Re: Upcoming Squeeze point release 6.0.2
[I'm not subscribed to -bsd; please Cc me on any replies originating
from there, if relevant]
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 12:55 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 00:09 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
the second Squeeze point release (6.0.2) is now scheduled for
Saturday, June 25th.
The archive side of the point release has now finished. The next
scheduled archive update begins in a couple of hours time, after which
updated packages will start appearing on mirrors.
Unfortunately, during the generation of the CD images, a problem was
discovered which meant that the kfreebsd-{amd64,i386} Packages file
contained the wrong information for a particular package.
That issue has been corrected, and the point release is being
re-published this morning as 6.0.2.1. There are no changes in package
content; the only difference from the original 6.0.2 (aside from
versioning in Release files, etc.) is the fix to the Packages files.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1309083451.2622.46.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Upcoming Squeeze point release 6.0.2
Hi Adam, Adam D. Barratt wrote: That issue has been corrected, and the point release is being re-published this morning as 6.0.2.1. There are no changes in package content; the only difference from the original 6.0.2 (aside from versioning in Release files, etc.) is the fix to the Packages files. Then, shouldn't that be 6.0.2a just like which occurred previously to result in 6.0.1a to replace 6.0.1 -- Kind Regards AndrewM Andrew McGlashan Broadband Solutions now including VoIP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e0734db.1050...@affinityvision.com.au
Re: Upcoming Squeeze point release 6.0.2
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 23:32 +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote: Adam D. Barratt wrote: That issue has been corrected, and the point release is being re-published this morning as 6.0.2.1. There are no changes in package content; the only difference from the original 6.0.2 (aside from versioning in Release files, etc.) is the fix to the Packages files. Then, shouldn't that be 6.0.2a just like which occurred previously to result in 6.0.1a to replace 6.0.1 The a suffix has previously been used to indicate CD-only rebuilds - i.e. where no changes were made on the archive side (with one exception during etch's stable lifetime). As this involved a change to the archive (albeit a minor one) we decided to use a version which distinguished it from a CD-only change. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1309099577.2622.53.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#594183: marked as done (can't build kernel modules)
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:03:03 +
with message-id e1qarnb-0002oh...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#594183: fixed in freebsd-buildutils 8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #594183,
regarding can't build kernel modules
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
594183: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594183
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: freebsd-buildutils
Version: 8.1-1
Severity: normal
Hi there
I was trying to build cuse4bsd and freebsd-make gives this critical error:
cd: 1: can't cd to /usr/src/sys/x86_64/include
Kernel sources are in /usr/src/sys, but freebsd-make is looking at the wrong
directory. the directory for amd64 headers is /usr/src/sys/amd64/include. I had
a look at the included makefiles, and it seems the problem originates with
${MACHINE} variable which is x86_64 instead of amd64.
cuse4bsd has other problems, which I'm workng on, but you can reproduce this
with attached makefile.
Cheers
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: kFreeBSD 8.1-1-amd64
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages freebsd-buildutils depends on:
ii bsdmainutils8.0.13 collection of more utilities from
ii libbsd0 0.2.0-1 utility functions from BSD systems
ii libc0.1 2.11.2-2 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii make3.81-8 An utility for Directing compilati
ii original-awk2010-05-23-1 The original awk described in The
ii patchutils 0.3.1-2 Utilities to work with patches
ii unzip 6.0-4De-archiver for .zip files
freebsd-buildutils recommends no packages.
freebsd-buildutils suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
SRCS=test.c
..include bsd.kmod.mk
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: freebsd-buildutils
Source-Version: 8.2-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
freebsd-buildutils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.debian.tar.gz
to main/f/freebsd-buildutils/freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.debian.tar.gz
freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.dsc
to main/f/freebsd-buildutils/freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.dsc
freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
to main/f/freebsd-buildutils/freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 594...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Robert Millan r...@debian.org (supplier of updated freebsd-buildutils package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 17:47:37 +0200
Source: freebsd-buildutils
Binary: freebsd-buildutils
Architecture: source kfreebsd-amd64
Version: 8.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Robert Millan r...@debian.org
Description:
freebsd-buildutils - Utilities for building FreeBSD sources
Closes: 594183 625261
Changes:
freebsd-buildutils (8.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* 18_fix_sysdir.diff: Fix SYSDIR path to make kernel modules buildable.
