Re: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#667018: avahi-daemon: add support for kFreeBSD native tools
reassign 667018 avahi-daemon retitle 667018 please add support for route utility from freebsd-net-tools thanks Hello, On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:52:08 +0200 Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote: I think the reasonable thing here to do, is make route from freebsd-net-tools behave compatible with route from net-tools. For sure this is not possible, as it would break compatibility with FreeBSD. It's much easier to fix scripts so they don't use non-portable behaviour of net-tools. So reassigning. Exactly! -- WBR, Andrew signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Processed: Re: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#667018: avahi-daemon: add support for kFreeBSD native tools
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 667018 avahi-daemon Bug #667018 [freebsd-net-tools] please make route behaviour compatible with net-tools Bug reassigned from package 'freebsd-net-tools' to 'avahi-daemon'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #667018 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #667018 to the same values previously set retitle 667018 please add support for route utility from freebsd-net-tools Bug #667018 [avahi-daemon] please make route behaviour compatible with net-tools Changed Bug title to 'please add support for route utility from freebsd-net-tools' from 'please make route behaviour compatible with net-tools' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 667018: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667018 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133568755810845.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#667018: avahi-daemon: add support for kFreeBSD native tools
tags 667018 patch thanks 2012/4/29 Andrew Shadura bugzi...@tut.by: For sure this is not possible, as it would break compatibility with FreeBSD. It's much easier to fix scripts so they don't use non-portable behaviour of net-tools. Yes. I've been meaning to address the problems in avahi for a few days, but I hadn't had the time to finish it. Attached patch should resolve them. Mats, could you confirm this works for you? -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXPfRnT=8hGHE=pE8KMbAm5q-yAT3xDXzJ3kEj53T7=t...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#670836: libv8: please enable for kfreebsd-*
Package: src:libv8 Version: 3.8.9.20-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Hi, I found that it is quite easy to build libv8 on GNU/kFreeBSD, with only minor changes to its packaging for Debian: 1. Enable kfreebsd-* builds of the package 2. Set v8arch/v8os suitably on GNU/kFreeBSD 3. Actually pass v8os into GYP 4. Create a kfreebsd target (a clone of the existing freebsd target, with -lpthread added and -lexecinfo removed) Then it builds fine and the test suite shows 100% passes for me on kfreebsd-i386. Please consider including these patches (to follow)! Thanks, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f9d4323.6030...@pyro.eu.org
[PATCH libX11] configure: check if issetugid is declared
GNU/kFreeBSD has issetugid in libc (for legacy apps?), but doesn't declare it anywhere, causing gcc to error out with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration. Use AC_CHECK_DECL in addition to AC_CHECK_FUNC so we disable this code instead of failing to build it. Debian bug#669670 http://bugs.debian.org/669670 Signed-off-by: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org --- configure.ac |5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index aaec968..c91234f 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -223,8 +223,9 @@ AC_CHECK_HEADERS([sys/select.h]) AC_CHECK_FUNCS([strtol seteuid]) # Used in lcFile.c (see also --enable-xlocaledir settings below) XLOCALEDIR_IS_SAFE=no -AC_CHECK_FUNC([issetugid], [XLOCALEDIR_IS_SAFE=yes] - AC_DEFINE(HASSETUGID,1,[Has issetugid() function])) +AC_CHECK_DECL([issetugid], + AC_CHECK_FUNC([issetugid], [XLOCALEDIR_IS_SAFE=yes] + AC_DEFINE(HASSETUGID,1,[Has issetugid() function]))) AC_CHECK_FUNC([getresuid], [XLOCALEDIR_IS_SAFE=yes] AC_DEFINE(HASGETRESUID,1,[Has getresuid() getresgid() functions])) # Used in Font.c -- 1.7.10 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1335710589-5231-1-git-send-email-jcris...@debian.org
Bug#654783 closed by Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org (Bug#654783: fixed in eglibc 2.13-31)
