Bug#644799: Any tracking of good mini-iso images?
2011/10/9 Arno Töll : >> I know, that's why I ask if it can be reproduced outside of D-I environment. > > I wonder how I am supposed to test that? For obvious reasons I can't > install with this netinst image provided and in an actual installation > (i.e. zfsutils installed from the latest binary package in the archive > it does not seem to happen). Which means the answer is no ;-) -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXNR9hXv+vAjUHnCfPxxZ9+oa7=ghw+vnjjoofvv7+w...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#644799: Any tracking of good mini-iso images?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Robert, On 09.10.2011 20:37, Robert Millan wrote: > 2011/10/9 Arno Töll : >> It turns out, it is not partman itself what fails, but the zpool/zfs >> binaries: > > I know, that's why I ask if it can be reproduced outside of D-I environment. I wonder how I am supposed to test that? For obvious reasons I can't install with this netinst image provided and in an actual installation (i.e. zfsutils installed from the latest binary package in the archive it does not seem to happen). - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOke05AAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtVB8P/2ieSQt2ftlEoH2CWkDxMKYa RXG12B49fvC+fzz+GhVKE1P3GPxu39eTy3yy8iFz57QcmqpX7yujhg6zqpDO3LYl 9eVVuWTZlSAEhuhKlgeKT78iMXzLv4LYtoMBscg7JcSLZPtZEqEarVAp1AWKIXgA KEIEXK9n/DTzG7+wVMdFVGY21rpqeSbQNtx+SpcAchWKYCEshPCfUe9VB0EI3gPz MJTBVDpcyKMU2RGewiz8y80oEZ84f9cYzDgEz/80gfP1kdAmjFGZ/BEnnzVAU8l/ CqOiJ9UKTYl0Kt73DFtwYGXq6qCPKu47qcoLtccNusyabuVdsOAHznrLtMrm62mu NoIHoMAaDhB2e1Z9OONRAdfHoIg7m47MqJ5iPjPF/0ttMN9OPEAUrL3MTY5VXyUo HSyEjCPY3VN31jU+FgNzmHW12bBoTfC9zpqqcjZuIs84L+QRZlVc2mtkIlB0Ecfy UOSLXivuvdy95JOD461R4UUXVHYzaEgl6YkvITCIc9C0qZMl0KttYEgkSHVJSdqO D5K0qwHKJ6n6mPVC9EAfh4OfK26S+Ca2fTBro76qTPeAc1ePXaOrH8K6lS+izMeY pEqH9A6dPCVU9WtYBq9qLWyIQstF29rI7k/c8sns6di/2iCYyAVublKt9UC8L3Ix UG6hNRYUElRMuBZq4f0+ =OFnT -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e91ed3a.8030...@toell.net
Bug#644799: Any tracking of good mini-iso images?
2011/10/9 Arno Töll : > It turns out, it is not partman itself what fails, but the zpool/zfs > binaries: I know, that's why I ask if it can be reproduced outside of D-I environment. Can it? It seems like an ABI problem. Maybe a rebuild helps? -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXMpBBqWzxwCXa_4tpTLD7=qmatxkmdviwqet_wt34d...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#644799: Any tracking of good mini-iso images?
Package: zfsutils-udeb Severity: grave Filing a bug report, please followup there. 2011/10/8 Arno Töll : > partman-zfs: zpool: /lib/libbsd.so.0: version `LIBBSD_0.3´ not found > (required by /lib/libgeom.so.1) > > Is that a known issue? Which D-I version? Can this be reproduced outside of D-I environment? Which are the versions of zfsutils-udeb, libgeom and libbsd involved? -- Robert Millan -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxony4ply3zncfcrqppcykgqahcs4tvm-jer7qcv-pc...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Any tracking of good mini-iso images?
Package: zfsutils-udeb Severity: grave Filing a bug report, please followup there. 2011/10/8 Arno Töll : > partman-zfs: zpool: /lib/libbsd.so.0: version `LIBBSD_0.3´ not found > (required by /lib/libgeom.so.1) > > Is that a known issue? Which D-I version? Can this be reproduced outside of D-I environment? Which are the versions of zfsutils-udeb, libgeom and libbsd involved? -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxnqpx5oc2bnjpozisv4rmgzb442n_rf-hcf2if2lfn...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Any tracking of good mini-iso images?
