Bug#767583: kfreebsd-10: ar9300_devid.h license restricts modification

2014-11-03 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi!

Riley bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch writes:
 After reading a discussion on the gnu-linux-libre mailing list [1],
 I found that the two files named ar9300_devid.h have a license that
 restricts modification:

Quoting that file:

 #ifndef   __AR9300_DEVID_H__
 #define   __AR9300_DEVID_H__
 
 /*
  * AR9380 HAL device IDs.
  */
 
 /*
  * MAC Version and Revision
  */
 #define   AR_SREV_VERSION_AR9380  0x1C0
 #define   AR_SREV_VERSION_AR9580  0x1C0
 #define   AR_SREV_VERSION_AR9460  0x280
 #define   AR_SREV_VERSION_QCA9565 0x2c0
 
 #define   AR_SREV_VERSION_AR9330  0x200
 #define   AR_SREV_VERSION_AR9340  0x300
 #define   AR_SREV_VERSION_QCA9550 0x400
 #define   AR_SREV_VERSION_AR9485  0x240
 
 #define   AR_SREV_REVISION_AR9380_10  0   /* AR9380 1.0 */
 #define   AR_SREV_REVISION_AR9380_20  2   /* AR9380 2.0/2.1 */
 #define   AR_SREV_REVISION_AR9380_22  3   /* AR9380 2.2 */
 #define   AR_SREV_REVISION_AR9580_10  4   /* AR9580/Peacock 1.0 */
 
 #define   AR_SREV_REVISION_AR9330_10  0   /* AR9330 1.0 */
 #define   AR_SREV_REVISION_AR9330_11  1   /* AR9330 1.1 */
 #define   AR_SREV_REVISION_AR9330_12  2   /* AR9330 1.2 */
 #define   AR_SREV_REVISION_AR9330_11_MASK 0xf /* AR9330 1.1 revision 
 mask */
 
 #define   AR_SREV_REVISION_AR9485_10  0   /* AR9485 1.0 */
 #define   AR_SREV_REVISION_AR9485_11  1   /* AR9485 1.1 */
 
 #define   AR_SREV_REVISION_AR9340_10  0   /* AR9340 1.0 */
 #define   AR_SREV_REVISION_AR9340_11  1   /* AR9340 1.1 */
 #define   AR_SREV_REVISION_AR9340_12  2   /* AR9340 1.2 */
 #define   AR_SREV_REVISION_AR9340_MASK0xf /* AR9340 revision mask 
 */
 
 #define   AR_SREV_REVISION_AR9460_10  0   /* AR946x 1.0 */
 
 #endif/* __AR9300_DEVID_H__ */

Do we think this is copyrightable material (adding FTP Master for
input)? What does linux do (doesn't seem obvious from the link you
quoted but codesearch seems to indicate debian linunx doesn't have it)?
Has FreeBSD upstream been contacted?

Regards

  Christoph

-- 
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857  70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#767583: kfreebsd-10: ar9300_devid.h license restricts modification

2014-11-03 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi,

Christoph Egger wrote:
 Riley bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch writes:
  After reading a discussion on the gnu-linux-libre mailing list [1],
  I found that the two files named ar9300_devid.h have a license that
  restricts modification:

 What does linux do (doesn't seem obvious from the link you
 quoted but codesearch seems to indicate debian linunx doesn't have it)?

Linux has a useful 3-clause BSD file:
http://sources.debian.net/src/linux/3.16.5-1/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/reg.h/

If we stripped that file of everything except the AR_SREV_REVISION_9*
and AR_SREV_VERSION_9* macros, prefixed the chipset numbers with the
abbreviated name of the manufacturer (AR or QCA), I think we'd have all
that's needed to still compile the FreeBSD driver.

Regards,
-- 
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141103213452.ga20...@squeeze.pyro.eu.org



Bug#767583: kfreebsd-10: ar9300_devid.h license restricts modification

2014-11-03 Thread Riley Baird
Hi,

 Do we think this is copyrightable material (adding FTP Master for 
 input)? What does linux do (doesn't seem obvious from the link you 
 quoted but codesearch seems to indicate debian linunx doesn't have
 it)? Has FreeBSD upstream been contacted?

Honestly, I doubt that it is copyrightable, but I think that I'll
leave that judgement up to the FTP Masters.

Linux upstream provides all firmware in a separate tree due to GPL
requirements. Strangely enough, it seems that they are still
distributing the closed-source firmware instead of
open-ath9k-htc-firmware (which is where the license problem was
discovered).

I hadn't contacted FreeBSD upstream about this before, but I just have
now. If you're subscribed to this bug, you should have received a copy
of the message.

Riley


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5457f52d.7080...@bitmessage.ch