(Closes: #594183).
* Switch to use the libbsd-overlay:
- Bump libbsd-dev Build-Depends to (= 0.3.0).
- Add pkg-config to Build-Depends.
- Remove some now obsolete porting code.
* Disable FreeBSD/pc98 pre-7.0 compatibility on non-FreeBSD (fixes FTBFS on
hurd-i386).
* 19_fix_cmd_pathnames.diff: Fix pathnames for a number of commands.
(Closes: #625261)
* Add myself to Uploaders.
Checksums-Sha1:
e3229466ed37121ff0fcd9950b7ae5c654442736 1374 freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.dsc
0476ea4fd3c543834cc2ef17af29d1333d61d520 28948
freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.debian.tar.gz
1cb9a8fcf893bd179f790d4e61055eefd0f67273 498418
freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
4c7c032761b75004b3eb169ffde8794badc722886bb4407b18c35c3a47bd673e 1374
freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.dsc
Bug#625261: marked as done (buildutils are shipped with unusable paths for kfreebsd)
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:03:03 + with message-id e1qarnb-0002on...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#625261: fixed in freebsd-buildutils 8.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #625261, regarding buildutils are shipped with unusable paths for kfreebsd to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 625261: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625261 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: freebsd-buildutils Version: 8.1-1 Severity: normal The FreeBSD -buildutils are shipped with upstream defaults for common BSD commands. As we use a GNU user land paths are slighty different, thus using a (BSD style) Makefile including paths from /usr/share/Mk/bsd.commands.mk will fail since some helper utilities are not found where expected, e.g.: UNAME?= /usr/bin/uname should be /bin/uname, GMAKE?= gmake maybe make (as we use GNU make anyway) and so on. Information: Debian Release: 6.0.1 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: kFreeBSD 8.1-1-amd64 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages freebsd-buildutils depends on: ii bsdmainutils8.0.13 collection of more utilities from ii libbsd0 0.2.0-1 utility functions from BSD systems ii libc0.1 2.11.2-10Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii make3.81-8 An utility for Directing compilati ii original-awk2010-05-23-1 The original awk described in The ii patchutils 0.3.1-2 Utilities to work with patches ii unzip 6.0-4De-archiver for .zip files freebsd-buildutils recommends no packages. freebsd-buildutils suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: freebsd-buildutils Source-Version: 8.2-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of freebsd-buildutils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.debian.tar.gz to main/f/freebsd-buildutils/freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.debian.tar.gz freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.dsc to main/f/freebsd-buildutils/freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.dsc freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-buildutils/freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 625...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Robert Millan r...@debian.org (supplier of updated freebsd-buildutils package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 17:47:37 +0200 Source: freebsd-buildutils Binary: freebsd-buildutils Architecture: source kfreebsd-amd64 Version: 8.2-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Robert Millan r...@debian.org Description: freebsd-buildutils - Utilities for building FreeBSD sources Closes: 594183 625261 Changes: freebsd-buildutils (8.2-2) unstable; urgency=low . * 18_fix_sysdir.diff: Fix SYSDIR path to make kernel modules buildable. (Closes: #594183). * Switch to use the libbsd-overlay: - Bump libbsd-dev Build-Depends to (= 0.3.0). - Add pkg-config to Build-Depends. - Remove some now obsolete porting code. * Disable FreeBSD/pc98 pre-7.0 compatibility on non-FreeBSD (fixes FTBFS on hurd-i386). * 19_fix_cmd_pathnames.diff: Fix pathnames for a number of commands. (Closes: #625261) * Add myself to Uploaders. Checksums-Sha1: e3229466ed37121ff0fcd9950b7ae5c654442736 1374 freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.dsc 0476ea4fd3c543834cc2ef17af29d1333d61d520 28948 freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.debian.tar.gz 1cb9a8fcf893bd179f790d4e61055eefd0f67273 498418 freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 4c7c032761b75004b3eb169ffde8794badc722886bb4407b18c35c3a47bd673e 1374 freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.dsc a9638f89600267149bc4fcb86ee992fd6a6c949fe717d97779abd500d47ee7ca 28948
Processing of freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.dsc freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.debian.tar.gz freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qarch-sg...@franck.debian.org
freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.debian.tar.gz to main/f/freebsd-buildutils/freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.debian.tar.gz freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.dsc to main/f/freebsd-buildutils/freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.dsc freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-buildutils/freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb Override entries for your package: freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.dsc - source devel freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - extra devel Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 594183 625261 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qarnb-0002ob...@franck.debian.org
Processing of freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2.dsc freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2.debian.tar.gz libsbuf0_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libsbuf0-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb libsbuf-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libcam0_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libcam-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libgeom1_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libgeom-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libgeom1-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb libusbhid4_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libusbhid-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libusb2_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libusb2-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libusb2-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb libkvm0_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libkvm-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libdevstat7_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libdevstat-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libmemstat3_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libmemstat-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libnetgraph4_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libnetgraph-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libipx2_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libipx-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libipx2-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb libkiconv4_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libkiconv-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libjail1_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libjail-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libusbhid-common_8.2+ds1-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qarw6-0002xe...@franck.debian.org
freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes REJECTED
Reject Reasons: md5sum for /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/ftp/pool/main/f/freebsd-libs/freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1.orig.tar.gz doesn't match freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2.dsc. size for /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/ftp/pool/main/f/freebsd-libs/freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1.orig.tar.gz doesn't match freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2.dsc. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qas1q-0003b9...@franck.debian.org
Bug#631544: marked as done (libusb2-dev: libusb.h not useable (?))
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:47:33 +
with message-id e1qasuf-0005ef...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#631544: fixed in freebsd-libs 8.2+ds1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #631544,
regarding libusb2-dev: libusb.h not useable (?)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
631544: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631544
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: libusb2-dev
Version: 8.2+ds1-1
Severity: serious
Building the following:
===
#include stdint.h
#include libusb.h
int main()
{
}
===
Results in the following error message:
/usr/include/libusb.h:223:30: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or
'__attribute__' before '__aligned'
/usr/include/libusb.h:238:31: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or
'__attribute__' before '__aligned'
/usr/include/libusb.h:243:20: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or
'__attribute__' before '__aligned'
/usr/include/libusb.h:257:28: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or
'__attribute__' before '__aligned'
/usr/include/libusb.h:273:32: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or
'__attribute__' before '__aligned'
/usr/include/libusb.h:292:19: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or
'__attribute__' before '__aligned'
This currently breaks pcsc-lite build
Regards
Christoph
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: kFreeBSD 8.2-1-amd64
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages libusb2-dev depends on:
ii libbsd-dev0.3.0-1utility functions from BSD systems
ii libc0.1-dev [libc-dev]2.13-7 Embedded GNU C Library: Developmen
ii libusb2 8.2+ds1-1 FreeBSD userspace USB programming
libusb2-dev recommends no packages.
