn't find any package by regex
'pcmcia-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
E: Unable to locate package usb-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'usb-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
E: Unable to locate package usb-storage-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
E: Couldn't find any package by regex
'usb-storage-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
E: Unable to locate package virtio-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
E: Couldn't find any package by regex
'virtio-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'

Complete log at http://pastebin.com/SQBAr0HU

So I am wondering if it is possible to build the debian-installer with the
3.2 kernel.

Regards.

-- 
Sylvain Rabot sylv...@abstraction.fr


Re: Build squeeze debian-installer with 3.2 kernel from backports

2014-09-04 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 05:57:47PM +0200, Sylvain Rabot wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'm trying to setup a PXE with netboot install of squeeze for some HP
 hardware that uses broadcom 10G cards.
 
 Those broadcom cards are only correctly detected with the 3.2 kernel from
 the backports (and with an additional non-free driver).
 
 In order to do a netboot install I need debian-install to use a 3.2 kernel
 instead of the regular 2.6.32.
 
 I tried to adapt this
 https://developer.rackspace.com/blog/using-a-custom-kernel-with-cloud-servers/
 but had no chance so far because the following packages do not exist in
 squeeze-backports
 
 E: Unable to locate package acpi-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
 E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'acpi-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
 E: Unable to locate package fat-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
 E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'fat-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
 E: Unable to locate package fb-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
 E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'fb-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
 E: Unable to locate package floppy-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
 E: Couldn't find any package by regex
 'floppy-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
 E: Unable to locate package input-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
 E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'input-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
 E: Unable to locate package kernel-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
 E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'kernel-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
 E: Unable to locate package nic-extra-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
 E: Couldn't find any package by regex
 'nic-extra-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
 E: Unable to locate package nic-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
 E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'nic-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
 E: Unable to locate package nic-pcmcia-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
 E: Couldn't find any package by regex
 'nic-pcmcia-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
 E: Unable to locate package nic-usb-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
 E: Couldn't find any package by regex
 'nic-usb-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
 E: Unable to locate package nic-wireless-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
 E: Couldn't find any package by regex
 'nic-wireless-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
 E: Unable to locate package pcmcia-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
 E: Couldn't find any package by regex
 'pcmcia-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
 E: Unable to locate package usb-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
 E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'usb-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
 E: Unable to locate package usb-storage-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
 E: Couldn't find any package by regex
 'usb-storage-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
 E: Unable to locate package virtio-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
 E: Couldn't find any package by regex
 'virtio-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
 
 Complete log at http://pastebin.com/SQBAr0HU
 
 So I am wondering if it is possible to build the debian-installer with the
 3.2 kernel.

Well wheezy (the current stable release) is already 3.2.  Why would you
be installing an obsolete version of Debian?

-- 
Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140904160047.gm17...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca



Re: Build squeeze debian-installer with 3.2 kernel from backports

2014-09-04 Thread Sylvain Rabot
I thought squeeze has became LTS ?

Anyway I'm obliged to install squeeze because the software stack I will use
has not been ported and tested on wheezy yet.

Regards.


On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Lennart Sorensen 
lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:

 On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 05:57:47PM +0200, Sylvain Rabot wrote:
  Hi,
 
  I'm trying to setup a PXE with netboot install of squeeze for some HP
  hardware that uses broadcom 10G cards.
 
  Those broadcom cards are only correctly detected with the 3.2 kernel from
  the backports (and with an additional non-free driver).
 
  In order to do a netboot install I need debian-install to use a 3.2
 kernel
  instead of the regular 2.6.32.
 
  I tried to adapt this
 
 https://developer.rackspace.com/blog/using-a-custom-kernel-with-cloud-servers/
  but had no chance so far because the following packages do not exist in
  squeeze-backports
 
  E: Unable to locate package acpi-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
  E: Couldn't find any package by regex
 'acpi-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
  E: Unable to locate package fat-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
  E: Couldn't find any package by regex
 'fat-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
  E: Unable to locate package fb-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
  E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'fb-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
  E: Unable to locate package floppy-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
  E: Couldn't find any package by regex
  'floppy-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
  E: Unable to locate package input-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
  E: Couldn't find any package by regex
 'input-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
  E: Unable to locate package kernel-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
  E: Couldn't find any package by regex
 'kernel-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
  E: Unable to locate package nic-extra-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
  E: Couldn't find any package by regex
  'nic-extra-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
  E: Unable to locate package nic-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
  E: Couldn't find any package by regex
 'nic-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
  E: Unable to locate package nic-pcmcia-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
  E: Couldn't find any package by regex
  'nic-pcmcia-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
  E: Unable to locate package nic-usb-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
  E: Couldn't find any package by regex
  'nic-usb-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
  E: Unable to locate package nic-wireless-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
  E: Couldn't find any package by regex
  'nic-wireless-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
  E: Unable to locate package pcmcia-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
  E: Couldn't find any package by regex
  'pcmcia-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
  E: Unable to locate package usb-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
  E: Couldn't find any package by regex
 'usb-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
  E: Unable to locate package usb-storage-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
  E: Couldn't find any package by regex
  'usb-storage-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
  E: Unable to locate package virtio-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di
  E: Couldn't find any package by regex
  'virtio-modules-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64-di'
 
  Complete log at http://pastebin.com/SQBAr0HU
 
  So I am wondering if it is possible to build the debian-installer with
 the
  3.2 kernel.

 Well wheezy (the current stable release) is already 3.2.  Why would you
 be installing an obsolete version of Debian?

 --
 Len Sorensen




-- 
Sylvain Rabot sylv...@abstraction.fr


Re: Build squeeze debian-installer with 3.2 kernel from backports

2014-09-04 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Sylvain,

On Donnerstag, 4. September 2014, Sylvain Rabot wrote:
 I thought squeeze has became LTS ?

yes, it has.

 Anyway I'm obliged to install squeeze because the software stack I will use
 has not been ported and tested on wheezy yet.

makes quite some sense to me too! :)


cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Build squeeze debian-installer with 3.2 kernel from backports

2014-09-04 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 17:57 +0200, Sylvain Rabot wrote:
[...]

 I tried to adapt this
 https://developer.rackspace.com/blog/using-a-custom-kernel-with-cloud-servers/
  but had no chance so far because the following packages do not exist in 
 squeeze-backports

Right, we don't build these because the 'kernel-wedge' program used to
build kernel udebs required that the configuration for doing that is in
a separate source package from the kernel itself.  During the
development of 'wheezy' I changed it to support building udebs from the
same source package as the regular kernel packages, and that's what we
do now.

[...]

 So I am wondering if it is possible to build the debian-installer with
 the 3.2 kernel.

It seems like it might be possible if you take kernel udebs from the
stable (wheezy) suite and everything else from the oldstable (squeeze)
suite.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Experience is directly proportional to the value of equipment destroyed.
 - Carolyn Scheppner


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Build squeeze debian-installer with 3.2 kernel from backports

2014-09-04 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (2014-09-04):
  So I am wondering if it is possible to build the debian-installer
  with the 3.2 kernel.
 
 It seems like it might be possible if you take kernel udebs from the
 stable (wheezy) suite and everything else from the oldstable (squeeze)
 suite.

That's likely. I started doing so for wheezy[1] but didn't finish
because I had to spend some time on jessie as well.

 1. https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2014/01/msg00407.html

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Build squeeze debian-installer with 3.2 kernel from backports

2014-09-04 Thread Sylvain Rabot
Thanks, I've tried and got a little bit further but now I'm stuck with that
:

Selecting previously deselected package libslang2.
dpkg: regarding udebs/libslang2.udeb containing libslang2, pre-dependency
problem:
 libslang2 pre-depends on multiarch-support
  multiarch-support is not installed.
dpkg: error processing udebs/libslang2.udeb (--unpack):
 pre-dependency problem - not installing libslang2
Errors were encountered while processing:
 udebs/libslang2.udeb
make[2]: *** [stamps/tree-unpack-netboot-stamp] Error 1
make[1]: *** [_build] Error 2
make: *** [build_netboot] Error 2

Regards


On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:

 On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 17:57 +0200, Sylvain Rabot wrote:
 [...]

  I tried to adapt this
 
 https://developer.rackspace.com/blog/using-a-custom-kernel-with-cloud-servers/
 but had no chance so far because the following packages do not exist in
 squeeze-backports

 Right, we don't build these because the 'kernel-wedge' program used to
 build kernel udebs required that the configuration for doing that is in
 a separate source package from the kernel itself.  During the
 development of 'wheezy' I changed it to support building udebs from the
 same source package as the regular kernel packages, and that's what we
 do now.

 [...]

  So I am wondering if it is possible to build the debian-installer with
  the 3.2 kernel.

 It seems like it might be possible if you take kernel udebs from the
 stable (wheezy) suite and everything else from the oldstable (squeeze)
 suite.

 Ben.

 --
 Ben Hutchings
 Experience is directly proportional to the value of equipment destroyed.
  - Carolyn
 Scheppner




-- 
Sylvain Rabot sylv...@abstraction.fr


Re: Bug#645709: www.debian.org: Debian “squeeze” Installation Information , errata outdated?

2014-08-16 Thread David Prévot
Control: tags -1 wontfix

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 07:53:48PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
 On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 07:31:39PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
  Le 17/10/2011 19:13, Touko Korpela a écrit :

   http://www.debian.org/releases/squeeze/debian-installer/
   
   Errata lists some items as This will be fixed on the next Squeeze point 
   release (6.0.1).
   Now 6.0.3 is released, so maybe those are now fixed?
  
  Thanks for your report, Debian Installer team CC: could you please
  update the page as needed?
 
 I know that you are busy with wheezy installer, but squeeze installer errata
 list is still at pre 6.0.1 level. Many bugs are now fixed but some remain.

A few years latter without update, and since the d-i team is working on
the Jessie installer now, we may consider that this page will never see
any update. Anyway, the errata links to the relevant bug reports that
are being tracked properly, so one can still check the bugs they may be
affected by and control a priori if it has been fixed in the mean time.

There won’t be any d-i update for Squeeze, so closing this bug.

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#610641: marked as done (debian-installer: Grub2 in squeeze installer attempts to install to wrong disk.)

2014-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Mar 2014 01:28:30 +0100
with message-id 20140317002830.ga32...@mraw.org
and subject line Re: Bug#388559: Installation report: subfire x4100, etch rc3
has caused the Debian Bug report #388559,
regarding debian-installer: Grub2 in squeeze installer attempts to install to 
wrong disk.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
388559: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=388559
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important

Install onto a disk other than /dev/sda (eg, /dev/sdb), but grub still
attempts to do a grub-install to /dev/sda, which fails, because /dev/sda
has no partition table.  Grub should install itself to the same disk that
/boot is on.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Version: 1.86

Jan Grant jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk (2006-09-21):
 The root disk is therefore /dev/sdi. I don't have a problem with this, 
 but the installer does. At the point where I selected a grub 
 installation into the MBR, I saw a response which stated that it 
 couldn't find or write to /dev/hda.
 
 The workaround was to use the emergency shell and chroot into /target, 
 running update-grub and grub-install /dev/sdi by hand.
 
 The installation otherwise completed - apparently, under my early 
 testing, successfully.

It took quite some time, but that's been finally fixed in the above
mentioned version, by prompting where to install grub to.

The first official release featuring this bug fix is the upcoming
jessie alpha 1 installer.

Thanks everyone for your reports.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---


Bug#633128: Acknowledgement (debian-installer: Squeeze Installer fails to detect RDC PATA controller)

2014-03-16 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Control: retitle -1 missing pata_rdc.ko in debian-installer
Control: reassign -1 src:linux

Hi,

and thanks for your report.

Kushal Koolwal kushalkool...@gmail.com (2011-07-08):
 OK, I think I figured out why Debian Squeeze won't detect my pata 
 controller...
 
 # dpkg -x 
 /media/cdrom0/pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/pata-modules-2.6.32-5-486-di_1.99+squeeze3_i386.udeb
 /root/
 # ls -l /root/lib/modules/2.6.32-5-486/kernel/drivers/ata/
 total 260
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14468 Jun 13 03:00 pata_ali.ko
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 15600 Jun 13 03:00 pata_amd.ko
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  9164 Jun 13 03:00 pata_artop.ko
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  8344 Jun 13 03:00 pata_atiixp.ko
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  9656 Jun 13 03:00 pata_cmd64x.ko
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10064 Jun 13 03:00 pata_cs5520.ko
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  9512 Jun 13 03:00 pata_cs5530.ko
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  7664 Jun 13 03:00 pata_efar.ko
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 16136 Jun 13 03:00 pata_it821x.ko
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  5668 Jun 13 03:00 pata_jmicron.ko
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  6824 Jun 13 03:00 pata_marvell.ko
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  7544 Jun 13 03:00 pata_mpiix.ko
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  5984 Jun 13 03:00 pata_netcell.ko
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  6984 Jun 13 03:00 pata_ns87410.ko
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  7220 Jun 13 03:00 pata_oldpiix.ko
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 12164 Jun 13 03:00 pata_pdc2027x.ko
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  8804 Jun 13 03:00 pata_pdc202xx_old.ko
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  6552 Jun 13 03:00 pata_rz1000.ko
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  6772 Jun 13 03:00 pata_sc1200.ko
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  6672 Jun 13 03:00 pata_sch.ko
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10820 Jun 13 03:00 pata_serverworks.ko
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10292 Jun 13 03:00 pata_sil680.ko
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  7368 Jun 13 03:00 pata_triflex.ko
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14148 Jun 13 03:00 pata_via.ko
 root@debian:~#
 
 The RDC PATA controller driver, *pata_rdc*, is missing from the list.

It looks like it's missing from the pata-modules udeb indeed, retitling
and reassigning to the linux source package accordingly.

 Can this be fixed in the next update (6.0.x.x) of Debian Squeeze?

I'm not sure it's worth fixing in squeeze at this point. If wheezy's
linux is fixed, the usual d-i rebuild in wheezy would likely pick this
up for the next point release though.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#633128: Acknowledgement (debian-installer: Squeeze Installer fails to detect RDC PATA controller)

2014-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 retitle -1 missing pata_rdc.ko in debian-installer
Bug #633128 [src:linux,kernel-wedge] debian-installer: Squeeze Installer fails 
to detect RDC PATA controller
Changed Bug title to 'missing pata_rdc.ko in debian-installer' from 
'debian-installer: Squeeze Installer fails to detect RDC PATA controller'
 reassign -1 src:linux
Bug #633128 [src:linux,kernel-wedge] missing pata_rdc.ko in debian-installer
Bug reassigned from package 'src:linux,kernel-wedge' to 'src:linux'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #633128 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #633128 to the same values 
previously set

-- 
633128: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633128
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b633128.139502422716259.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#730441: release-notes: Debian requires an i586 since at least squeeze

2014-03-10 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Control: tag -1 moreinfo

Hi Baptiste,

first of all, thanks for the reassign and the patch.

Baptiste Jammet bapti...@mailoo.org (2014-02-15):
 Control: reassign -1 installation-guide

Please cc maintainers when reassigning, otherwise the mail isn't sent to
them. Also, please always cc bug submitters (debbugs doesn't do that on
its own).

 I'm reassigning this bug because these words are from
 installation-guide, and note from RN.
 
 Dixit Samuel Bronson, le 24/11/2013 :
 
 Looking at http://bugs.debian.org/609690, it seems that gcc has been
 defaulting to -march=i586 at least since squeeze, or r4557 in the GCC
 packaging SVN [1].
 
 This would seem to indicate that you now need at least a 586 to run
 Debian.
 
 However, section 2.1.2.1 CPU of the release notes still says:
 
  However, Debian GNU/Linux wheezy will not run on 386 or earlier
  processors. Despite the architecture name i386, support for actual
  80386 processors (and their clones) was dropped with the Sarge
  (r3.1) release of Debian[2]. (No version of Linux has ever supported
  the 286 or earlier chips in the series.) All i486 and later
  processors are still supported[3].
 
 I'd like to add that, despite the fact that gcc has been defaulting to
 -march=i586, I succesfully installed wheezy 7.3 inside
 qemu-system-i386 -cpu 486. 
 (I've only chosen base install and did not make more tests.)
 
 This should be updated.
 
