Re: Bug#796798: Add that patch to stable also? [perl: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: t/op/stat.t]

2016-01-30 Thread Dominic Hargreaves 
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 06:33:30PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:56:19PM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
>  
> > Maybe this patch could also be applied to stable (as all buildds have
> > been updated to freebsd-10 and it'd be great to be able to build
> > proposed-updates and security without additional work ;-)
> > 
> > FWIW I'll take care of the current version in -p-u for
> > jessie-kfreebsd-p-u so no need to hurry
> 
> Sure, will include it if we need to make more updates to jessie
> in the future. I suppose it's not a candidate on its own though.

I've added this to git now so we don't forget.

> I wonder if it also happens with the wheezy packages? The test
> code looks quite similar.

The patch doesn't apply without modifications, but the freebsd
porters can confirm that a similar patch is needed, I expect we
can easily apply it.

Cheers,
Dominic.

Re: Bug#677046: Bug#628493: perl: FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386: t/op/threads failed

2013-09-09 Thread Dominic Hargreaves 
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:14:53AM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
> >>IMO, my suggested change (Perl_atfork_reinit) in "Message #54" [1]
> >>still should be aplied by perl upstream. While it might not be
> >>problem for this testcase, the unlocking in forked child is fragile.
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >I finally (!) got round to submitting this upstream, at [1], and the
> >comment so far is that the patch isn't appropriate. If you have any
> >further thoughts, could you comment on the upstream RT ticket?
> 
> If I remember correctly, the perl code expects something which is
> not guaranteed by POSIX. But our new implementation provides this,
> therefore we (kfreebsd) are not affected by this any longer.

Indeed, although at one time you argued that it was a correctness
fix anyway. We seem to have a consensus that that's not the case, so
closing this.

Cheers,
Dominic.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130909202435.gw19...@urchin.earth.li

Re: Bug#628493: perl: FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386: t/op/threads failed

2013-09-07 Thread Dominic Hargreaves 
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 07:03:57AM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >I just bisected on past eglibc versions and this is reproducible for me
> >(segfault 5% of the time) on kfreebsd-i386, up until this version, with
> >which I can't reproduce the problem any more (10,000+ test runs) :
> >
> >> eglibc  (2.13-22) unstable; urgency=low
> >> -- Aurelien Jarno   Sat, 10 Dec 2011 21:49:03 +0100
> >
> >The changelog for that version was quite long, but probably these
> >changes are what fixed this:
> >
> >>   [ Petr Salinger ]
> >>   * kfreebsd/local-sysdeps.diff: update to revision 3763 (from glibc-bsd).
> >>   * add kfreebsd/local-use-thr-primitives.diff to use kernel thr*
> >> primitives inside linuxthreads. Closes: #639658.
> >
> >Therefore I'm marking this as fixed in that eglibc upload and I'll try
> >to let upstream know.  Thanks!
> 
> 
> IMO, my suggested change (Perl_atfork_reinit) in "Message #54" [1]
> still should be aplied by perl upstream. While it might not be
> problem for this testcase, the unlocking in forked child is fragile.

Hi,

I finally (!) got round to submitting this upstream, at [1], and the
comment so far is that the patch isn't appropriate. If you have any
further thoughts, could you comment on the upstream RT ticket?

Cheers,
Dominic.

[1] 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130907214154.gx19...@urchin.earth.li

Re: Bug#628493: perl: FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386: t/op/threads failed

2012-06-11 Thread Dominic Hargreaves 
clone 628493 -1 -2
reassign -1 perl
reassign -2 perl
found -1 5.14.2-11
found -2 5.14.2-11
severity -1 important
severity -2 wishlist
retitle -1 Re-enable kFreeBSD threads test
retitle -2 Perl_atfork_reinit change
tags -2 +patch
thanks

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 07:03:57AM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >I just bisected on past eglibc versions and this is reproducible for me
> >(segfault 5% of the time) on kfreebsd-i386, up until this version, with
> >which I can't reproduce the problem any more (10,000+ test runs) :
> >
> >> eglibc  (2.13-22) unstable; urgency=low
> >> -- Aurelien Jarno   Sat, 10 Dec 2011 21:49:03 +0100
> >
> >The changelog for that version was quite long, but probably these
> >changes are what fixed this:
> >
> >>   [ Petr Salinger ]
> >>   * kfreebsd/local-sysdeps.diff: update to revision 3763 (from glibc-bsd).
> >>   * add kfreebsd/local-use-thr-primitives.diff to use kernel thr*
> >> primitives inside linuxthreads. Closes: #639658.
> >
> >Therefore I'm marking this as fixed in that eglibc upload and I'll try
> >to let upstream know.  Thanks!
> 
> 
> IMO, my suggested change (Perl_atfork_reinit) in "Message #54" [1]
> still should be aplied by perl upstream. While it might not be
> problem for this testcase, the unlocking in forked child is fragile.
> 
> Petr
> 
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org//cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628493#54

Thanks both. Cloning bugs as appropriate.

Dominic.

-- 
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120611091234.gf5...@urchin.earth.li

Re: Bug#628493: perl: FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386: t/op/threads failed

2012-06-10 Thread Dominic Hargreaves 
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 09:41:38PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 12:36:22PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
> > >perl -Mthreads -e 'threads->create(sub {})->detach; fork'
> > >
> > >which crashes non-deterministically about half the time for me.
> 
> > The problem might be in usage of "pthread_atfork(lock, unlock, unlock)".
> 
> [...]
> 
> > It should suffice to add into util.c
> 
> > Perl_atfork_reinit(void)
> 
> > and
> 
> > --- miniperlmain.c
> > +++ miniperlmain.c
> > @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
> >   * --GSAR 2001-07-20 */
> >  PTHREAD_ATFORK(Perl_atfork_lock,
> > Perl_atfork_unlock,
> > -   Perl_atfork_unlock);
> > +   Perl_atfork_reinit);
> >  #endif
> 
> Thanks, and sorry for the delay!
> 
> I finally found the time to try this out, but unfortunately it does
> not seem to fix the problem.  Even the crash trace looks the same.
> (I did check that Perl_atfork_reinit() actually gets run.)
> 
> I'm attaching the full patch I used based on the above. Most of it is
> generated by regen.pl in the source top level directory after editing
> embed.fnc.
> 
> Running 'debian/rules perl.debug' after applying this should be enough to
> do a test build. Alternatively, I'm happy to try out other suggestions,
> hopefully with a shorter turnaround time than with this one :)

The test case:

perl -Mthreads -e 'threads->create(sub {})->detach; fork'

ran 10,000 times without crashing on my kfreeBSD KVM (SMP) VM, using
5.14.2-11 and up-to-date sid from today.

Can you reproduce this? If so, perhaps the problem has been solved
by some change in kFreeBSD.

-- 
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120610221835.gd5...@urchin.earth.li

Re: Bug#672152: perl: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: dist/threads-shared/t/waithires.t failing

2012-06-08 Thread Dominic Hargreaves 
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 11:16:24AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 29/05/12 18:00, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 08:00:48PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> >> On 27/05/12 17:55, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> >>> I just checked to see if Petr's eglibc getosreldate() fix made any
> >>> difference to the Perl waithires.t test [...]
> >>
> >> Actually this is fixed (#673711), I just didn't notice the other commit
> >> in pkg-glibc SVN.  Thanks Petr!
> > 
> > Thanks - I'd appreciate a heads-up when the updated package is
> > available for test in sid.
> 
> Hi Dominic,
> 
> The new eglibc is installed in sid now.  Hopefully that failing test can
> be re-enabled.  (I'm running it now and it looks fixed to me).

Thanks, confirmed here too and re-enabled in git.

Cheers,
Dominic.

-- 
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120608211727.gg5...@urchin.earth.li

Re: [PATCH] Further eliminate POSIX-emulation under LinuxThreads

2012-06-03 Thread Dominic Hargreaves 
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 03:03:13PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2012/5/31 Dominic Hargreaves :
> > This is now hitting us with the packaging of perl 5.16. Can you provide
> > a reference which might enable us know which outcome to expect, so that
> > the test[1] can be updated accordingly?
> 
> I just requested a version bump, see http://bugs.debian.org/675606

Excellent, thanks for this!

Dominic.

-- 
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120603083551.go29...@urchin.earth.li

Re: [PATCH] Further eliminate POSIX-emulation under LinuxThreads

2012-05-31 Thread Dominic Hargreaves 
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 02:16:49PM +, Robert Millan wrote:
> El 12 de febrer de 2012 12:42, Niko Tyni  ha escrit:
> > [crossposted to the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD development list debian-bsd
> >                         and the Perl 5 development list perl5-porters ]
> 
> Thanks for bringing this up.
> 
> >> This is also a complete non-issue in practice these days, LinuxThreads
> >> was a Linux 2.4 thread implementation that nobody maintains
> >> anymore[2], all modern Linux distros use NPTL threads which don't
> >> suffer from this discrepancy.
> 
> This is not correct.  LinuxThreads is only obsolete on GNU/Linux, but
> it is maintained and used on GNU/kFreeBSD because, contrary to what
> its name would indicate, it's a reasonably portable pthread library
> with few kernel-specific dependencies.
> 
> However...
> 
> > Under POSIX threads the getpid() and getppid() functions return the
> > same values across multiple threads, i.e. threads don't have their own
> > PID's. This is not the case under the obsolete LinuxThreads where each
> > thread has a different PID, so getpid() and getppid() will return
> > different values across threads.
> 
> The version of LinuxThreads used on GNU/kFreeBSD has been patched to
> use kFreeBSD (kernel of FreeBSD) thread primitives, and thus future
> releases of Debian GNU/kFreeBSD will no longer be affected by this
> problem.
> 
> Debian "Squeeze" release *IS* affected, however.  It'd be better if
> you could wait at least until there's a new release before breaking
> compatibility with Squeeze users.

