Re: kfreebsd-* buildd issues
Christoph Egger wrote: > Steven Chamberlain writes: > > Would this be possible again please :/ psmisc is still not fixed, and > > there are still surprisingly many gcc-6 uploads. > > And gcc-5. Done And, again please :) > > (Maybe even a daily cron for this would be a good idea...) > > that cron would need to run as buildd user at the very least and > reliably detect the situation .. maybe ;-) I'll gather information the > next time this happens and see. At the moment it happens almost daily! (Had a lot of GCC uploads this week). Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: kfreebsd-* buildd issues
Steven Chamberlain writes: > Would this be possible again please :/ psmisc is still not fixed, and > there are still surprisingly many gcc-6 uploads. And gcc-5. Done > (Maybe even a daily cron for this would be a good idea...) that cron would need to run as buildd user at the very least and reliably detect the situation .. maybe ;-) I'll gather information the next time this happens and see. Christoph
Re: kfreebsd-* buildd issues
Hi Christoph, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > please could somebody once again kill the hung gdb > processes? Would this be possible again please :/ psmisc is still not fixed, and there are still surprisingly many gcc-6 uploads. (Maybe even a daily cron for this would be a good idea...) Thanks, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: kfreebsd-* buildd issues
> >> Steven Chamberlain writes: > >> > Please could someone check the gcc-7 build on fayrfax, to see of it is > >> > stuck again with hung gdb processes? [...] > > Please could you do the same again... some/all of the buildds are stuck > > building gcc-snapshot. Christoph Egger wrote: > Only fayrfax and fils it seems (or someone killed the others already) I think someone else already took care of it that time. But now we had new uploads of gcc-6 and gcc-snapshot... psmisc is not yet fixed in sid... please could somebody once again kill the hung gdb processes? Many thanks, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: kfreebsd-* buildd issues
Hi! Steven Chamberlain writes: > Christoph Egger wrote: >> Steven Chamberlain writes: >> > Please could someone check the gcc-7 build on fayrfax, to see of it is >> > stuck again with hung gdb processes? >> >> It is, will kill it in a minute just need to remember my sudo password >> >> > Also, I can't see that buildd fano has built much recently either. >> >> Building gcc 6.3 and stuck there > > Please could you do the same again... some/all of the buildds are stuck > building gcc-snapshot. Only fayrfax and fils it seems (or someone killed the others already) > Hopefully soon there may be a procps upload fixing this. Thanks for taking care! Christoph signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: kfreebsd-* buildd issues
Hello, Christoph Egger wrote: > Steven Chamberlain writes: > > Please could someone check the gcc-7 build on fayrfax, to see of it is > > stuck again with hung gdb processes? > > It is, will kill it in a minute just need to remember my sudo password > > > Also, I can't see that buildd fano has built much recently either. > > Building gcc 6.3 and stuck there Please could you do the same again... some/all of the buildds are stuck building gcc-snapshot. Hopefully soon there may be a procps upload fixing this. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: kfreebsd-* buildd issues
Hi! Steven Chamberlain writes: > Please could someone check the gcc-7 build on fayrfax, to see of it is > stuck again with hung gdb processes? It is, will kill it in a minute just need to remember my sudo password > Also, I can't see that buildd fano has built much recently either. Building gcc 6.3 and stuck there Christoph signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: kfreebsd-* buildd issues
Hello, Please could someone check the gcc-7 build on fayrfax, to see of it is stuck again with hung gdb processes? Also, I can't see that buildd fano has built much recently either. Many thanks, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: kfreebsd-* buildd issues
On 2016-12-04 20:44, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Hi! > > Did we lose the kfreebsd-* buildds? > > The queues are huge, and the current wanna-build state has this: > > Building 2 1: arb (77d 22h 13m, non-free, fano), notmuch (3d 1h > 37m, fayrfax) > Building 1 1: notmuch (3d 6h 42m, fils) This is more or less correct. fano and finzi are stuck building notmuch 0.23.3-1. fayrfax and fils are stuck building notmuch 0.23.3-2. I have just killed all the builds, by killing -9 the gdb processes. Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net signature.asc Description: PGP signature
kfreebsd-* buildd issues
Hi! Did we lose the kfreebsd-* buildds? The queues are huge, and the current wanna-build state has this: Building2 1: arb (77d 22h 13m, non-free, fano), notmuch (3d 1h 37m, fayrfax) Building1 1: notmuch (3d 6h 42m, fils) Thanks, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: kfreebsd buildd
Just to add more information, the opendnssec build is failing due doxygen builds (and blocking the transition to testing). https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?arch=kfreebsd-i386&pkg=opendnssec&ver=1%3A1.3.9-4 It was successfully built before and there's no -3 to -4 related change which should make the doxygen to fail. Ondrej On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Christoph Egger wrote: > Hi! > > To answer your question on irc: You get buildd maintainers on > $a...@buildd.debian.org -> kfreebsd-am...@buildd.debian.org. Currently > that's me (and maybe still Aurelien). Doxygen "likes" to segfault. I > assume the problem is actually doxygen but I think noone did actually > debug the problem (yet) unfortunately. Cc-ing -bsd@ -- maybe one of the > (other) porters has time right now and wants to look into it. > > Christoph -- Ondřej Surý -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CALjhHG9SPG36q+=orcws_+jakan4inufbk0pp+yk4ftfjs1...@mail.gmail.com
kfreebsd buildd
Hi! To answer your question on irc: You get buildd maintainers on $a...@buildd.debian.org -> kfreebsd-am...@buildd.debian.org. Currently that's me (and maybe still Aurelien). Doxygen "likes" to segfault. I assume the problem is actually doxygen but I think noone did actually debug the problem (yet) unfortunately. Cc-ing -bsd@ -- maybe one of the (other) porters has time right now and wants to look into it. Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87sj4izxep@mitoraj.siccegge.de
Re: haxe & kfreebsd buildd
Petr Salinger writes: >> It fails in a local kfreebsd-i386 (kvm based) exactly the same way -- so >> it seems to be rather reproducible. > > I tried it today and it does not fail in my local > kfreebsd-i386 (kvm based) :-( With or without sbuild involved? Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? pgpIxMb5n0XXY.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: haxe & kfreebsd buildd
It fails in a local kfreebsd-i386 (kvm based) exactly the same way -- so it seems to be rather reproducible. I tried it today and it does not fail in my local kfreebsd-i386 (kvm based) :-( Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.lrh.2.02.1105021957040.24...@sci.felk.cvut.cz
haxe & kfreebsd buildd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, it seem that me...@debian.org has somehow requested that haxe is removed from testing. I assume it is because it does not build on kfreebsd. (Is it?) Now, when I build the package manually on kfreebsd-amd64, it works fine. There have been such buildd problems before with the exact same error message. So, I cannot do anything about it. Does this mean that I have to exclude the haxe package from kfreebsd? Please advice. Cheers, - -- Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iJwEAQECAAYFAk27QqgACgkQiFVdEFPVQL9VhAP/YpbJ4KNDtS7LUx3zoV6Pdmcl L4SdMVp3v/1xONaAE7FTmVAfKBAetspUyMyoEG8NSt2hXhDGZtEASLgJmnyji6nT v77a2UVvKQBaLtjkFf8GH1AtFxMKcdgh1QPZX/RUdBecSxRPEnOSfXyCMm3xceWg MBaHitVYqmndmJZW8Jw= =BEYx -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dbb42ab.5080...@debian.org