 You can find attached a proposed wording for 
 d-i/trunk/manual/en/hardware/supported/i386.xml
 
 Baptiste

 Index: d-i/trunk/manual/en/hardware/supported/i386.xml
 ===
 --- d-i/trunk/manual/en/hardware/supported/i386.xml   (r??vision 69081)
 +++ d-i/trunk/manual/en/hardware/supported/i386.xml   (copie de travail)
 @@ -36,8 +36,9 @@
  /para
  
  /footnote. (No version of Linux has ever supported the 286 or earlier
 -chips in the series.)  All i486 and later processors are still
 -supportedfootnote
 +chips in the series.)  Since the Squeeze release (6.0), gcc uses i586 as 
 default arch ; 
 +this means that all i586 and later processors are supported. Debian could 
 still run on i486 
 +processors (and their clones), but some packages may not run as 
 expectedfootnote
  
  para

FWIW, there's also:
  https://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2011/11/msg00073.html

We could probably update the squeeze section, but it might make sense
to keep that open until jessie's fate is decided; tagging moreinfo
accordingly.

(If someone wants to commit and close this bug report, please clone it
first to keep track of jessie's future.)

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#730441: release-notes: Debian requires an i586 since at least squeeze

2014-03-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #730441 [installation-guide] release-notes: Debian requires an i586 since 
at least squeeze
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
730441: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=730441
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b730441.13945025327749.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#538086: marked as done (user-setup: Lenny version is incompatible with Squeeze/Sid)

2014-03-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 2 Mar 2014 05:24:17 +0100
with message-id 20140302042417.ga25...@mraw.org
and subject line Re: Bug#538086: installation-reports: Installation works, but 
neither is user created  nor a root password set
has caused the Debian Bug report #538086,
regarding user-setup: Lenny version is incompatible with Squeeze/Sid
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
538086: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=538086
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable



-- Package-specific info:

Boot method: USB stick with netboot
Image version: 
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/main/installer-i386/current/images/netboot/
Date: Date and time of the install

Machine: Lenovo Thinkpad x200s
Partitions: df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred

dinyar-notebook:/home/dinyar# df -Tl
FilesystemType   1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/dinyar--notebook-root
  ext3   295996296   5050720 275909776   2% /
tmpfstmpfs 1979968 0   1979968   0% /lib/init/rw
udev tmpfs   10240   148 10092   2% /dev
tmpfstmpfs 1979968 0   1979968   0% /dev/shm
/dev/sda1 ext2  25 44713176174  21% /boot


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [O]
Detect network card:[O]
Configure network:  [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [E]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Install base system:[O]
Clock/timezone setup:   [O]
User/password setup:[E]
Install tasks:  [O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Overall install:[E]

Comments/Problems:

The first problem I encountered while trying to install a system with an
encrypted LVM was that the USB stick was taken to be /dev/sda while the
harddisk was /dev/sdb. This changed at first boot when the usb stick was
unplugged.

This first problem could be fixed either by booting into a rescue system
and first changing grub's menu.lst to point to (hd0,0) instead of (hd1,0)
and then unpack the initrd.img file and change /conf/conf.d/cryptroot to
point to /dev/sda instead of /dev/sdb, or alternatively I pulled the USB
stick out right before detecting the harddisk. (priority=medium is helpfull
for timing here.) This seemed to have no negativ effects on the installation.

The second problem I encountered was that neither my user account was created
during installation nor was the root password set. This left the system fairly
unusable until I used a rescue system to mount my encrypted disk, added a user
to /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow (without a password) and subsequently added
this user to the sudoers group. In this way I could aquire root on my new
system.



-- 

Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other
installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this
report. Please compress large files using gzip.

Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org.

==
Installer lsb-release:
==
DISTRIB_ID=Debian
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer
DISTRIB_RELEASE=5.0 (lenny) - installer build 20090123lenny3
X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=netboot

==
Installer hardware-summary:
==
umame -a: Linux dinyar-notebook 2.6.26-2-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Jun 21
04:47:08 UTC 2009 x86_64 unknown
lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Mobile 4
Series Chipset Memory Controller Hub [8086:2a40] (rev 07)
lspci -knn: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel
Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller
[8086:2a42] (rev 07)
lspci -knn: 00:02.1 Display controller [0380]: Intel Corporation
Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2a43]
(rev 07)
lspci -knn: 00:03.0 Communication controller [0780]: Intel Corporation
Mobile 4 Series Chipset MEI Controller [8086:2a44] (rev 07)
lspci -knn: 00:03.2 IDE interface [0101]: Intel Corporation Mobile 4
Series Chipset PT IDER Controller [8086:2a46] (rev 07)
lspci -knn: 00:03.3 Serial controller [0700]: Intel Corporation Mobile
4 Series Chipset AMT SOL Redirection [8086:2a47] (rev 07)
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: serial
lspci -knn: 00:19.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation

Bug#612281: marked as done (installation-reports: volatile reference instead of squeeze/updates in, installer)

2014-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 Feb 2014 21:51:04 +0100
with message-id 20140228205104.ga3...@mraw.org
and subject line Re: Bug#492937: apt-setup: inconsistent path handling for 
'security' and 'volatile' services
has caused the Debian Bug report #492937,
regarding installation-reports: volatile reference instead of squeeze/updates 
in, installer
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
492937: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=492937
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---


Package: installation-reports
Severity: minor



-- Package-specific info:

Boot method: CD
Image version: 
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.0/multi-arch/iso-cd/debian-6.0.0-amd64-i386-netinst.iso

Date: 7th February 2011

Machine: HP DL380 G4
Partitions: df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [O]
Detect network card:[O] -- with non-free firmware added to iso
Configure network:  [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Install base system:[O]
Clock/timezone setup:   [O]
User/password setup:[O]
Install tasks:  [O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Overall install:[O]

Comments/Problems:

Simple base minimalistic installation with ssh server and standard only,
as server, no desktop GUI installed.


--

Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other
installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this
report. Please compress large files using gzip.

Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org.

==
Installer lsb-release:
==
DISTRIB_ID=Debian
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer
DISTRIB_RELEASE=6.0 (squeeze) - installer build 20110106+b1
X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom

==
Installer hardware-summary:
==
uname -a: Linux hp-dl380g4-a 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Dec 10 15:35:08 
UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation E7520 Memory 
Controller Hub [8086:3590] (rev 0c)

lspci -knn: Subsystem: Compaq Computer Corporation Device [0e11:3200]
lspci -knn: 00:02.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 
E7525/E7520/E7320 PCI Express Port A [8086:3595] (rev 0c)

lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport
lspci -knn: 00:06.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation E7520 PCI 
Express Port C [8086:3599] (rev 0c)

lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport
lspci -knn: 00:1d.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER 
(ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI Controller #1 [8086:24d2] (rev 02)

lspci -knn: Subsystem: Compaq Computer Corporation Device [0e11:3201]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:1d.1 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER 
(ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI Controller #2 [8086:24d4] (rev 02)

lspci -knn: Subsystem: Compaq Computer Corporation Device [0e11:3201]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:1d.2 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER 
(ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI Controller #3 [8086:24d7] (rev 02)

lspci -knn: Subsystem: Compaq Computer Corporation Device [0e11:3201]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:1d.3 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER 
(ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI Controller #4 [8086:24de] (rev 02)

lspci -knn: Subsystem: Compaq Computer Corporation Device [0e11:3201]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:1d.7 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER 
(ICH5/ICH5R) USB2 EHCI Controller [8086:24dd] (rev 02)

lspci -knn: Subsystem: Compaq Computer Corporation Device [0e11:3201]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:1e.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI 
Bridge [8086:244e] (rev c2)
lspci -knn: 00:1f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER 
(ICH5/ICH5R) LPC Interface Bridge [8086:24d0] (rev 02)
lspci -knn: 00:1f.1 IDE interface [0101]: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER 
(ICH5/ICH5R) IDE Controller [8086:24db] (rev 02)

lspci -knn: Subsystem: Compaq Computer Corporation Device [0e11:3201]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ata_piix
lspci -knn: 01:03.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: ATI Technologies 
Inc Rage XL [1002:4752] (rev 27)

lspci -knn: Subsystem

Processed: Re: Bug#730441: release-notes: Debian requires an i586 since at least squeeze

2014-02-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 reassign -1 installation-guide
Bug #730441 [release-notes] release-notes: Debian requires an i586 since at 
least squeeze
Bug reassigned from package 'release-notes' to 'installation-guide'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #730441 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #730441 to the same values 
previously set

-- 
730441: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=730441
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b730441.139247506017457.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed (with 1 errors): propagating wheezy-ignore to squeeze-ignore

2013-11-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 # maintainer address bounces
 tag 687815 squeeze-ignore
Bug #687815 {Done: Dafydd Harries d...@debian.org} [src:kanjipad] kanjipad: 
maintainer address bounces
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
 tag 714985 wheezy-ignore
Bug #714985 [src:trac-datefieldplugin,trac-icalviewplugin,trac-wikitablemacro] 
maintainer address bounces
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
 # busybox unxz silently fails to decompress multiple compressed streams on 
 input
 tag 686502 squeeze-ignore
Bug #686502 {Done: Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru} [src:busybox] busybox 
unxz silently fails to decompress multiple compressed streams on input
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
 # libfso-glib: not properly built from source
 tag 693577 squeeze-ignore
Bug #693577 {Done: Sebastian Reichel s...@debian.org} [src:libfso-glib] 
libfso-glib: not properly built from source (actual source is in fso-specs)
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
 # chicken: multiple security issues
 tag 702410 squeeze-ignore
Bug #702410 {Done: Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org} [chicken] chicken: 
CVE-2012-6122 CVE-2012-6123 CVE-2012-6124 CVE-2012-6125 CVE-2013-1874
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
 tag 706525 squeeze-ignore
Bug #706525 {Done: Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org} [chicken] chicken: 
CVE-2013-2024: OS command injection vulnerability
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
 # backuppc: conffile handled with ucf
 tag 706315 squeeze-ignore
Bug #706315 [backuppc] conffile handled with ucf
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
 # fetchmail: mimedecode option drops last message line if it is unterminated
 tag 706045 squeeze-ignore
Bug #706045 {Done: Nico Golde n...@debian.org} [fetchmail] mimedecode option 
drops last message line if it is unterminated
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
 # logrotate: racy creation of logrotate.state file causing lost logfiles
 tag 706484 squeeze-ignore
Bug #706484 {Done: Paul Martin p...@debian.org} [logrotate] racy creation of 
logrotate.state file causing lost logfiles
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
 # os-prober: damages XFS exported via iSCSI but not mounted locally; 
 potential data loss
 tag 701814 squeeze-ignore
Bug #701814 [os-prober] os-prober: damages XFS exported via iSCSI but not 
mounted locally; potential data loss
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
 # *.icm is non-free
 tag 699306 squeeze-ignore
Bug #699306 [xicc] xicc: sRGB.icm is non-free
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
 tag 699301 squeeze-ignore
Bug #699301 [python-uniconvertor] python-uniconvertor: 
sRGB_Color_Space_Profile.icm is non-free
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
 # lenny - squeeze - wheezy upgrade problem
 tag 700670 wheezy sid
Bug #700670 [cltl] cltl: /usr/share/doc/cltl/* disappearing after lenny - 
squeeze - wheezy upgrade
Added tag(s) sid and wheezy.
 # Non-free code in xgraph?
 tag 705152 squeeze-ignore
Bug #705152 [xgraph] Non-free code in xgraph? [copyright.h and derivative.c for 
starters.]
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
 # sudo-ldap failes when you change uri to ldaps
 tag 368297 squeeze-ignore
Bug #368297 [libgcrypt11] sudo-ldap failes when you change uri to ldaps
Bug #545414 [libgcrypt11] sudo-ldap: sudo fails with sudo: setreuid(ROOT_UID, 
user_uid): Operation not permitted for ldap users
Bug #566351 [libgcrypt11] libgcrypt11: should not change user id as a side 
effect
Bug #579647 [libgcrypt11] nss-ldap changing uid due to using gcrypt somewhere...
Bug #601667 [libgcrypt11] libpam-smbpass migrate breaks su (squeeze)
Bug #628671 [libgcrypt11] passwd: Ordinary users can't change their passwords.
Bug #658739 [libgcrypt11] gnutls26: LDAP+SSL account cannot use setuid binaries 
until gnutls26 is rebuilt with nettle not libgcrypt11
Bug #658896 [libgcrypt11] sudo: setresuid(ROOT_UID, ROOT_UID, ROOT_UID): 
Operation not permitted
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
 # GPA unusable due to General Assuan error
 tag 634930 squeeze-ignore
Bug #634930 [gpa] gpa: GPA unusable due to General Assuan error
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
 # t1lib: many severe security issues, unmaintained upstream, unsupportable
 tag 637488 squeeze-ignore .
Unknown tag/s: ..
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid 
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed 
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore lenny 
lenny-ignore squeeze squeeze-ignore wheezy wheezy-ignore jessie jessie-ignore.

Bug #637488 [t1lib] t1lib: many severe security issues, unmaintained upstream, 
unsupportable
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
 # Segfaults when running ruby-hpricot's test suite on ia64
 tag 653582 squeeze-ignore
Bug #653582 [ruby1.9.1] Segfaults when running ruby-hpricot's test suite on ia64
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
 # non-DFSG postscript embedded in fontforge ... and fonts
 tag 665334 squeeze-ignore
Bug #665334

Bug#674849: marked as done (Squeeze Wheezy install for EFI GPT boot through elilo)

2013-08-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Aug 2013 00:24:06 +0200
with message-id 201308310024.32985.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #674849,
regarding Squeeze  Wheezy install for EFI  GPT boot through elilo
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
674849: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674849
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports

Boot method: CD debian-6.0.5 amd64 business card
Image version: 
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/release/6.0.5/amd64/iso-cd/debian-6.0.5-amd64-businesscard.iso
Date: May 25, 2012, JST

Machine: Self built PC based on Intel M/B D2700DC
Processor: Intel D2700
Memory: 8GB
    M/B spec. says 4GB Max, but it boots and even its BIOS recognize 8GB
    Have not examined the recognized memory above 4GB, yet.
    Also tried a pair of 8GB modules, but it fails to boot as 16GB.
    $ cat /proc/meminfo is attached as dmeminfo.lst
HDD partitions:
Disk /dev/sda: 312581808 sectors, 149.1 GiB
Logical sector size: 512 bytes
Disk identifier (GUID): C1701390-2E1C-49D9-8B12-FBA7131DDD90
Partition table holds up to 128 entries
First usable sector is 34, last usable sector is 312581774
Partitions will be aligned on 2048-sector boundaries
Total free space is 5741 sectors (2.8 MiB)

Number  Start (sector)    End (sector)  Size   Code  Name
   1    2048  526335   256.0 MiB   EF00  EFI System
   2  526336    67635199   32.0 GiB    8300  Sq64@d27@52512
   3    67635200   134744063   32.0 GiB    8200  Linux swap
   4   134744064   201852927   32.0 GiB    0700  Wh64@d27@52512
   5   201852928   268961791   32.0 GiB    EF00  Cent62@d27@52812
   6   268961792   285739007   8.0 GiB 8300  Linux filesystem
   7   285739008   302516223   8.0 GiB 8300  Linux filesystem
   8   302516224   312578047   4.8 GiB EF00  Cent62Txt@d27@52812


Partitions:   ~$ df -Tl
Filesystem Type 1K-blocks    Used Available Use% Mounted on
rootfs rootfs    33027952 2601692  28748540   9% /
udev   devtmpfs   4084296   0   4084296   0% /dev
tmpfs  tmpfs   818036 312    817724   1% /run
/dev/sda4  ext3  33027952 2601692  28748540   9% /
tmpfs  tmpfs 5120   0  5120   0% /run/lock
tmpfs  tmpfs  1636072  12   1636060   1% /tmp
tmpfs  tmpfs  1636072  76   1635996   1% /run/shm
/dev/sda1  vfat    261868   78752    183116  31% /boot/efi
/dev/sdb1  vfat    507104   78696    428408  16% /media/UEFI1


Output of lspci -knn:
00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Atom Processor D2xxx/N2xxx DRAM 
Controller [8086:0bf3] (rev 03)
    Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:2011]
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Atom Processor 
D2xxx/N2xxx Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0be2] (rev 09)
    Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:2011]
00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family High Definition 
Audio Controller [8086:27d8] (rev 02)
    Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:2011]
    Kernel driver in use: snd_hda_intel
00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family PCI Express Port 
1 [8086:27d0] (rev 02)
    Kernel driver in use: pcieport
00:1d.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB UHCI 
Controller #1 [8086:27c8] (rev 02)
    Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:2011]
    Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
00:1d.1 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB UHCI 
Controller #2 [8086:27c9] (rev 02)
    Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:2011]
    Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
00:1d.2 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB UHCI 
Controller #3 [8086:27ca] (rev 02)
    Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:2011]
    Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
00:1d.3 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB UHCI 
Controller #4 [8086:27cb] (rev 02)
    Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:2011]
    Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
00:1d.7 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB2 EHCI 
Controller [8086:27cc] (rev 02)
    Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:2011]
    Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd
00:1e.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801 Mobile PCI Bridge 
[8086:2448] (rev e2)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation NM10 Family LPC Controller 
[8086:27bc] (rev 02)
    Subsystem: Intel

