Re: Init system for non-Linux ports
Hi, On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 02:47:14PM +, Robert Millan wrote: > On 14/02/2014 18:46, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > > Well, we have an announcement today from Canonical - AIUI Upstart will > > be discontinued after Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and they will switch to systemd: > > http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1316 > > I'm not familiar with Ubuntu politics. Is everyone in line with that decision? About upstart as default, my understanding is that (i) defunding upstart development will likely make that question moot cause the Ubuntu community is very probably not interested in putting up the work now that everybody else switches, (ii) I saw statements from other technical board members before Mark's announcement that dropping upstart as default is likely, now that Debian is moving to systemd for the Linux ports. The more interesting question is whether upstart will be continued as a community project and/or supported as an alternative in Debian/Ubuntu. Not sure about that. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140217165630.ga30...@raptor.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org
Re: maintainer communication
Hi, On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 04:47:30PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Finn Thain dixit: > > >Why is CONFIG_SERIAL_PMACZILOG to be disabled? And why was > > See the discussion in the thread before this message. I am not sure which thread you are meaning, and in general, I think discussing random Linux kernel config options on -ports is off-topic. Maybe you sent the initial mail to the wrong list? Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131223170941.gg4...@raptor.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org
Re: failed kfreebsd-i386 build of net-snmp 5.4.3~dfsg-2.6
tags 625985 +pending
thanks
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:45:51PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> reopen 625985 =
> found 625985 5.4.3~dfsg-2.6
> tags 625985 + patch
> thanks
>
> On 20/11/12 21:35, David Prévot wrote:
> > net-snmp FTBFS on kfreebsd-*. Seems like #625985 is back, reporter of
> > that bug, who fixed it via an NMU, in CC too. Thanks in advance if
> > someone could fix it or put me in the right track to do it myself.
>
> I wonder if this has to do with compiler version that was used, and
> resulting availability/use of the kd symbol.
I can't reproduce it on asdfasdf right now, but as the code is in some
freebsd specific file and it clearly FTBFS on the buildds, I don't see
how it would hurt to apply this patch. I have uploaded an NMU for this
to DELAYED/3-day, the debdiff is attached.
Cheers,
Michael
diff -Nru net-snmp-5.4.3~dfsg/debian/changelog
net-snmp-5.4.3~dfsg/debian/changelog
--- net-snmp-5.4.3~dfsg/debian/changelog2012-11-18 14:24:32.0
+0100
+++ net-snmp-5.4.3~dfsg/debian/changelog2012-11-24 13:31:09.0
+0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+net-snmp (5.4.3~dfsg-2.7) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * debian/patches/27_kfreebsd_bug625985.patch: New patch, fix build error on
+kfreebsd-*, by Steven Chamberlain.
+
+ -- Michael Banck Sat, 24 Nov 2012 13:30:51 +0100
+
net-snmp (5.4.3~dfsg-2.6) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru net-snmp-5.4.3~dfsg/debian/patches/27_kfreebsd_bug625985.patch
net-snmp-5.4.3~dfsg/debian/patches/27_kfreebsd_bug625985.patch
--- net-snmp-5.4.3~dfsg/debian/patches/27_kfreebsd_bug625985.patch
1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ net-snmp-5.4.3~dfsg/debian/patches/27_kfreebsd_bug625985.patch
2012-11-24 13:29:36.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+Index: net-snmp-5.4.3~dfsg/agent/mibgroup/hardware/memory/memory_freebsd.c
+===
+--- net-snmp-5.4.3~dfsg.orig/agent/mibgroup/hardware/memory/memory_freebsd.c
2008-05-28 12:48:46.0 +0100
net-snmp-5.4.3~dfsg/agent/mibgroup/hardware/memory/memory_freebsd.c
2012-11-20 22:23:34.693203872 +
+@@ -205,11 +205,12 @@
+
+ #include
+
++kvm_t *kd = NULL;
++
+ int
+ swapmode(long pagesize)
+ {
+ int i, n;
+-static kvm_t *kd = NULL;
+ struct kvm_swap kswap[16];
+ netsnmp_memory_info *mem;
+ char buf[1024];
diff -Nru net-snmp-5.4.3~dfsg/debian/patches/series
net-snmp-5.4.3~dfsg/debian/patches/series
--- net-snmp-5.4.3~dfsg/debian/patches/series 2012-05-27 17:29:54.0
+0200
+++ net-snmp-5.4.3~dfsg/debian/patches/series 2012-11-24 13:30:03.0
+0100
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
08_defaultconfig.patch
25_duplicate_iftable.patch
26_kfreebsd.patch
+27_kfreebsd_bug625985.patch
32_mnttab_path.patch
44_nlist_kvm.patch
56_manpage.patch
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#497165: amiga-fdisk-cross is not being built on any architecture other than i386]
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 08:52:31PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > could the buildd admins please enable building for amiga-fdisk and upload > the resulting packages (powerpc has been built, but it seems it was never > uploaded). First off, debian-ports is not the right contact address for buildd admins, there is no guarantee the buildd admins of a particular port are subscribed, AFAIK. Second, you need to get amiga-fdisk removed from packages-arch-specific to have it built by the buildds, see http://cvs.debian.org/srcdep/Packages-arch-specific?root=dak&view=markup and the contact addresses at the top of that file. cheers, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
