Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:23:02PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > Option a) doesn't seem particularly sensible to me, btw, because the > > "risk" is near certain... > Incidentally, is it possible to put udev on hold, upgrade everything > else, install a new kernel and then select udev for upgrade? Yes. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#313073: kdvi: problem with multiple figures fixed?
Package: kdvi Version: 4:3.4.2-1 Followup-For: Bug #313073 Hi, I can no longer reproduce the bug 313073 on kdvi 3.4.2. Changelog files didn't say much, but I guess you can close this bug now. Best regards, Jukka Suomela -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=fi_FI, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages kdvi depends on: ii kdelibs4c24:3.4.2-3 core libraries for all KDE applica ii kviewshell4:3.4.2-1 generic framework for viewer appli ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-6 GCC support library ii libqt3-mt 3:3.3.4-7 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libstdc++64.0.1-6The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime Versions of packages kdvi recommends: ii tetex-bin 2.0.2-31 The teTeX binary files -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325819: doesn't use all package properties (like descriptions) from default distribution
Package: synaptic Version: 0.57-2 Severity: normal Synaptic doesn't seem to honor Package upgrade behaviour (default distribution) to display package descriptions, at least when the default distribution is not the highest one. I am experiencing this behavior for all the packages I verified, that is gnumeric and ssh. I noticed the behavior when ssh was described as a transitional package on an Etch/Sid mix. Note that Default-Release is also set to testing. In case the behavior is intentional, remember that while a few description changes are fixes that apply to old versions, most (hopefully, anyway) are updates reflecting changes in the package. For example, seeing ssh described as a transitional package depending on openssh-client and openssh-server led me to believe I better try to install the real package I needed, which failed since unstable had broken dependencies for that one. When I understood the real problem, installing ssh through synaptic worked, installing the testing version as expected. Before sending this report, I realized that this may actually concern more package properties than just the description. The dependencies have a "Dependencies of the latest version" option, but maybe a general option for determining which distribution package properties must be taken from should be implemented. This bug was present in sarge's synaptic. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386 Locale: LANG=fr_CA, LC_CTYPE=fr_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages synaptic depends on: ii apt [libapt-pkg-libc6.3- 0.5.28.6Advanced front-end for dpkg ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.1-2The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc62.3.2.ds1-22GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.4 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-2 GCC support library ii libglade2-0 1:2.5.1-2 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.5-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.8-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libncurses5 5.4-9 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libpango1.0-01.8.2-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.6-7 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libvte4 1:0.11.13-2 Terminal emulator widget for GTK+ ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System protocol client li ii libxft2 2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxml2 2.6.20-1GNOME XML library ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra ii scrollkeeper 0.3.14-10 A free electronic cataloging syste ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime Versions of packages synaptic recommends: pn deborphan (no description available) ii gksu 1.3.0-1graphical frontend to su pn libgnome2-perl (no description available) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#317962: kde: shortcuts for tab changing fixed
Package: kde Followup-For: Bug #317962 Hi, It seems that KDE 3.4 has improved the situation regarding the wishlist bug 317962. There is now a system-wide application shortcut for activating next/previous tab. I think you can close this bug now. Best regards, Jukka Suomela -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=fi_FI, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 01:59:26AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Aug 31, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you aren't > > satisfied with the current solution, the answer is to figure out a > > better one rather than lamenting that no one else has. (I do have a > This is where these threads usually end... With one of your terse one-liners? -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325744: kernel-image-2-686: Symlink lib/modules/2.6.8-2-386/source pointing nowhere
tag 325744 -sid reassign 325744 kernel-image-2.6.8-i386 merge 325744 268971 270577 268970 323999 thanks On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:44:20PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > > Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386 > Version: 2.6.8-16 > Priority: minor > Tags: sarge sid > > I have a cron job running Tiger (default installation) and it will complain > in a sarge system because of this: > > $ ls -la /lib/modules/2.6.8-2-386/source > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 100 2005-06-07 00:09 /lib/modules/2.6.8-2-386/source > -> > /home/horms/tmp/debian-kernel-test/kernel-image-2.6.8-i386/kernel-image-2.6.8-i386-2.6.8/install-386 > $ dpkg -S /lib/modules/2.6.8-2-386/source > kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386: /lib/modules/2.6.8-2-386/source > > Obviously, there is no /home/horms/tmp/ directory in my system. Really? There is on on mine :) Seriously though, this is a known problem, and it seems to be a problem with make-kpkg, and its a bit to trick to fix for Sarge. Please see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=323999 -- Horms
Bug#325155: warped: more complete patch for mpich changes
Package: warped Followup-For: Bug #325155 Here is a more complete patch for the mpich changes. I'm also somewhat confused by why the binary package does not have a dependency on the mpich shared library. It seems like it should, since it seems to build against the shared library, but that hasn't happened in the version currently in sid. If this isn't fixed by the rebuild, it will require more investigation. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.30 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) warped.patch Description: application/empty
Bug#324202: include ReiserFS ACL support in 2.6.12 kernel
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:29:02PM +0200, David Madore wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:20:37PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > Appart from my general feeling that no one should use Reiser FS, > > Why is that? I mean, certainly every filesystem has its problems, but > I don't think there's a consensus that ReiserFS is much worse than the > others? I personally find it useful because it doesn't have any > limitation on the number of inodes. After hearing Ted T'so talk about how Reiser's fsck works, basically searching for things that look like blocks and joining them up, I felt a bit uncomfortable - what if you have an image of a riserfs on a reiserfs partition? I've herad some other unplesant things too, though I can't remember any of them off hand. So I don't recommend that people use Reiser FS, though I do know a lot of work has gone into it, and a lot of people find it quite useful, and thats fine too. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#319222: ghc6: Depends on non-existing package
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:29:03AM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:04:22AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > I would like to get a new version of ghc6 into unstable soon. > > I think it's best to build the current version with gcc 3.3. > > Upstream seem to be taking a while to get the new release out > Yeah; the release seemed imminent on the 11th, but this was shortly > followed by Mrs Upstream, with complete disregard for the release > schedule, giving birth. > I'm afraid I don't have a good estimated release date now, but I think > he'll be back at work soon. > Unfortunately at each stage I've been under the impression the release > will probably have happened before m68k has built everything, making > spending time on uploading a new 6.4 et al an unattractive proposition. The work of manually bootstrapping ghc6 around libgmp is something that shouldn't be delayed any longer. It happens that thanks to the glibc maintainers choosing to push ppc64 support into the archive before glibc 2.3.5 is in testing, glibc, gcc-4.0, and gmp all have to go into testing together. If ghc6 and ghc5 aren't rebuilt against libgmp3c2 soon, then pretty much all haskell packages will need to be pulled out of testing in order to get things unstuck for etch. (That may happen regardless, in which case it's just a question of how long before ghc is eligible to get back in.) So Kurt, I think it would be a good idea if you did go ahead with an NMU here. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#325815: ppp-dev: Put all the header files into the package
Package: ppp-dev Version: 2.4.3-20050321+2 Severity: wishlist The current Debian package only puts the following files into /usr/include/pppd: ccp.h fsm.h ipcp.h lcp.h patchlevel.h pppd.h The upstream source package puts all of these files there: ccp.h eap.h ipcp.h magic.h patchlevel.h pppd.h tdb.h chap-new.h ecp.h ipxcp.h md4.hpathnames.h sha1.h upap.h chap_ms.h fsm.h lcp.hmd5.hpppcrypt.hspinlock.h Could you include all of these files in ppp-dev also? Thanks, Paul -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.4-1 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325814: mergeant: FTBFS