libusb2-dev suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: freebsd-libs
Source-Version: 8.2+ds1-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
freebsd-libs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2.debian.tar.gz
to main/f/freebsd-libs/freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2.debian.tar.gz
freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2.dsc
to main/f/freebsd-libs/freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2.dsc
libcam-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
to main/f/freebsd-libs/libcam-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libcam0_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
to main/f/freebsd-libs/libcam0_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libdevstat-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
to main/f/freebsd-libs/libdevstat-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libdevstat7_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
to main/f/freebsd-libs/libdevstat7_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libgeom-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
to main/f/freebsd-libs/libgeom-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libgeom1-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb
to main/f/freebsd-libs/libgeom1-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb
libgeom1_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
to main/f/freebsd-libs/libgeom1_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libipx-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
to main/f/freebsd-libs/libipx-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libipx2-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb
to main/f/freebsd-libs/libipx2-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb
libipx2_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
to main/f/freebsd-libs/libipx2_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libjail-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
to main/f/freebsd-libs/libjail-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libjail1_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
to main/f/freebsd-libs/libjail1_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libkiconv-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
to main/f/freebsd-libs/libkiconv-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libkiconv4_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
to main/f/freebsd-libs/libkiconv4_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libkvm-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
to main/f/freebsd-libs/libkvm-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libkvm0_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
to main/f/freebsd-libs/libkvm0_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libmemstat-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
to main/f/freebsd-libs/libmemstat-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libmemstat3_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
to main/f/freebsd-libs/libmemstat3_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libnetgraph-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
to main/f/freebsd-libs/libnetgraph-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libnetgraph4_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
to main/f/freebsd-libs/libnetgraph4_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
Processing of freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2.dsc freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2.debian.tar.gz libsbuf0_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libsbuf0-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb libsbuf-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libcam0_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libcam-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libgeom1_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libgeom-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libgeom1-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb libusbhid4_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libusbhid-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libusb2_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libusb2-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libusb2-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb libkvm0_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libkvm-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libdevstat7_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libdevstat-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libmemstat3_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libmemstat-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libnetgraph4_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libnetgraph-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libipx2_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libipx-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libipx2-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb libkiconv4_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libkiconv-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libjail1_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libjail-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libusbhid-common_8.2+ds1-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qaskp-0004ev...@franck.debian.org
freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2.debian.tar.gz to main/f/freebsd-libs/freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2.debian.tar.gz freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2.dsc to main/f/freebsd-libs/freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2.dsc libcam-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libcam-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libcam0_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libcam0_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libdevstat-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libdevstat-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libdevstat7_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libdevstat7_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libgeom-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libgeom-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libgeom1-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libgeom1-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb libgeom1_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libgeom1_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libipx-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libipx-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libipx2-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libipx2-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb libipx2_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libipx2_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libjail-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libjail-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libjail1_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libjail1_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libkiconv-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libkiconv-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libkiconv4_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libkiconv4_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libkvm-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libkvm-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libkvm0_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libkvm0_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libmemstat-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libmemstat-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libmemstat3_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libmemstat3_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libnetgraph-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libnetgraph-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libnetgraph4_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libnetgraph4_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libsbuf-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libsbuf-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libsbuf0-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libsbuf0-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb libsbuf0_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libsbuf0_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libusb2-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libusb2-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libusb2-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libusb2-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb libusb2_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libusb2_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libusbhid-common_8.2+ds1-2_all.