2011/10/8 Arno Töll : > On 08.10.2011 15:30, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: >> The only errors I had with the mini-iso were with a handful >> hashing failures by aspell localisation. No sign of libbsd.so >> in my run, and I only used a swap area and ZFS. (Well I am >> not getting the Swedish keyboard, it still is American ASCII!) > > I now tried the weekly (full) image dated Oct. 3 which just works fine. Uhm unfortunately it seems that past weekly builds are not stored, so this build will be eventually removed. Anyway, it installs Wheezy which is not what the majority of users want (Wheezy is very unstable on kfreebsd-*). -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxmd3tfykzzyhafj+ef9vl10peejh4kzoejkzvnthkw...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Any tracking of good mini-iso images?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08.10.2011 15:30, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > The only errors I had with the mini-iso were with a handful > hashing failures by aspell localisation. No sign of libbsd.so > in my run, and I only used a swap area and ZFS. (Well I am > not getting the Swedish keyboard, it still is American ASCII!) I now tried the weekly (full) image dated Oct. 3 which just works fine. Hence I conclude, that's a new issue. Maybe Robert knows more about? - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOkFYeAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtGQoQALOuoP845mWIbfhbyjBfh8PD P1Qt6fTHwcq/onf3d+IQfuvJbZbE/m0ukDYjFRE5b8RnG7YJRbzqEyeldJ6IUzYW OXFaKr3biLn9wopxw9wDfq4oWVn3VCmr+qQ/2wf1tOYhaBnZ2evdmoUOcatdS7RA Vj78xE6fJD+PB1JsrctzlrGe73yVK1cgErftW8Gls+29qGfeDlw8mrxbC7XsfksU c4lGV48kBVQcW1qBd3qUBya5ZtL8YKVobhD7qDtoGQc+pFs2aVNGqjspzKBovan6 j6HIEK4wD3BOb/Cy1w0nIXKMxUL53p0gRf35q1+zywr5M/Dh2/MPPRYn7xOWfhZz RX0Y1+3cK312KH36cNGDzTAQ4Bsyf78kB0LOqlGNTXIH6LfYbZn1yIxgTf8guiI0 E4BKj6job762YWoNOf2TYOtmtp7a/+2vKfAyFC2Jk/zP7q2z+/i36+uJ77wJrehq Q/62mxDAz16jeITs7y75e/353hsGjx7H02v0Fww7D7T42uKUrCtQbCNVM5aC0FP5 Qx/qGskCu5DT3j9g+tgIu61Y+SvES/msjRmOZwGlkojAqL9GvzGokTZc/hRyDxw4 lyhxCi87ysmGF0Hjx/ZbDN/f8WciNCyZNMNdLufYd5AyGu792GxFwbdF3ZA1zVEY 8IALPsbD9OrymYdLuMmg =33tj -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e90561f.30...@toell.net
Re: Any tracking of good mini-iso images?
lördag den 8 oktober 2011 klockan 15:15 skrev Arno Töll detta: > Hello, > > On 08.10.2011 13:52, Robert Millan wrote: > > 2011/10/8 Mats Erik Andersson : > >> So the opportunity is there: Take the installer for a spin. > >> I am running it on kfreebsd-amd64 with ZFS, and so forth. > >> My run uses the d-i snapshot 2011-09-29 as I had it handy. > > > > Is there any netinst image that currently works? > > I tried netinst of today (Oct 10) which fails to use partman-zfs: > > partman-zfs: zpool: /lib/libbsd.so.0: version `LIBBSD_0.3´ not found > (required by /lib/libgeom.so.1) > > Is that a known issue? The only errors I had with the mini-iso were with a handful hashing failures by aspell localisation. No sign of libbsd.so in my run, and I only used a swap area and ZFS. (Well I am not getting the Swedish keyboard, it still is American ASCII!) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111008133009.ga23...@mea.homelinux.org
Re: Any tracking of good mini-iso images?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, On 08.10.2011 13:52, Robert Millan wrote: > 2011/10/8 Mats Erik Andersson : >> So the opportunity is there: Take the installer for a spin. >> I am running it on kfreebsd-amd64 with ZFS, and so forth. >> My run uses the d-i snapshot 2011-09-29 as I had it handy. > > Is there any netinst image that currently works? I tried netinst of today (Oct 10) which fails to use partman-zfs: partman-zfs: zpool: /lib/libbsd.so.0: version `LIBBSD_0.3´ not found (required by /lib/libgeom.so.1) Is that a known issue? - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOkEzpAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtzvkP/3/dCIHAx9cZX2d5cgv7n/zV