Package: mergeant Version: 0.52-1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source tail of the build log: cc -DXTHREADS -DORBIT2=1 -pthread -I/usr/include/libgnomedb-1.2 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgda-1.2 -I/usr/include/libgnomeui-2.0 -I/usr/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 -I/usr/include/libbonoboui-2.0 -I/usr/include/libglade-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/libgnome-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnomecanvas-2.0 -I/usr/include/libart-2.0 -I/usr/include/gconf/2 -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/include/libbonobo-2.0 -I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libgnomeprint-2.2 -I/usr/include/libgnomeprintui-2.2 -I../../.. -I../../.. -Wall -g -Wall -O2 -c libmergeant-scan.c -o libmergeant-scan.o >/dev/null 2>&1 *** Warning: Linking the executable libmergeant-scan against the loadable module*** libmergeant_handler_cidr.so is not portable! *** Warning: Linking the executable libmergeant-scan against the loadable module*** libmergeant_handler_text.so is not portable! *** Warning: Linking the executable libmergeant-scan against the loadable module*** libmergeant_handler_passmd5.so is not portable! cc -Wall -g -Wall -O2 -o .libs/libmergeant-scan .libs/libmergeant-scan.o -Wl,--export-dynamic ../../../libmergeant/.libs/libmergeant-2.so -L/usr/X11R6/lib -L/usr/lib ../../../libmergeant/handlers/.libs/libmergeant_handlers-2.so ../../../libmergeant/handlers/plugins/.libs/libmergeant_handler_cidr.so ../../../libmergeant/handlers/plugins/.libs/libmergeant_handler_text.so ../../../libmergeant/handlers/plugins/.libs/libmergeant_handler_passmd5.so -lssl ../../../libmergeant/graph/.libs/libmergeant_graph-2.so -pthread /usr/lib/libgnomedb-2.so /usr/lib/libgda-2.so /usr/lib/libgdasql.so /usr/lib/libxslt.so /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so /usr/lib/libgnome-keyring.so /usr/lib/libjpeg.so /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so -lSM -lICE -lX11 /usr/lib/libgnome-2.so /usr/lib/libesd.so /usr/lib/libaudiofile.so /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so /usr/lib/libgnutls.so /usr/lib/libtasn1.so /usr/lib/libgcrypt.so -lnsl /usr/lib/libgpg-error.so -lresolv -lrt /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so /usr/lib/libgconf-2.so /usr/lib/libbono bo-activation.so /usr/lib/libORBitCosNaming-2.so /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so /usr/lib/libpopt.so /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so /usr/lib/libgnomeprintui-2-2.so /usr/lib/libgnomeprint-2-2.so -lfontconfig /usr/lib/libfreetype.so /usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so /usr/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so /usr/lib/libglade-2.0.so -lpthread /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so /usr/lib/libxml2.so -lz /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so /usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so -lm /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so -ldl /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/share/mergeant/plugins creating libmergeant-scan Scan failed make[4]: *** [scan-build.stamp] Error 255 make[4]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/mergeant-0.52/doc/libmergeant/C' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/mergeant-0.52/doc/libmergeant' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/mergeant-0.52/doc' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/mergeant-0.52' make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2 pbuilder: Failed autobuilding of package -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: ia64 Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-itanium-smp Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325812: unison-gtk: looks for .unison-2.13.16-gtk instead of .unison for profiles
Package: unison-gtk Version: 2.13.16-1 Severity: normal - Unison is looking in .unison-2.13.16-gtk instead of .unison for user profiles. - Also, if I run unison-gtk, sync a profile and then press the quit button I get 'Killed by signal 1.' printed in the terminal, i.e. @quaver:~ 4Q> unison-gtk Killed by signal 1. @quaver:~ 4Q> -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_GB.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.ISO-8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages unison-gtk depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.1-2 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.0-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.9-1The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.2-1Layout and rendering of internatio ii unison2.13.16-1 A file-synchronization tool for Un ii unison2.9.1 [unison] 2.9.1-3A file-synchronization tool for Un Versions of packages unison-gtk recommends: ii ssh-askpass 1:1.2.4.1-3 under X, asks user for a passphras ii ssh-askpass-gnome [ssh-askpa 1:4.1p1-6 under X, asks user for a passphras -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325811: mergeant: implicitly converted pointer
Package: mergeant Version: 0.52-1 Severity: important Tags: patch Our automated buildd log filter[1] detected a problem[2] that will cause your package to segfault on architectures where the size of a pointer is greater than the size of an integer, such as ia64. [1]http://people.debian.org/~dannf/check-implicit-pointer-functions [2]Function `mg_data_handler_get_str_from_value' implicitly converted to pointer at mg-result-set.c:596 diff -urN mergeant-0.52.orig/libmergeant/mg-result-set.c mergeant-0.52/libmergeant/mg-result-set.c --- mergeant-0.52.orig/libmergeant/mg-result-set.c 2004-07-10 07:42:53.0 -0600 +++ mergeant-0.52/libmergeant/mg-result-set.c 2005-08-30 23:59:41.0 -0600 @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ #include "mg-entity.h" #include "mg-qfield.h" #include "mg-field.h" +#include "mg-data-handler.h" /* * Main static functions -- dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325813: fftw: shared libraries must be linked with dependencies
Package: fftw Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.2 fftw and its varient packages currently build shared libraries with rules like: cd mpi && gcc -shared -Wl,-soname \ -Wl,libfftw_mpi.so.$(version_major) \ -o .libs/libfftw_mpi.so.$(lib_version) sched.lo \ TOMS_transpose.lo transpose_mpi.lo fftwnd_mpi.lo fftw_mpi.lo The resulting shared library depends on the mpich shared library, but since that shared library isn't explicitly linked in the fftw rules, the dependency isn't encoded in the fftw library. This violates policy 10.2 and prevents shared library dependencies from working properly. This should be resolvable by adding the shared libraries that this library depends on to the link line, but I've not checked to be sure of exactly which libraries those are. (Also, when fixing this, you will want to change the Suggests of mpich to mpich-bin instead; the mpich package has been reorganized and the old mpich package is no longer available.) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.30 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325810: scalapack: must be rebuilt for the mpich transition
Package: scalapack
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
mpich was caught up in the C++ transition, and has also dropped the mpich
package. mpicc and friends have moved to a libmpich1.0-dev package, and
the runtime has moved to mpich-bin.
Attached is a patch that I believe should fix the build and runtime
dependencies, although please take a look and be sure that this is the
correct runtime dependency. After applying this patch, a new upload is
needed to build against the new mpich shared libraries, since the shared
library package has changed names given the C++ transition.
Please try to do this soon as possible, as all of mpich's dependencies
have to be transitioned for mpich to move into testing.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.30
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
--- scalapack-1.7/debian/control.orig 2005-08-30 22:47:03.0 -0700
+++ scalapack-1.7/debian/control2005-08-30 22:48:35.0 -0700
@@ -3,11 +3,11 @@
Priority: extra
Maintainer: Philipp Frauenfelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
-Build-Depends: mpich, lam4-dev, pvm-dev, blacs-mpich-dev, blacs-lam-dev,
blacs-pvm-dev, g77, lapack3-dev | liblapack-3.so, refblas3-dev | libblas-3.so,
f2c, debhelper
+Build-Depends: libmpich1.0-dev, lam4-dev, pvm-dev, blacs-mpich-dev,
blacs-lam-dev, blacs-pvm-dev, g77, lapack3-dev | liblapack-3.so, refblas3-dev |
libblas-3.so, f2c, debhelper
Package: scalapack1-mpich
Architecture: any
-Depends: mpich, ${shlibs:Depends}
+Depends: mpich-bin, ${shlibs:Depends}
Suggests: scalapack-doc
Description: Scalable Linear Algebra Package - Shared libs. for MPICH
ScaLAPACK is the parallel version of LAPACK and is used on Beowulf type
Bug#325808: blacs-mpi: must be rebuilt for mpich transition
Package: blacs-mpi
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
mpich was caught up in the C++ transition, and has also dropped the mpich
package. mpicc and friends have moved to a libmpich1.0-dev package, and
the runtime has moved to mpich-bin.
Attached is a patch that I believe should fix the build and runtime
dependencies, although please take a look and be sure that this is the
correct runtime dependency. After applying this patch, a new upload is
needed to build against the new mpich shared libraries, since the shared
library package has changed names given the C++ transition.
Please try to do this soon as possible, as all of mpich's dependencies
have to be transitioned for mpich to move into testing.
Thanks!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.30
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
--- blacs-mpi-1.1/debian/control.orig 2005-08-30 22:33:54.0 -0700
+++ blacs-mpi-1.1/debian/control2005-08-30 22:41:18.0 -0700
@@ -3,12 +3,12 @@
Priority: extra
Maintainer: Philipp Frauenfelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4), lam4-dev (>= 7.0.4-2), mpich (>=
1.2.5.3-1.1), g77
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4), lam4-dev (>= 7.0.4-2), libmpich1.0-dev, g77
Package: blacs1-mpich
Section: libs
Architecture: any
-Depends: mpich (>= 1.2.5.3-1.1), ${shlibs:Depends}
+Depends: mpich-bin, ${shlibs:Depends}
Description: Basic Linear Algebra Comm. Subprograms - Shared libs. for MPICH
The BLACS project is an ongoing investigation whose purpose is to
create a linear algebra oriented message passing interface that may be
Bug#325809: ptunnel: Please wrap long lines in package Description: (now 80th col)
Package: ptunnel Severity: minor Package's "Description:" field contains lines that are at col 80. Please shorten them to maximum for 75 or so in order to read the lines easier at console. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323744: netpipe: must also be rebuilt for the mpich transition
Package: netpipe
Followup-For: Bug #323744
In addition to the change of mpich package names, netpipe must also be
rebuilt for the mpich C++ transition, since the shared library package
has changed names.
The patch previously submitted on this bug is incomplete; it leaves the
binary package still depending on mpich, which no longer exists. It
should instead depend on mpich-bin. Attached is a fixed patch.
Please try to upload a new version as soon as possible, as all of mpich's
dependencies have to be transitioned for mpich to move into testing.