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libusbhid-common_8.2+ds1-2_all.deb libusbhid-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libusbhid-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libusbhid4_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libusbhid4_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb Override entries for your package: freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2.dsc - source libs libcam-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libdevel libcam0_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libs libdevstat-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libdevel libdevstat7_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libs libgeom-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libdevel libgeom1-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb - optional debian-installer libgeom1_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libs libipx-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libdevel libipx2-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb - optional debian-installer libipx2_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libs libjail-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libdevel libjail1_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libs libkiconv-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libdevel libkiconv4_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libs libkvm-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libdevel libkvm0_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libs libmemstat-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libdevel libmemstat3_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libs libnetgraph-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libdevel libnetgraph4_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libs libsbuf-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libdevel libsbuf0-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb - optional debian-installer libsbuf0_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libs libusb2-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libdevel libusb2-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb - optional debian-installer libusb2_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libs libusbhid-common_8.2+ds1-2_all.deb - optional libs
Bug#631754: mountfrom=ufs:/dev/ufsid/... can timeout with USB flash drives
Package: kfreebsd-image-8.1-1-686 Version: 8.1+dfsg-8 Severity: normal The photos at http://iki.fi/lindi/kfreebsd/ufsid-boot-trouble/ have been captured from the display of my aspire one laptop that boots debian kfreebsd-i386 squeeze from a USB flash drive. As you can see, the kernel does not wait long enough for the USB flash drive. It prints ROOT MOUNT ERROR and drops me to mountroot prompt. If I enter a wrong device (one that contains ext2) three times then the List of GEOM managed disk devices: suddenly changes and includes the real rootfs ufsid/4cc08aab6455cf88. If I then type this long string with the keyboard the boot continues normally. Is there a parameter like rootwait=N in Linux? I'm ok with slow bootup but I'm not ok with unreliable bootup :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/84mxh45ppj@sauna.l.org
Bug#631754: mountfrom=ufs:/dev/ufsid/... can timeout with USB flash drives
2011/6/26 Timo Juhani Lindfors timo.lindf...@iki.fi: Is there a parameter like rootwait=N in Linux? I'm ok with slow bootup but I'm not ok with unreliable bootup :-) Not exactly the same but, check if this helps: set kFreeBSD.kern.cam.scsi_delay=15000 -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktimez0z8tponesdbknknfnk_gyn...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#631754: mountfrom=ufs:/dev/ufsid/... can timeout with USB flash drives
2011/6/26 Robert Millan r...@debian.org: 2011/6/26 Timo Juhani Lindfors timo.lindf...@iki.fi: Is there a parameter like rootwait=N in Linux? I'm ok with slow bootup but I'm not ok with unreliable bootup :-) Not exactly the same but, check if this helps: set kFreeBSD.kern.cam.scsi_delay=15000 Btw in case this works, please try also if 5000 would be enough. We decrease the default from 5 s to 2 s, perhaps this should be reconsidered untill a synchronous solution is found: ./999_config.diff:-options SCSI_DELAY=5000 # Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI ./999_config.diff:+options SCSI_DELAY=2000 # Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTi=U=pmyjrpkcmc_iczm9nfgj9r...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#631754: mountfrom=ufs:/dev/ufsid/... can timeout with USB flash drives
Robert Millan r...@debian.org writes: set kFreeBSD.kern.cam.scsi_delay=15000 Unfortunately this does not seem to help. I tried also 3 but it clearly does not wait. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/84sjqw48ap@sauna.l.org
Bug#631754: mountfrom=ufs:/dev/ufsid/... can timeout with USB flash drives
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: Robert Millan r...@debian.org writes: set kFreeBSD.kern.cam.scsi_delay=15000 Unfortunately this does not seem to help. I tried also 3 but it clearly does not wait. Where/how are you setting the value? My understanding is that if that new value is read, the kernel should force a delay of that long on the entire boot process, which cannot be skipped prematurely. -Ben Kaduk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.gso.1.10.1106261704200.6...@multics.mit.edu
Bug#631754: mountfrom=ufs:/dev/ufsid/... can timeout with USB flash drives
Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu writes: Where/how are you setting the value? I hit e in grub to get the menu entries. Then I added it as a new line. My understanding is that if that new value is read, the kernel should force a delay of that long on the entire boot process, which cannot be skipped prematurely. When exactly should it do this delay? Is it handling USB events during that time? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/84oc1k4793@sauna.l.org
Bug#631754: mountfrom=ufs:/dev/ufsid/... can timeout with USB flash drives
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu writes: Where/how are you setting the value? I hit e in grub to get the menu entries. Then I added it as a new line. Hmm, I am not very familiar with the kFreeBSD boot process, but this value is normally set in the FreeBSD loader; on stock FreeBSD it would be in /boot/loader.conf . My understanding is that if that new value is read, the kernel should force a delay of that long on the entire boot process, which cannot be skipped prematurely. When exactly should it do this delay? Is it handling USB events during that time? It should delay during the device probe stage of the boot process (though I don't remember exactly where). Sorry I don't have all the details relevant here; hopefully someone else on debian-bsd will chime in. -Ben Kaduk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.gso.1.10.1106261729120.6...@multics.mit.edu
Bug#609757: libmd in freebsd-libs?
Hi! On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 17:03:20 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: I noticed libmd has its own directory in SVN. Is there any reason for not merging it in freebsd-libs? If it's because of Architecture: any setting, note that freebsd-libs already includes portable libraries (like libsbuf). Few reasons, one has been because libmd is more generic than something like libsbuf and it's prone to be used more widely than anything in freebsd-libs, so it might make sense to promote it to standard or higher for example. The other reason is that the licenses in the FreeBSD tree are a bit unfortunate so my plan is to use the OpenBSD implementation instead. Just have to commit my latest changes. regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110626220251.gb29...@gaara.hadrons.org
Bug#630911: please provide link_ntoa()
On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 19:10:46 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Package: libbsd-dev Version: 0.2.0-1 Severity: wishlist Please provide link_ntoa() so that it can be removed from [freebsd-utils]/debian/patches/030_arp_libbsd.diff Implementation from FreeBSD is available in: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/lib/libc/net/linkaddr.c?revision=165903view=markup The problem with link_ntoa() is that it relies on the BSD specific ‘struct sockaddr_dl’ which for example does not match any Linux sockaddr structure, the closes one is sockaddr_ll, but not quite the same, also no standard function returns such type, so the code has to be ported anyway. As such I don't think libbsd is the correct place for that function. regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110626221621.gc29...@gaara.hadrons.org
Bug#609757: libmd in freebsd-libs?