NKyIlrL1EBkPjYpevbKx/OL9naEA1kb6IhmHCgOjYjKI7mfIuJSTki1Cqe3l8ZFq qGHSMSwEBC/COitWKAHaDCSZtFdEpa7vjGzIYhXtbalSOEt/QCNjIc+1KIkfn+mF j8IIIcH9Vy0YIavg0uMGItdaHIX7D0QROu5w3HECvmu3y3IQovoOVzTApwrELf17 rb7IwKiljNTwatZoMixqgeGs0U22kWzwDBJnwvMiIm1Dh9V5U/4OdjB/U1U2ZQZP BmTtXhvM9UDBNmQVZ7XK13+gS+hZDteruLXcMNULu3FATMbQirSqGyP7uoZ5KWv5 gppdo26pQJYxylraI442lLAQSRnhAAe2U2+JpHJM/pyRNEoDoerNlZrJYXsH2dgX AZegj90IId2upZ80oHI+I2pEZSfLlyizsGiF2t0ngPQ1nk9TiZnPWzhtKqnnqMSJ yaKoBp1NCBVKpmEDRzRNs5VJoq4F11RdF3NybEoaOZPF7SaDn4V+1Ly3WdX4KqmI RiDkASw96ro0y9kKzBrYAxOhp0j8tEhTFBVnZjb2lRtarJ29IMLOPBkzTls+kyfg ArJIy1FNJKxLaexfv3Tyc8jhvvjSKooQDUUZgoa3BTNmPjs3OoF4lSQbRfVhGXv7 dsUgL4P/CGGph24ql7JY =RgmR -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e904cea.9080...@toell.net
Re: Any tracking of good mini-iso images?
2011/10/8 Mats Erik Andersson : > So the opportunity is there: Take the installer for a spin. > I am running it on kfreebsd-amd64 with ZFS, and so forth. > My run uses the d-i snapshot 2011-09-29 as I had it handy. Is there any netinst image that currently works? We can't just put information about "good mini.iso" in the wiki because installability doesn't only depend on the mini.iso version, as you've just verified. However, a netinst image is always capable of self-contained install. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxmjzqdjdf9fynbsdo-yeh5keeoe7hhglz+4cj1wnnb...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Any tracking of good mini-iso images?
fredag den 30 september 2011 klockan 23:26 skrev Robert Millan detta: > 2011/9/30 Mats Erik Andersson : > > Are we keeping some record of functional mini-iso images > > that we can name as pointers for people interested to have > > a go with kfreebsd-any? An uncomfortably naive formulation as I now understand, but Robert's reply got me into investigating the cause of the installer problem! The good news is that as of this night, having seen #643950 closed by NMU of Julien Christau, the debian-installer now indeed is able to install kfreebsd-amd64 from Sid! So the opportunity is there: Take the installer for a spin. I am running it on kfreebsd-amd64 with ZFS, and so forth. My run uses the d-i snapshot 2011-09-29 as I had it handy. Regards, Mats E A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111008104104.ga21...@mea.homelinux.org
Re: Any tracking of good mini-iso images?
2011/9/30 Mats Erik Andersson : > Are we keeping some record of functional mini-iso images > that we can name as pointers for people interested to have > a go with kfreebsd-any? Squeeze images should always work. Daily builds are prone to break, it's a cumbersome task to keep track of them. Feel free to help, the wiki is probably a good place, but please don't encourage users to run daily builds. People who do this are supposed to know what they're doing. > This evening I have had a go with snapshot 2009-09-29 > and it is kind of embarrasing that the bzcat problem > still is the showstopper. I'd rather spend the time fixing the actual problems first. This bzcat issue sounds a lot like #633782. Can someone try the install process and tell which packages are affected by looking at the install log? -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxm9uuwmevhkqzuxh-moxbf34n-hvzyjhtrexgng9ac...@mail.gmail.com
Any tracking of good mini-iso images?
Dear all! Are we keeping some record of functional mini-iso images that we can name as pointers for people interested to have a go with kfreebsd-any? This evening I have had a go with snapshot 2009-09-29 and it is kind of embarrasing that the bzcat problem still is the showstopper. For similar reasons it could be useful to have a list mentioning some images known to be successful. Now that ZFS works in the installer, the present situation is annoying. Best regards, Mats E A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110930211042.ga17...@mea.homelinux.org