Bug#606496: marked as done (debian squeeze installer halts at boot menu)

2013-08-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 25 Aug 2013 12:42:38 +0200
with message-id 201308251243.25305.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #606496,
regarding debian squeeze installer halts at boot menu
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
606496: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606496
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports

Boot method: USB stick
Image version: 
http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/current/images/hd-media/boot.img.gz
(01-12-10)
Date: 2010-12-09, 22:10 MSK

Machine: Acer Aspire One ZG8
Processor: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N270   @ 1.60GHz
Memory: 1022596 kB
Partitions:
FilesystemType   1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda2 ext420641788   3492100  16101064  18% /
tmpfstmpfs  511296 0511296   0% /lib/init/rw
udev tmpfs  506468   212506256   1% /dev
tmpfstmpfs  51129688511208   1% /dev/shm
/dev/sda3 ext4   131121692   3291212 121169824   3% /home

Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn):
00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GME Express
Memory Controller Hub [8086:27ac] (rev 03)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:022c]
Kernel driver in use: agpgart-intel
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Mobile
945GME Express Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:27ae] (rev 03)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:022c]
Kernel driver in use: i915
00:02.1 Display controller [0380]: Intel Corporation Mobile
945GM/GMS/GME, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller
[8086:27a6] (rev 03)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:022c]
00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family High
Definition Audio Controller [8086:27d8] (rev 02)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:022c]
Kernel driver in use: HDA Intel
00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family PCI
Express Port 1 [8086:27d0] (rev 02)
Kernel driver in use: pcieport
00:1c.2 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family PCI
Express Port 3 [8086:27d4] (rev 02)
Kernel driver in use: pcieport
00:1c.3 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family PCI
Express Port 4 [8086:27d6] (rev 02)
Kernel driver in use: pcieport
00:1d.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB
UHCI Controller #1 [8086:27c8] (rev 02)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:022c]
Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
00:1d.1 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB
UHCI Controller #2 [8086:27c9] (rev 02)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:022c]
Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
00:1d.2 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB
UHCI Controller #3 [8086:27ca] (rev 02)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:022c]
Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
00:1d.3 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB
UHCI Controller #4 [8086:27cb] (rev 02)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:022c]
Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
00:1d.7 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB2
EHCI Controller [8086:27cc] (rev 02)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:022c]
Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd
00:1e.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801 Mobile PCI Bridge
[8086:2448] (rev e2)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation 82801GBM (ICH7-M) LPC
Interface Bridge [8086:27b9] (rev 02)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:022c]
00:1f.1 IDE interface [0101]: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family)
IDE Controller [8086:27df] (rev 02)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:022c]
Kernel driver in use: ata_piix
00:1f.2 SATA controller [0106]: Intel Corporation 82801GBM/GHM (ICH7
Family) SATA AHCI Controller [8086:27c5] (rev 02)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:022c]
Kernel driver in use: ahci
00:1f.3 SMBus [0c05]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family SMBus
Controller [8086:27da] (rev 02)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:022c]
Kernel driver in use: i801_smbus
01:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Atheros Communications
AR8121/AR8113/AR8114 Gigabit or Fast Ethernet [1969:1026] (rev b0)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025

Bug#605076: marked as done (installation-reports: debian squeeze testing install fails with undefined video mode number 314)

2013-08-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 25 Aug 2013 12:42:38 +0200
with message-id 201308251243.25305.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #605076,
regarding installation-reports: debian squeeze testing install fails with 
undefined video mode number 314
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
605076: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605076
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal

Debian squeeze testing install fails with undefined video mode number 314.
I noticed that the boot parameter vga is set to vga=788.
On debian 5.0, this variable is set to vga=normal, and the install works fine.
When I press tab and set vga to vga=normal on debian squeeze, the install works
fine.
Perhaps vga should be set to vga=normal by default instead of vga=788?



-- Package-specific info:

Boot method: CD
Image version: 
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-CD-1.iso
 22-Nov-2010
Date: Date and time of the install

Machine: Dell Dimension 2400
Partitions: df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [ ]
Detect network card:[ ]
Configure network:  [ ]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Clock/timezone setup:   [ ]
User/password setup:[ ]
Install tasks:  [ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Overall install:[ ]

Comments/Problems:

Description of the install, in prose, and any thoughts, comments
  and ideas you had during the initial install.


-- 

Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other
installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this
report. Please compress large files using gzip.

Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org.

==
Installer lsb-release:
==
DISTRIB_ID=Debian
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer
DISTRIB_RELEASE=6.0 (squeeze) - installer build 20101020
X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom

==
Installer hardware-summary:
==
uname -a: Linux debian-i386 2.6.32-5-486 #1 Thu Oct 14 16:56:52 UTC 2010 i686 
GNU/Linux
lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 
82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE/PE DRAM Controller/Host-Hub Interface [8086:2560] 
(rev 01)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0160]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: agpgart-intel
lspci -knn: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation 
82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE Chipset Integrated Graphics Device [8086:2562] (rev 
01)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0160]
lspci -knn: 00:1d.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM 
(ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) USB UHCI Controller #1 [8086:24c2] (rev 01)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0160]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:1d.1 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM 
(ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) USB UHCI Controller #2 [8086:24c4] (rev 01)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0160]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:1d.2 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM 
(ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) USB UHCI Controller #3 [8086:24c7] (rev 01)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0160]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:1d.7 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBM 
(ICH4/ICH4-M) USB2 EHCI Controller [8086:24cd] (rev 01)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0160]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:1e.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge 
[8086:244e] (rev 81)
lspci -knn: 00:1f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL 
(ICH4/ICH4-L) LPC Interface Bridge [8086:24c0] (rev 01)
lspci -knn: 00:1f.1 IDE interface [0101]: Intel Corporation 82801DB (ICH4) IDE 
Controller [8086:24cb] (rev 01)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0160]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ata_piix
lspci -knn: 00:1f.3 SMBus [0c05]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM 
(ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) SMBus Controller [8086:24c3] (rev 01)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0160]
lspci -knn: 00:1f

Bug#605907: marked as done (squeeze beta1 on Toshiba Satellite C655-S5119)

2013-08-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 24 Aug 2013 17:57:31 +0200
with message-id 201308241758.08374.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #605907,
regarding squeeze beta1 on Toshiba Satellite C655-S5119
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
605907: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605907
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal

Boot method: USB stick
Image version: 
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_beta1/i386/iso-cd/debian-squeeze-di-beta1-i386-CD-1.iso

Machine: Toshiba Satellite C655-S5119 laptop
Partitions: 

   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   *   1 192 1536000   27  Unknown
/dev/sda2 1926368496093757  HPFS/NTFS
/dev/sda3   37733   38914 9486336   17  Hidden HPFS/NTFS
/dev/sda46368   37733   2519377935  Extended
/dev/sda56368   37491   24360   83  Linux
/dev/sda6   37492   37733 1937408   82  Linux swap / Solaris


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [O]
Detect network card:[O]
Configure network:  [O] wifi works with no non-free firmware needed
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Install base system:[O]
Clock/timezone setup:   [O]
User/password setup:[O]
Install tasks:  [ ] first CD no longer comtains desktop environment
Install boot loader:[O] os-prober created 3 separate menu items for
Windows Vista (some really OEM/recovery partitions?)
Overall install:[O]

Comments/Problems:

All hardware works well, including wifi (with no nonfree firmware needed),
brightness controls, audio, X, and even suspend/resume.

Had to manually run isohybrid on the CD to boot it from USB stick.

The lack of any desktop environment was an unpleasant quasi-surprise,
as it would have added an hour to the install to download it from a mirror.
Especially since I was already looking at getting home after midnight,
and snow was expected. The first CD thus seems basically useless compared
to say, a netinst. Ended up installing the desktop task after d-i, using
a handy mirror on a USB drive.

Here are some parition contents listings to possibly improve os-prober
to not call various OEM/recovery partitions Windows Vista

root@grebe:/home/joeymount -o ro /dev/sda1 /mnt
root@grebe:/home/joeydir /mnt
total 389K
drwxrwxrwx  1 root root 4.0K Nov  4 09:55 ./
drwxr-xr-x 21 root root 4.0K Dec  3 21:20 ../
drwxrwxrwx  1 root root 4.0K Nov  4 10:54 Boot/
drwxrwxrwx  1 root root0 Dec  3 16:10 Recovery/
drwxrwxrwx  1 root root0 Dec  3 16:25 System\ Volume\ Information/
-rwxrwxrwx  2 root root  187 Oct 14 19:24 WinREPartition.ini*
-rwxrwxrwx  1 root root 375K Jul 13  2009 bootmgr*
root@grebe:/home/joeymount -o ro /dev/sda3 /mnt
root@grebe:/home/joeydir /mnt
total 421K
-rwxrwxrwx  2 root root0 Jun 29  2009 !V6_00_03.VRP*
-rwxrwxrwx  2 root root0 Jul 15  2009 !V6_00_04.VRP*
drwxrwxrwx  1 root root 4.0K Oct 14 18:50 ./
drwxr-xr-x 21 root root 4.0K Dec  3 21:20 ../
drwxrwxrwx  1 root root  28K Oct 14 19:50 BIN/
drwxrwxrwx  1 root root0 Oct 14 18:49 BOOT/
-rwxrwxrwx  1 root root 375K Jul 13  2009 BOOTMGR*
-rwxrwxrwx  1 root root  187 Oct 14 19:24 DATA.INI*
-rwxrwxrwx  1 root root 1.6K Jul 19 04:08 EDITAF.BAT*
drwxrwxrwx  1 root root0 Jul 19 04:07 IMAGES_BOOT/
-rwxrwxrwx  1 root root 1.8K Jul 19 04:07 PLANDATA.INI*
drwxrwxrwx  1 root root0 Oct 14 18:49 PLANFOLDER/
drwxrwxrwx  1 root root0 Oct 14 18:50 SOURCES/
drwxrwxrwx  1 root root0 Jul 19 04:07 ZZIMAGES/

-- 

Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other
installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this
report. Please compress large files using gzip.

Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org.

==
Installer lsb-release:
==
DISTRIB_ID=Debian
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer
DISTRIB_RELEASE=6.0 (squeeze) - installer build 20101020
X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom

==
Installer hardware-summary:
==
uname -a: Linux grebe 2.6.32-5-486 #1 Thu Oct 14 16:56:52 UTC

Bug#611839: marked as done (non-free network drivers not really supported with netinstall of squeeze/rc2)

2013-08-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 24 Aug 2013 17:57:31 +0200
with message-id 201308241758.08374.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #611839,
regarding non-free network drivers not really supported with netinstall of 
squeeze/rc2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
611839: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611839
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports

I installed debian squeeze from netinstall rc2-cd on a Lenovo ThinkPad
SL510. Both network interfaces (eth + wlan) are detected, but not
supported due to non-free drivers. Setup provides the possibility to
add the needed drivers using an usb-stick. Setup asked for the
following files:

eth: rtl8168d-1.fw
wlan: iwlwifi-1000-1.ucode iwlwifi-1000-2.ucode iwlwifi-1000-3.ucode

The files iwlwifi-1000-1.ucode and iwlwifi-1000-2.ucode don't exist,
setup though asks for all three. So I copied the following files on
the usb-stick:
rtl8168d-1.fw
iwlwifi-1000-3.ucode

and I copied iwlwifi-1000-3.ucode to iwlwifi-1000-1.ucode and
iwlwifi-1000-2.ucode

The files are successfully copied to /lib/firmware, but the
network interfaces still don't work.

I finally finished the installation without a network, and installed the
packages firmware-iwlwifi_0.28_all.deb and firmware-realtek_0.28_all.deb
using the usb-stick after the first reboot.


Email secured by Check Point


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Hi,

thank you for submitting installation reports, much appreciated.

I read through all the bugs mentioned here (and I'm sure they were read by 
several people at the time they were submitted) and am closing them now as/if
- they (finally) indicated success and/or
- I know from first hand experience that the functionality is working in 
Wheezy and/or
- they only contained very little information and/or
- they contained user errors and/or
- they were caused by broken hardware and/or
- they have been from a development phase where things were not stable and/or
- they are quite old (and thus likely fixed today).

If I've closed a bug incorrectly please do reply (it's easy to reopen and I'll 
do if requested) or just file a new one - thats often better, as the bug log 
will be clearer and shorter and not contain cruft.


cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
---End Message---


Bug#624102: marked as done (Installing or upgrading Squeeze on RX6600)

2013-07-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jul 2013 13:23:19 +0200
with message-id 201307211323.57027.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #624102,
regarding Installing or upgrading Squeeze on RX6600
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
624102: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624102
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---

Package: installation-reports

Boot method: CD
Image version: debian-6.0.1a-ia64-CD-1.iso
Date: 25 - 04 - 2011

Machine: HP rx6600
Processor: Itanium II
Memory: 4 GB
Partitions: df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred

Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn):

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [O]
Detect network card:[O]
Configure network:  [O]
Detect CD:  [E]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Clock/timezone setup:   [ ]
User/password setup:[ ]
Install tasks:  [ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Overall install:[ ]

Comments/Problems:
 This is basically the problem:



   lqqqu [!!] Detect and mount CD-ROM
tk
   x
x
   x No common CD-ROM drive was detected.
x
   x
x
   x You may need to load additional CD-ROM drivers from removable media,
x
   x such as a driver floppy. If you have such media available now, insert
x
   x it, and continue. Otherwise, you will be given the option to manually
x
   x select CD-ROM modules.
x
   x
x
   x Load CD-ROM drivers from removable media?
x
   x
x
   x YesNo
x
   x
x

mqqqj


I tried many times to make it work but it always fails. So I installed
Lenny and it was successfull. So after that I tried to make a dist-upgrade
and it seems to do it well but when I rebooted the system it didn't boot.
The  system fails looking for the root device. So rather than the
installation issue is the dist-upgrade issue.

Can someone help me?.








---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
reassign 699697 src:linux
reassign 690515 grub-installer
thanks

Hi,

thank you for submitting installation reports, much appreciated.

I read through all the bugs mentioned here (and I'm sure they were read by 
several people at the time they were submitted) and am closing them now as/if
- they (finally) indicated success and/or
- I know from first hand experience that the functionality is working in 
Wheezy and/or
- they only contained very little information and/or
- they contained user errors and/or
- they were caused by broken hardware and/or
- they have been from a development phase where things were not stable.

If I've closed a bug incorrectly please do reply (it's easy to reopen and I'll 
do if requested) or just file a new one - thats often better, as the bug log 
will be clearer and shorter and not contain cruft.


cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
---End Message---


Bug#606976: marked as done (Kernel panic with Squeeze (AMD64) d-i beta 2)

2013-07-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jul 2013 14:32:43 +0200
with message-id 201307211433.01341.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line dealing with old debian-installer bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #606976,
regarding Kernel panic with Squeeze (AMD64) d-i beta 2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
606976: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606976
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports

Boot method: CD and USB stick
Image version: 
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_beta2/amd64/iso-cd/debian-squeeze-di-beta2-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: Dec 13, 2010

Machine: Dell XPS 630i
Processor: Core 2 Quad 2.4 GHz
Memory: 4 GB
Partitions: N/A

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:           [E ]
Detect network card:    [ ]
Configure network:      [ ]
Detect CD:              [ ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives:     [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Install base system:    [ ]
Clock/timezone setup:   [ ]
User/password setup:    [ ]
Install tasks:          [ ]
Install boot loader:    [ ]
Overall install:        [E ]

Comments/Problems:

I've tried d-i beta 2 on Dell XPS 630i.  I first tried creating a USB
memory stick with the installer .iso on it (following a standard
procedure); the install USB stick works on my other computer (Lenovo
T410s).  However, on 630i it always fails at the beginning of the
install process.  The message, when kernel panics, typically goes like
this:

... (no apparent error messages thru this point) ...
[0.597991] List of all partitions:
[0.600310] No filesystem could mount root, tried:
[0.602749] Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
unknown-block(8,3)
... (call trace output after this) ...

(This output is from an attempt to use CD install medium.)

I have tried adding rootdelay=10 option for the kernel, without any effect.

I have observed the same symptom with the netinst .iso burned on a
blank CD.  In fact, I have never been able to use d-i successfully on
630i (I've tried the same thing several months ago).  Last time I
installed Debian, I had to install off a Lenny install medium and then
do dist-upgrade.