Thanks!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.30
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
--- netpipe-3.6.2/debian/control.orig 2005-08-30 22:53:36.0 -0700
+++ netpipe-3.6.2/debian/control2005-08-30 22:54:23.0 -0700
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Section: net
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: lam4-dev, mpich, pvm-dev,debhelper ( >= 4 )
+Build-Depends: lam4-dev, libmpich1.0-dev, pvm-dev,debhelper ( >= 4 )
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
Package: netpipe-tcp
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
Package: netpipe-mpich
Architecture: any
-Depends: mpich, ${shlibs:Depends}
+Depends: mpich-bin, ${shlibs:Depends}
Description: A network performance tool using MPICH MPI
NetPIPE is a protocol independent performance tool that encapsulates
the best of ttcp and netperf and visually represents the network
Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:23:02PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:59:48PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > > Becuase I roll my own kernel. If I upgrade the kernel with gcc-3.3 > > > (currently the Sarge default) and then upgrade to Etch (which will have > > > gcc-4.0 for a default) I will run into problems if I decide to add new > > > modules to my kernel. Thus, those with a self-compiled kernel are in a > > > situation where you can a) dist-upgrade without first upgrading the > > > kernel and risk breakage; or b) upgrade the kernel twice. Once before > > > and once after. I suppose that it is possible to build the new kernel > > > inside of a chroot (or sbuild or pbuilder) if kernel-package is being > > > used. > > > > > I am simply pointing out that there is a potential issue that needs to > > > at least be addressed in the release notes. > > > > Ah, yes. I really don't understand why the kernel embeds the gcc > > version into its version-matching logic, but I've run into this problem > > as well. I agree that it warrants documenting, though I also suspect > > that most users running self-compiled 2.6 kernels are going to be > > running something a bit newer than 2.6.8 anyway. > > > I also don't understand why the gcc version is an issue. I mean, you > can compile a library with one version of gcc and link to it when > compiling a program with a different version of gcc. We are even > talking about C, which AFAICT doesn't suffer the same binary > compatibility issues as C++. The kernel enables or disables many different things depending on the version of gcc to work around different issues. Because of this, the main kernel, and all kernel modules must be built with the exact same version of gcc, otherwise very bad things can happen. greg k-h -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325807: xserver-xorg: Backport new evdev input driver
Package: xserver-xorg
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
There is a new evdev input driver merged into upstream which works
much better than the old system (at least for me trying to use a Apple
Mighty Mouse on a IA64 system with udev, which I guess not many people
do!)
In general this input driver seems much better than the older version,
which is not supported upstream.
I removed the 053_lnx_evdev.diff, 054_lnx_evdev_mouse.diff and
055_lnx_evdev_keyboard.diff patches and added the attached, and
rebuilt (this patch also adds a small patch to enable horizontal
scrolling with my Mighty Mouse, see
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4316). I couldn't figure
out how to get it in the packages with the MANIFEST stuff, but
installing it by hand everything works as expected.
It requires loading the module and changing the mouse line to have
Driver "evdev"
with the correct Device specifier. No need for the "Buttons" options,
etc.
Since upstream have decided this is the version to use and Debian has
to make a transition one day anyway, maybe we could get a head start
with this backport?
-i
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: ia64
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.2
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
diff -urN xc-orig/config/cf/linux.cf xc/config/cf/linux.cf
--- xc-orig/config/cf/linux.cf 2005-08-31 15:18:16.0 +1000
+++ xc/config/cf/linux.cf 2005-08-31 15:20:11.0 +1000
@@ -771,7 +771,7 @@
# define OSXInputDrivers1 /**/
# endif
# if HasLinuxInput
-# define OSXInputDrivers2 aiptek
+# define OSXInputDrivers2 aiptek evdev
# else
# define OSXInputDrivers2 /**/
# endif
diff -urN xc-orig/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/input/evdev/evdev.c
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/input/evdev/evdev.c
--- xc-orig/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/input/evdev/evdev.c 1970-01-01
10:00:00.0 +1000
+++ xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/input/evdev/evdev.c 2005-08-31
15:19:23.0 +1000
@@ -0,0 +1,743 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright © 2004 Red Hat, Inc.
+ *
+ * Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute, and sell this software
+ * and its documentation for any purpose is hereby granted without
+ * fee, provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies
+ * and that both that copyright notice and this permission notice
+ * appear in supporting documentation, and that the name of Red Hat
+ * not be used in advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution
+ * of the software without specific, written prior permission. Red
+ * Hat makes no representations about the suitability of this software
+ * for any purpose. It is provided "as is" without express or implied
+ * warranty.
+ *
+ * RED HAT DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE,
+ * INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS, IN
+ * NO EVENT SHALL RED HAT BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT OR
+ * CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS
+ * OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT,
+ * NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF OR IN
+ * CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
+ *
+ * Author: Kristian Høgsberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
+ */
+
+#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
+#include "config.h"
+#endif
+
+#include
+#include
+#include
+
+/* The libc wrapper just blows... linux/input.h must be included
+ * before xf86_ansic.h and xf86_libc.h so we avoid defining ioctl
+ * twice. */
+
+#include
+
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+
+#include
+
+/* 2.4 compatibility */
+#ifndef EVIOCGRAB
+#define EVIOCGRAB _IOW('E', 0x90, int)
+#endif
+
+#ifndef BTN_TASK
+#define BTN_TASK 0x117
+#endif
+
+#ifndef EV_SYN
+#define EV_SYN EV_RST
+#endif
+/* end compat */
+
+#define ArrayLength(a) (sizeof(a) / (sizeof((a)[0])))
+
+#define MIN_KEYCODE 8
+#define GLYPHS_PER_KEY 2
+#define AltMaskMod1Mask
+#define NumLockMaskMod2Mask
+#define AltLangMaskMod3Mask
+#define KanaMask Mod4Mask
+#define ScrollLockMask Mod5Mask
+
+#define CAPSFLAG 1
+#define NUMFLAG2
+#define SCROLLFLAG 4
+#define MODEFLAG 8
+#define COMPOSEFLAG16
+
+typedef struct {
+int kernel24;
+} EvdevRec, *EvdevPtr;
+
+static int wheel_up_button = 4;
+static int wheel_down_button = 5;
+static int wheel_left_button = 6;
+static int wheel_right_button = 7;
+
+static void
+PostButtonClicks(InputInfoPtr pInfo, int button, int count)
+{
+int i;
+
+for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+xf86PostButtonEvent(pInfo->dev, 0, button, 1, 0, 0);
+xf86PostButtonEvent(pInfo->dev, 0, button, 0, 0, 0);
+}
+}
+
+static void
+EvdevReadInput(InputInfoPtr pInfo)
+{
+struct input_event ev;
+int len, value;
+int dx, dy;
+
+dx = 0;
+dy = 0;
+
+while (
Bug#325806: codeville: Missing manual pages - cdv, cdvserver, cdvpasswd, cdv-agent, cdvupgrade
Package: codeville Version: 0.1.13-1 Severity: important Please provide manuals with the package. Unable to do $ man cdv makes it hard to learn and use the program effectively. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US) Versions of packages codeville depends on: ii python2.3.5-3An interactive high-level object-o Versions of packages codeville recommends: pn python-psyco (no description available) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325805: codeville: Add /etc/init.d/codeville daemon control script
Package: codeville Severity: wishlist Codeville includes server functionality, so please provide Debian daemon control scripts. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#181025: Fwd: 0nline Dating via Cam
Adult Dating,Free Register: www.diggingdawg.com/extra/brokendates/ Remove link is below: www.diggingdawg.com/extra/brokendates/getmeoff.php -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#324900: nscd: umount /var fails (unclean shutdowns)
At Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:52:30 +0200, Zlatko Calusic wrote: > No file-rc, and no long running (bash or other) processes. Here's > process list just before /etc/init.d/umountfs runs the umount command, > with only kernel daemons removed (they're not interesting, and too > many of them): > > UIDPID PPID C STIME TTY TIME CMD > root 1 0 0 12:42 ?00:00:00 init [6] > root 1119 1 0 12:47 ?00:00:00 /bin/sh /etc/init.d/rc 6 > root 1421 1119 0 12:47 ?00:00:00 /bin/sh > /etc/rc6.d/S40umountfs stop > root 1424 1421 0 12:47 ?00:00:00 ps -ef > > As you can see, we have just init, bash that has just spawned > /etc/init.d/rc (from initscripts), and rc has reached S40umountfs in > runlevel 6. > > The real question would be, how in the hell rc managed to have > /var/db/nscd/passwd mapped, when nscd has exited long ago. Even bigger > mistery happens when I disable persistent cache, than rc somehow > "inherits" file descriptor (or was it also file mapping?) to a deleted > file in /var/run?! > > rc1119 root mem REG8,9 217016 228931 /var/db/nscd/passwd It's very weird behavior. Please disable nscd when your boot up time, and then run /etc/init.d/nscd. You can see which processes have such nscd file descriptor (fd), and you can clear process inheritance with pstree easily. If nothing has nscd fd, we can clear rc behaves oddly. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325142: Don't understand, seems like circular issue
Thomas, I guess I don't follow... udev 0.060 and to some extent greater depends on kernel 2.6.12 or greater. Not sure whether something up to .068 fixed this or not. kernel-source 2.6.11 is unstable and 2.6.8 is testing. Looking at the udev .068 package in unstable, it looks like there are plenty of problems that'll make it quite some time before it is moved to testing. About 585 other packages in testing seem to depend on the testing version of udev. This seems to be the only package in testing that requires an unstable version of a tool that would break dependencies of so many other packages. Yet somehow alsa-utils was built to require udev .063 or greater (unstable). I thought the idea was to build a package for testing, you get a testing install and build with those dependencies. I do understand that the other packages change, but they seem to try hard not to break the other packages of the same release. They as I understand it have checkpoints to make sure they don't get released if that's the case, especially below unstable. I did a dist-upgrade just recently from stable to testing and lost alsa-utils in the big upgrade and now can't seem to get it back without going through the hastle of having hundreds of packages wanting to upgrade to unstable due to dependencies. I really don't want to go there. Yes, I could probably get the sources and build it myself, but that somehow doesn't seem like it should be necessary. I understand your comment about just wait, ok not having sound is not the end of the world and I do appear to have an option. I guess like I said I just don't understand how we got to this place of such a mismatch and I'm hoping you can explain. BTW, in case it hasn't been said in a while, I and I'm sure many others do appreciate the work you and others do as package maintainers. I don't want this email to seem like complaining. It does however seem that the package should have been kept more in sync with the release it's intended for. What is it that I and the others in this boat are missing? If nothing, could this be rebuilt for testing with the testing version of udev (.056-3)? At least until udev resolves their many issues and get's a newer version into testing... Thanks, Steve -- Steve Strong, P.E. PGP Fingerprint 59A5 2DCA F01A C8E8 F847 5BAD 21B7 F851 2B0E 575C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325804: dpkg: typo in Russian man start-stop-daemon
