Re: kFreeBSD progress report week 10

2009-08-03 Thread Luca Favatella
On 30/07/2009, Luca Favatella  wrote:
[...]
> I have not been able to build iso images due to a misconfiguration on
> ftp.debian.org; I will provide them when the problem is fixed.

Problem is fixed now. Thanks to all people who worked on this.


I built iso images for monolithic [0][1] and netboot [2][3]
(I am linking both MANIFEST.udebs and mini.iso)
from current kfreebsd d-i branch [4].
I included the fix at [5] too.

Here you can find some of the localudebs I used (I didn't document
very well how to create them)
* dhcp3-client [6]
* freebsd-net-tools [7]

[0] 
http://slackydeb.altervista.org/files/debian_gnu_kfreebsd/gsoc2009_kfreebsd_progress_report_week_10/iso/monolithic/MANIFEST.udebs
[1] 
http://slackydeb.altervista.org/files/debian_gnu_kfreebsd/gsoc2009_kfreebsd_progress_report_week_10/iso/monolithic/mini.iso

[2] 
http://slackydeb.altervista.org/files/debian_gnu_kfreebsd/gsoc2009_kfreebsd_progress_report_week_10/iso/netboot/MANIFEST.udebs
[3] 
http://slackydeb.altervista.org/files/debian_gnu_kfreebsd/gsoc2009_kfreebsd_progress_report_week_10/iso/netboot/mini.iso

[4] http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/d-i/branches/d-i/kfreebsd/
[5] 
http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/d-i/people/slackydeb/kfreebsd/d-i/freebsd-net-tools-udeb.diff?r1=59567&r2=59893

[6] 
http://slackydeb.altervista.org/files/debian_gnu_kfreebsd/gsoc2009_kfreebsd_progress_report_week_10/localudebs/dhcp3-client-udeb_3.1.2p1-1_kfreebsd-i386.udeb
[7] 
http://slackydeb.altervista.org/files/debian_gnu_kfreebsd/gsoc2009_kfreebsd_progress_report_week_10/localudebs/freebsd-net-tools-udeb_7.2-5_kfreebsd-i386.udeb


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: kFreeBSD progress report week 10

2009-07-30 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Luca Favatella dixit:

>* makefs Debian package [4.2] (thanks to Thorsten Glaser)
> + testing it

That would be nice.

> + trying to use it to create ufs2 initrd as normal user in [4.3]

Whether UFS1 or UFS2 isn’t the problem, I’d say (except UFS1 is
better on floppies and such, and probably better suited for an
initrd).

Note that you might need the -s option, and that -t MUST come
first in the makefs invocation.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
“It is inappropriate to require that a time represented as
 seconds since the Epoch precisely represent the number of
 seconds between the referenced time and the Epoch.”
-- IEEE Std 1003.1b-1993 (POSIX) Section B.2.2.2


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org