Is there any way to get Squeeze d-i to work on this machine?  Any help
is appreciated.


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
reassign 716710 preseed,release-notes
forcemerge 704881 552563
tags 633128 + confirmed
reassign 633128 src:linux,kernel-wedge
affects 633128 debian-installer
reassign 653391 archdetect
forcemerge 653390 653391 
reassign 655579 rootskel-gtk
reassign 690246 partman-lvm
affects 690246 debian-installer
severity 699430 wishlist
reassign 655124 kernel-wedge
affects 655124 debian-installer
thanks

Hi,

thank you for submitting bug reports concering debian-installer, much 
appreciated.

I read through all the bugs mentioned here (and I'm sure they were read by 
several people at the time they were submitted) and am closing them now as/if
- they (finally) indicated success and/or
- I know from first hand experience that the functionality is working in 
Wheezy and/or
- they only contained very little information and/or
- they contained user errors and/or
- they have been from a development phase where things were not stable and/or
- they are very old and/or
- they are wishlist but rather special + exotic and not have been acted on for 
years. (See http://blog.liw.fi/posts/wishlist-bugs/ why it's often useful to 
close wishlist bugs.)

If I've closed a bug incorrectly please do reply (it's easy to reopen and I'll 
do if requested) or just file a new one - and that's often better, as the bug 
log will be clearer and shorter and not contain cruft.


cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
---End Message---


Bug#653471: marked as done (installation-reports: Squeeze i386 6.0.3 on EeePC 701 Network)

2013-07-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jul 2013 13:23:19 +0200
with message-id 201307211323.57027.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #653471,
regarding installation-reports: Squeeze i386 6.0.3 on EeePC 701 Network
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
653471: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653471
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important



-- Package-specific info:

Boot method: Netinst CD
Image version: Squeeze 6.0.3 i386 Netinst
Date: 12.27.2011

Machine: ASUS EeePC 4G 701
Partitions: 


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [O]
Detect network card:[ ]
Configure network:  [ ]
Detect CD:  [E]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Clock/timezone setup:   [ ]
User/password setup:[ ]
Install tasks:  [ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Overall install:[ ]

Comments/Problems:

Description of the install, in prose, and any thoughts, comments
  and ideas you had during the initial install.



Sorry if I used the wrong message format, I don't get Debian installed and so I 
do not get reportbug running.

Installation does not work on EeePC 701.

I used the netinstall image (debian-6.0.3-i386-netinst.iso), dd'ed it to a 
SD-card and rebooted the EeePC.

It looks like the Ethernetadapter Atheros L2 100 Mbit (rev a0) and the WLAN 
Adapter Atheros AR5007EG 802.11 b/g Wireless PCI Express Adapter (rev 01) are 
both not working.

I tried to modprobe the corresponding modules, but the modules are not in the 
image.

Since Netzwork does not work the installer tries to find a CD-ROM drive which I 
do not have.

The only option left is to stop the installation.

Is there a kernel and initrd files which I can copy into the SD-card to resolve 
the problem?

Regards Richard


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
reassign 699697 src:linux
reassign 690515 grub-installer
thanks

Hi,

thank you for submitting installation reports, much appreciated.

I read through all the bugs mentioned here (and I'm sure they were read by 
several people at the time they were submitted) and am closing them now as/if
- they (finally) indicated success and/or
- I know from first hand experience that the functionality is working in 
Wheezy and/or
- they only contained very little information and/or
- they contained user errors and/or
- they were caused by broken hardware and/or
- they have been from a development phase where things were not stable.

If I've closed a bug incorrectly please do reply (it's easy to reopen and I'll 
do if requested) or just file a new one - thats often better, as the bug log 
will be clearer and shorter and not contain cruft.


cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
---End Message---


Bug#623187: marked as done (Squeeze installation fails on IBM x3650 M3 with LSI MegaRAID)

2013-07-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jul 2013 01:12:11 +0200
with message-id 201307220112.30643.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line dealing with old debian-installer bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #623187,
regarding Squeeze installation fails on IBM x3650 M3 with LSI MegaRAID
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
623187: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=623187
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: debian-installer
Version: debian-6.0.1a-amd64-businesscard.iso

After regular installation of Debian Squeeze from businesscard
netinst.iso on IBM x3650 M3 with LSI MegaRAID system is not booting.
There are no errors reported during installation, all hardware is
properly recognized and GRUB installs without problem but after restart
GRUB is not loading, only cursor blinks at top left corner of screen.
I suspect, that the problem is related to the GRUB installation.
To fix the problem, I have started netinst/rescue and installed LILO on
target system. With LILO, system works flawlessly. What is more funny,
if I install GRUB after LILO, GRUB is working also.
It means that LILO must change something in boot sector making it
bootable.
Server has LSI MegaRAID SAS controller and two disks in RAID-1.
This problem has been confirmed on second IBM x3650 M3 servers.


lspci:
===
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 5520 I/O Hub to ESI Port (rev 22)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 I/O Hub PCI Express
Root Port 1 (rev 22)
00:02.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 I/O Hub PCI Express
Root Port 2 (rev 22)
00:03.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 I/O Hub PCI Express
Root Port 3 (rev 22)
00:05.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 5520/X58 I/O Hub PCI Express Root
Port 5 (rev 22)
00:07.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 I/O Hub PCI Express
Root Port 7 (rev 22)
00:09.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 I/O Hub PCI Express
Root Port 9 (rev 22)
00:10.0 PIC: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 Physical and Link Layer
Registers Port 0 (rev 22)
00:10.1 PIC: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 Routing and Protocol Layer
Registers Port 0 (rev 22)
00:11.0 PIC: Intel Corporation 5520/5500 Physical and Link Layer
Registers Port 1 (rev 22)
00:11.1 PIC: Intel Corporation 5520/5500 Routing  Protocol Layer
Register Port 1 (rev 22)
00:14.0 PIC: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 I/O Hub System Management
Registers (rev 22)
00:14.1 PIC: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 I/O Hub GPIO and Scratch
Pad Registers (rev 22)
00:14.2 PIC: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 I/O Hub Control Status and
RAS Registers (rev 22)
00:14.3 PIC: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 I/O Hub Throttle Registers
(rev 22)
00:15.0 PIC: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 Trusted Execution
Technology Registers (rev 22)
00:16.0 System peripheral: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 Chipset
QuickData Technology Device (rev 22)
00:16.1 System peripheral: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 Chipset
QuickData Technology Device (rev 22)
00:16.2 System peripheral: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 Chipset
QuickData Technology Device (rev 22)
00:16.3 System peripheral: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 Chipset
QuickData Technology Device (rev 22)
00:16.4 System peripheral: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 Chipset
QuickData Technology Device (rev 22)
00:16.5 System peripheral: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 Chipset
QuickData Technology Device (rev 22)
00:16.6 System peripheral: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 Chipset
QuickData Technology Device (rev 22)
00:16.7 System peripheral: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 Chipset
QuickData Technology Device (rev 22)
00:1a.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB
UHCI Controller #4
00:1a.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB
UHCI Controller #5
00:1a.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB2
EHCI Controller #2
00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) PCI Express
Root Port 1
00:1c.4 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) PCI Express
Root Port 5
00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB
UHCI Controller #1
00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB
UHCI Controller #2
00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB
UHCI Controller #3
00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB2
EHCI Controller #1
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge (rev 90)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation

Bug#602147: marked as done (Squeeze installation freezes on network interfaces detection)

2013-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 20 Jul 2013 12:54:21 +0200
with message-id 201307201254.45120.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #602147,
regarding Squeeze installation freezes on network interfaces detection
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
602147: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602147
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation
Severity: normal

Hi,
I'm having some problems with Debian Squeeze installation.
It freezes for a long time when detecting network interfaces. The interest 
thing is that when I first installed Squeeze a few weeks ago, I didn't have 
this problem (just some suggestion from the installer about a firmware, called 
rtl8168d-2.fw), but the detection was really fast.

I downloaded a new ISO from Debian FTP, but the problem persisted.

Any suggestions about what to do? Why is it taking so long?

My hardware: Intel i3 530 2,93Ghz, 4GB RAM, ASUS P7H55M-BR, SAMSUNG HD 250GB, 
SEAGATE HD 80GB, LG DVDRW, C3 TECH 500W POWER SUPPLY.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Hi,

thank you for submitting installation reports, much appreciated.

I read through all the bugs mentioned here (and I'm sure they were read by 
several people at the time they were submitted) and am closing them now as/if
- they (finally) indicated success and/or
- I know from first hand experience that the functionality is working in 
Wheezy and/or
- they only contained very little information and/or
- they contained user errors and/or
- they have been from a development phase where things were not stable and/or
- they are very old, more than 2.3 years.

If I've closed a bug incorrectly please do reply (it's easy to reopen and I'll 
do if requested) or just file a new one - thats often better, as the bug log 
will be clearer and shorter and not contain cruft.


cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
---End Message---


Bug#606242: marked as done (issue-report: USB mouse and wonky install 'continue' button on debian-squeeze-di-beta1-i386 install.)

2013-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 20 Jul 2013 12:54:21 +0200
with message-id 201307201254.45120.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #606242,
regarding issue-report: USB mouse and wonky install 'continue' button on 
debian-squeeze-di-beta1-i386 install.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
606242: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606242
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports

TITLE: issue-report: USB mouse and wonky install 'continue' button.
My filename: 
issue-report:USB-mouse-and-rusty-install-continue-button-20101207.utf

Package: installation-reports (I could not progress the install far
enough to use the i-r package.)

Boot method: DVD install.
Image version: Full URL to image downloaded. The first two DVD's of
the set only.
Date: 06 December 2010.

Machine: Motherboard: A bit KT7, Raid, 1 Ghz.
Processor: AMD AThlon K7, 850 Mhz, Socket 'A'
Memory:SDRAM  2 x 512Mb = 1Gb.
Chipset:   Via KT 133 ATX, USB 1.0 compliant, UDMA 100, Socket 'A',
FSB 200Mhz, AGP 4X.

Updated bios: Award Modular Bios v6.00 PG.
07/11/2002-8363-6A6A-6A6LMA19C-A9 The Latest level.
CMOS Set Up Utility: Advanced BIOS features: First boot device: CDROM,
Second boot device: ATA100RAID,
 Third boot device: ATA100RAID, 
Boot other device: disabled.
 Delay for IDE Initial (Secs) 8.
 Intergrated Peripherals: ATA100RAID IDE Controller: 
Enabled.
Two additional IDE channels provide the capability of adding high
performance device(s) to system.
  IDE HDD Block Mode:
Enabled.
for automatic detection of the optimal number of block read/writes per
sector the drive can support.

DASD chip: On-motherboard HPT370 raid controller 2001
www.highpoint-tech.com (hardware raid)
Not used by me for 'hardware raid'. The HPT370 is used by me, only for
the fast disk control bus.
Linux Debian MDADM Software raid will be used when I can get that far
into the 'squeeze-di-Beta1' install.

Onboard Hipoint HPT370 UDMA/ATA100 RAID controller BIOS v01.11.0402
HPT370 BIOS Setting Utility screen button F1 toggles the view ARRAY
STATUS shows no array or devices. Good!
screen button F1 toggles the view CHANNEL STATUS 
which shows the devices:
DASD:   quantity two: IBM-DTLA-307030 drives, primary master and
secondary master,
Mode UDMA5  size 30Gb each, as HDD0 and HDD1 both attached to 
the
HPT370 controller. Good!
HPT370 Bios Setting Utility option 7. Set Boot Disk: I have set no
disk as Boot Disk here,
as I believe the 'Linux Software Raid Array' is the place to specify
/dev/md2  /boot as bootable in partition manager, which I have set.

IDE Primary master: none.
IDE Primary slave:  Pioneer DVD-ROM ATAP  (I do not use this.)
IDE Secondary master:   LITE-ON LTR-16102B  DVD rewriter (I use this all
the time.)
IDE Secondary slave:none.

Partitions: df -Tl
df: invalid option --'T'
BusyBox v1.17.1 (Debian 1:1.17.1-4) multi call binary.
usage: df  [-Pkmh]  [FILESYSTEM]...
df -h
Filesystem  SizeUsedAvailable   Use%Mounted on  
tmpfs   505.4m  92.0k   505.3m  0%  /dev
/dev/md126.6g   473.6m  24.8g   2%  /target
/dev/md292.0M   17.5M   69.7M   20% /target/boot
/dev/md126.6G   473.6M  24.8G   2%  /dev/.static/dev
tmpfs   505.4M  92.0K   505.3M  0%  /target/dev

For completmess; /dev/md0 size is 1.something Gb/swap
 /dev/md1   ext3/
 /dev/md2   ext3/bootafter I 
partition them.

Output of lspci -nn
00:00.0 Host Bridge [0600] Via Technologies   ... (rev 02)
00:01.0 PCI Bridge  [0604]  ... AGP
   07.0 ISA bridge...   Appollo Super South ... (rev 22)
   07.1 IDE   ... PIPC Bus Master IDE ... (rev 10)
   07.2 USB Controller [0c03]: Via Technologies VT82x UHCI USB1.1
Controller ... (rev 10)
   07.3  USB1.1
Controller ... (rev 10)
   07.4 BridgeVT82c686 [Appollo
Super ACPI]... (rev 30)
   11.0 Ethernet controller ...
00:13.0 Mass storage controller   [0180]: HighPoint Technologies, Inc.
HPT ... /370/ ... [1103:00041] (rev 03)
01:00.0

Bug#606396: marked as done (installation-reports: Squeeze Beta1 on Apple iBook G4 (powerpc))

2013-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 20 Jul 2013 12:54:21 +0200
with message-id 201307201254.45120.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #606396,
regarding installation-reports: Squeeze Beta1 on Apple iBook G4 (powerpc)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
606396: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606396
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i



-- Package-specific info:

Boot method: CD
Image version: 
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_beta1/powerpc/iso-cd/debian-squeeze-di-beta1-powerpc-netinst.iso
Date: Dec 2 2010 20:17:21

Machine: iBook G4 PowerBook6,5 (powerpc)
Partitions: 

root@ap-laptop:/home/andrzej# mac-fdisk -l
/dev/hda
#type name  length   base  ( 
size )  system
/dev/hda1 Apple_partition_map Apple 63 @ 1 ( 
31.5k)  Partition map
/dev/hda2 Apple_Bootstrap untitled1954 @ 64
(977.0k)  NewWorld bootblock
/dev/hda3 Apple_UNIX_SVR2 untitled   112330079 @ 2018  ( 
53.6G)  Linux native
/dev/hda4 Apple_UNIX_SVR2 swap 4878142 @ 112332097 (  
2.3G)  Linux swap
/dev/hda5  Apple_Free Extra  1 @ 117210239 (  
0.5k)  Free space

Block size=512, Number of Blocks=117210240
DeviceType=0x0, DeviceId=0x0


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [O]
Detect network card:[O]
Configure network:  [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Install base system:[O]
Clock/timezone setup:   [O]
User/password setup:[O]
Install tasks:  [O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Overall install:[O]

Comments/Problems:

Install went well.  The only problems/observations were:

1. Partitioning 

   I used the default single partition setup suggested by 'partman'.
   I assume that the suggested partitioning is correct.  I was
   puzzled however that the suggested scheme includes a 2.5 GB swap
   space since the Installation Manual states On 32-bit architectures
   (i386, m68k, 32-bit SPARC, and PowerPC), the maximum size of a swap
   partition is 2GB. [C.3. Recommended Partitioning Scheme].  Is this
   no longer true?  Am I wasting drive space?  Also, does there need
   to be 512.0 B of free space at the end of the drive?


2. Keyboard was not set up correctly.  I have the UK variant of the
   iBook keyboard and e.g. @ and  were inverted, and some other keys
   were incorrect.  The Installation Manual states Once the system
   installation is complete, you'll be able to select a keyboard
   layout from a wider range of choices (run kbd-config as root after
   you have completed the installation). [6.3.1.3. Choosing a
   Keyboard].  I notice that 'kbd-config' is part of the
   'console-common' package and this was not installed.  Installing
   'console-common' configures an almost perfect console keymap setup
   but the X keymap is still wrong.

3. Sound did not work.  It turns out that the 'snd_powermac' module
   must be loaded and I have put this in '/etc/modules'.  Now sound
   works.

4. Battery not detected by 'gnome-power-manager', etc.  The
   'pmu_battery' module must be loaded and I had to put this in
   '/etc/modules'.