2011/6/27 Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org: The other reason is that the licenses in the FreeBSD tree are a bit unfortunate so my plan is to use the OpenBSD implementation instead. Are you sure there the OpenBSD version will work for FreeBSD userland? The reporter of this bug mentioned geom. Other possibly interesting candidates are: libzpool, libzfs: -lmd introduced in 9-CURRENT. mtree: We disabled crypto functionality in 03_glibc.diff. authpf, pfctl: We removed -lmd in 013_pf.diff. Apparently it was a gratuitous dependency (?). ppp: We don't currently build it (needs porting?). -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktimryum4psj0i6w5_8k8vzkrwga...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bug#630911: please provide link_ntoa()
2011/6/27 Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org: The problem with link_ntoa() is that it relies on the BSD specific ‘struct sockaddr_dl’ which for example does not match any Linux sockaddr structure, the closes one is sockaddr_ll, but not quite the same, also no standard function returns such type, so the code has to be ported anyway. As such I don't think libbsd is the correct place for that function. Should we reassign to libc0.1-dev then? -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTikDjM+�weksz9ysr+0vyn-6z...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#631754: mountfrom=ufs:/dev/ufsid/... can timeout with USB flash drives
2011/6/26 Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu: I hit e in grub to get the menu entries. Then I added it as a new line. Hmm, I am not very familiar with the kFreeBSD boot process, but this value is normally set in the FreeBSD loader; on stock FreeBSD it would be in /boot/loader.conf . When using GRUB this value is set through a different UI, but it should be equivalent. Maybe there's a bug in GRUB that breaks parameter passing, or maybe kFreeBSD doesn't allow this variable to be overriden? -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktimgtffu6n1dta-4hrdjkopch7u...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bug#630911: please provide link_ntoa()
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 00:27:12 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/6/27 Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org: The problem with link_ntoa() is that it relies on the BSD specific ‘struct sockaddr_dl’ which for example does not match any Linux sockaddr structure, the closes one is sockaddr_ll, but not quite the same, also no standard function returns such type, so the code has to be ported anyway. As such I don't think libbsd is the correct place for that function. Should we reassign to libc0.1-dev then? We used to have this in libfreebsd, and given the recent discussion about adding new functions to (e)glibc, I don't really know where we should put this, but the same answer should apply as for the other (Free)BSD specific functions. regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110626232103.gb30...@gaara.hadrons.org
Re: Bug#630911: please provide link_ntoa()
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 01:21:03AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 00:27:12 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/6/27 Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org: The problem with link_ntoa() is that it relies on the BSD specific ‘struct sockaddr_dl’ which for example does not match any Linux sockaddr structure, the closes one is sockaddr_ll, but not quite the same, also no standard function returns such type, so the code has to be ported anyway. As such I don't think libbsd is the correct place for that function. Should we reassign to libc0.1-dev then? We used to have this in libfreebsd, and given the recent discussion about adding new functions to (e)glibc, I don't really know where we should put this, but the same answer should apply as for the other (Free)BSD specific functions. And if you look at the history, link_ntoa() was in libfreebsd, and given freebsd-utils was the only user it has been moved to [freebsd-utils]/debian/patches/030_arp_libbsd.diff Is there a reason why we want it to be implemented in a library? Are there other users? -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110627053022.gb11...@hall.aurel32.net
Processed: block
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 492889 by 609757 Bug #492889 [freebsd-utils] freebsd-utils does not contain geli Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 492889: 609757 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 492889: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=492889 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130915415812197.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