Package: dpkg Version: 1.10.28 Severity: minor Tags: l10n patch man -L ru start-stop-daemon says that short vershion of "--nicelevel" is "-n" -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages dpkg depends on: ii dselect 1.10.28 a user tool to manage Debian packa ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information --- man/ru/start-stop-daemon.8.orig 2005-08-31 08:54:31.251938152 +0500 +++ man/ru/start-stop-daemon.8 2005-08-31 08:54:56.735064128 +0500 @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ программ, которым не имеет смысла выполнять fork() самим, или если нет возможности добавить в них код для этого. .TP -.BR -n | --nicelevel +.BR -N | --nicelevel Этот флаг перед запуском изменяет приоритет процесса. .TP .BR -m | --make-pidfile
Bug#323141: update on cpio
Here is some additional info: 1. I've verified that the current GNU version, http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/cpio/cpio-2.6.tar.bz2 , DOES NOT have this bug. 2. Debian cpio version 2.6-4 still contains the bug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325802: libc6: glibc.sh uses dpkg
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.5-5 Severity: normal /etc/init.d/glibc.sh uses dpkg --compare-versions extensively. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% which dpkg /usr/bin/dpkg Init scripts, at least this early, can't use /usr. It isn't mounted yet! -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-rc6 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312402: lessdisks: consider updating to new upstream
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 30-08-2005 05:35, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > in CVS, i have included a TODO.upgrades file which documents a number of > the changes between versions. near the bottom is notes from an actual > 0.5.x to 0.6.x upgrade, and what we needed to change. > > i have also included some code in the .config and .postinst scripts in > distrib/debian to grab info from the older configuration files if > appropriate. Thanks - that sounds really helpful. Sorry that I haven't looked into this move yet :-( > might be putting off 0.7.x even longer, with the goal of breaking it > into many smaller parts. hopefully this can be managed without driving > me insane. the initrd-netboot split was pretty clear and simple to do- > it was already pretty isolated code, but the rest is a little more > integrated. sounds sane. My first job is to get rid of 0.5.x, and then I hope to find time to look into splitting more code of - if can be cut in sane pieces off course. Also I would like to improve the debconf handling as discussed earlier, but again: moving off of the "Debian fork" of lessdisks is highest on my list. - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDFS10n7DbMsAkQLgRAor9AJ4xkMorKa5H5Sh4pJD1PgOFCkQntgCgkT2H jzq1siJ7BbX2y1qsrsrwF6o= =f2+y -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#325803: keychain error adding gpg key; seems to think pinentry is not installed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: keychain Version: 2.5.5-3 Severity: normal When using keychain to add a GPG key, I am experiencing an error message that seems to say that keychain thinks pinentry is not installed, though it is. Below is the repeatable output in a login shell: *** Begin sample output *** KeyChain 2.5.5; http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/keychain/ Copyright 2002-2004 Gentoo Foundation; Distributed under the GPL * Found existing ssh-agent (7203) * Found existing gpg-agent (7185) * Adding 2 ssh key(s)... Enter passphrase for /home/barryh/.ssh/id_rsa: Identity added: /home/barryh/.ssh/id_rsa (/home/barryh/.ssh/id_rsa) Identity added: /home/barryh/.ssh/id_dsa (/home/barryh/.ssh/id_dsa) * Adding 1 gpg key(s)... * Error: Problem adding (is pinentry installed?); giving up *** End sample output *** The keychain invocation from ~/.bash_profile is as follows *** Begin .bash_profile excerpt *** # Keychain usage keychain --nogui id_rsa id_dsa 80B2D10A [[ -f $HOME/.keychain/$HOSTNAME-sh ]] && \ source $HOME/.keychain/$HOSTNAME-sh [[ -f $HOME/.keychain/$HOSTNAME-sh-gpg ]] && \ source $HOME/.keychain/$HOSTNAME-sh-gpg *** End .bash_profile excerpt *** The following packages are installed on the system: $ dpkg -l pinentry* Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name VersionDescription +++-==-==- un pinentry(no description available) ii pinentry-curse 0.7.2-2curses-based PIN or pass-phrase entry dialog ii pinentry-doc 0.7.2-2documentation for pinentry packages un pinentry-gtk(no description available) ii pinentry-gtk2 0.7.2-2GTK+-2-based PIN or pass-phrase entry dialog un pinentry-qt (no description available) un pinentry-x11(no description available) $ dpkg -l gnupg* Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name VersionDescription +++-==-==- ii gnupg 1.4.1-1GNU privacy guard - a free PGP replacement ii gnupg-agent1.9.15-6 GNU privacy guard - password agent ii gnupg-doc 2003.04.06-4 GNU Privacy Guard documentation un gnupg2 (no description available) Regards, - -- Barry Hawkins site: www.bytemason.org weblog: www.yepthatsme.com Registered Linux User #368650 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDFSyQHuKcDICy0QoRAkuSAJ43yk0bZHkZ+pBe0zSrDhx5dMkxFQCfeIj8 aSFO5o7v12+1xe0u2rJUzVA= =BtsZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325709: ITP: xmms2 -- XMMS2 is a redesign of the XMMS music player
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 14:31 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: > [Florian Ragwitz] > > XMMS2 is a redesign of the XMMS music player. It features a > > client-server model, allowing multiple (even simultaneous!) user > > interfaces, both textual and graphical. > > Gee, and Beep Media Player is going through a similar redesign. Me wonder. What? Where? Google... > Once > that's finished and packaged, we'll have four xmmses. I think old ones can be dropped after a while with transitional packages. Cheers, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325801: logcheck: new regex to filter imap "Moved xxx bytes of new mail" messages
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.41 Severity: wishlist Hi folks, thanks for your work maintaining logcheck, it works well. When my users read their mail using imap (usually via squirrelmail, not sure about other clients) I get a message like this in the log: Aug 22 21:03:32 phoenix imapd[6551]: Moved 11323 bytes of new mail to /home/winky/mail/mbox from /var/spool/mail/winky host= localhost [127.0.0.1] It seems to me that this is a normal enough system event that it can be filtered so I added a new regex to /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/imap: imapd\[[._[:alnum:]-]+\]: Moved [0-9]+ bytes of new mail to [^[:space:]]+ from [^[:space:]]+ host= localhost \[127.0.0.1\]$ Thanks, Toby -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages logcheck depends on: ii adduser 3.67Add and remove users and groups ii cron 3.0pl1-91 management of regular background p ii debconf [debconf 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 2.14.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii grep 2.5.1.ds1-5 GNU grep, egrep and fgrep ii lockfile-progs 0.1.10 Programs for locking and unlocking ii logcheck-databas 1.2.41 database of system log rules for t ii logtail 1.2.41 Print log file lines that have not ii mailx1:8.1.2-0.20050715cvs-1 A simple mail user agent ii postfix [mail-tr 2.2.4-1 A high-performance mail transport ii sysklogd [system 1.4.1-17System Logging Daemon logcheck recommends no packages. -- debconf information: * logcheck/noroot: logcheck/changes: * logcheck/install-note: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#322713: (fwd) Bug#322713: dvipdfm doesn't understand gs anymore
On Aug 24, 2005, at 3:17 AM, Hilmar Preusse wrote: I'm sending this E-Mail to the author of dvipdfm and of dvipdfmx as dvipdfm seems to be dead actually (the latest version is from 2001 and in the Mail archive got 3 Mails in 2004 and none in 2005). The following bug was submitted here at the Debian Bug Tracking system. There is an example file demonstrating that behaviuor but it consist of private content and hence was not published. Please contact us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you need it for debugging. Thanks for the message. I could not remember the exact version date, but DVIPDFMx had no problem with PDF name containing "#" character. But it is true that DVIPDFM has such problem. Because the authors of DVIPDFMx have no right to fix a bug in DVIPDFM, we cannot do anything. The only person who can fix the bug is the author of DVIPDFM. Best, ChoF. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325644: keychain error 'ssh_askpass: exec(/usr/bin/ssh-askpass): No such file or directory'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Cesar Mendoza wrote: > Hi, > > For now try the --nogui option on keychain. That should take care of > your problem. Can you please tell me which version where you running > before you upgraded? I would like to check why is the difference in > behavior. > > Bye > Cesar Mendoza > http://www.kitiara.org [...] Adding the --nogui reference does indeed return the behavior to what I experienced prior to the upgrade to 2.5.5-3. As far as my previous version, I run sid on i386, and update packages daily, so I am pretty sure I had 2.5.5-2 before that. Sorry I haven't filed the gpg bug yet; will try to do that before I go to bed. I have been working on some packages I really want to get released. Regards, - -- Barry Hawkins site: www.bytemason.org weblog: www.yepthatsme.com Registered Linux User #368650 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD4DBQFDFSm9HuKcDICy0QoRAmcQAJYiD/LqC6dM94RW4FZQ79jSxJggAJ4rcl5p wozTqgfr+HWk8hwaoqo8Iw== =ZfW7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325800: logcheck: filters miss nfs mount/unmount messages
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.41
Severity: wishlist
Hi, thanks for maintaining logcheck, it works very well. At some
point it appears as if the log messages for nfs mounts and unmounts
changed out from under you. There's a rule in
/etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/nfs to filter out messages like this:
Aug 22 21:00:49 phoenix mountd[29423]: authenticated mount request from
warthog.caboteria.org:601 for /home (/home)
but it expects the message to be slightly different: "rpc.mountd:"
instead of "mountd[29423]". I believe that adding the following line
to the file will catch those messages:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ mountd\[[0-9]+\]: authenticated (un|)mount
request from [._[:alnum:]-]+:[0-9]+ for (/[[:alnum:]]*)+ \((/[[:alnum:]]*)+\)$
Thanks,
Toby
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages logcheck depends on:
ii adduser 3.67Add and remove users and groups
ii cron 3.0pl1-91 management of regular background p
ii debconf [debconf 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy
ii debianutils 2.14.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii grep 2.5.1.ds1-5 GNU grep, egrep and fgrep
ii lockfile-progs 0.1.10 Programs for locking and unlocking
ii logcheck-databas 1.2.41 database of system log rules for t
ii logtail 1.2.41 Print log file lines that have not
ii mailx1:8.1.2-0.20050715cvs-1 A simple mail user agent
ii postfix [mail-tr 2.2.4-1 A high-performance mail transport
ii sysklogd [system 1.4.1-17System Logging Daemon
logcheck recommends no packages.
