Re: Edit /boot/loader.conf
2011/10/3 David Watson : > I found a section in the FreeBSD handbook about installing FreeBSD as a vm > guest, and it mentioned about editing /boot/loader.conf to include the line > "kern.hz=100". (This was also mentioned in the other thread as a possible > solution.) The only problem is that I checked and there is no loader.conf > file in /boot! So should I create one? Or can I edit grub's config file? You can add "set kFreeBSD.kern.hz=100" to /etc/grub.d/40_custom, then run update-grub to propagate this. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxmuwc-t9pa2phhkazcum3lrmtx54ftxyuckasvprdz...@mail.gmail.com
Edit /boot/loader.conf
In Debian GNU/kFreeBSD, is there an equivalent to /boot/loader.conf? Or can I edit grub's config file to pass kernel parameters? I was finally able to install kFreeBSD, but I'm having the same problem as I mentioned in a previous thread - the vm is using up a lot of cpu even when the os is idle (host and guest). I found a section in the FreeBSD handbook about installing FreeBSD as a vm guest, and it mentioned about editing /boot/loader.conf to include the line "kern.hz=100". (This was also mentioned in the other thread as a possible solution.) The only problem is that I checked and there is no loader.conf file in /boot! So should I create one? Or can I edit grub's config file? Thanks. David e: hiranwat...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/699695650-1317610088-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-788341633-@b26.c28.bise6.blackberry
-bsd@ folks: tar patch anyone?
user 639178 debian-bsd@lists.debian.org usertag 639178 +kfreebsd kthxbye > On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:03:04 +0200 (CEST), Petr Salinger > wrote: > > just to make it clear. > > The tar works as expected, it just emits extra warning. > > Maybe a patch to this test that would allow it to succeed in the > presence of the "extra warning" makes sense for now? I would accept > such a patch if someone wants to figure it out. > > Bdale Hi -bsd@ Anyone up for writing a patch here? Unfortunately don't have that time myself right now. Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8739fbp0m2@hepworth.siccegge.de
Bug#641167: base: Any call to mount returns /dev/ : No such device (fwd)
[Oops, I sent this to the wrong bug address. Resending to the correct one, for the record.] Hi John-Charles, I'm reassigning this bug to kfreebsd-8 on the basis that that's where the following similar bug report was filed: http://bugs.debian.org/593733 I don't think it's the same bug, though. But hopefully this should get it visible by a kFreeBSD user or developer, who can reassign it elsewhere (the mount command, perhaps?) if this is incorrect. -- Geoffrey Thomas http://ldpreload.com geo...@ldpreload.com On Sat, 10 Sep 2011, John-Charles D. Sokolow wrote: Package: base Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? While attempting to mount a second hard disk which contains some data I recieved "No such device" error. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? I confirmed both that the device exists and had not been acidently erased through installing gparted I confirmed that the device /dev/ad1s2 was present on the disk and valid. I called the stat command stat /dev/ad1s2 to validate that the device file existed. stat printed out valid information about the file. I attempted to validate that I had permission to mount. both using sudo, and running mount as root after using su root. * What was the outcome of this action? There was no specific outcome of this action. The problem persists the only file system that was able to be mounted was root. No other file system can be mounted on the system anywhere my any user with any level of permission. * What outcome did you expect instead? To successfully mount the file system on my second partition. Further notes. I have not changed this file system during the os install it is on a seperate hard disk. Not that the disk also as a fat file system, and a btrfs file system on it. Neither were able to mount either. Furthermore, the file system I was attempting to mount is an active root partition for a debian instance which can successfully boot if I rebot the system. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: kFreeBSD 8.2-1-amd64 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.00.1110021537040.4...@mega-man.mit.edu
Processed: Re: Processed: Re: base: Any call to mount returns /dev/ : No such device
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 641667 e2fslibs
Bug #641667 {Done: ty...@mit.edu (Theodore Y. Ts'o)} [kfreebsd-8]
/lib/libe2p.so.2: [patch] e2fsprogs/libe2p: tune2fs never recognizes MNTOPT_*
mount options
Bug reassigned from package 'kfreebsd-8' to 'e2fslibs'.
