kfreebsd-10 built with clang (Re: kfreebsd-10_10.0~svn255412-1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental)

[Robert Millan]

Debian FTP Masters:
>  kfreebsd-10 (10.0~svn255412-1) experimental; urgency=low
>  .
>* New upstream snapshot.
>  - 920_linux_cflags.diff: Set __FreeBSD__=10 in order to fix 
>buildability.
>  - Switch to clang (at least until/unless GCC  becomes 
> buildable).
 ^^^

GCC  is unbuildable in kernel because it drags in userland
headers such as . Lacking time and ideas on how to solve this,
I switched to clang-3.3 to get it building.

I reckon that "force majure" is not the kind of clang plan we were
discussing a few weeks ago... If someone has an alternate idea on what
to do, please tell :-)

-- 
Robert Millan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/522e5e51.7010...@debian.org

Re: kfreebsd-10 built with clang (Re: kfreebsd-10_10.0~svn255412-1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental)

[Bruno Maximo e Melo]

Therefore I can use gcc to compile my programs normally and use the
kernel with no problems, i agree.
I agree that build it with gcc for a project called GNU/kFreeBSD is more
acceptable but if it's impossible, don't lose time to build with
clang ;)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1378776107.6221.4.camel@debian