This is now hitting us with the packaging of perl 5.16. Can you provide
a reference which might enable us know which outcome to expect, so that
the test[1] can be updated accordingly?

Cheers,
Dominic.

[1] 
<http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/blob/7a04c38f6a1f87cc07b6ab6c7778e2a56ca24902:/t/op/getpid.t#l33>

-- 
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120531205850.gm29...@urchin.earth.li

Re: Bug#672152: perl: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: dist/threads-shared/t/waithires.t failing

2012-05-29 Thread Dominic Hargreaves 
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 08:00:48PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 27/05/12 17:55, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > I just checked to see if Petr's eglibc getosreldate() fix made any
> > difference to the Perl waithires.t test [...]
> 
> Actually this is fixed (#673711), I just didn't notice the other commit
> in pkg-glibc SVN.  Thanks Petr!

Thanks - I'd appreciate a heads-up when the updated package is
available for test in sid.

Cheers,
Dominic.

-- 
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120529170022.gc29...@urchin.earth.li

Bug#672152: perl: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: dist/threads-shared/t/waithires.t failing

2012-05-08 Thread Dominic Hargreaves 
Source: perl
Version: 5.14.2-10
Severity: important

On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:30:07PM +, Debian buildds wrote:
>  * Source package: perl
>  * Version: 5.14.2-10
>  * Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64
>  * State: failed
>  * Suite: sid
>  * Builder: fano.debian.org
>  * Build log: 
> https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=perl&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=5.14.2-10&stamp=1336429714&file=log

New failure I don't think we've seen before, consistent on both
arch buildds:

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=perl&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=5.14.2-10&stamp=1336466769

dist/threads-shared/t/waithiresFAILED at test 7

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=perl&arch=kfreebsd-i386&ver=5.14.2-10&stamp=1336457980

dist/threads-shared/t/waithiresFAILED at test 35

We'll need to figure out exactly which test this is, which may be
cumbersome just reading the test source file.

May possibly be related to a sporadic test failure in threads described
in #628493. In that case, finzi was able to compile it but the other two
-i386 hosts weren't.

This did not appear when I tried compiling 5.14.2-10 on
asdfasdf.debian.net recently.

-- 
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120508205938.gq29...@urchin.earth.li

Re: Bug#670722: perl-base: IO::Socket::UNIX::hostpath dies on kFreeBSD

2012-05-06 Thread Dominic Hargreaves 
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 10:05:18PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 06/05/12 22:01, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > Good point. The test does fail on hurd-i386 too.
> 
> If you're able to test this on a GNU/Hurd box you can try:
> 
> #   if defined(__linux__) || defined(__GNU__) || defined(__GLIBC__)

This seems to result in a segfault on Hurd, and a Bus error on
kFreeBSD.

Dominic.

-- 
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120506223301.gq29...@urchin.earth.li

Re: Bug#670722: perl-base: IO::Socket::UNIX::hostpath dies on kFreeBSD

2012-05-06 Thread Dominic Hargreaves 
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 05:26:45PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2012/5/6 Steven Chamberlain :
> > It looks to me like GNU/kFreeBSD uses the sys/un.h provided by eglibc,
> > with a sockaddr_un different to FreeBSD's, so the test should rather be:
> >
> > #   if defined(__linux__) || defined(__GLIBC__)
> 
> Note that this is true for the declaration (which is matters here
> AFAICT) but it's not for the actual structure, see #645527.
> 
> > As for GNU/Hurd, my guess is that it doesn't have that header at all and
> > skips the entire #ifdef I_SYS_UN block.  So it shouldn't need to be
> > considered here.
> 
> Actually ISTR GNU/Hurd had zero-length sun_path too.  CCing debian-hurd...

Good point. The test does fail on hurd-i386 too.

Dominic.

-- 
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120506210107.gf29...@urchin.earth.li

Re: Bug#670722: perl-base: IO::Socket::UNIX::hostpath dies on kFreeBSD

2012-05-06 Thread Dominic Hargreaves 
On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 06:39:21PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 01:53:00PM +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> 
> > The attached script comes from the MySQL test quite.
> >* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
> >  ineffective)?
> > It returns "SUCCESS" on Linux and "FAIL" on kFreeBSD. This is irrespective
> > of the length of the file.
> > 
> > There is an error message thrown which is in results.txt.
> 
> > FAILED
> > Bad arg length for Socket::unpack_sockaddr_un, length is 106, should be 110 
> > at /usr/lib/perl/5.14/Socket.pm line 278.
> 
> Confirmed on asdfasdf.debian.net. A slightly more obvious test script
> attached.
> 
> Testing with bleadperl now.

The problem only arises on Debian kFreeBSD (on bleadperl, 5.14, and 5.10).
It doesn't arise with plain FreeBSD. I'm guessing that the problem is
related to the __linux__ conditional at

http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/blob/HEAD:/cpan/Socket/Socket.xs#l710

I'd be grateful for any confirmation, and suggestions from people more
familiar with kFreeBSD for how to proceed.

Thanks,
Dominic.

-- 
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120506130328.gd29...@urchin.earth.li

Re: Bug#664612: wu-ftpd: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: error: 'struct dqblk64' has no member named 'dqb_fhardlimit'

2012-03-19 Thread Dominic Hargreaves 
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:47:22AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:10:57PM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
> > x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu-gcc  -g -Wall -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64  -O2 -I.. 
> > -I../support -c -o extensions.o extensions.c
> 
> ...
> 
> > extensions.c: In function 'msg_massage':
> > extensions.c:412:47: error: 'struct dqblk64' has no member named 
> > 'dqb_fhardlimit'
> > extensions.c:420:47: error: 'struct dqblk64' has no member named 
> > 'dqb_fsoftlimit'
> > extensions.c:428:47: error: 'struct dqblk64' has no member named 
> > 'dqb_curfiles'
> > extensions.c:437:12: error: 'struct dqblk64' has no member named 
> > 'dqb_btimelimit'
> > extensions.c:447:19: error: 'struct dqblk64' has no member named 
> > 'dqb_curfiles'
> > extensions.c:447:39: error: 'struct dqblk64' has no member named 
> > 'dqb_fsoftlimit'
> > extensions.c:448:12: error: 'struct dqblk64' has no member named 
> > 'dqb_ftimelimit'
> ...
> 
> > make[2]: *** [extensions.o] Error 1
> > 
> > 
> > Full build log at
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=wu-ftpd&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=2.6.2-34&stamp=1332143034
> 
> Thanks. Unfortunately this package is orphaned, and although I did
> the QA upload to fix a (trivial) bug in the package, I'm not in a
> position to fix this ensuing bug (though I will do what I can to help).

Just to be clear; the change I made was to add a Depends to the resultant
binary package, and nothing which could have introduced this problem.

Cheers,
Dominic.

-- 
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120319125742.gl28...@urchin.earth.li

Re: Bug#664612: wu-ftpd: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: error: 'struct dqblk64' has no member named 'dqb_fhardlimit'

2012-03-19 Thread Dominic Hargreaves 
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:10:57PM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
> x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu-gcc  -g -Wall -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64  -O2 -I.. 
> -I../support -c -o extensions.o extensions.c

...

> extensions.c: In function 'msg_massage':
> extensions.c:412:47: error: 'struct dqblk64' has no member named 
> 'dqb_fhardlimit'
> extensions.c:420:47: error: 'struct dqblk64' has no member named 
> 'dqb_fsoftlimit'
> extensions.c:428:47: error: 'struct dqblk64' has no member named 
> 'dqb_curfiles'
> extensions.c:437:12: error: 'struct dqblk64' has no member named 
> 'dqb_btimelimit'
> extensions.c:447:19: error: 'struct dqblk64' has no member named 
> 'dqb_curfiles'
> extensions.c:447:39: error: 'struct dqblk64' has no member named 
> 'dqb_fsoftlimit'
> extensions.c:448:12: error: 'struct dqblk64' has no member named 
> 'dqb_ftimelimit'
...

> make[2]: *** [extensions.o] Error 1
> 
> 
> Full build log at
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=wu-ftpd&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=2.6.2-34&stamp=1332143034

Thanks. Unfortunately this package is orphaned, and although I did
the QA upload to fix a (trivial) bug in the package, I'm not in a
position to fix this ensuing bug (though I will do what I can to help).

Cheers,
Dominic.

-- 
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120319114722.gk28...@urchin.earth.li