5. There is no CPU frequency scaling.  '/var/log/syslog' has the line:

   ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of HW,
   fallback to performance governor

   I have installed the 'powernowd' daemon to work around this.

6. 'pbbuttonsd' failed to install.  The relevant lines in
   '/var/log/installer/syslog' are probably:

   Dec  2 20:17:48 apt-install: Queueing package pbbuttonsd for later 
installation
   [...]
   Dec  2 20:28:56 in-target: Unable to locate package pbbuttonsd
   Dec  2 20:28:56 in-target: 
   Dec  2 20:28:56 base-installer: warning: Failed to install pbbuttonsd into 
/target/: 100

   I installed this manually after installation.  I am not really sure
   if 'pbbuttonsd' is needed on this machine.  The brightness, volume
   and eject buttons work as expected without 'pbbuttonsd'.  By
   default, installation of 'pbbuttonsd' and its dependencies seems to
   have only the following noticable effects:
   * The laptop suspends again immediately after waking from suspend
 (unless this is turned off in '/etc

Bug#623410: marked as done (installation problems with squeeze)

2013-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 20 Jul 2013 14:01:13 +0200
with message-id 201307201401.32133.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #623410,
regarding installation problems with squeeze
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
623410: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=623410
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports

Boot method: network/preseed
Image version: 
http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/squeeze/main/installer-i386/current/images/netboot/
Date: April 19th 2011, 1200 hours

Machine: custom
Partitions:
var/log # df -Tl
df: invalid option -- 'T'
BusyBox v1.17.1 (Debian 1:1.17.1-8) multi-call binary.

Usage: df [-Pkmh] [FILESYSTEM]...

/var/log # df
Filesystem   1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
tmpfs
   181787240   1817832   0% /dev



Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [OK ]
Detect network card:[OK ]
Configure network:  [OK ]
Detect CD:  [ OK]
Load installer modules: [OK ]
Detect hard drives: [E ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Clock/timezone setup:   [ ]
User/password setup:[ ]
Install tasks:  [ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Overall install:[ ]

Comments/Problems:

We have a number of exact same machines that have a 2GB ATP flash
cards in addition to mechanical disks. When I try to install, the
installer sees the USB flash card as /dev/sda, but it does not sees
the disk, however if I physically remove the flash card then the
installer sees all the disks. This is happening with Squeeze. I have a
nfsroot environment built on Lenny and it sees all the disks as well
as the flash card, all as /dev/sdX.


Regards


installation-report.tgz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
reassign 659211 finish-install
reassign 645757 partman-target
severity 630380 wishlist
reassign 705971 console-setup
reassign 689975 partman-partioning
reassign 675413 pkgsel
reassign 642159 apt-cacher-ng
affects 642159 debian-installer
reassign 496068 apt-setup
thanks

Hi,

thank you for submitting installation reports, much appreciated.

I read through all the bugs mentioned here (and I'm sure they were read by 
several people at the time they were submitted) and am closing them now as/if
- they (finally) indicated success and/or
- I know from first hand experience that the functionality is working in 
Wheezy and/or
- they only contained very little information and/or
- they contained user errors and/or
- they have been from a development phase where things were not stable.

If I've closed a bug incorrectly please do reply (it's easy to reopen and I'll 
do if requested) or just file a new one - thats often better, as the bug log 
will be clearer and shorter and not contain cruft.


cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
---End Message---


Bug#613093: marked as done (Debian Squeeze networking error)

2013-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 20 Jul 2013 17:22:32 +0200
with message-id 201307201723.03308.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #613093,
regarding Debian Squeeze networking error
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
613093: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613093
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: debian squeeze netinstall
Version: 6.0.0

When I install debian via the netinstall method (burn CD, boot, install), the 
installer asks for my network card type.  I answer (correctly) 3c509.  The 
installer apparently is able to find the card and a driver for it as it then 
connects to the Internet, downloads packages, etc.

However, the installer apparently does not transfer this knowledge to 
the installed OS.  When squeeze boots, aside from may other annoyances, it
has no clue there is a network card installed.  My various attempts to fix
this have so far been in vain since I cannot access the Internet.

I would suggest that the installer should pass along the network interface
info that it used during the install to the installed system.  I don't
remember having this issue with lenny.

I am using Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.0, kernel whatever it downloaded this AM.





---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
reassign 609339 netcfg
tags 609339 + wontfix
reassign 604150 partman-partitioning
thanks

Hi,

thank you for submitting installation reports, much appreciated.

I read through all the bugs mentioned here (and I'm sure they were read by 
several people at the time they were submitted) and am closing them now as/if
- they (finally) indicated success and/or
- I know from first hand experience that the functionality is working in 
Wheezy and/or
- they only contained very little information and/or
- they contained user errors and/or
- they have been from a development phase where things were not stable and/or
- they are quite old.

If I've closed a bug incorrectly please do reply (it's easy to reopen and I'll 
do if requested) or just file a new one - thats often better, as the bug log 
will be clearer and shorter and not contain cruft.


cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
---End Message---


Bug#613835: marked as done (Squeeze install from CD or USB both fail with CD-drive errors)

2013-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 20 Jul 2013 17:22:32 +0200
with message-id 201307201723.03308.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #613835,
regarding Squeeze install from CD or USB both fail with CD-drive errors
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
613835: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613835
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports
Severity: serious

Part 1: failure to install from CD (similar to bug #602380)

I've failed to do a fresh netinst of Squeeze from a CD on a new desktop.  The
install hangs during Select and install software.  I looked at console 4
while it was hanging and saw 8-line kernel errors like this ad nauseam:

sr 0:0:0:0: [sr0] Sense Key: Medium error [current]
sr 0:0:0:0: [sr0] Add. Sense: Unrecovered read error
sr 0:0:0:0: [sr0] CDB: Read(10): 28 00 00 00 00 1e 00 00 02 00
end_request: I/O error, dev sr0, sector 120
Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 30
Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 31
sr 0:0:0:0: [sr0] Unhandled sense code
sr 0:0:0:0: [sr0] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE

So it's failing to read the CD.  Other possibly useful info:

  The motherboard is an Intel DH55HC, and the CD/DVD drive is a Toshiba
  Samsung DVD Writer Model TS-H663 (see lspci output below).

  The info file on the CD says
Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.0 Squeeze - Official i386 NETINST Binary-1 
20110205-14:34

  With another desktop and CD/DVD drive, I verified the checksums on the CD
  with
md5sum -c md5sum.txt | grep -v 'OK$'
  I also made a second copy of the CD and failed to install with that.

  On the same hardware, netinst CD installs of 5.0.8 and Wheezy ran to
  completion.

  During the failed 6.0.0 install, the CD was successfully read quite a bit
  before it hung.  I found over 3 files installed on /dev/sda1 (mounted
  on /target).

Part 2: failure to install from USB flash drive (similar to bug #593013)

I made an 8-GB flash drive bootable as follows:

cat debian-6.0.0-i386-netinst.iso  /dev/sdc
sync

It booted, and the install got through the initial language and keymap
selection.  Then:

  No common CD-ROM was detected.

I also failed to install Wheezy this way, although Wheezy from CD ran to
completion.  The version of Wheezy was:
  Debian GNU/Linux testing Wheezy - Official Snapshot i386 NETINST Binary-1 
20110215-15:58

This post at debian-user also mentions failure to install Squeeze from USB
flash:
  http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2011/02/msg01448.html
but this poster succeeded (at least to partitioning):
  http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2011/02/msg01562.html

Part 3.  output of lspci (running Wheezy from hard drive)

00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Core Processor DRAM Controller (rev 02)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Core Processor Integrated 
Graphics Controller (rev 02)
00:16.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series 
Chipset HECI Controller (rev 06)
00:16.2 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset PT IDER 
Controller (rev 06)
00:16.3 Serial controller: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset KT 
Controller (rev 06)
00:19.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82578DC Gigabit Network 
Connection (rev 06)
00:1a.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset USB2 
Enhanced Host Controller (rev 06)
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset High 
Definition Audio (rev 06)
00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset USB2 
Enhanced Host Controller (rev 06)
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge (rev a6)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 5 Series Chipset LPC Interface Controller 
(rev 06)
00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset 4 port 
SATA IDE Controller (rev 06)
00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset SMBus Controller 
(rev 06)
00:1f.5 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset 2 port 
SATA IDE Controller (rev 06)
01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82541PI Gigabit Ethernet 
Controller (rev 05)

I was unable to find a description of the CD/DVD drive under /proc but may
not have known where to look in Wheezy.  I was able to mount /media/cdrom and
read the netinst CD.



---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
reassign 609339 netcfg
tags 609339 + wontfix
reassign 604150 partman-partitioning
thanks

Hi,

thank you for submitting installation

Bug#596907: marked as done (installation-reports: mostly successful squeeze install from USB stick)

2013-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Jul 2013 12:47:28 +0200
with message-id 201307191247.39152.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports and d-i related bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #596907,
regarding installation-reports: mostly successful squeeze install from USB stick
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
596907: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596907
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i



-- Package-specific info:

Boot method: USB
Image version: squeeze, daily build 9/14/10 16:07 using netinst .iso
Date: 9/14/10 approx. 5pm

Machine: custom tower
Partitions: df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred
root@LinuxBox:/home/milesf# df -Tl
FilesystemType   1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/md2  ext3 9614052   3424084   5701600  38% /
tmpfstmpfs  500924 0500924   0% /lib/init/rw
udev tmpfs  495960   228495732   1% /dev
tmpfstmpfs  500924 0500924   0% /dev/shm


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [O ]
Detect network card:[O ]
Configure network:  [O ]
Detect CD:  [O ]
Load installer modules: [O/E ]
Detect hard drives: [O ]
Partition hard drives:  [O ]
Install base system:[O ]
Clock/timezone setup:   [O ]
User/password setup:[O ]
Install tasks:  [O ]
Install boot loader:[O/E ]
Overall install:[ O]

Comments/Problems:
- no opportunity to load custom installer modules
- no opportunity to install grub legacy, installed grub2 ok

successfully installed squeeze from a USB stick


1. The installer mostly does things on auto-pilot - no splash screen (so no
opportunity to enter rescue mode), no opportunity to install optional
components, The first time it stops for user input is after entering the
partitioner.  Next time is for tasksel.  After that it goes all the way through
installing grub before it stops.

2. It seems to install grub2, without giving the opportunity to install grub-
legacy.  It seems to do all the right things, and the installed system boots
properly.

3. I Still need to figure out the nits of setting things up for a RAID1 /boot.
- initially, it installs on one drive
- it has the interesting feature that it sets root=(md0) - which grub2 seems to
be able to handle at boot time, but you have to go back and manually install an
MBR on the 2nd drive in order to load grub regardless of which drive is 1st in
boot order
- the new approach of referring to drives by GUID seems to present some
trickiness - only one drive's info ends up in /etc/fstab - not sure yet what
happens if that drive fails and you try to boot off a degraded array





-- 

Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other
installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this
report. Please compress large files using gzip.

Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org.

==
Installer lsb-release:
==
DISTRIB_ID=Debian
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer
DISTRIB_RELEASE=6.0 (squeeze) - installer build 20100914-16:04
X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=hd-media

==
Installer hardware-summary:
==
uname -a: Linux LinuxBox 2.6.32-5-486 #1 Thu Aug 12 12:59:56 UTC 2010 i686 
GNU/Linux
lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 
661FX/M661FX/M661MX Host [1039:0661] (rev 11)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Foxconn International, Inc. Device [105b:0c56]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: agpgart-sis
lspci -knn: 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS AGP 
Port (virtual PCI-to-PCI bridge) [1039:0003]
lspci -knn: 00:02.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS964 
[MuTIOL Media IO] [1039:0964] (rev 36)
lspci -knn: 00:02.5 IDE interface [0101]: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5513 
[IDE] [1039:5513] (rev 01)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Foxconn International, Inc. Device [105b:0c56]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pata_sis
lspci -knn: 00:02.7 Multimedia audio controller [0401]: Silicon Integrated 
Systems [SiS] AC'97 Sound Controller [1039:7012] (rev a0)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Foxconn International, Inc. Device [105b:0c56]
lspci -knn: 00:03.0 USB

Bug#651299: marked as done (Installation-report: ASUS Squeeze)

2013-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Jul 2013 12:47:28 +0200
with message-id 201307191247.39152.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports and d-i related bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #651299,
regarding Installation-report: ASUS Squeeze
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
651299: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651299
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports




-- Package-specific info:

Boot method: USB pen with NetInst CD
Image version: 
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/current/amd64/iso-cd/firmware-6.0.3-amd64-netinst.iso
 (Last-Modified: 08-Oct-2011 21:53)
Date: 07-Dec 2011

Machine: ASUS U36JC-RX231V
Partitions:
df -Tl:
df -Tl:Filesystem  Type  1K-blocksUsed Available Use% Mounted on
df -Tl:/dev/sda1   xfs97607104 1631292  95975812   2% /
df -Tl:tmpfs   tmpfs  5120   0  5120   0% /lib/init/rw
df -Tl:tmpfs   tmpfs384676 316384360   1% /run
df -Tl:udevtmpfs   1917228   0   1917228   0% /dev
df -Tl:tmpfs   tmpfs769348   0769348   0% /run/shm
df -Tl:/dev/mapper/private xfs 9754620   38428   9716192   1% 
/encrypted/local
df -Tl:/dev/sda3   xfs   371016704   59236 370957468   1% /home


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
[I] = extra information

Initial boot:   [E]
Detect network card:[O]
Configure network:  [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [I]
Install base system:[O]
Clock/timezone setup:   [O]
User/password setup:[O]
Install tasks:  [O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Overall install:[O]

Comments/Problems:

I used the expert (non-GUI) install.

I originally overlooked the configure encrypted volumes (after
initial partition).  It would have been nice if the installer had
warned me about this, though I noticed myself a while later[1] and
corrected this issue (after base install and bootloader setup).


On the first couple of boots I got an error because my encrypted
volumes were not decrypted.  Luckily they were not critical to
booting, so I could continue the boot without these volumes.
  The issue turned out to be cryptsetup, which had not been installed.
This might have been due to not configuring the encrypted volumes
before installing the base system, though I honestly do not know.

Finally, this report was sent after upgrading the system into a
Wheezy/sid environment and further manually tweaking.  :)

I have yet to test my wireless beyond dhcp, but so far it appears to
be working.  :)

Tasks installed: laptop and the standard system utilities.
Bootloader: grub

[1] I lazily read from installation guide during the installation. :)

http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/index

-- 

==
Installer lsb-release:
==
DISTRIB_ID=Debian
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer
DISTRIB_RELEASE=6.0 (squeeze) - installer build 20110106+squeeze3+b1
X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=hd-media

==
Installer hardware-summary:
==
uname -a: Linux mangetsu 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Oct 3 03:59:20 UTC 2011 
x86_64 GNU/Linux
lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Core Processor DRAM 
Controller [8086:0044] (rev 18)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:1c77]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: agpgart-intel
lspci -knn: 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation Core Processor PCI 
Express x16 Root Port [8086:0045] (rev 18)
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport
lspci -knn: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Core 
Processor Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0046] (rev 18)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:1542]
lspci -knn: 00:16.0 Communication controller [0780]: Intel Corporation 5 
Series/3400 Series Chipset HECI Controller [8086:3b64] (rev 06)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:1c77]
lspci -knn: 00:1a.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 
Series Chipset USB2 Enhanced Host Controller [8086:3b3c] (rev 06)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:1c77]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd
lspci -knn

Bug#624092: marked as done (debian-installer: Debian Squeeze logo aspect ratio not respected)

2013-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:59:24 +0200
with message-id 201307191659.27729.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line spacefun theme will not be changed anymore, closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #624092,
regarding debian-installer: Debian Squeeze logo aspect ratio not respected
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
624092: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624092
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: debian-installer
Version: Debian Squeeze
Severity: normal

Las proporciones del logotipo de Debian utilizado en Debian Squeeze
no son respetadas, el logotipo utilizado en Debian Squeeze está
achatado con respecto al original.

Enlace al Splash screen de la instalación de Debian Squeeze:
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/netboot/gtk/debian-installer/amd64/boot-screens/splash.png

Enlace al logotipo original de Debian:
http://www.debian.org/logos/openlogo-nd.eps

Enlace a la imagen superpuesta entre ambos logotipos (El logotipo
original fue cambiado de color para que se note la diferencia de
tamaños):
http://img202.imageshack.us/i/logotipossuperpuestos.png/

Nota: la imagen superpuesta es incluída en el informe.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.8
  APT prefers oldstable
  APT policy: (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-libre2-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=es_AR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_AR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
attachment: logotipos-superpuestos.png---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
spacefun theme will not be changed anymore, closing




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
---End Message---


Bug#541987: marked as done (Installation failure Squeeze)

2013-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 20 Jul 2013 00:54:38 +0200
with message-id 201307200054.58292.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #541987,
regarding Installation failure Squeeze
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
541987: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541987
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports

Boot method: Cd
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/i
so-cd/debian-testin-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: 2009-08-17 09:35 CET

Machine: HP Compaq dc7900 Convertible Minitower
Processor: Intel(r) Core(tm)2 Quad CPU Q9400 @ 2.66 GHz 2.67 GHz
Memory: 4 GB
Partitions: 


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error, [ ] = provade det inte

Initial boot:   [E]
Detect network card:[ ]
Configure network:  [ ]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Clock/timezone setup:   [ ]
User/password setup:[ ]
Install tasks:  [ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Overall install:[ ]

Comments/Problems:

The installation hangs immediately after the installer boot menu. I
tried expert install and the system hangs after saying:

[6.432555] Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
[6.436477] sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 type 0
[6.436553] sr 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg1 type 5

I tried to install Lenny which worked fine, however it did not detect my
network card (Intel(r) 82567LM). Apparently the correct driver is
e1000e, which I chose from the list but it still didn't work. 

It is annoying that the installation and reading from the CD works fine
in Lenny but is broken in squeeze.

Best Regards
Karin

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Hi,

thank you for submitting installation reports, much appreciated.

I read through all the bugs mentioned here (and I'm sure they were read by 
several people at the time they were submitted) and am closing them now as/if
- they (finally) indicated success and/or
- I know from first hand experience that the functionality is working in 
Wheezy and/or
- they only contained very little information and/or
- they contained user errors and/or
- they have been from a development phase where things were not stable and/or
- they are very old, more than 3 years.

If I've closed a bug incorrectly please do reply (it's easy to reopen and I'll 
do if requested) or just file a new one - thats often better, as the bug log 
will be clearer and shorter and not contain cruft.


cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
---End Message---


Bug#590575: marked as done (Installation of squeeze using cd freezes after main menu)

2013-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 20 Jul 2013 01:02:26 +0200
with message-id 201307200102.46526.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #590575,
regarding Installation of squeeze using cd freezes after main menu
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
590575: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590575
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports

Boot method:  CD
Image version: 
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/sparc/iso-cd/debian-testing-sparc-CD-1.iso
Date: 26-Jul-2010

Machine: SunBlade 100
Processor:
# cat /proc/cpuinfo
cpu: TI UltraSparc IIe (Hummingbird)
fpu: UltraSparc IIe integrated FPU
prom: OBP 4.3.2 2001/08/29 15:43

Memory: 128 mb ram
Partitions:
# df -Tl
S.ficherosTipo Bloques de 1K   UsadoDispon Uso% Montado en
/dev/hda2 ext3  264443 71920178868  29% /
tmpfstmpfs   58280 0 58280   0% /lib/init/rw
udev tmpfs   10240  1280  8960  13% /dev
tmpfstmpfs   58280 0 58280   0% /dev/shm
/dev/hda1 ext2   90329  5385 80125   7% /boot
/dev/hda8 ext3   148790332192088 141040064   1% /home
/dev/hda7 ext3  381121 10289351153   3% /tmp
/dev/hda4 ext3 4806936405572   4157176   9% /usr
/dev/hda5 ext3 2885808206024   2533192   8% /var

Output of lspci -knn:
~# lspci -knn
00:03.0 Non-VGA unclassified device []: ALi Corporation M7101
Power Management Controller [PMU] [10b9:7101]
00:05.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21152
[1011:0024] (rev 03)
00:07.0 ISA bridge [0601]: ALi Corporation M1533/M1535/M1543 PCI to
ISA Bridge [Aladdin IV/V/V+] [10b9:1533]
00:08.0 Multimedia audio controller [0401]: ALi Corporation M5451 PCI
AC-Link Controller Audio Device [10b9:5451] (rev 01)
Kernel driver in use: ALI 5451
Kernel modules: snd-ali5451
00:0c.0 Bridge [0680]: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. RIO EBUS
[108e:1100] (rev 01)
00:0c.1 Ethernet controller [0200]: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp.
RIO 10/100 Ethernet [eri] [108e:1101] (rev 01)
Kernel driver in use: gem
Kernel modules: sungem
00:0c.2 FireWire (IEEE 1394) [0c00]: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp.
RIO 1394 [108e:1102] (rev 01)
Kernel driver in use: ohci1394
Kernel modules: ohci1394
00:0c.3 USB Controller [0c03]: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. RIO USB
[108e:1103] (rev 01)
Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd
Kernel modules: ohci-hcd
00:0d.0 IDE interface [0101]: ALi Corporation M5229 IDE [10b9:5229] (rev c3)
Kernel driver in use: ALI15x3_IDE
Kernel modules: alim15x3
00:13.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL
[1002:4752] (rev 27)
Kernel driver in use: atyfb
01:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ [10ec:8139] (rev 10)
Kernel driver in use: 8139too
Kernel modules: 8139too

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [E ]
Detect network card:[ ]
Configure network:  [ ]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Clock/timezone setup:   [ ]
User/password setup:[ ]
Install tasks:  [ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Overall install:[ ]

Comments/Problems:

I tried to install Debian squeeze with the weekly-builds 19-Jul-2010
and 26-Jul-2010 on Sparc hardware (sun blade 100) and the installer
freezes after show the main menu blue screen: the keyboard doesn't
work and the only solution is perform a hard reboot (power off)

I tried different USB keyboards and I have the same problem.

But if I try with Debian release 5.0.5 the system install and works well.

-- 
J Mauricio Mejia Vargas - b0r0las
Linux User # 381752
http://mmejiav.wordpress.com
http://twitter.com/b0r0las


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Hi,

thank you for submitting installation reports, much appreciated.

I read through all the bugs mentioned here (and I'm sure they were read by 
several people at the time they were submitted) and am closing them now as/if
- they (finally) indicated success and/or
- I know from first hand experience that the functionality is working in 
Wheezy and/or
- they only contained very little information and/or
- they contained user errors and/or
- they have

Bug#585901: marked as done (installation-reports: squeeze install on an NVidia AWRDACPI PC)

2013-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 20 Jul 2013 01:07:31 +0200
with message-id 201307200107.51378.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #585901,
regarding installation-reports: squeeze install on an NVidia AWRDACPI PC
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
585901: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=585901
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal

Duel boot computer with Windows XP (SP3) and Debian lenny 5.0.4 already
installed.

Ethernet connections:
Realtek controller (motherboard) - Internet
D-Link controller (separate card) - LAN

Installer mode: expert (text)

For the most part the installation process went smoothly except for the
following:

1) Initial failure to detect ethernet controllers

It took several attempts to get the installer to find the controllers. In each
case the progress bar would show then the installer would freeze on a blank
screen. The system had to be rebooted in each case. Only after rebooting into
the installer from Windows XP did the installer find both controllers  and the
installation proceeded to completion.

Conjecture: I was using Debian lenny before attempting the install and found it
was prone to freezing on start-up. Powering down the computer would clear the
problem. lenny would also leave the Realtek controller still powered up after
shutdown (the modem ethernet light remained on). Windows XP turned it off at
shutdown. So I suspect the lenny power down procedure was either improperly
configured or faulty, leaving some hardware active and in an indeterminate
state. This interfered with the squeeze installer's hardware detection. Notably
absent from the nForce2 driver installed by XP is SMBus support, though it is
present in an earlier version of the driver found at the NVidia web site. I
will see what squeeze does before filing this as a separate bug report.

2) Missing Debian lenny and Windows XP entries in the Grub 2 boot menu

The installer detected both lenny and XP, then indicated they would be included
on the boot menu. But only the squeeze items are on the menu. Maybe I
misunderstood the prompt and accidentally bypassed their inclusion, but then
that part of the installation process should be made clearer.




-- Package-specific info:

Boot method: CD
Image version: 
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
 (For June 12, 2010)
Date: Date and time of the install

Machine: NVidia AWRDACPI PC (G)
Partitions: df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [ ]
Detect network card:[ ]
Configure network:  [ ]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Clock/timezone setup:   [ ]
User/password setup:[ ]
Install tasks:  [ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Overall install:[ ]

Comments/Problems:

Description of the install, in prose, and any thoughts, comments
  and ideas you had during the initial install.


-- 

Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other
installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this
report. Please compress large files using gzip.

Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org.

==
Installer lsb-release:
==
DISTRIB_ID=Debian
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer
DISTRIB_RELEASE=6.0 (squeeze) - installer build 20100612-15:55
X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom

==
Installer hardware-summary:
==
uname -a: Linux reptile01 2.6.32-5-486 #1 Wed May 19 19:19:16 UTC 2010 i686 
GNU/Linux
lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: nVidia Corporation nForce2 IGP2 
[10de:01e0] (rev c1)
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: agpgart-nvidia
lspci -knn: 00:00.1 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory 
Controller 1 [10de:01eb] (rev c1)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: nVidia Corporation Device [10de:0c17]
lspci -knn: 00:00.2 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory 
Controller 4 [10de:01ee] (rev c1)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: nVidia Corporation Device [10de:0c17]
lspci -knn: 00:00.3 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation nForce2

Bug#566310: marked as done (installation report for Squeeze (daily build))

2013-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 20 Jul 2013 01:11:55 +0200
with message-id 201307200112.15052.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #566310,
regarding installation report for Squeeze (daily build)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
566310: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566310
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports

Boot method: USB stickHow did you boot the installer? CD? floppy? network?
Image version: 
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
   (Daily build #5 for Squeeze, This build finished at
Fri Jan 22 15:47:45 UTC 2010.
   
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/hd-media/boot.img.gz
   Both linked from http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
Date: 22.Jan 2010, approximately 19:45 GMT

Machine: Dell XPS M1330
Processor: Intel Centrino
Memory: 2 GB
Partitions: irrelevant

Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn):

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [O]
Detect network card:[ ]
Configure network:  [ ]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Clock/timezone setup:   [ ]
User/password setup:[ ]
Install tasks:  [ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Overall install:[E]

Comments/Problems:

After giving in language and keyboard information, the disks are
detected and the installer searches for an image on the installation
media, then gives a blue screen entitled: Load installer components
from an installer ISO
No kernel modules were found. This probably is due to a mismatch
between the kernel used...  etc.

The USB stick was prepared according to
http://www.debian.org/releases/squeeze/amd64/ch04s03.html.en using
4.3.1 Copying the files -- the easy way:
For this installation method you will also need to download a CD
image. The installation image and the CD image must be based on the
same release of debian-installer. If they do not match you are likely
to get errors[4] during the installation.
---
[4] The error message that is most likely to be displayed is that no
kernel modules can be found. This means that the version of the kernel
module udebs included on the CD image is different from the version of
the running kernel.

If the installation image and the CD image linked from the same page
do not match, I don't know how to make sure they match. This is
perhaps a mis-coordination in the daily builds or in the links
provided on http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/

It failed the same way with the businesscard image:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-businesscard.iso

Regards,
Mike


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Hi,

thank you for submitting installation reports, much appreciated.

I read through all the bugs mentioned here (and I'm sure they were read by 
several people at the time they were submitted) and am closing them now as/if
- they (finally) indicated success and/or
- I know from first hand experience that the functionality is working in 
Wheezy and/or
- they only contained very little information and/or
- they contained user errors and/or
- they have been from a development phase where things were not stable and/or
- they are very old, more than 2.5 years.

If I've closed a bug incorrectly please do reply (it's easy to reopen and I'll 
do if requested) or just file a new one - thats often better, as the bug log 
will be clearer and shorter and not contain cruft.


cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
---End Message---


Bug#590190: marked as done (d-i sparc squeeze weekly 2010-07-12: unable to partition harddisk properly)

2013-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 20 Jul 2013 01:07:31 +0200
with message-id 201307200107.51378.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #590190,
regarding d-i sparc squeeze weekly 2010-07-12: unable to partition harddisk 
properly
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
590190: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590190
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports

Boot method: netboot (RARP/TFTP)
Image version: 
http://people.debian.org/~stappers/d-i/sparc/daily/netboot/boot.img (2010-07-12)
Install Date: 2010-07-24

Machine: Sun Ultra5
Processor: UltraSparc IIi 400MHz
Memory: 384 MB
Partitions: partitioning fails

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [O]
Detect network card:[O]
Configure network:  [O]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [E]
Install base system:[ ]
Clock/timezone setup:   [ ]
User/password setup:[ ]
Install tasks:  [ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Overall install:[ ]

Comments/Problems:

Partitioning the harddisk (standard 15GB PATA disk) fails with
the message Unable to satisfy all constraints on the partition.
This happens

a) when using guided partitioning and 
b) when partitioning manually and trying to create more than one
   partition

Creating the first partition works without problems, but as soon
as one tries to add another partition, the aforementioned error
occurs. When one creates just a root partition (no swap etc.), the
rest of the installation process works normally.

Attached is a partman log from an installation attempt with
manual partitioning. Creating only the root partition worked,
trying to add an additional swap partition failed as described
above.

Regards,
Karsten
-- 
Gem. Par. 28 Abs. 4 Bundesdatenschutzgesetz widerspreche ich der Nutzung
sowie der Weitergabe meiner personenbezogenen Daten für Zwecke der
Werbung sowie der Markt- oder Meinungsforschung.


partman.log.gz
Description: Binary data
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Hi,

thank you for submitting installation reports, much appreciated.

I read through all the bugs mentioned here (and I'm sure they were read by 
several people at the time they were submitted) and am closing them now as/if
- they (finally) indicated success and/or
- I know from first hand experience that the functionality is working in 
Wheezy and/or
- they only contained very little information and/or
- they contained user errors and/or
- they have been from a development phase where things were not stable and/or
- they are very old, more than 2.5 years.

If I've closed a bug incorrectly please do reply (it's easy to reopen and I'll 
do if requested) or just file a new one - thats often better, as the bug log 
will be clearer and shorter and not contain cruft.


cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
---End Message---


Bug#693141: marked as done (installation-report: LXDE-variant of Squeeze installed on FSC-Futro-S300)

2013-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:35:20 +0200
with message-id 20130410113520.12bc551a@osrdii.lokal
and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #693141,
regarding installation-report: LXDE-variant of Squeeze installed on 
FSC-Futro-S300
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
693141: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693141
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.44
Severity: wishlist

*** Please type your report below this line ***


- -- Package-specific info:

Boot method: USB
Image version:
http://hammurabi.acc.umu.se/debian-cd/6.0.6/i386/iso-cd/debian-6.0.6-i386-xfce+lxde-CD-1.iso
from 2012-09-29 Date: 2012-11-01

Machine: FSC Futro S300
Partitions: 
Dateisystem   Typ1K‐Blöcke   Benutzt Verfügbar Ben% Eingehängt auf
/dev/sda1  xfs 6824960   2918196   3906764  43% /
tmpfstmpfs  119296 0119296   0% /lib/init/rw
udev tmpfs  11   164114280   1% /dev
tmpfstmpfs  119296 0119296   0% /dev/shm

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [o]
Detect network card:[o]
Configure network:  [o]
Detect CD:  []
Load installer modules: [o]
Detect hard drives: [o]
Partition hard drives:  [o]
Install base system:[o]
Clock/timezone setup:   [o]
User/password setup:[o]
Install tasks:  [o]
Install boot loader:[o]
Overall install:[o]

Comments/Problems:

There was an impression that the XFCE-version of Wheezy is not running very 
well on this
box, i.e. hangs in places, so I decided to take the current Squeeze-LXDE with 
backports.
XFCE-terminal-emulator does not work as expected for example. Should this be 
reported
separately? After a week or two there was a Kernel-OOPS, which was reported 
automatically
upon request. The fact, why I want to give this report is that the thinclient 
ran only at
733MHz initially, installing cpufreqd and altering /etc/cpufreqd.conf unlocked 
the full
range of 800 MHz to 667 MHz. The difference in top speed is small, but 
perceivable when
using the device. cpufreqd.conf.gz is attached to this report. Another issue, 
which I
have on my own PC, too, is that some packages from debian-backorts or 
debian-multimedia
are only installable with the graphical update-manager and will not be 
installed when
trying to '# aptitude upgrade' the system. 'apt-cache policy [pkgname]' keeps 
telling me
that the backported package has a piority of 100 only, regardless of my 
pinning-efforts. 

- -- 

Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other
installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this
report. Please compress large files using gzip.

Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org.