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report which was filed against the libc0.1 package: #654783: race condition in libpthread causes hangs in python2.7 testsuite It has been closed by Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org. Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please contact Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org by replying to this email. -- 654783: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=654783 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: eglibc Source-Version: 2.13-31 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of eglibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: eglibc-source_2.13-31_all.deb to main/e/eglibc/eglibc-source_2.13-31_all.deb eglibc_2.13-31.diff.gz to main/e/eglibc/eglibc_2.13-31.diff.gz eglibc_2.13-31.dsc to main/e/eglibc/eglibc_2.13-31.dsc glibc-doc_2.13-31_all.deb to main/e/eglibc/glibc-doc_2.13-31_all.deb libc-bin_2.13-31_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc-bin_2.13-31_amd64.deb libc-dev-bin_2.13-31_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc-dev-bin_2.13-31_amd64.deb libc6-dbg_2.13-31_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-dbg_2.13-31_amd64.deb libc6-dev-i386_2.13-31_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-dev-i386_2.13-31_amd64.deb libc6-dev_2.13-31_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-dev_2.13-31_amd64.deb libc6-i386_2.13-31_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-i386_2.13-31_amd64.deb libc6-pic_2.13-31_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-pic_2.13-31_amd64.deb libc6-prof_2.13-31_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-prof_2.13-31_amd64.deb libc6-udeb_2.13-31_amd64.udeb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-udeb_2.13-31_amd64.udeb libc6_2.13-31_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6_2.13-31_amd64.deb libnss-dns-udeb_2.13-31_amd64.udeb to main/e/eglibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.13-31_amd64.udeb libnss-files-udeb_2.13-31_amd64.udeb to main/e/eglibc/libnss-files-udeb_2.13-31_amd64.udeb locales-all_2.13-31_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/locales-all_2.13-31_amd64.deb locales_2.13-31_all.deb to main/e/eglibc/locales_2.13-31_all.deb multiarch-support_2.13-31_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/multiarch-support_2.13-31_amd64.deb nscd_2.13-31_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/nscd_2.13-31_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 654...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org (supplier of updated eglibc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 17:45:45 +0200 Source: eglibc Binary: libc-bin libc-dev-bin glibc-doc eglibc-source locales locales-all nscd multiarch-support libc6 libc6-dev libc6-dbg libc6-prof libc6-pic libc6-udeb libc6.1 libc6.1-dev libc6.1-dbg libc6.1-prof libc6.1-pic libc6.1-udeb libc0.3 libc0.3-dev libc0.3-dbg libc0.3-prof libc0.3-pic libc0.3-udeb libc0.1 libc0.1-dev libc0.1-dbg libc0.1-prof libc0.1-pic libc0.1-udeb libc6-i386 libc6-dev-i386 libc6-sparc64 libc6-dev-sparc64 libc6-s390 libc6-dev-s390 libc6-s390x libc6-dev-s390x libc6-amd64 libc6-dev-amd64 libc6-powerpc libc6-dev-powerpc libc6-ppc64 libc6-dev-ppc64 libc6-mipsn32 libc6-dev-mipsn32 libc6-mips64 libc6-dev-mips64 libc0.1-i386 libc0.1-dev-i386 libc6-i686 libc6-xen libc0.1-i686 libc0.3-i686 libc0.3-xen libc6.1-alphaev67 libc6-loongson2f libnss-dns-udeb libnss-files-udeb Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 2.13-31 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org Changed-By: Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org Description: eglibc-source - Embedded GNU C Library: sources glibc-doc - Embedded GNU C Library: Documentation libc-bin - Embedded GNU C Library: Binaries libc-dev-bin - Embedded GNU C Library: Development binaries libc0.1- Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries libc0.1-dbg - Embedded GNU C Library: detached debugging symbols libc0.1-dev - Embedded GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Header Files libc0.1-dev-i386 - Embedded GNU C Library: 32bit development libraries for AMD64 libc0.1-i386 - Embedded GNU C Library: 32bit shared libraries for AMD64 libc0.1-i686 - Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i686 optimized] libc0.1-pic - Embedded GNU C Library: PIC archive library libc0.1-prof - Embedded GNU C Library: Profiling Libraries libc0.1-udeb - Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries - udeb (udeb) libc0.3- Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries libc0.3-dbg - Embedded GNU C Library: detached debugging symbols libc0.3-dev - Embedded
Re: new patch. eglibc upload urgently required!
