Re: debiandoc-sgml issues (html being lynx/links unfriendly)
Hi, Well, I put the urgency to 'high' with a note in the changelog about the how and why. So, I do guess this will make it into woody. Thanks, Ardo On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 01:51:03PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Ardo, do you know if that's likely to make it into woody? I would > assume not Anyhow, good to know, I can disable the workarounds in > the developers-reference Makefiles... > > -- > ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/> > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debiandoc-sgml issues (html being lynx/links unfriendly)
Josip Rodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 07:40:19PM -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: > > [debiandoc-sgml] now builds PDF and PS output in a bi-stable loop > > (so various Makefiles can now be cleaned up and bug #134701 is closed). > > I've no idea about code or what you mean by "bi-stable", so excuse me if I'm > asking a completely clueless question. Adam Di Carlo told me that the > debiandoc2latex* scripts used to run LaTeX a fixed number of times and that > that was the reason why he did all those ugly things in his makefiles. > > This is the problem that is now fixed? Yep. Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij home email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] home page: http://people.debian.org/~ardo GnuPG fp: 3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73 7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debiandoc-sgml issues (html being lynx/links unfriendly)
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 07:40:19PM -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: > [debiandoc-sgml] now builds PDF and PS output in a bi-stable loop > (so various Makefiles can now be cleaned up and bug #134701 is closed). I've no idea about code or what you mean by "bi-stable", so excuse me if I'm asking a completely clueless question. Adam Di Carlo told me that the debiandoc2latex* scripts used to run LaTeX a fixed number of times and that that was the reason why he did all those ugly things in his makefiles. This is the problem that is now fixed? -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debiandoc-sgml issues (html being lynx/links unfriendly)
Hi, I just uploaded a new version of debiandoc-sgml which has its urgency set to high to speed up things. It now builds PDF and PS output in a bi-stable loop (so various Makefiles can now be cleaned up and bug #134701 is closed). Thanks, Ardo Josip Rodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 10:59:07PM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > Some coordinated rebuild activity may be a good idea for document created > > with known problematic version (1.1.59). > > So far I've only heard about the broken installation documentation in > disks-* directory of the FTP archive, and seen it in the Policy (3.5.6.1). > > The former requires either a boot-floppies rebuild, which would be yucky, > or someone to run 'make docs' and send the new stuff to the FTP admins. > > The latter requires a debian-policy upload, which shouldn't be much of a > problem since it doesn't change the manual text... Cc:ed -policy so Julian > or Manoj are aware. > > -- > 2. That which causes joy or happiness. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Ardo van Rangelrooij home email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] home page: http://people.debian.org/~ardo GnuPG fp: 3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73 7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debiandoc-sgml issues (html being lynx/links unfriendly)
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 10:59:07PM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Some coordinated rebuild activity may be a good idea for document created > with known problematic version (1.1.59). So far I've only heard about the broken installation documentation in disks-* directory of the FTP archive, and seen it in the Policy (3.5.6.1). The former requires either a boot-floppies rebuild, which would be yucky, or someone to run 'make docs' and send the new stuff to the FTP admins. The latter requires a debian-policy upload, which shouldn't be much of a problem since it doesn't change the manual text... Cc:ed -policy so Julian or Manoj are aware. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debiandoc-sgml issues (html being lynx/links unfriendly)
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit: > Since there seems to be another new debiandoc-sgml coming, it may take > few more days before new unstable version (1.1.66?) appears into testing. > > Some coordinated rebuild activity may be a good idea for document created > with known problematic version (1.1.59). It might be nice if you could just mass-NMU (maybe to DELAYED/1-day) with Build-Depends updated. Coordination is pretty difficult. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4 Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
debiandoc-sgml issues (html being lynx/links unfriendly)
Hi folks, debiandoc-sgml in testing (1.1.59) is known to be very unfriendly to the current links/lynx. Though the maintainer (Ardo) and I think this is browser issue, we think it is practical to fix debiandoc-sgml and build pages with new version. And that is what is happening in unstable but has not propagated yet to testing :( (Bug #140677, #138240 and #138241: Thanks Ardo) Since there seems to be another new debiandoc-sgml coming, it may take few more days before new unstable version (1.1.66?) appears into testing. Some coordinated rebuild activity may be a good idea for document created with known problematic version (1.1.59). Sincerely Osamu -- ~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ + Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GnuPG-key: 1024D/D5DE453D . See "User's Guide": http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/users-guide/ See "Debian reference": http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ . "Debian reference" Project at: http://qref.sf.net . I welcome your constructive criticisms and corrections. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