-- debconf information:
* logcheck/noroot:
logcheck/changes:
* logcheck/install-note:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#319222: ghc6: Depends on non-existing package
Hi Kurt, On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:04:22AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > I would like to get a new version of ghc6 into unstable soon. > I think it's best to build the current version with gcc 3.3. > Upstream seem to be taking a while to get the new release out Yeah; the release seemed imminent on the 11th, but this was shortly followed by Mrs Upstream, with complete disregard for the release schedule, giving birth. I'm afraid I don't have a good estimated release date now, but I think he'll be back at work soon. Unfortunately at each stage I've been under the impression the release will probably have happened before m68k has built everything, making spending time on uploading a new 6.4 et al an unattractive proposition. Believe me, I'm as frustrated by this as you. But at the same time, I don't think Debian is in a position to throw stones regarding such matters :-) > that should work with gcc 4.0, and I'm not really sure how stable > that is going to be on all arches we have. Looking at the > changelog, it seems that it already had it share of problems with > compiler versions. *nod*; I've done prerelease builds on a couple of arches, so I'm hoping that won't be a problem this time round. > There are going to be some problems getting this build in any > case. ghc6 build-depends on itself, which currently means it > depends on libgmp3, and that of course conflicts with > libgmp3c2/libgmp3-dev. This means someone will have to build all > those things manually on all arches. > > How to get around this and get a working version: [...] An alternative is to install everything but the Haskellish packages, unpack the debs of the things you are missing and: sed -i "s#/usr/#`pwd`/usr/#g" usr/bin/* for p in usr/lib/ghc-*/package.conf.shipped do sed -e "s#/usr/\(lib\|share\)/ghc#`pwd`&#g" \ < "$p" > `echo "$p" | sed "s/\.shipped$//"` done for f in usr/bin/*6 do ln -s `echo "$f" | sed "s#.*/##"` `echo "$f" | sed "s/6$//"` done and set PATH accordingly. This has the advantage (for me, at least) of not needing twiddling as root. > I'll can do an NMU of this if you want. Please feel free. Thanks Ian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325722: ttf-mph-2b-damase - printing fails from Abiword
Hi, when using the ttf-mph-2b-damase font in an Abiword document, printing (CUPS, rastertogutenpr...) failed. When I changed the font to Bitstream Vera Sans Mono printing worked again. Regards, Arthur. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#194460: Auto-generation of rsh server hosts file(s)
Greetings, The update-cluster package provides an efficient way to manage multiple configuration files from a single master list of machines. It is used, for example, by mpich, jmon, dsh and update-cluster-hosts to generate and maintain config files involving lists of machines. I'm wondering whether this approach can be used efficiently to configure rsh and ssh host lists, such as /etc/hosts.equiv and, with a bit more difficulty, /etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts2 (this would involve polling all of the relevant machines for their public keys, or harvesting them from some user's ~/.ssh/known_hosts2 file). hosts.equiv is easy to do, but hard to assign in terms of ownership: does rsh-server own it, or is it more generic to all rsh server implementations? After two idle years in the BTS, I'd like to move forward on this, and would be happy to generate patches as appropriate. So, any thoughts on where this should go: update-cluster-hosts, rsh-server, etc? And Matthew or Colin, would you accept into ssh an update-cluster script to auto-generate /etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts2? Thanks, -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe! http://www.take6.com/albums/greatesthits.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#49627: mile
farther system
Bug#49627: subject
begin still
Bug#325733: Please add xvattr to xbase-clients
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 16:30 +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Please add the xvattr tool > > (http://freshmeat.net/projects/xvattr/?topic_id=100%2C125) > > to xbase-clients. It's useful to tweak XV stuff at runtime without server > restart, for instance to get xine running on the external CRTC port > instead of the laptop panel (xvattr -a XV_SWITCHCRT -v 1). > > Found this hack mentioned on > http://www.winischhofer.at/linuxsispart3.shtml#download > > (quite a lot of other good XV hints at > http://www.winischhofer.at/linuxsispart2.shtml) It should be packaged on its own (it's in Marillat's repository, IIRC), but certainly not in xbase-clients. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#250216: [tex-k] Plans about supporting TrueType/Type42 fonts in dvips?
> "Karl" == Karl Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Karl> Support for OpenType would probably be even more useful going Karl> forward. Do you know if they be handled via Type42? Or some Karl> other way? [Pre Scriptum: written for the archives and the CCed bugreport; not just for the people on the CC list -JimC] If by OpenType you mean sfnt/CFF fonts, you just embed the (optionally subsetted) CFF table mostly just like a type1. (The CFF table is in type2 format; you may need to convert the outlines to type1 depending on which version of postscript is targeted. It may also be CID keyed; that may also require a conversion.) The rest of the tables are only relevant for deciding which glyphs to set for a given string and what if any kerning is required. Type42 works for all sfnt/glyf fonts, no matter what additional tables they have. (OpenType, AAT, Graphite, et al.) -JimC -- James H. Cloos, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325799: sl-modem-source: unresolved symbols due to class/class_simple change in 2.6.13
Package: sl-modem-source Version: 2.9.9d-6 Severity: important hi, upon load under kernel 2.6.13 slamr.ko reports: [4297338.593000] slamr: Unknown symbol class_simple_device_add [4297338.593000] slamr: Unknown symbol class_simple_destroy [4297338.594000] slamr: Unknown symbol class_simple_device_remove [4297338.594000] slamr: Unknown symbol class_simple_create from kernel 2.6.13 on class_simple cannot be used anymore. instead class has to be used. thanks martin -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (300, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages sl-modem-source depends on: ii bzip2 1.0.2-8high-quality block-sorting file co ii debhelper 4.9.7 helper programs for debian/rules ii module-assistant 0.9.8 tool to make module package creati Versions of packages sl-modem-source recommends: ii kernel-package9.006 A utility for building Linux kerne -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12
On Aug 31, "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Incidentally, is it possible to put udev on hold, upgrade everything > else, install a new kernel and then select udev for upgrade? Everything else which does not depend on the new version of conflicts with the old version, which will be a lot of packages (among them everything which depends on HAL). -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#325791: libofx2: stale debian/shlibs causes missing reverse dependencies
"Aaron M. Ucko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The libofx source package includes a debian/shlibs file that > inappropriately reads > > libofx 1 libofx1c2 > > and evidently overrides dh_makeshlibs; as a result, packages such as > gnucash that build against the library fail to pick up appropriate > dependencies, because there is no shlibs entry for libofx.so.2. Whoops; I thought dh_makeshlibs would automatically remake that. Deleted, and the new package is now building and will be installed shortly. Thanks for the catch. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325710: [Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)] Bug#325710: libofx2: Tries to replace libofx.so.2.0 which is part of libofx1c2
reassign 325710 ftp.debian.org retitle 325710 "Please delete version 1:0.8.0-1 version of libofx1c2 and libofx-dev" thanks Explanation: Version 1:0.8.0-1 of libofx failed to catch an soname bump (upstream didn't indicate, and I foolishly failed to check). So it contains a package named libofx1c2, but which install libofx2, not libofx1. Version 1:0.8.0-2 of libofx is correct: it installs libofx2, and doesn't install a libofx1c2 at all. But people who caught the 1:0.8.0-1 version and now upgrade to 1:0.8.0-2 find that libofx2-0.8.0-2 conflicts with libofx1c2-0.8.0-1, of course. It seems to me the correct course is to expunge the 0.8.0-1 packages entirely. It is perfectly fine for the 0.7.0-7.1 packages to stay in the archive. If this is not the correct fix, please reassign the bug back to libofx2, and I would also appreciate instructions on the correct way to fix the bug. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#314719: Ubuntu packages
El sáb, 27-08-2005 a las 10:24 +0200, Martin Samuelsson escribió: > [ubuntu maintainer Cc:ed] > > Good morning, (kind of) > > Is there any progress on this? I had some time problems... but probably the next week. :D > If it is of any help, ubuntu packages now seem to be available at: > > http://ziemia.ath.cx/~at/dev/ubuntu.html Thx... I will see it. > Maybe some joined effort could be worked out? No source debs published > there though, as far as I can see. > > Feel free to tell me if I can do anything to help. Ok... thx! I will consider it. -- Luciano Bello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux Argentina signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#325536: mozilla: FTBFS: change in behavior of __attribute__((unused))
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 02:11:26AM +0200, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote: > Thanks Steve, where is this patch from? Is this debian made or from > bugzilla or somewhere? If it is not yet know to upstream I will forward it. I wrote it. I poked around in upstream cvs a little bit, and couldn't find an equivalent fix. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:59:48PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Becuase I roll my own kernel. If I upgrade the kernel with gcc-3.3 > > (currently the Sarge default) and then upgrade to Etch (which will have > > gcc-4.0 for a default) I will run into problems if I decide to add new > > modules to my kernel. Thus, those with a self-compiled kernel are in a > > situation where you can a) dist-upgrade without first upgrading the > > kernel and risk breakage; or b) upgrade the kernel twice. Once before > > and once after. I suppose that it is possible to build the new kernel > > inside of a chroot (or sbuild or pbuilder) if kernel-package is being > > used. > > > I am simply pointing out that there is a potential issue that needs to > > at least be addressed in the release notes. > > Ah, yes. I really don't understand why the kernel embeds the gcc > version into its version-matching logic, but I've run into this problem > as well. I agree that it warrants documenting, though I also suspect > that most users running self-compiled 2.6 kernels are going to be > running something a bit newer than 2.6.8 anyway. > I also don't understand why the gcc version is an issue. I mean, you can compile a library with one version of gcc and link to it when compiling a program with a different version of gcc. We are even talking about C, which AFAICT doesn't suffer the same binary compatibility issues as C++. As far as running newer self-compiled kernels, that certainly is not the case for me. In fact, I only compile my own kernel becuase I require the mppe patch on my machines. If not for that, I would be running a stock kernel because I have been bitten in the past by staying on the bleeding edge. I know that I am only one data point, but I am sure that I am not the only one. > Option a) doesn't seem particularly sensible to me, btw, because the > "risk" is near certain... > Incidentally, is it possible to put udev on hold, upgrade everything else, install a new kernel and then select udev for upgrade? -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto pgpsZCEqDzQC6.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#94175: it's me, Alexander
it's me Alexander Invite me http://rygalytalogapu.com/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=AFICE.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#85088: =))
it's me Pat Invite me http://rygalytalogapu.com/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=BEJBB.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#76625: it's me, Jasper
my name is Jasper leave me a message http://rygalytalogapu.com/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=CDDHE.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#45291: it's me, Darla
my name is Darla leave me a message http://rygalytalogapu.com/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=FEHAI.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#56179: from Nicole
it's me Nicole Invite me http://rygalytalogapu.com/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=EDICA.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12
On Aug 31, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you aren't > satisfied with the current solution, the answer is to figure out a > better one rather than lamenting that no one else has. (I do have a This is where these threads usually end... -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#22506: it's me, Elton !!!!
remember me? my page http://rygalytalogapu.com/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=HHEJD.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325536: mozilla: FTBFS: change in behavior of __attribute__((unused))
Thanks Steve, where is this patch from? Is this debian made or from bugzilla or somewhere? If it is not yet know to upstream I will forward it. On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 02:07:51AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Package: mozilla > Severity: serious > > The current mozilla package fails to build on alpha, arm, and ia64 > because it uses __attribute__((unused)) to mark static functions that > are called only from assembly routines. As of gcc 3.1, > __attribute__((used)) exists for marking static functions that are used; > as of gcc 4.0, __attribute__((unused)) still suppresses compiler > warnings about unused static functions, but it does *not* prevent the > compiler from optimizing them away. > > The attached patch should fix this failure for all three architectures. > It has only been tested on alpha, and each architecture has its own > implementation for this bit of code, but this patch fixes all uses of > __attribute__((unused)), so it should be sufficient. (FWIW, one other > architecture -- i386 -- already uses ((used)) in the code...) > > Since this bug is in the XPCOM code, it also affects other packages that > build copies of XPCOM. I'll clone this bug off to them as soon as I > have a bug number back. > > Thanks, - Alexander p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/). -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#292477: mozilla-thunderbird: "view" pull down filter 'To Do' doesn't work with search setting "Entire Message"
forwarded 292477 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301142 thanks finally the confirmed upstream bug. On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 02:39:54PM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote: > Package: mozilla-thunderbird > Version: 1.0-3 > Severity: normal > > > On the Thunderbird main window, just above the message index, we have > the "view" filter to the left and the "search messages text input box" > to the right. > > 1. Some of the messages in the message index have been marked as "To Do" > (from the "Message -> Label -> 4 To Do" menu item. > > 2. In the search messages input box, the "Entire Message" option is > choosen (from the pull down menu that we get when we click on the lens > and down arrow icon) > > When 1 and 2 above are done, and "To Do" is selected in the "view" > filter pull down menu (on the left side just above the message index), I > would expect only the messages marked as "To Do" in step 1 above to be > displayed, but they not displayed (infact, nothing is displayed). This > however, works with the rest of the options in step 2 (i.e. Subject, > Sender, Subject Or Sender and Find In Message). > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: 3.1 > APT prefers unstable > APT policy: (500, 'unstable') > Architecture: i386 (i686) > Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686 > Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > > Versions of packages mozilla-thunderbird depends on: > ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit > ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries > an > ii libfontconfig1 2.2.3-4 generic font configuration > library > ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared > lib > ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-7 GCC support library > ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.1-3 The GLib library of C routines > ii libgtk2.0-0 2.4.14-2The GTK+ graphical user > interface > ii libpango1.0-01.6.0-3 Layout and rendering of > internatio > ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-6 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 > ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client > li > ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous > exte > ii libxft2 2.1.2-6 FreeType-based font drawing > librar > ii libxp6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System printing > extension > ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client > libra > ii libxt6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Toolkit Intrinsics > ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) > configu > ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime > > -- debconf information: > mozilla-thunderbird/browser: Debian > > - Alexander p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/). -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325558: login: newgrp quite broken?
Nicolas> I still have my question: Do you think that the paragraph of my Nicolas> previous mail would have permitted you to understand how newgrp Nicolas> works? You need to insert "user" after "this" in the first addition. It's tough to give a yes/no answer. Had the patch been applied, _and_ had I read it with a lawyer's eyes, then yes, I would have known how it actually works. But my presupposition that pre-existing supplementary membership in the group would insulate me from being prompted would still likely be so strong that my inner lawyer would take a coffee break, and I would miss the literal meaning even as my eyes scanned over it. -- Optimist: We're only two weeks behind schedule. Pessimist: The schedule is a whole two weeks ahead of us. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#152152: it's me, Goldie
it's me Goldie Invite me http://rygalytalogapu.com/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=IEHIEH.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#24900: from Jasmine
my name is Jasmine leave me a message http://rygalytalogapu.com/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=HFAJJ.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297840: Bug#297846: mozilla-thunderbird: does not send attachment of attached mail
tags 297846 + moreinfo tags 297840 + moreinfo thanks you just did not answer any of my requests. Setting moreinfo. - Alexander p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/). -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#145370: from Omar
remember me? my page http://rygalytalogapu.com/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=IFEGCJ.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#142998: it's me, Mervin
it's me Mervin Invite me http://rygalytalogapu.com/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=IFHAAB.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#101647: it's me, Isaac
remember me? my page http://rygalytalogapu.com/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=IJIDFC.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#100421: from Numbers
it's me Numbers Invite me http://rygalytalogapu.com/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=IJJFHI.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#121201: from Earnestine
it's me Earnestine Invite me http://rygalytalogapu.com/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=IHIHJI.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#121756: :D
it's me Nathaniel Invite me http://rygalytalogapu.com/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=IHICED.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#122776: =)
it's me Elnora Invite me http://rygalytalogapu.com/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=IHHCCD.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#126984: ;-)
my name is Kip leave me a message http://rygalytalogapu.com/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=IHDABF.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#146449: :D
my name is Antoine leave me a message http://rygalytalogapu.com/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=IFDFFA.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#155740: 8)
my name is Kenny leave me a message http://rygalytalogapu.com/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=IEECFJ.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#20977: it's me, Sharon
remember me? my page http://rygalytalogapu.com/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=HJACC.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#155819: from Joseph
it's me Joseph Invite me http://rygalytalogapu.com/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=IEEBIA.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#250216: [tex-k] Plans about supporting TrueType/Type42 fonts in dvips?