> found 641667 e2fsprogs/1.41.12-4stable1
Bug #641667 {Done: ty...@mit.edu (Theodore Y. Ts'o)} [e2fslibs]
/lib/libe2p.so.2: [patch] e2fsprogs/libe2p: tune2fs never recognizes MNTOPT_*
mount options
Bug Marked as found in versions e2fsprogs/1.41.12-4stable1 and reopened.
> fixed 641667 e2fsprogs/1.42~WIP-2011-09-16-1
Bug #641667 [e2fslibs] /lib/libe2p.so.2: [patch] e2fsprogs/libe2p: tune2fs
never recognizes MNTOPT_* mount options
The source e2fsprogs and version 1.42~WIP-2011-09-16-1 do not appear to match
any binary packages
Bug Marked as fixed in versions e2fsprogs/1.42~WIP-2011-09-16-1.
> reassign 641167 kfreebsd-8
Bug #641167 [base] base: Any call to mount returns /dev/ : No such
device
Bug reassigned from package 'base' to 'kfreebsd-8'.
> severity 641167 normal
Bug #641167 [kfreebsd-8] base: Any call to mount returns /dev/ :
No such device
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
641167: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641167
641667: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641667
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131758409218301.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#641667: Processed: Re: base: Any call to mount returns /dev/ : No such device
reassign 641667 e2fslibs
found 641667 e2fsprogs/1.41.12-4stable1
fixed 641667 e2fsprogs/1.42~WIP-2011-09-16-1
reassign 641167 kfreebsd-8
severity 641167 normal
thanks
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011, Ted Ts'o wrote:
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 12:33:30PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 641667 kfreebsd-8
Bug #641667 {Done: ty...@mit.edu (Theodore Y. Ts'o)} [e2fslibs]
/lib/libe2p.so.2: [patch] e2fsprogs/libe2p: tune2fs never recognizes MNTOPT_*
mount options
Bug reassigned from package 'e2fslibs' to 'kfreebsd-8'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions e2fsprogs/1.41.12-4stable1.
Bug No longer marked as fixed in versions e2fsprogs/1.42~WIP-2011-09-16-1.
severity 641667 normal
Bug #641667 {Done: ty...@mit.edu (Theodore Y. Ts'o)} [kfreebsd-8]
/lib/libe2p.so.2: [patch] e2fsprogs/libe2p: tune2fs never recognizes MNTOPT_*
mount options
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 641667 to the same value.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Um you hit the wrong bug. The bug you wanted is:
#641167: base: Any call to mount returns /dev/ : No such device
641167, not 641667.
... oops, that'll teach me not to use the BTS right before falling
asleep. Sorry about the confusion, and hopefully I've put things back
together correctly now.
--
Geoffrey Thomas
http://ldpreload.com
geo...@ldpreload.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.00.1110021511280.4...@mega-man.mit.edu
Re: Processed: Re: base: Any call to mount returns /dev/ : No such device
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 12:33:30PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
> > reassign 641667 kfreebsd-8
> Bug #641667 {Done: ty...@mit.edu (Theodore Y. Ts'o)} [e2fslibs]
> /lib/libe2p.so.2: [patch] e2fsprogs/libe2p: tune2fs never recognizes MNTOPT_*
> mount options
> Bug reassigned from package 'e2fslibs' to 'kfreebsd-8'.
> Bug No longer marked as found in versions e2fsprogs/1.41.12-4stable1.
> Bug No longer marked as fixed in versions e2fsprogs/1.42~WIP-2011-09-16-1.
> > severity 641667 normal
> Bug #641667 {Done: ty...@mit.edu (Theodore Y. Ts'o)} [kfreebsd-8]
> /lib/libe2p.so.2: [patch] e2fsprogs/libe2p: tune2fs never recognizes MNTOPT_*
> mount options
> Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 641667 to the same value.
> > thanks
> Stopping processing here.
>
> Please contact me if you need assistance.
Um you hit the wrong bug. The bug you wanted is:
#641167: base: Any call to mount returns /dev/ : No such device
641167, not 641667.
