new libc6

2002-01-26 Thread John H. Robinson, IV

ome congratulations may be in order, i am not sure

i updated sid again this afternoon (around midnight GMT), and rebuilt
the bootfloppies. it failed:

I: single locale mode forced for flavor '', no FB console support
I: ld.so on this architecture is ld-linux.so.2
E: expected to find /lib/libc-2.2.4.so; upgrade local libc to 2.2.4
E: ./rootdisk.sh abort
make[1]: *** [root.bin] Error 255
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/boot-floppies/woody/boot-floppies'
make: *** [build] Error 2
zsh: exit 2 make

due to the new libc6 (2.2.5-1). the congratulations that may be in order
is the ``b-f no longer builds against sid'' of course, i may be totaly
out to lunch on that one.

my question: are we supposed to build against libc-2.2.4 or -2.2.5?
changelog indicates that -2.2.5 fixes the glob problem, so i guess that
answers my question.

i'd fix the sources, but it is _way_ past my bedtime ATM (past midnight
local time :)

-john


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: new libc6

2002-01-26 Thread Chris Tillman

On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 12:33:34AM -0800, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
 ome congratulations may be in order, i am not sure
 
 i updated sid again this afternoon (around midnight GMT), and rebuilt
 the bootfloppies. it failed:
 
 I: single locale mode forced for flavor '', no FB console support
 I: ld.so on this architecture is ld-linux.so.2
 E: expected to find /lib/libc-2.2.4.so; upgrade local libc to 2.2.4
 E: ./rootdisk.sh abort
 make[1]: *** [root.bin] Error 255
 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/boot-floppies/woody/boot-floppies'
 make: *** [build] Error 2
 zsh: exit 2 make
 
 due to the new libc6 (2.2.5-1). the congratulations that may be in order
 is the ``b-f no longer builds against sid'' of course, i may be totaly
 out to lunch on that one.
 
 my question: are we supposed to build against libc-2.2.4 or -2.2.5?
 changelog indicates that -2.2.5 fixes the glob problem, so i guess that
 answers my question.
 
 i'd fix the sources, but it is _way_ past my bedtime ATM (past midnight
 local time :)
 
 -john

AFAIK, our goal is to build it against woody, not sid. There's no
reason to build against sid, boot-floppies dies with woody. It still
needs a few packages from unstable, that's taken into account with
make check.

-- 
*--v- Installing Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 v--*
|  http://www.debian.org/releases/woody/installmanual  |
|   debian-imac (potato): http://debian-imac.sourceforge.net   |
|Chris Tillman[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
|   May the Source be with you   |
**


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: new libc6

2002-01-26 Thread Marcin Owsiany

On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 11:54:38AM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
 AFAIK, our goal is to build it against woody, not sid. There's no
 reason to build against sid, boot-floppies dies with woody.

That is true, but libc 2.2.5 will get into woody someday, no?

Marcin
-- 
Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://marcin.owsiany.pl/
GnuPG: 1024D/60F41216  FE67 DA2D 0ACA FC5E 3F75  D6F6 3A0D 8AA0 60F4 1216


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: new libc6

2002-01-26 Thread Jordi Mallach

On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 08:44:00PM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
  AFAIK, our goal is to build it against woody, not sid. There's no
  reason to build against sid, boot-floppies dies with woody.
 That is true, but libc 2.2.5 will get into woody someday, no?

Yeah, it needs to get in...

-- 
Jordi Mallach PĂ©rez || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Rediscovering Freedom,
   aka Oskuro in|| [EMAIL PROTECTED]  || Using Debian GNU/Linux
 Reinos de Leyenda  || [EMAIL PROTECTED]  || http://debian.org

http://sindominio.net  GnuPG public information:  pub  1024D/917A225E 
telnet pusa.uv.es 23   73ED 4244 FD43 5886 20AC  2644 2584 94BA 917A 225E



msg15130/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature