Re: bogl forked (was Re: [patch] bogl memset_var for 32 bpp screen)
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 08:54:38PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 08:27:51PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Sorry for not being clear - yes, I know that bterm has the same bug. > > > > I'd appreciate it if someone on this list would look into using the > > > > bogl and bterm in that package, so that we can scrap the one in > > > > debian-boot CVS; having both makes me nervous about lost work. > > > > > > I guess we'll plan on using straight bogl from woody for the woody > > > boot floppies. I hate forking. I'm not sure why we forked > > > it... Maybe Marcin (or was it Marcel?) can explain it? > > > > We didn't fork it for boot floppies; it was originally there. I added > > new bogl packages to woody for debian-installer, though, a month ago. > > At that point it was effectively forked - mostly my fault. > > Oh. Ok. So -- am I correct in concluding that boot-floppies for > woody should rely on using bogl from woody (the .deb, b-f can't use > udebs) and not the internal stuff? If at all possible, yes! It will take a little doing, because I removed the boxes code; that just needs to link to the provided libbogl. Then I can go through and sweep up any pending patches in the b-f bogl repository, and delete the whole directory. I don't have time to do this right now, alas :( Dan /\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \/ \/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bogl forked (was Re: [patch] bogl memset_var for 32 bpp screen)
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 08:27:51PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Sorry for not being clear - yes, I know that bterm has the same bug. > > > I'd appreciate it if someone on this list would look into using the > > > bogl and bterm in that package, so that we can scrap the one in > > > debian-boot CVS; having both makes me nervous about lost work. > > > > I guess we'll plan on using straight bogl from woody for the woody > > boot floppies. I hate forking. I'm not sure why we forked > > it... Maybe Marcin (or was it Marcel?) can explain it? > > We didn't fork it for boot floppies; it was originally there. I added > new bogl packages to woody for debian-installer, though, a month ago. > At that point it was effectively forked - mostly my fault. Oh. Ok. So -- am I correct in concluding that boot-floppies for woody should rely on using bogl from woody (the .deb, b-f can't use udebs) and not the internal stuff? -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bogl forked (was Re: [patch] bogl memset_var for 32 bpp screen)
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 08:27:51PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Sorry for not being clear - yes, I know that bterm has the same bug. > > I'd appreciate it if someone on this list would look into using the > > bogl and bterm in that package, so that we can scrap the one in > > debian-boot CVS; having both makes me nervous about lost work. > > I guess we'll plan on using straight bogl from woody for the woody > boot floppies. I hate forking. I'm not sure why we forked > it... Maybe Marcin (or was it Marcel?) can explain it? We didn't fork it for boot floppies; it was originally there. I added new bogl packages to woody for debian-installer, though, a month ago. At that point it was effectively forked - mostly my fault. Dan /\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \/ \/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bogl forked (was Re: [patch] bogl memset_var for 32 bpp screen)
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry for not being clear - yes, I know that bterm has the same bug. > I'd appreciate it if someone on this list would look into using the > bogl and bterm in that package, so that we can scrap the one in > debian-boot CVS; having both makes me nervous about lost work. I guess we'll plan on using straight bogl from woody for the woody boot floppies. I hate forking. I'm not sure why we forked it... Maybe Marcin (or was it Marcel?) can explain it? -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