Regards,
- Ted
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111002165240.ge2...@thunk.org
Re: Bug#644084: failed to initialize AP scan (kfreebsd/squeeze)
2011/10/2 Robert Millan : > wpasupplicant 0.6.10-2.1 failed to initialize AP scan on my Squeeze > Debian GNU/kFreeBSD system: Any suggestions on how to handle this? Unless someone has time to investigate, I think it'd be better to request removal of kfreebsd-* binaries in Squeeze and try to support those users by putting version 0.7.x in backports. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXP3Q3TkJ6=PR1WRrxv1y6atk-Np5axnb=es++czwjp...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#644084: failed to initialize AP scan (kfreebsd/squeeze)
Package: wpasupplicant Version: 0.6.10-2.1 Severity: grave User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd This problem is fixed in wpasupplicant 0.7.3-4 This problem is NOT the same as #634935 wpasupplicant 0.6.10-2.1 failed to initialize AP scan on my Squeeze Debian GNU/kFreeBSD system: $ sudo wpa_supplicant -i wlan0 -c wlan.conf ioctl[SIOCS80211, op 103, arg 0x0]: Invalid argument Failed to initiate AP scan. ioctl[SIOCS80211, op 103, arg 0x0]: Invalid argument Failed to initiate AP scan. [... repeatedly untill interrupted ] Notice that the ioctl error is also present in bug #634935. It is probably unrelated to this problem. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.2 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: kFreeBSD 8.1-1-amd64 Locale: LANG=ca_AD.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_AD.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages wpasupplicant depends on: ii adduser3.112+nmu2add and remove users and groups ii libbsd00.2.0-1 utility functions from BSD systems ii libc0.12.11.2-10 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libdbus-1-31.2.24-4+squeeze1 simple interprocess messaging syst ii libpcap0.8 1.1.1-2 system interface for user-level pa ii libpcsclite1 1.5.5-4+b1Middleware to access a smart card ii libreadline6 6.1-3 GNU readline and history libraries ii libssl0.9.80.9.8o-4squeeze2 SSL shared libraries ii lsb-base 3.2-23.2squeeze1 Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip wpasupplicant recommends no packages. Versions of packages wpasupplicant suggests: pn libengine-pkcs11-openssl (no description available) pn wpagui (no description available) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111002162837.90669.45092.reportbug@thorin
Re: Sharing ZFS pools
Wiadomość napisana przez Arno Töll w dniu 2 paź 2011, o godz. 11:58: > On 02.10.2011 10:38, akindo wrote: >> It seems that ZFS for kFreeBSD doesn't support the set sharenfs=on >> and set sharesmb=on commands. Does this mean I cannot share my ZFS >> pool to other networked machines in any way? This is my goal. > > Robert gave you a very good answer in the other thread, so just for the > sake of completeness: share=on does not work on kfreebsd but > it neither does on FreeBSD. Actually, sharenfs=on works perfectly well under FreeBSD. > Those are Solaris specific extensions. In Debian (or pure FreeBSD as > well), Samba, NFS and iSCSI aren't part of the core system and are not > configured that way. On pure FreeBSD, NFS client and server and iSCSI initiator _are_ part of the core system. -- If you cut off my head, what would I say? Me and my head, or me and my body? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ef78bd86-46f4-4e23-9a76-cf10fca8e...@freebsd.org
Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1
On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 14:37 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > 2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt : > > If there are changes which need propagating to the udebs > > Yes. The if_msk update is specially important for the installer. > > > If the aim is to do that for 6.0.3 then those uploads need to happen > > within the next day, or they'll miss the cut-off. > > I've uploaded a BinNMU for both packages. If I'd been sure that binNMUs would work then we could have scheduled them directly; the previous uploads have all been sourceful, so I assumed there was a reason for that. In any case, I've flagged the uploads for acceptance at the next dinstall. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1317561661.2999.77.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
congratulation for your hard work
hi Guys, Normally I'm not used to send emails to mailing lists like this, but now I have to:) Thanks for all your excellent work, tamas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e8852f5.8060...@rtfm.co.hu
Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1
2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt : > If there are changes which need propagating to the udebs Yes. The if_msk update is specially important for the installer. > If the aim is to do that for 6.0.3 then those uploads need to happen > within the next day, or they'll miss the cut-off. I've uploaded a BinNMU for both packages. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXPW77aouTqOvyC=vpfjhhvmvpg53+eg0npoioy6t4-...@mail.gmail.com
Processed: Re: base: Any call to mount returns /dev/ : No such device
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 641667 kfreebsd-8
Bug #641667 {Done: ty...@mit.edu (Theodore Y. Ts'o)} [e2fslibs]
/lib/libe2p.so.2: [patch] e2fsprogs/libe2p: tune2fs never recognizes MNTOPT_*
mount options
Bug reassigned from package 'e2fslibs' to 'kfreebsd-8'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions e2fsprogs/1.41.12-4stable1.