==
Installer lsb-release:
==
DISTRIB_ID=Debian
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer
DISTRIB_RELEASE=6.0 (squeeze) - installer build 20110106+squeeze4+b2
X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom

==
Installer hardware-summary:
==
uname -a: Linux s300 2.6.32-5-486 #1 Sun Sep 23 09:17:35 UTC 2012 i586 GNU/Linux
lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Transmeta Corporation LongRun 
Northbridge
[1279:0395] (rev 03) lspci -knn:Subsystem: Transmeta Corporation Device
[1279:0295] lspci -knn: 00:00.1 RAM memory [0500]: Transmeta Corporation SDRAM 
controller
[1279:0396] lspci -knn: Subsystem: Transmeta Corporation Device 
[1279:0295]
lspci -knn: 00:00.2 RAM memory [0500]: Transmeta Corporation BIOS scratchpad 
[1279:0397]
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Transmeta Corporation Device [1279:0295]
lspci -knn: 00:09.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Silicon Integrated 
Systems [SiS]
315PRO PCI/AGP VGA Display Adapter [1039:0325] lspci -knn: 00:10.0 USB 
Controller [0c03]:
VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller [1106:3038] (rev 80) 
lspci -knn:
Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller 
[1106:3038]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:10.1 USB 
Controller
[0c03]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller [1106:3038] 
(rev 80)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 
Controller
[1106:3038] lspci -knn

Re: Is the bad URL also present in squeeze manual?

2013-03-27 Thread Regid Ichira
  Can you tell whether the bad url is also found in the current
version, 20130208, of the installation guide?  
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch06s03.html.en#ftn.id593125
 is related to the bottom of

Chapter 6. Using the Debian Installer
6.3. Using Individual Components
footnote [17]

Should a bug report be opened?

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 08:29:06AM +0800, River Chien-hsun Chiang (?) 
wrote:
 Yes, http://luks.endorphin.org/ is a bad URL.
 
 On 3/26/13, Regid Ichira regi...@nt1.in wrote:
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch06s03.html.en#ftn.id593125
  maps LUKS to http://luks.endorphin.org/ .
 
  $ host luks.endorphin.org
  Host luks.endorphin.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
 
  Is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LUKS a better mapping?
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130327115824.gb7...@nt1.in



Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#703146: apt: BADSIG AED4B06F473041FA Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (6.0/squeeze)?

2013-03-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 found -1 1.0.44
Bug #703146 {Done: Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org} [debootstrap] apt: 
BADSIG AED4B06F473041FA Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (6.0/squeeze)?
Marked as found in versions debootstrap/1.0.44.
 severity serious
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.


-- 
703146: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703146
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b703146.1364288476307.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#703146: apt: BADSIG AED4B06F473041FA Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (6.0/squeeze)?

2013-03-26 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Control: found -1 1.0.44
Control: severity serious

I hit this bug yesterday ... and think that this should be RC if
debootstrap/wheezy cannot produce a working chroot environment.


Andreas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/515163d9.2080...@debian.org



Bug#703146: marked as done (apt: BADSIG AED4B06F473041FA Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (6.0/squeeze)?)

2013-03-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 22 Mar 2013 06:17:29 +
with message-id e1uivi9-0001id...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#703146: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.47
has caused the Debian Bug report #703146,
regarding apt: BADSIG AED4B06F473041FA Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key 
(6.0/squeeze)?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
703146: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703146
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: apt
Version: 0.9.7.8
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,
I got an error: 
W: GPG error: http://ftp.us.debian.org sid Release: The following signatures 
were invalid: BADSIG AED4B06F473041FA Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key 
(6.0/squeeze) ftpmas...@debian.org
when run apt-get update in a debootstrap sid base system.
The steps to reproduce this issue:
1. LANG=C debootstrap --verbose --arch=i386 sid sid-chroot 
http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian
2. chroot sid-chroot/
3. apt-get update
Get:1 http://ftp.us.debian.org sid Release.gpg [836 B]
Hit http://ftp.us.debian.org sid Release
Ign http://ftp.us.debian.org sid Release
Get:2 http://ftp.us.debian.org sid/main i386 Packages/DiffIndex [7876 B]
Get:3 http://ftp.us.debian.org sid/main Translation-en [4111 kB]
Fetched 4120 kB in 12s (331 kB/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://ftp.us.debian.org sid Release: The following signatures 
were invalid: BADSIG AED4B06F473041FA Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key 
(6.0/squeeze) ftpmas...@debian.org

Two days ago the same steps worked without any issue. Attached please find the 
whole log.

-- Package-specific info:

-- (no /etc/apt/preferences present) --


-- (/etc/apt/sources.list present, but not submitted) --


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii  debian-archive-keyring  2012.4
ii  gnupg   1.4.12-7
ii  libapt-pkg4.12  0.9.7.8
ii  libc6   2.13-38
ii  libgcc1 1:4.7.2-5
ii  libstdc++6  4.7.2-5

apt recommends no packages.

Versions of packages apt suggests:
pn  apt-doc  none
pn  aptitude | synaptic | wajig  none
ii  dpkg-dev 1.16.9
pn  python-apt   none
ii  xz-utils 5.1.1alpha+20120614-2

-- no debconf information
root@debian-TU:# LANG=C debootstrap --verbose --arch=i386 sid sid-chroot 
http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian
I: Retrieving InRelease
I: Checking Release signature
I: Valid Release signature (key id 9FED2BCBDCD29CDF762678CBAED4B06F473041FA)
I: Retrieving Packages
I: Validating Packages
I: Resolving dependencies of required packages...
I: Resolving dependencies of base packages...
I: Found additional required dependencies: insserv libbz2-1.0 libdb5.1 
libsemanage-common libsemanage1 libslang2 libustr-1.0-1
I: Found additional base dependencies: libept1.4.12 libgcrypt11 libgnutls26 
libgpg-error0 libidn11 libmnl0 libnetfilter-acct1 libnfnetlink0 libp11-kit0 
libsqlite3-0 libtasn1-3 libxapian22
I: Checking component main on http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian...
I: Retrieving libacl1
I: Validating libacl1
I: Retrieving adduser
I: Validating adduser
I: Retrieving apt
I: Validating apt
I: Retrieving apt-utils
I: Validating apt-utils
I: Retrieving libapt-inst1.5
I: Validating libapt-inst1.5
I: Retrieving libapt-pkg4.12
I: Validating libapt-pkg4.12
I: Retrieving aptitude
I: Validating aptitude
I: Retrieving aptitude-common
I: Validating aptitude-common
I: Retrieving libattr1
I: Validating libattr1
I: Retrieving base-files
I: Validating base-files
I: Retrieving base-passwd
I: Validating base-passwd
I: Retrieving bash
I: Validating bash
I: Retrieving libboost-iostreams1.49.0
I: Validating libboost-iostreams1.49.0
I: Retrieving bsdmainutils
I: Validating bsdmainutils
I: Retrieving libbz2-1.0
I: Validating libbz2-1.0
I: Retrieving coreutils
I: Validating coreutils
I: Retrieving cpio
I: Validating cpio
I: Retrieving cron
I: Validating cron
I: Retrieving libcwidget3
I: Validating libcwidget3
I: Retrieving dash
I: Validating dash
I: Retrieving libdb5.1
I: Validating libdb5.1
I: Retrieving debconf
I: Validating debconf
I: Retrieving debconf-i18n
I: Validating debconf-i18n
I: Retrieving debian-archive-keyring
I: Validating debian-archive-keyring
I: Retrieving debianutils
I: Validating debianutils
I: Retrieving diffutils
I

Bug#703146: apt: BADSIG AED4B06F473041FA Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (6.0/squeeze)?

2013-03-20 Thread Thierry
Hi,

to be more precise abouti my previous message (#44), here is a log of
what happened while running

lb config --architectures i386 ; sudo lb build

http://paste.debian.net/243117/

Interesting lines are 791, 845, 863, 911, 915.

By the way, may this bug be related to #614029 ?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=614029

Ciao,
Thierry


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130320155013.ga14...@dontexist.metelu.net



Bug#703146: apt: BADSIG AED4B06F473041FA Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (6.0/squeeze)?

2013-03-19 Thread Thierry
Hi,

i fall on a similar problem while running the following command on
wheezy (you should have live-config live-boot live-build packages
installed):

lb config --architectures i386 ; sudo lb build

I got the same warning (which eventually lead to an error saying that
some packages cannot be authenticated):

W: GPG error: http://ftp.debian.org wheezy Release: The following
signatures were invalid: BADSIG AED4B06F473041FA Debian Archive
Automatic Signing Key (6.0/squeeze) ftpmas...@debian.org

Hope this helps to reproduce the bug and check the fix.

Ciao,
Thierry


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130320010909.ga12...@dontexist.metelu.net



Bug#703146: apt: BADSIG AED4B06F473041FA Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (6.0/squeeze)?

2013-03-19 Thread Steven Shiau
I suggest to add a command rm -f $reldest before the gpg command, as 
attached.
Otherwise although it works for debootstrap, however, when using with 
Debian live-build, it will enter interactive mode:

=
P: If the following stage fails, the most likely cause of the problem is 
with your mirror configuration, a caching proxy or the sid distribution.

P: Running debootstrap...
I: Retrieving InRelease
I: Checking Release signature
I: Valid Release signature (key id 9FED2BCBDCD29CDF762678CBAED4B06F473041FA)
File 
`/work/debian-live/chroot/var/lib/apt/lists/debootstrap.invalid_dists_sid_Release' 
exists. Overwrite? (y/N)

=

My 2 cents.

Steven.

--
Steven Shiau steven _at_ nchc org tw steven _at_ stevenshiau org
National Center for High-performance Computing, Taiwan.
http://www.nchc.org.tw
Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 4096R/47CF935C
Fingerprint: 0240 1FEB 695D 7112 62F0  8796 11C1 12DA 47CF 935C
--- functions.orig  2013-03-20 11:30:46.0 +0800
+++ functions   2013-03-20 09:35:10.0 +0800
@@ -530,7 +530,8 @@
warning KEYRING Cannot check Release signature; keyring file 
not available %s $KEYRING_WANTED
fi
if [ $release_file_variant = IN ]; then
-   mv $relsigdest $reldest
+   rm -f $reldest
+gpg --output $reldest --decrypt --keyring $KEYRING 
--ignore-time-conflict $relsigdest
fi
 }
 


Can iso-scan/filename be preseeded in squeeze?

2013-01-21 Thread Krylov Ivan

Hi!

I recently tried installing Debian Squeeze using hd-media method and 
realized that I have to manually confirm searching my whole drive for 
the ISO image if it is present deeper than in top-level subdirectories.


I tried adding iso-scan/filename=/long/path/to/my/image.iso and 
iso-scan:iso-scan/filename=/long/path/to/my/image.iso kernel parameters, 
but nothing helped: I still had to confirm full search for the image.


After reading iso-scan.postinst I noticed that this parameter is only 
set, but never read in this script. I read iso-scan.postinst from 
Wheezy, too, but didn't see any readings of this parameter. What did I 
miss? Where can I read how does it actually work in Wheezy? Is there a 
way to specify the loaction of installation image in Squeeze?


Thanks in advance and best regards,
Ivan Krylov.

// Sorry if I posted in the wrong list. I have carefully read the list 
of possible addresses, but there's always possibility of a mistake.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50fd952d.7080...@gmail.com



Re: Bug#606395: [G-I][squeeze-d-i-beta2] wrong keyboard layout in console (correct in X)

2012-12-27 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 01:10:58AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
 
 I guess we could indeed make busybox call “setupcon” (maybe with the
 -k flag?) before spawning a shell, if that file exists? (possibly with
 its stderr redirected to /dev/null to avoid the gzip-related message?)

Isn't it possible to create a ~/.profile or /etc/profile script calling 
setupcon?  This would be clearer and easier to maintain.  The profile 
script could easily test for the existence of /etc/default/keyboard.

Anton Zinoviev


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121227201731.ga13...@debian.lan



Re: Bug#606395: [G-I][squeeze-d-i-beta2] wrong keyboard layout in console (correct in X)

2012-12-27 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Anton Zinoviev an...@lml.bas.bg (27/12/2012):
 Isn't it possible to create a ~/.profile or /etc/profile script calling
 setupcon?  This would be clearer and easier to maintain.  The profile
 script could easily test for the existence of /etc/default/keyboard.

Oh, right. Tested that:
,---[ ~/.profile ]---
| if [ -f /etc/default/keyboard ]; then
|   setupcon /dev/null 21
| fi

and that seems to work fine without any other modifications, thanks!

If others agree this is an appropriate change, any ideas where to ship
that little file?

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#606395: [G-I][squeeze-d-i-beta2] wrong keyboard layout in console (correct in X)

2012-12-27 Thread Samuel Thibault
Cyril Brulebois, le Thu 27 Dec 2012 22:06:01 +0100, a écrit :
 Anton Zinoviev an...@lml.bas.bg (27/12/2012):
  Isn't it possible to create a ~/.profile or /etc/profile script calling
  setupcon?  This would be clearer and easier to maintain.  The profile
  script could easily test for the existence of /etc/default/keyboard.
 
 Oh, right. Tested that:
 ,---[ ~/.profile ]---
 | if [ -f /etc/default/keyboard ]; then
 |   setupcon /dev/null 21
 | fi
 
 and that seems to work fine without any other modifications, thanks!
 
 If others agree this is an appropriate change, any ideas where to ship
 that little file?

Actually we already have almost that, in rootskel/src/etc/profile. It
seems we just need to fix s/console-setup/keyboard/ there.

Samuel


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121227210955.GK6172@type



Bug#607058: marked as done (keyboard-configuration: [lenny-squeeze] prompt twice during upgrade)

2012-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2012 22:22:39 +0100
with message-id sa7k3s3jilc@gismo.pca.it
and subject line Re: Bug#607058: keyboard-configuration: [lenny-squeeze] 
prompt twice during upgrade
has caused the Debian Bug report #607058,
regarding keyboard-configuration: [lenny-squeeze] prompt twice during upgrade
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
607058: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607058
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: keyboard-configuration
Version: 1.61
Severity: normal

Hi there!

Upgrading from lenny to squeeze produce the following error (the output
is in French, but it should be easy to understand what is going on):
=
debian:/home/luca# apt-get dist-upgrade
[...]

Extraction des modèles depuis les paquets : 100%
Préconfiguration des paquets...

Outil de configuration des paquets

┌─┤ Configuration de keyboard-configuration ├─┐
│ Veuillez choisir le modèle du clavier de cette machine. │
│ │
│ Modèle du clavier : │
│ │
│Memorex MX2750↑  │
│Microsoft Natural ▒  │
│Multimedia Super Power▒  │
│Northgate OmniKey 101 ▒  │
│OLPC  ▒  │
│PC-98xx Series▒  │
│PC générique 101 touches  ▮  │
│PC générique 102 touches (intl)   ▒  │
│PC générique 104 touches  ▒  │
│PC générique 105 touches (intl)   ↓  │
│ │
│ │
│OkAnnuler│
│ │
└─┘
[...]

Paramétrage de keyboard-configuration (1.61) ...
Installation de la nouvelle version du fichier de configuration 
/etc/init.d/console-setup ...
Installation de la nouvelle version du fichier de configuration 
/etc/init.d/keyboard-setup ...

Outil de configuration des paquets

┌─┤ Configuration de keyboard-configuration ├─┐
│ Veuillez choisir le modèle du clavier de cette machine. │
│ │
│ Modèle du clavier : │
│ │
│A4Tech KB-21  ↑  │
│A4Tech KBS-8  ▮  │
│Acer AirKey V ▒  │
│Acer C300 ▒  │
│Acer Ferrari 4000 ▒  │
│ACPI standard ▒  │
│Advance Scorpius KI   ▒  │
│Amiga ▒  │
│Apple ▒  │
│  ↓  │
│ │
│ │
│OkAnnuler│
│ │
└─┘
=

Given that I already chose the keyboard at the beginning of the upgrade,
I do not see why the question is asked again.

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT

Bug#607058: keyboard-configuration: [lenny-squeeze] prompt twice during upgrade

2012-12-27 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Luca Capello l...@pca.it (27/12/2012):
 It would make sense for documentation and also because there is an
 upstream bug (#352697), but given that after a bit more than 2
 years no one has reported anything new, I would say that I was the
 only one interested there.
 
 Moreover, the question is now asked once in a fresh squeeze chroot
 (1.68+squeeze2) and it is then not asked again during a
 squeeze-wheezy upgrade (1.88).  Given that on a fresh wheezy chroot
 (still 1.88 ;-) ) the behavior is similar, I consider it fixed, thus
 closing it with the squeeze version.