2012/4/22 Robert Millan r...@debian.org: I notice that my initial patch didn't handle the library dependency part. I'm attaching a new patch that fixes this issue. This makes new packages built against the patched libc0.1-dev depend on libc0.1 = 2.13-31. VERY IMPORTANT NOTICE: if this patch is introduced in a later version (rather than 2.13-31), you MUST change the version in debian/libc0.1.symbols.common to the first version that provides pthread_condattr_*etclock on GNU/kFreeBSD. Uhm, I notice you didn't include this part. Now packages that build with libc0.1-dev 2.13-31 won't have a versioned dependency on libc0.1 = 2.13-31. Are you sure this is correct? It seems to me that this can be a big problem if those packages migrate to testing before eglibc does. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxn33lcn-bmsfefx3k7y_waw8d2vd5obxpzbdy8hfmw...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bug#669307: pcp: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
2012/4/20 Robert Millan r...@debian.org: El 20 d’abril de 2012 1:43, Nathan Scott nath...@debian.org ha escrit: That's merged. For the glibc-bsd commit, will I need an updated Build-Depends line to ensure that the new glibc is present when building pcp? Yes. If so, could you suggest a minimum version to depend on there? Thanks! No, but if you subscribe to #669424 you'll get notice when the fixed version is known. Fix available in libc0.1-dev (= 2.13-31~). -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxngjebnzkkos8htqjzeqc68yzifgss_beex-fotdz7...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bug#669165: mount errors when attempting remount of /run, /proc and /sys
Hi Roger, 2012/4/29 Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net: On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:47:34PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Misc errors are displayed during boot because initscripts attempts to remount /run, /proc and /sys. However, on GNU/kFreeBSD it's not possible to remount tmpfs, linprocfs or linsysfs file systems: mount: /run: unknown special file or file system mount: proc : Operation not supported mount: sys : Operation not supported Is it possible to know ahead of time which filesystems do not support remounting? There's no automated method, but grepping MNT_UPDATE through the source reveals that tmpfs supports remounting only for certain flags. For linprocfs/linsysfs I'm not sure, it seems there isn't a struct vfsops in them. I'm afraid I don't have time to investigate this atm, sorry! I'm adding debian-bsd to CC, maybe someone can help. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxnhtcts-mi37kzed6c7cvpixvpa__ewsgzwscfuhr4...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#661825: do we need to provide keymaps in kbdcontrol?
severity 661825 normal thanks I think that for now I'll assume everything is working fine with the new scheme. In this scenario the old debconf questions and their associated keyboard files are harmless, and still useful for users upgrading from Squeeze. At some point we can remove support for the old mechanism completely, but this doesn't necessarily have to happen in Wheezy IMHO. 2012/4/27 Robert Millan r...@debian.org: Hi all, I have the impression that everything needed to handle keyboard properly on GNU/kFreeBSD is already in place: - keyboard-configuration provides the user setting (maybe fed from D-I) and /etc/init.d/keyboard-setup - In turn, /etc/init.d/keyboard-setup uses /bin/setupcon from console-setup - In turn, /bin/setupcon uses /bin/kbdcontrol to load fonts from console-setup-freebsd. Do we need to do anything else in kbdcontrol to make this work? It seems that the only missing thing is removing the fonts we're currently providing in /usr/share/syscons/keymaps, or move them aside to another package, since these aren't being used anymore. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXPY8mgewN5azmGMq0hECyc+u4WayQUQdu4qN6yE2_=t...@mail.gmail.com -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxnwu_vawveu92zdhf28wybr7_kl74cd25blr7pinmd...@mail.gmail.com
Processed: Re: Bug#661825: do we need to provide keymaps in kbdcontrol?
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 661825 normal Bug #661825 [kbdcontrol] On kfreebsd-*, please integrate kbdcontrol within keyboard-configuration. Severity set to 'normal' from 'wishlist' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 661825: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661825 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133573731430174.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