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 06:59:28PM +0200, Karl Berry wrote: > are there any plans to enable dvips to include TrueType fonts in a > Postscript file, by wrapping them up as Type42 fonts? > > I am not aware of anything along these lines. Tom? > > If there is some TrueType+TeX volunteer interested in working on it, > patches would be welcome, I'm sure. I also feel sure there are a lot of > subsidiary issues. It would be good to be compatible with pdftex's > truetype support, if that makes sense. (I'm not too familiar with what > pdftex can and can't do with truetype.) I have looked into supporting TrueType in xdvi. A key subsidiary issue that came up (and stopped it for me) was compatibility with ttf2tfm and ttf2pk. They come up with their own character encoding that basically (as I recall) chooses the lowest-numbered 255 or 256 available characters into the encoding vector. Adding to the difficulties is the fact that ttf2tfm/ttf2pk use the old (version 1) freetype library. I tried porting these programs to freetype2, but the latter lacks some features of the original freetype, and is never likely to have them (Werner Lemberg said that programs should use pango instead for these features). --Paul Vojta, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:06:39AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 09:43:33PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > 1) upgrade your kernel > > > > 2) dist-upgrade > > > > That doesn't seem terribly elaborate to me? And if people choose not to > > > > read, well, they get a failure on dist-upgrade and get to figure it out > > > > for themselves, I guess. > > > Will that still apply in the case of a home-rolled kernel? > > Yes, of course. The reason this is such an issue in the first place is > > because kernel dependencies are *not* expressed as package dependencies; > > instead, udev checks the running kernel version in the preinst. > Thanks for the clarification. > > > However, if you have to compile your own kernel, do you upgrade kernel, > > > dist-upgrade and then recompile with the new gcc? > > Why? > Becuase I roll my own kernel. If I upgrade the kernel with gcc-3.3 > (currently the Sarge default) and then upgrade to Etch (which will have > gcc-4.0 for a default) I will run into problems if I decide to add new > modules to my kernel. Thus, those with a self-compiled kernel are in a > situation where you can a) dist-upgrade without first upgrading the > kernel and risk breakage; or b) upgrade the kernel twice. Once before > and once after. I suppose that it is possible to build the new kernel > inside of a chroot (or sbuild or pbuilder) if kernel-package is being > used. > I am simply pointing out that there is a potential issue that needs to > at least be addressed in the release notes. Ah, yes. I really don't understand why the kernel embeds the gcc version into its version-matching logic, but I've run into this problem as well. I agree that it warrants documenting, though I also suspect that most users running self-compiled 2.6 kernels are going to be running something a bit newer than 2.6.8 anyway. Option a) doesn't seem particularly sensible to me, btw, because the "risk" is near certain... -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#297886: mozilla-thunderbird: after adding a custom filter rule it'll be not the default
tags 297886 + moreinfo tags 297886 + wontfix severity 297886 + wishlist retitle 297886 mozilla-thunderbird: select newly added filter rule right after it has been added thanks On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 12:07:37AM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: > Dobai-Pataky Balint wrote: > > Package: mozilla-thunderbird > > Version: 1.0-3 > > Severity: normal > > > > > > after i add a custom filter rule like 'Reply-To', it'll be not the selected > > one > > for the rule, so i select it from the combo again. > > > I don't see the problem here. I think there is just no such feature > implemented > ... or do you say 'make default' somewhere? > Any news? I still don't see that this is good for all. Unless you can explain why all need this, I will keep this wontfix. If you care for this bug you can always try to lobby the mozilla community (e.g. forums.mozillazine.org) ... nevertheless, if you take action, please remember to keep this bug up-to-date. - Alexander p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/). -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#48477: from Rhoda
my name is Rhoda leave me a message http://rygalytalogapu.com/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=FBFCC.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#70001: :D
remember me? my page http://rygalytalogapu.com/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=CJJJI.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#74889: ;)
it's me Elvin Invite me http://rygalytalogapu.com/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=CFBBA.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#74909: from Bridgett
my name is Bridgett leave me a message http://rygalytalogapu.com/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=CFAJA.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#94197: it's me, Branden !!!
it's me Branden Invite me http://rygalytalogapu.com/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=AFIAC.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325558: login: newgrp quite broken?
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:54:06PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Nicolas> This situation does not looks like buggy per se to me. It is > Nicolas> (just) a documentation issue. In fact, the information is not > Nicolas> duplicated in /etc/group and /etc/gshadow. The list of members > Nicolas> in /etc/groups indicate the list of users who will gain the > Nicolas> permissions of this group. > > Nicolas> The list of members in /etc/gshadow indicate the list of users > Nicolas> who can gain the permissions of this group by requesting them > Nicolas> (with newgrp or sg, without any password and this will be > Nicolas> logged). > > Let me read between your lines. > > The membership list in /etc/group determines which users get the group > into their supplementary list during login (and, I guess, any other > program that calls initgroups (3)). (Note that initgroups comes from the libc, which is not aware of the gshadow file, so this is normal that this function does not use any information from gshadow) > The membership list in /etc/gshadow determines which users can newgrp > or sg to the group. With a fall back to /etc/group if there is no entry for the group in gshadow (which is the case when you delete the gshadow file). > Maybe the really counterintuitive thing here is that _either_ file > should be consulted for membership info when I am newgrping to a group > that is _already_ in my supplementary list. I am not getting any new > privileges that way; all that changes is that new files will be created > owned by the other group, and I could do that already, with less > convenience, by using chgrp after the fact. Yes. unless in some rare cases, there is no need to change the primary group. However newgrp or sg can be used in another use cases: getting the privileges of a group you are not in, by providing a password. This can be used to setup boxes with a guest account and let some of the guests gain more privileges. In those cases, guest is not a member of any group (in /etc/group and /etc/gshadow), and the password of the privileged group is distributed to some of the physical persons using the guest account. You can also imagine some configurations where somebody do not want to be in a given group (to avoid mistake), but wants to be able to gain this group privilege with newgrp (without password if this user is in the member list in gshadow). The gshadow file also permits to use group administrators (see gpasswd(1)). If you are not willing to do any of these, you can live without any notice without the /etc/gshadow file. I still have my question: Do you think that the paragraph of my previous mail would have permitted you to understand how newgrp works? Regards, -- Nekral -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 11:48:17PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > (pruning CC list; AFAIK all will still get the message this way) > On Tuesday 30 August 2005 04:56, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > So we're going to have another release with a very elaborate upgrade > > > procedure in the release notes (which a lot of users, especially > > > desktop users, don't read anyway)? > > 1) upgrade your kernel > > 2) dist-upgrade > > That doesn't seem terribly elaborate to me? And if people choose not > > to read, well, they get a failure on dist-upgrade and get to figure it > > out for themselves, I guess. > Yeah, and that IMHO is exactly the problem. > Debian used to be known for relatively trouble free upgrades. For the > Woody-Sarge upgrade the upgrade problems (the kernel issues at least) > were mostly limited to non-mainstream architectures, but now we're likely > to hit 80% of Sarge desktop users. No, failing to read the release notes for sarge and doing a blind dist-upgrade on a desktop system was also likely to rip out large swaths of packages in the process. I understand that we all want dist-upgrade to Just Work, but I don't see how complaining that the release notes contain important information that users ignore at their peril is different from complaining that the list of packages being removed on apt-get dist-upgrade contains important information that users ignore at their peril. If you aren't satisfied with the current solution, the answer is to figure out a better one rather than lamenting that no one else has. (I do have a vague idea of what this would entail, and I'm not willing to spend a month of my time on trying to make it work.) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#325457: gabber: depends on obselete libaries
* Johannes Kloos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Package: gabber > Version: 0.8.8-5 > Severity: important > > Hello, > the gabber package in sid depends on libgnomemm1.2-9 and libgtkmm1.2-0, > which are obselete. Please update the package. > > greetings, > Johannes Thank you for remembering me of this. I'm currently working on trying to stabilize the Gabber 2 code, so it can replace gabber. Gabber 2 is already compiled against the newer gtkmm libs. regards, -- .''`. Goedson Teixeira Paixao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : http://people.debian.org/~goedson/ `. `' Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#325239: pppoe.8.gz: explain pty or no arguments
Dan Jacobson a écrit : Well, in SYNOPSIS pppd pty 'pppoe [pppoe_options]' [pppd_options] pppoe -A [pppoe_options] we see that just plain pppoe with no arguments is illegal. So someone should add it to the SYNOPSIS, at least. It wouldn't hurt to also mention what it does. Actually it is there, although the synopsis isn't all that clear I guess. The first line is "this is how you use pppoe with pppd", and there, calling it with no options is legal, and (depending on what you want to do) useful. The second one is "this is what's useful when you're runnning pppoe as a user in a shell, and there only the -A option (list all access concentrators) is indeed useful. Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295623: mozilla-thunderbird: message download on initial account setup even if told to not
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 08:00:56PM -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote: > > After initial account setup, thunderbird tries to download email from given > server even if told to not do so on last dialog box. I've experienced this > situation on two fresh install/setups. What is the last dialog box for you? I can say Exit there and after confirming that I want to exit now, thunderbird starts without downloading anything. - Alexander p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/). -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297846: mozilla-thunderbird: does not send attachment of attached mail
tags 297846 + moreinfo thanks On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 12:04:43AM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: > Dobai-Pataky Balint wrote: > > Package: mozilla-thunderbird > > Version: 1.0-3 > > Severity: normal > > > > > > i attached a previously recieved mail (wich had a .rtf attachment). > > i got report from the recipient that the mail arrived, > > and had a .rtf attachment, in it the mail text of my attached mail, > > and not the real .rtf. > > the reald .rtf did not arrive there. > > in my sent folder it's viewed right - a text attachment (the text of the > > attached mail) > > and the .rtf as it is. > > > > strange. > > the recipient has windows98 with it's outlook express. > > > > Maybe this was just an inline attachment? Don't know if outlook express knows > about different things :). > > Maybe you can craft an example mail *without* sensitive information that you can attach to this public bug? - Alexander p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/). -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302122: mozilla-thunderbird: Wrong mailbox and signature pathes importing old Mozilla data
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 09:30:25AM +0200, Florian Boor wrote: > Importing mails and settings from Mozilla 1.x doesn't work properly. > The paths to the mailbox directory are wrong, the same with the path to the > signature files. > For example i have this in the configuration dialog: > /home/fuchs/fuchs/l2n1x5vx.slt/Mail/MyMailBox > > But it should be: > /home/fuchs/.mozilla-thunderbird/r7b3524f.default/Mail/MyMailBox > > For news there is actually a new directory created: > /home/fuchs/fuchs/l2n1x5vx.slt/News > But this one is empty - no news from the old account is copied there. Sorry for the late answer ... this sounds interesting. How old is your mozilla profile? Can you reproduce this with a fresh mozilla profile too? - Alexander p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/). -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325798: insserv: makes 2.6 kernel system unbootable and 2.4 system barely usable
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 02:02:30AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > Basically, this package should not have been allowed into unstable and is > already of questionable use for Debian at this point, given Debian's > extremely limitted LSB support. As such, I demand that it be > immediately removed from the archive; if it ever gets reintroduced, it > should first go to and be thoroughly tested via experimental. Thanks! Er, there is nothing "limited" about Debian's support for LSB init scripts. You (and the maintainer of this package) seem to be making the error of thinking that LSB support imposes requirements on how an LSB-compliant OS manages its *own* init scripts. It does not -- it only specifies the features that an LSB-compliant OS must make available for use by an LSB init script. So yes, if insserv assumes that all Debian initscripts are LSB init scripts, it is fundamentally broken. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#325234: debian-policy: mention if coincidence runlevels 2345 all same
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 06:33:14AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote: > B> Debian doesn't enforce a policy on the multi-user run-levels (2-5), this > B> is the decision of the local administrator. > > OK, it wouldn't hurt to mention that fact then in the policy document, > just to make things clear. Or maybe it would hurt. I don't know. Policy is not the right place to document this. If you want it documented, talk to debian-doc@lists.debian.org -- The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the pavement is precisely one bananosecond -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#319296: mozilla-thunderbird: "Do this automatically from now on" greyed out in open dialog
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 12:25:18PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: > Ben Eastep wrote: > > >When an attachement is of type application/octet-stream, thunderbird > >figures out what to open it by some means, presumably based on the filename, > >however the open dialog greys out the "Do this automatically for files like > >this from now on." Presumably this is since a user wouldn't want to pick a > >single helper to open ALL application/octet-streams, however it would be > >useful if the user could still edit what thunderbird does with files of > >whatever specific type thunderbird settled on. Otherwise, with any file > >types that the user always recieves as octet-stream, there is no way for the > >user to specifiy a default handling for those files (very annoying) > > > > > You can think of any default handling that makes sense? > You ever answered this mail? I cannot find any answer in my mailbox, thus I either received none or it sank because you replied to my private address only - in this case sorry ;). FWIW, I still can't see how to implement a default octet-stream handler. Maybe one could leverage the 'file' command to extract a suitable mime-type. Anyway, this is not an option since there is no such command under windows. - Alexander p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/). -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#310770: Preliminary section added to CVS
Yes, I think that will do nicely, thanks. luke On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 12:17:50AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > tag 310770 pending confirmed patch > thanks > > I've added the following entry to the Faq in the DDP CVS, it will be > made available with the next package upload. Please review it and > tell me if it fixes this bug. > > - > Are there package upgrades in `stable'? > > No new functionality is added to the stable release. Once a Debian > version is released and tagged `stable' it will only get security > updates. That is, only packages for which a security vulnerability has > been found after the release will be upgraded. All the security > updates are served through id="ftp://security.debian.org";>. > > Security updates serve one purpose: to supply a fix for a security > vulnerability. They are not a method for sneaking additional changes > into the stable release without going through normal point release > procedure. Consequently, fixes for packages with security issues will > not upgrade the software. The Debian Security Team will backport the > necessary fixes to the version of the software distributed in `stable' > instead. > > For more information related to security support please read the > http://www.debian.org/security/faq";> or > the id="http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/";>. > > - -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#317249: mozilla-thunderbird: Very long subjects cause immediate program termination.
clone 317249 -1 retitle -1 mozilla-thunderbird: long subject line display messed up - text gets wrapped if larger than label area tags -1 + confirmed tags 317249 unreproducible thanks I clone this bug, because it contains info on the display issue of long lines. Further, I set the original bug to unreproducible. Nevertheless, I see the output and for me it won't be a suprise if drawing text in such a way could lead to some segfault et al in some special situation. - Alexander p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/). -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325670: gcc-4.0: regression: generates wrong code for inlined memcpy
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 12:09:40AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 12:34:01AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > When passing pointers to 4-byte types to memcpy(), gcc-4.0 generates > > wrong code which assumes that these pointers are aligned at 4-byte > > boundaries for purposes of optimization, ignoring the implicit cast to > > (char *) in the prototype of memcpy(). > There is no implicit cast to char *. memcpy gets two void pointers. Hmm, yes... Unfortunately, it appears that using (void *) is not sufficient to stop gcc-4.0 from peeking at the pointer in this case -- whereas, if memcpy() is implemented as a function, it certainly would be... On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 12:05:35AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 02:45:41PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > By any chance, can you provide a reference to the C spec that shows > > gcc's current behavior is valid? Given that traceroute is among the > > programs that breaks under gcc-4.0, it seems to me that the assumption > > that it's safe to use memcpy this way has been around for quite some > > time. > 6.3.2.3, paragraph 7. That paragraph appears to read: A pointer to an object or incomplete type may be converted to a pointer to a different object or incomplete type. If the resulting pointer is not correctly aligned for the pointed-to type, the behavior is undefined. Otherwise, when converted back again, the result shall compare equal to the original pointer. When a pointer to an object is converted to a pointer to a character type, the result points to the lowest addressed byte of the object. So by making the initial cast from char * to the pointer type that requires greater alignment, the programmer is invoking undefined behavior, which means gcc's implementation of memcpy() is allowed by the spec. That's what I wanted to know, thanks. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#325140: mozilla-thunderbird: Can't save a small image in an e-mail
Here comes the /maybe/ upstream bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290050 ... let's see! - Alexander p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/). -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#324609: mozilla-firefox: Left click also does not open files with helper apps
Package: mozilla-firefox Version: 1.0.4-2sarge2 Followup-For: Bug #324609 I can confirm that I'm also affected by this bug. Most disruptive when the link isn't a direct link to a file, meaning "save link as" isn't an option. For example: This used to (prior to mozilla-firefox 1.0.4-2sarge2) initiate a download of the CSV file from the website it belonged to. Between this bug and #324311 mozilla-firefox is broken to the point that an alternative browser or rollback of mozilla-firefox is required, which is unfortunate. Thanks for maintaining this package! I'm hopeful that we'll see these issues fixed shortly. Cheers, James. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages mozilla-firefox depends on: ii debianutils2.8.4 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii fontconfig 2.3.1-2 generic font configuration library ii libatk1.0-01.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfontconfig1 2.3.1-2 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.4 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc11:3.4.3-13GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-02.6.4-3 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libidl00.8.5-1 library for parsing CORBA IDL file ii libjpeg62 6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libkrb53 1.3.6-2sarge2 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1PNG library - runtime ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-13The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft22.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxp6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System printing extension ii libxt6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii psmisc 21.5-1Utilities that use the proc filesy ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4.sarge.2 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325798: insserv: makes 2.6 kernel system unbootable and 2.4 system barely usable
Package: insserv Version: 1.00.8-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I copied the two scripts, checked that the boot order in the rc*d directories still made sense, then ran "insserv - -v" and ended up with a serverely broken system: 1) if booting from a 2.6 kernel, the system repeatedly reboots right at the stage when it should be loading modules selected in /etc/modules. 2) if booting from a 2.4 kernel, it goes all the way to the last boot script, but portmap and libwrap both report being unable to load some SO libraries. In any case, X barely loads, while GNOME gets stuck at its splash screen; meanwhile, a few command line tools work on the virtual console as expected, others don't. I would also like to point out that according to Debian Policy, software that has the potential to render a system unusable must have a priority of "extra", not "optional". Basically, this package should not have been allowed into unstable and is already of questionable use for Debian at this point, given Debian's extremely limitted LSB support. As such, I demand that it be immediately removed from the archive; if it ever gets reintroduced, it should first go to and be thoroughly tested via experimental. Thanks! PS: this being said, if and when Debian achieves LSB compliance, this package might eventually be safe and even usefull, but this is definitely not the case now, so it must be removed right away. - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.18-newpmac Locale: LANG=fi_FI.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages insserv depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an insserv recommends no packages. - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDFOWGeXr56x4Muc0RAnblAJ9moh4Ju/lLWhRs1pX9nKtUwPKaFQCgoutV UzjQqxyPB/7lb6cWInbvo/M= =WiEy -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325233: rp-pppoe assumes names all start with eth
Sure wish the nic- thing was mentioned in /usr/share/doc/ppp/README.pppoe Good chance users might not always see the bottom of /usr/share/doc/ppp/README.Debian.gz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325234: debian-policy: mention if coincidence runlevels 2345 all same
B> Debian doesn't enforce a policy on the multi-user run-levels (2-5), this B> is the decision of the local administrator. OK, it wouldn't hurt to mention that fact then in the policy document, just to make things clear. Or maybe it would hurt. I don't know. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