Bug No longer marked as fixed in versions e2fsprogs/1.42~WIP-2011-09-16-1.
> severity 641667 normal
Bug #641667 {Done: ty...@mit.edu (Theodore Y. Ts'o)} [kfreebsd-8]
/lib/libe2p.so.2: [patch] e2fsprogs/libe2p: tune2fs never recognizes MNTOPT_*
mount options
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 641667 to the same value.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
641667: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641667
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131755848024170.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Installing Grub on new squeeze vm failed
2011/10/2 David Watson : > But I couldn't manually boot into the system? I've never experienced grub > rescue mode, but apparently commands like "help", "boot", etc. all return > with the message "Unknown command"! I don't think that will work. Rescue mode is for debugging mostly. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxorgx1d3ev2efahi92ct5fj9nb9sexgbe8r2wuy1wq...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Installing Grub on new squeeze vm failed
But I couldn't manually boot into the system? I've never experienced grub rescue mode, but apparently commands like "help", "boot", etc. all return with the message "Unknown command"! My problems started when I tried 6.0.2.1 (both netinstall and cd1); I'm going to try with 6.0.0.0. --Original Message-- From: Robert Millan Sender: rmh.ayba...@gmail.com To: David H. Watson Cc: Mailing List - Debian GNU/*BSD Subject: Re: Installing Grub on new squeeze vm failed Sent: 2 Oct 2011 07:00 2011/10/2 David Watson : > That didn't work! I was able to finish the installation, but upon reboot, > grub reports "error: couldn't find boot", and has entered rescue mode. How > can I manually boot into my system? I can try installing grub again and > updating it. Yes, grub-install is what I'd try next. -- Robert Millan David e: hiranwat...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/947119096-1317553441-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-141581677-@b26.c28.bise6.blackberry
Re: Installing Grub on new squeeze vm failed
2011/10/2 David Watson : > That didn't work! I was able to finish the installation, but upon reboot, > grub reports "error: couldn't find boot", and has entered rescue mode. How > can I manually boot into my system? I can try installing grub again and > updating it. Yes, grub-install is what I'd try next. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXN6QUX6yC6WAC+N-2MQWziLQMX=zq=v+c-tasx7e7v...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Sharing ZFS pools
Thanks for your answers Robert and Arno, Good to know that NFS doesn't work that well, even though it is possible to use with ZFS. I didn't know about iSCSI, but after having read about it it seems like a good alternative, so I will try the istgt package. On Oct 2, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Arno Töll wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello, > > On 02.10.2011 10:38, akindo wrote: >> It seems that ZFS for kFreeBSD doesn't support the set sharenfs=on >> and set sharesmb=on commands. Does this mean I cannot share my ZFS >> pool to other networked machines in any way? This is my goal. > > Robert gave you a very good answer in the other thread, so just for the > sake of completeness: share=on does not work on kfreebsd but > it neither does on FreeBSD. > > Those are Solaris specific extensions. In Debian (or pure FreeBSD as > well), Samba, NFS and iSCSI aren't part of the core system and are not > configured that way. However you can still just configure each of those > protocols by using a traditional standalone daemon. Just install samba, > freebsd-nfs-server or istgt respectively. > > As Robert says, NFS does not really work too well for the time being. > That's a kfreebsd specific problem, indeed. > > - -- > with kind regards, > Arno Töll > IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC > GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOiDXLAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtmhEP/1uUUu06ZAjTV5hol0Tv+W+X > vKwBQc0YUxnbjEGwswrbd8mbjnGvD1XzEd3kIvhs/q88o1M0biGxPA9ZuHxhBhRK > A7lKYqaKsxMBbFi30gZ2qclWCJhvfhf3gWE2WJGf4qpVqtRzypAt0YUiggBVBd89 > 1WRPq/PyrGHjWn/I5u7/IycUe5dhITJq0W5CgzV8S99yiDKKVOmylqRuJDJUKN+2 > T9T+WHD3bfav3qJQMp7eB/GEMWkefBXtxgYqLFVd1EyZTMbHmoAeriW2t53YMK6P > SDRnKU0mJzr9mf9aEnj7Y3aTd9pRq1momPM6EW2J3MFWZv/YXx5RG7HVIiHdmULc > 3vPxXq1WMXRq4KaKOHGycoNwJzqth6EUfD9GaUPcqZrS7MF7fmyoWZkKDAFoibyv > WhCmHiEDdAcjZAHHIvLcMBn5SP3OWTMAxHusSvf7XPmcL79ricGRlcHGxoPloW02 > cDjb9dEZxQ0IdVel2WLUZduxj1zmU21i5htLRe5M2w4NZCio7CHP6dIO4JNeIBdI > lR5QwXHV2PqQiZ1XRq7cUwrphwbmuYxDx0uzlbOMPYBynY+8ZkHUGGdwFxKhGook > YmOb6dDsacHwZzx//A9ae6f2Lwpan+jM/05e130T6qfkfs+CbEzBOsb9yAFSn9hC > R0lNoHd0/dljvuAeTf4L > =Upa/ > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e8835cb.1070...@toell.net > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/blu0-smtp162bbb2abb2b459b57a465ec8...@phx.gbl
Re: Installing Grub on new squeeze vm failed
That didn't work! I was able to finish the installation, but upon reboot, grub reports "error: couldn't find boot", and has entered rescue mode. How can I manually boot into my system? I can try installing grub again and updating it. --Original Message-- From: Robert Millan Sender: rmh.ayba...@gmail.com To: David H. Watson Cc: Mailing List - Debian GNU/*BSD Subject: Re: Installing Grub on new squeeze vm failed Sent: 2 Oct 2011 06:37 2011/10/2 David Watson : > Did that, and it worked ok; it generated grub.cfg and found both the kernel > and module directory. So can I safely "Continue without boot loader" - skip > to the next step in the installation? Yes, but I wonder what happened before when it failed. Maybe it's missing some sync() call so that data is committed to disk? -- Robert Millan David e: hiranwat...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/750635972-1317552469-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1129614404-@b26.c28.bise6.blackberry
Re: Installing Grub on new squeeze vm failed
2011/10/2 David Watson : > Did that, and it worked ok; it generated grub.cfg and found both the kernel > and module directory. So can I safely "Continue without boot loader" - skip > to the next step in the installation? Yes, but I wonder what happened before when it failed. Maybe it's missing some sync() call so that data is committed to disk? -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxmnyj3qupacbokaugwbpw5kuehtpe0bz6ajegcfxh3...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Sharing ZFS pools
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, On 02.10.2011 10:38, akindo wrote: > It seems that ZFS for kFreeBSD doesn't support the set sharenfs=on > and set sharesmb=on commands. Does this mean I cannot share my ZFS > pool to other networked machines in any way? This is my goal. Robert gave you a very good answer in the other thread, so just for the sake of completeness: share=on does not work on kfreebsd but it neither does on FreeBSD. Those are Solaris specific extensions. In Debian (or pure FreeBSD as well), Samba, NFS and iSCSI aren't part of the core system and are not configured that way. However you can still just configure each of those protocols by using a traditional standalone daemon. Just install samba, freebsd-nfs-server or istgt respectively. As Robert says, NFS does not really work too well for the time being. That's a kfreebsd specific problem, indeed. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOiDXLAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtmhEP/1uUUu06ZAjTV5hol0Tv+W+X vKwBQc0YUxnbjEGwswrbd8mbjnGvD1XzEd3kIvhs/q88o1M0biGxPA9ZuHxhBhRK A7lKYqaKsxMBbFi30gZ2qclWCJhvfhf3gWE2WJGf4qpVqtRzypAt0YUiggBVBd89 1WRPq/PyrGHjWn/I5u7/IycUe5dhITJq0W5CgzV8S99yiDKKVOmylqRuJDJUKN+2 T9T+WHD3bfav3qJQMp7eB/GEMWkefBXtxgYqLFVd1EyZTMbHmoAeriW2t53YMK6P SDRnKU0mJzr9mf9aEnj7Y3aTd9pRq1momPM6EW2J3MFWZv/YXx5RG7HVIiHdmULc 3vPxXq1WMXRq4KaKOHGycoNwJzqth6EUfD9GaUPcqZrS7MF7fmyoWZkKDAFoibyv WhCmHiEDdAcjZAHHIvLcMBn5SP3OWTMAxHusSvf7XPmcL79ricGRlcHGxoPloW02 cDjb9dEZxQ0IdVel2WLUZduxj1zmU21i5htLRe5M2w4NZCio7CHP6dIO4JNeIBdI lR5QwXHV2PqQiZ1XRq7cUwrphwbmuYxDx0uzlbOMPYBynY+8ZkHUGGdwFxKhGook YmOb6dDsacHwZzx//A9ae6f2Lwpan+jM/05e130T6qfkfs+CbEzBOsb9yAFSn9hC R0lNoHd0/dljvuAeTf4L =Upa/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e8835cb.1070...@toell.net
Re: Installing Grub on new squeeze vm failed
Did that, and it worked ok; it generated grub.cfg and found both the kernel and module directory. So can I safely "Continue without boot loader" - skip to the next step in the installation? --Original Message-- From: Robert Millan Sender: rmh.ayba...@gmail.com To: David H. Watson Cc: Mailing List - Debian GNU/*BSD Subject: Re: Installing Grub on new squeeze vm failed Sent: 2 Oct 2011 05:42 2011/10/2 David Watson : > Oct 2 04:44:36 /bin/in-target: warning: /target/etc/mtab won't be updated > since it is a symlink > Oct 2 04:44:40 grub-installer: error: Running 'update-grub' failed Could you open a terminal and run update-grub manually? From the /target hierrachy, e.g. $ chroot /target update-grub -- Robert Millan David e: hiranwat...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1162177947-1317548985-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1381014720-@b26.c28.bise6.blackberry
Re: Installing Grub on new squeeze vm failed
2011/10/2 David Watson : > Oct 2 04:44:36 /bin/in-target: warning: /target/etc/mtab won't be updated > since it is a symlink > Oct 2 04:44:40 grub-installer: error: Running 'update-grub' failed Could you open a terminal and run update-grub manually? From the /target hierrachy, e.g. $ chroot /target update-grub -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXPtuf_G5_LnALBj5bxZMWuzMM25qH6az0+F4c=gjr+...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Sharing ZFS pools
Hi, 2011/10/2 akindo : > Having read a bit more, it seems I can still share my ZFS pool via Samba by > using the normal Samba application, but that it is not possible to share via > NFS. Is this correct? Yes. > Will NFS support be added in future (is there a rough date?)? It's almost complete and just needs some debugging, but so far nobody volunteered to do it. An alternative is to use iSCSI. Unlike NFS, iSCSI is well supported on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxo_jkhv+u0oyxna2iqupayksjqtxvnov--1q_lkhsa...@mail.gmail.com
Sharing ZFS pools
Hi guys, I've read through the kFreeBSD FAQ and searched the mailing lists for an answer to my question but found none, so asking here now. It seems that ZFS for kFreeBSD doesn't support the set sharenfs=on and set sharesmb=on commands. Does this mean I cannot share my ZFS pool to other networked machines in any way? This is my goal. FYI, I read here that I have to use those two commands to share to NFS and SMB: http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Best_Practices_Guide#ZFS_file_service_for_SMB_.28CIFS.29_or_SAMBA Thanks a lot for any help. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/blu0-smtp184ba44fb76a8ad2ac0cf97c8...@phx.gbl
Re: Sharing ZFS pools
Having read a bit more, it seems I can still share my ZFS pool via Samba by using the normal Samba application, but that it is not possible to share via NFS. Is this correct? Will NFS support be added in future (is there a rough date?)? Otherwise I will consider switching to FreeBSD as I want to use NFS for performance and other reasons. On Oct 2, 2011, at 10:38 AM, akindo wrote: > Hi guys, > > I've read through the kFreeBSD FAQ and searched the mailing lists for an > answer to my question but found none, so asking here now. > > It seems that ZFS for kFreeBSD doesn't support the set sharenfs=on and set > sharesmb=on commands. Does this mean I cannot share my ZFS pool to other > networked machines in any way? This is my goal. > > FYI, I read here that I have to use those two commands to share to NFS and > SMB: > http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Best_Practices_Guide#ZFS_file_service_for_SMB_.28CIFS.29_or_SAMBA > > Thanks a lot for any help. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/blu0-smtp265d954a66c18bae01c7e16c8...@phx.gbl