Thank you very much for the quick follow-up.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#606395: [G-I][squeeze-d-i-beta2] wrong keyboard layout in console (correct in X)

2012-12-27 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Control: reassign -1 rootskel 1.101
Control: tag -1 patch pending

Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org (27/12/2012):
 Cyril Brulebois, le Thu 27 Dec 2012 22:06:01 +0100, a écrit :
  Oh, right. Tested that:
  ,---[ ~/.profile ]---
  | if [ -f /etc/default/keyboard ]; then
  |   setupcon /dev/null 21
  | fi
  
  and that seems to work fine without any other modifications, thanks!
  
  If others agree this is an appropriate change, any ideas where to ship
  that little file?
 
 Actually we already have almost that, in rootskel/src/etc/profile. It
 seems we just need to fix s/console-setup/keyboard/ there.

Yoohoo. Thank you! Reassigning to rootskel, already on its way to the
archive after successful tests here.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#606395: [G-I][squeeze-d-i-beta2] wrong keyboard layout in console (correct in X)

2012-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 reassign -1 rootskel 1.101
Bug #606395 [debian-installer] [G-I] wrong keyboard layout in console (correct 
in X)
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'rootskel'.
No longer marked as found in versions debian-installer/20120508 and 
debian-installer/20120626.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #606395 to the same values 
previously set
Bug #606395 [rootskel] [G-I] wrong keyboard layout in console (correct in X)
Marked as found in versions rootskel/1.101.
 tag -1 patch pending
Bug #606395 [rootskel] [G-I] wrong keyboard layout in console (correct in X)
Added tag(s) pending and patch.

-- 
606395: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606395
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b606395.13566445793295.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#607058: keyboard-configuration: [lenny-squeeze] prompt twice during upgrade

2012-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 fixed 607058 1.88
Bug #607058 {Done: Luca Capello l...@pca.it} [keyboard-configuration] 
keyboard-configuration: [lenny-squeeze] prompt twice during upgrade
Marked as fixed in versions console-setup/1.88.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
607058: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607058
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.135665130819508.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#607058: keyboard-configuration: [lenny-squeeze] prompt twice during upgrade

2012-12-26 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Luca,

Luca Capello l...@pca.it (14/12/2010):
 Package: keyboard-configuration
 Version: 1.61
 Severity: normal
 
 Hi there!
 
 Upgrading from lenny to squeeze produce the following error (the output
 is in French, but it should be easy to understand what is going on): […]

does it make sense to keep this open? Shrugging and concentrating on
squeeze→wheezy looks like the way to go, I think?

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#606395: [G-I][squeeze-d-i-beta2] wrong keyboard layout in console (correct in X)

2012-12-26 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi all,

after quite some time spent hacking on d-i, I would really find it a
shame if we weren't going to fix that for wheezy.

Anton Zinoviev an...@lml.bas.bg (09/12/2010):
 On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 08:35:24AM +0800, Samuel Thibault wrote:
 
  That's actually expected: we didn't want to switch back to the text
  console just to setup the keyboard (setupcon would refuse to run from
  the X server). But we should keep that on the TODO list, yes.

 As far as I can remember on the virtual consoles there is a text saying
 something like Press ENTER to activate this console.  I don't know
 what program is displaying this text but isn't it possible to change the
 same program to run setupcon just before the shell?

That could be an idea. From a quick grep, busybox is displaying it:
,---[ init/init.c ]---
| static pid_t run(const struct init_action *a)
| […]
| /* NB: on NOMMU we can't wait for input in child, so
|  * askfirst will work the same as respawn. */
| if (BB_MMU  (a-action_type  ASKFIRST)) {
| static const char press_enter[] ALIGN1 =
| #ifdef CUSTOMIZED_BANNER
| #include CUSTOMIZED_BANNER
| #endif
| \nPlease press Enter to activate this console. ;
| char c;
| […]
`---

After some quick tests, if setupcon is called too early (before a
keymap is selected), one gets:
| ~ # setupcon
| setupcon: None of /usr/etc/default/keyboard nor //.console-setup exists.

After a keymap is selected, one gets this message instead:
| ~ # setupcon
| gzip is not accessible. Will not save cached keyboard map.

[and the keymap is indeed taken into account.]

The difference (despite the buggy error message) is the presence of
/etc/default/keyboard.

I guess we could indeed make busybox call “setupcon” (maybe with the
-k flag?) before spawning a shell, if that file exists? (possibly with
its stderr redirected to /dev/null to avoid the gzip-related message?)

I haven't checked what would happen in the text mode installation.

Michael, what do you think?

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#693141: installation-report: XFCE-variant of Squeeze installed on FSC-Futro-S300 w/ backports

2012-11-13 Thread Andreas Glaeser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.44
Severity: wishlist

*** Please type your report below this line ***


- -- Package-specific info:

Boot method: USB
Image version:
http://hammurabi.acc.umu.se/debian-cd/6.0.6/i386/iso-cd/debian-6.0.6-i386-xfce+lxde-CD-1.iso
from 2012-09-29 Date: 2012-11-01

Machine: FSC Futro S300
Partitions: 
Dateisystem   Typ1K‐Blöcke   Benutzt Verfügbar Ben% Eingehängt auf
/dev/sda1  xfs 6824960   2918196   3906764  43% /
tmpfstmpfs  119296 0119296   0% /lib/init/rw
udev tmpfs  11   164114280   1% /dev
tmpfstmpfs  119296 0119296   0% /dev/shm

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [o]
Detect network card:[o]
Configure network:  [o]
Detect CD:  []
Load installer modules: [o]
Detect hard drives: [o]
Partition hard drives:  [o]
Install base system:[o]
Clock/timezone setup:   [o]
User/password setup:[o]
Install tasks:  [o]
Install boot loader:[o]
Overall install:[o]

Comments/Problems:

There was an impression that the XFCE-version of Wheezy is not running very 
well on this
box, i.e. hangs in places, so I decided to take the current Squeeze-LXDE with 
backports.
XFCE-terminal-emulator does not work as expected for example. Should this be 
reported
separately? After a week or two there was a Kernel-OOPS, which was reported 
automatically
upon request. The fact, why I want to give this report is that the thinclient 
ran only at
733MHz initially, installing cpufreqd and altering /etc/cpufreqd.conf unlocked 
the full
range of 800 MHz to 667 MHz. The difference in top speed is small, but 
perceivable when
using the device. cpufreqd.conf.gz is attached to this report. Another issue, 
which I
have on my own PC, too, is that some packages from debian-backorts or 
debian-multimedia
are only installable with the graphical update-manager and will not be 
installed when
trying to '# aptitude upgrade' the system. 'apt-cache policy [pkgname]' keeps 
telling me
that the backported package has a piority of 100 only, regardless of my 
pinning-efforts. 

- -- 

Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other
installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this
report. Please compress large files using gzip.

Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org.

==
Installer lsb-release:
==
DISTRIB_ID=Debian
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer
DISTRIB_RELEASE=6.0 (squeeze) - installer build 20110106+squeeze4+b2
X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom

==
Installer hardware-summary:
==
uname -a: Linux s300 2.6.32-5-486 #1 Sun Sep 23 09:17:35 UTC 2012 i586 GNU/Linux
lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Transmeta Corporation LongRun 
Northbridge
[1279:0395] (rev 03) lspci -knn:Subsystem: Transmeta Corporation Device
[1279:0295] lspci -knn: 00:00.1 RAM memory [0500]: Transmeta Corporation SDRAM 
controller
[1279:0396] lspci -knn: Subsystem: Transmeta Corporation Device 
[1279:0295]
lspci -knn: 00:00.2 RAM memory [0500]: Transmeta Corporation BIOS scratchpad 
[1279:0397]
lspci -knn: Subsystem: Transmeta Corporation Device [1279:0295]
lspci -knn: 00:09.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Silicon Integrated 
Systems [SiS]
315PRO PCI/AGP VGA Display Adapter [1039:0325] lspci -knn: 00:10.0 USB 
Controller [0c03]:
VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller [1106:3038] (rev 80) 
lspci -knn:
Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller 
[1106:3038]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:10.1 USB 
Controller
[0c03]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller [1106:3038] 
(rev 80)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 
Controller
[1106:3038] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 
00:10.2 USB
Controller [0c03]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller 
[1106:3038]
(rev 80) lspci -knn:Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1
Controller [1106:3038] lspci -knn:  Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci 
-knn:
00:10.3 USB Controller [0c03]: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 [1106:3104] (rev 
82) lspci
- -knn: Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 [1106:3104] lspci 
-knn:
Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:11.0 ISA bridge [0601]: VIA 
Technologies,
Inc. VT8235 ISA Bridge [1106:3177] lspci -knn:  Subsystem: VIA Technologies, 
Inc.
VT8235 ISA Bridge [1106:3177] lspci -knn: 00:11.1 IDE interface [0101]: VIA 
Technologies,
Inc. VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C PIPC Bus Master IDE [1106:0571] (rev 
06

Re: debootstrap backport for squeeze

2012-10-18 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Vagrant Cascadian vagr...@debian.org (15/10/2012):
 I intend to upload a backport of debootstrap for squeeze, as other
 packages I will be backporting depend on newer versions of
 debootstrap. It seems to be a simple rebuild (arguably, not even
 that is truely necessary).
 
 Let me know if you have any suggestions or concerns: […]

Even if I'm not in Uploaders, I can't think of a reason against your
taking care of backporting that package.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


debootstrap backport for squeeze

2012-10-15 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
I intend to upload a backport of debootstrap for squeeze, as other packages
I will be backporting depend on newer versions of debootstrap. It seems to be 
a simple rebuild (arguably, not even that is truely necessary).

Let me know if you have any suggestions or concerns:

diff -Nru debootstrap-1.0.42/debian/changelog 
debootstrap-1.0.42~bpo60+1/debian/changelog
--- debootstrap-1.0.42/debian/changelog 2012-07-03 07:35:00.0 -0700
+++ debootstrap-1.0.42~bpo60+1/debian/changelog 2012-10-15 12:04:27.0 
-0700
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+debootstrap (1.0.42~bpo60+1) squeeze-backports; urgency=low
+
+  * Rebuild for squeeze-backports.
+  * Add myself to Uploaders.
+
+ -- Vagrant Cascadian vagr...@debian.org  Mon, 15 Oct 2012 12:02:47 -0700
+
 debootstrap (1.0.42) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Downgrade the absence of an InRelease file from a warning to an info
diff -Nru debootstrap-1.0.42/debian/control 
debootstrap-1.0.42~bpo60+1/debian/control
--- debootstrap-1.0.42/debian/control   2011-08-10 04:59:34.0 -0700
+++ debootstrap-1.0.42~bpo60+1/debian/control   2012-10-15 12:03:36.0 
-0700
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: admin
 Priority: extra
 Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
-Uploaders: Anthony Towns a...@debian.org, Joey Hess jo...@debian.org, 
Junichi Uekawa dan...@debian.org, Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org
+Uploaders: Anthony Towns a...@debian.org, Joey Hess jo...@debian.org, 
Junichi Uekawa dan...@debian.org, Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org, Vagrant 
Cascadian vagr...@debian.org
 Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7.0.50), makedev (= 2.3.1-69) [linux-any]
 Standards-Version: 3.9.2
 Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=d-i/debootstrap.git


live well,
  vagrant


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121015194532.GP11525@talon.fglan



Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 09:01 +0900, dann frazier wrote:
 On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
  Thanks for the upload; the builds seem to be going well.  There don't
  seem to be any new d-i changes in git, so I assume we just need lkdi,
  a round of d-i binNMUs and then a d-i-n-i upload?
 
 afaik, that's correct.

Cool; thanks.  All of the kernel builds are (finally) in now; would you
have time to take care of the lkdi uploads?

Cheers,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1348523640.6724.21.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org



Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-24 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:54:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
 On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 09:01 +0900, dann frazier wrote:
  On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
   Thanks for the upload; the builds seem to be going well.  There don't
   seem to be any new d-i changes in git, so I assume we just need lkdi,
   a round of d-i binNMUs and then a d-i-n-i upload?
  
  afaik, that's correct.
 
 Cool; thanks.  All of the kernel builds are (finally) in now; would you
 have time to take care of the lkdi uploads?

Yep, should after work today.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120925002142.ga26...@dannf.org



Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-23 Thread dann frazier
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
 On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 11:30 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
  On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
   ok, given the replies, let's settle on this:
   
   On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
* Sep 29/30: ok from RT side
 [...]
  Sorry, been travelling heavily for the past several days. We do have
  some changes queued, and I should be able to get a kernel uploaded by
  this weekend, but probably not sooner since I expect work to keep me
  pretty busy throught the work week.
 
 Thanks for the upload; the builds seem to be going well.  There don't
 seem to be any new d-i changes in git, so I assume we just need lkdi,
 a round of d-i binNMUs and then a d-i-n-i upload?

afaik, that's correct.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120924000123.ga14...@dannf.org



Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-18 Thread Neil McGovern
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:59:09PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
 On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
  ok, given the replies, let's settle on this:
  On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
   * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side
  We still need a press officer for somewhen in the evening to send out the
  announcement, feedback from -live and a note from -kernel if there's still a
  change staged for the next point release.
 
 That should be read as let's settle for Sep 29.
 

I'm around with a press hat if needed.

Neil


-- 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-18 Thread Francesca Ciceri
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 09:13:53AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
  On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
  
  That should be read as let's settle for Sep 29.
  
 
 I'm around with a press hat if needed.
 

Me too.

Cheers,
Francesca

-- 
You're scared of mice and spiders, but oh-so-much greater is your fear
that one day the two species will cross-breed to form an all-powerful
race of mice-spiders, who will immobilize human beings in giant webs in
order to steal cheese.
Tim Bisley, Spaced (1x01, Beginnings)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-18 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
 Hi,
 
 ok, given the replies, let's settle on this:
 
 On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
  * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side
 
 We still need a press officer for somewhen in the evening to send out the
 announcement, feedback from -live and a note from -kernel if there's still a
 change staged for the next point release.
 
 p-u-NEW will close on the weekend of Sep 22nd/23rd (barring any breakage
 induced by the ftp-master meeting ;-).

Sorry, been travelling heavily for the past several days. We do have
some changes queued, and I should be able to get a kernel uploaded by
this weekend, but probably not sooner since I expect work to keep me
pretty busy throught the work week.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120918173003.gf4...@dannf.org



Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-17 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi,

ok, given the replies, let's settle on this:

On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
 * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side

We still need a press officer for somewhen in the evening to send out the
announcement, feedback from -live and a note from -kernel if there's still a
change staged for the next point release.

p-u-NEW will close on the weekend of Sep 22nd/23rd (barring any breakage
induced by the ftp-master meeting ;-).

Kind regards
Philipp Kern


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-17 Thread Philipp Kern
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
 ok, given the replies, let's settle on this:
 On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
  * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side
 We still need a press officer for somewhen in the evening to send out the
 announcement, feedback from -live and a note from -kernel if there's still a
 change staged for the next point release.

That should be read as let's settle for Sep 29.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-14 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
Hi,

I'd like to arrange a point release to be done as soon as feasible.
So I'd like to propose a bunch of weekends here:

* Sep 22/23: I'm personally busy on the 23th

Available that weekend fine.

* Sep 29/30: ok from RT side

Available that weekend fine.

* Oct 6/7: Adam's busy for the weekend, hence we'd like to avoid that
  if possible

Ditto, I'm guessing the same event :-)

* Oct 13/14: BSP attended by adsb/Sledge, not ideal to schedule it
  there

Worked OK at the last BSP we did, tbh...

So dear FTP masters, CD team, Press team: Would one out of Sep 22/29/30
work out for all of you?

Dear Kernel team: Which changes are still pending for 6.0.6? When could
we get them into the archive? For 22nd we'd close p-u-NEW on the 15th,
which would leave us with a week.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern


-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
C++ ate my sanity -- Jon Rabone


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120914122252.gc24...@einval.com



Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-07 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi,

I'd like to arrange a point release to be done as soon as feasible.
So I'd like to propose a bunch of weekends here:

* Sep 22/23: I'm personally busy on the 23th
* Sep 29/30: ok from RT side
* Oct 6/7: Adam's busy for the weekend, hence we'd like to avoid that
  if possible
* Oct 13/14: BSP attended by adsb/Sledge, not ideal to schedule it
  there

So dear FTP masters, CD team, Press team: Would one out of Sep 22/29/30
work out for all of you?

Dear Kernel team: Which changes are still pending for 6.0.6? When could
we get them into the archive? For 22nd we'd close p-u-NEW on the 15th,
which would leave us with a week.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >