Re: Bug#559398: goffice0.4: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD: headers/includes issues

2009-12-07 Thread Cyril Brulebois 
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (04/12/2009):
 | In file included from /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gtk/gtk.h:228,
 |  from /usr/include/libglade-2.0/glade/glade-xml.h:26,
 |  from ../../../goffice/gtk/goffice-gtk.h:23,
 |  from ../../../goffice/gtk/goffice-gtk.c:22:
 | /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gtk/gtkitemfactory.h:47: warning: function declaration 
 isn't a prototype
 | In file included from /usr/include/sys/stat.h:107,
 |  from /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gstdio.h:26,
 |  from ../../../goffice/gtk/goffice-gtk.c:32:
 | /usr/include/bits/stat.h:198: error: expected ')' before 'dev'
 | /usr/include/bits/stat.h:199: error: expected ')' before 'dev'
 | ../../../goffice/gtk/goffice-gtk.c: In function 'cb_parent_mapped':
 | ../../../goffice/gtk/goffice-gtk.c:210: warning: ISO C forbids passing 
 argument 6 of 'g_signal_handlers_disconnect_matched' between function pointer 
 and 'void *'
 | make[4]: *** [goffice-gtk.lo] Error 1
 
 At first glance, it looks like it could be a bug in the headers
 since dev_t is declared through sys/types.h, which probably should
 be included prior to using it in a prototype.

Heya here,

it looks like this bug is still present in the latest upload of the
kfreebsd headers. Maybe I should just open bugreports against the
appropriate package instead of asking on the mailing list, it might
help keeping track of possible bugs. And if I'm wrong and headers are
fine, bugs could simply be closed?

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#559398: goffice0.4: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD: headers/includes issues

2009-12-07 Thread Petr Salinger 

| /usr/include/bits/stat.h:198: error: expected ')' before 'dev'
| /usr/include/bits/stat.h:199: error: expected ')' before 'dev'



it looks like this bug is still present in the latest upload of the
kfreebsd headers.


The bug is in our headers,
but the header comes from libc0.1-dev, not kfreebsd-kernel-headers.

It is pending -

http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/glibc-bsd/?op=compcompare[]=...@2876compare[]=...@2877
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-glibc/?op=compcompare[]=...@4023compare[]=...@4024


Maybe I should just open bugreports against the
appropriate package instead of asking on the mailing list, it might
help keeping track of possible bugs. And if I'm wrong and headers are
fine, bugs could simply be closed?


I expect more problems would be on our side, so it might be better
for unclear cases to bother us and not the package maintainer.

Petr


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Bug#559398: goffice0.4: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD: headers/includes issues

2009-12-07 Thread Cyril Brulebois 
Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz (07/12/2009):
 The bug is in our headers, but the header comes from libc0.1-dev,
 not kfreebsd-kernel-headers.

Oh, indeed. I guess some bits of sleep might help…

 I expect more problems would be on our side, so it might be better
 for unclear cases to bother us and not the package maintainer.

Makes sense, will do.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature