Bug#388874: checksecurity: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: checksecurity Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in checksecurity debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: checksecurity -- postinst:8 checksecurity/oldconf -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388884: desktop-profiles: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: desktop-profiles Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in desktop-profiles debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: desktop-profiles -- config:15 desktop-profiles/replace-gconf-system-wide-path-file desktop-profiles -- config:27 desktop-profiles/replace-gconf-system-wide-path-file -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388877: console-setup: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: console-setup Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in console-setup debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: console-setup -- config:1817 console-setup/dont_ask_layout -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388880: cricket: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: cricket Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in cricket debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: cricket -- config:13 cricket/config_tree_moved -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388881: dailystrips: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: dailystrips Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in dailystrips debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: dailystrips -- config:9 dailystrips/warning-etcdefs -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388891: em8300: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: em8300 Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in em8300 debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: em8300 -- postinst:27 em8300/microcode/download_failed -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388875: colormake: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: colormake Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in colormake debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: colormake -- config:14 colormake/renamed -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388879: cpufreqd: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: cpufreqd Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in cpufreqd debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: cpufreqd -- config:17 cpufreqd/no_pm cpufreqd -- config:26 cpufreqd/no_procfs_sysfs -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388898: gradm2: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: gradm2 Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in gradm2 debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: gradm2 -- config:9 gradm2/create_dev_grsec -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388886: dpkg-www: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: dpkg-www Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in dpkg-www debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: dpkg-www -- config:7 dpkg-www/update-apache-config -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388876: console-cyrillic: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: console-cyrillic Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in console-cyrillic debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: console-cyrillic -- config:187 console-cyrillic/abusing_debconf -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388902: harden: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: harden Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in harden debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: harden -- config:8 harden/welcome -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388878: console-setup-mini: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: console-setup-mini Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in console-setup-mini debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: console-setup-mini -- config:1817 console-setup/dont_ask_layout -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388895: flashplugin-nonfree: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: flashplugin-nonfree Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in flashplugin-nonfree debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: flashplugin-nonfree -- config:20 flashplugin-nonfree/not_exist -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388906: hybserv: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: hybserv Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in hybserv debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: hybserv -- config:6 hybserv/configure-hybrid-notice -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388887: dput: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: dput Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in dput debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: dput -- config:11 dput/config-file-format -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388904: harden-servers: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: harden-servers Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in harden-servers debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: harden-servers -- config:10 harden-servers/inetd harden-servers -- config:14 harden-servers/vncserver harden-servers -- config:8 harden-servers/plaintext harden-servers -- postinst:13 harden-servers/vncserver -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388893: facturalux: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: facturalux Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in facturalux debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: facturalux -- config:10 facturalux/databasenote -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388920: libvpopmail-freecdb: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: libvpopmail-freecdb Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in libvpopmail-freecdb debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: libvpopmail-freecdb -- postinst:33 shared/vpopmail/enableplugin -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388905: hwtools: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: hwtools Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in hwtools debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: hwtools -- config:9 hwtools/no-scsi -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388894: filterproxy: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: filterproxy Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in filterproxy debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: filterproxy -- config:9 filterproxy/readme -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388882: dbishell: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: dbishell Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in dbishell debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: dbishell -- config:7 dbishell/dbiwarning -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388925: logcheck-database: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: logcheck-database Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in logcheck-database debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: logcheck-database -- config:17 logcheck-database/standard-rename-note -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388888: dump: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: dump Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in dump debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: dump -- config:13 dump/dumpdates_is_a_symlink dump -- config:19 dump/moving_from_etc_to_var -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388939: mush-src: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: mush-src Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in mush-src debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: mush-src -- config:7 mush-src/build -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388907: hylafax-server: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: hylafax-server Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in hylafax-server debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: hylafax-server -- postinst:221 hylafax-server/attachment hylafax-server -- postinst:231 hylafax-server/configure_note -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388896: gidentd: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: gidentd Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in gidentd debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: gidentd -- config:5 gidentd/default_daemon -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388956: resolvconf: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: resolvconf Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in resolvconf debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: resolvconf -- config:33 resolvconf/bad-pppconfig-hook resolvconf -- config:38 resolvconf/bad-pppconfig-hook resolvconf -- config:42 resolvconf/bad-pppoeconf-hook resolvconf -- config:46 resolvconf/bad-xisp-hook resolvconf -- config:51 resolvconf/bad-xisp-hook resolvconf -- config:75 resolvconf/downup-interfaces -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388944: netenv: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: netenv Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in netenv debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: netenv -- config:247 netenv/info_interfaces netenv -- config:265 netenv/noconf netenv -- config:267 netenv/twoconfs -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388900: gtktrain: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: gtktrain Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in gtktrain debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: gtktrain -- config:7 gtktrain/get-train-schedule -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388911: john: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: john Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in john debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: john -- config:20 john/no-replacement -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388940: muttprint: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: muttprint Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in muttprint debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: muttprint -- config:34 muttprint/utf8 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388938: mueller7-dict: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: mueller7-dict Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in mueller7-dict debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: mueller7-dict -- postinst:51 mueller7-dict/no-utf-8-locale -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388952: qmail-src: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: qmail-src Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in qmail-src debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: qmail-src -- config:7 qmail-src/build -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388916: leafnode: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: leafnode Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in leafnode debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: leafnode -- config:85 leafnode/update-groupinfo leafnode -- config:87 leafnode/update-groupinfo leafnode -- config:92 leafnode/expireinfo -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388889: efingerd: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: efingerd Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in efingerd debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: efingerd -- config:14 efingerd/note -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388934: mozilla-browser: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: mozilla-browser Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in mozilla-browser debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: mozilla-browser -- config:26 mozilla/prefs_note -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388953: quake2-data: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: quake2-data Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in quake2-data debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: quake2-data -- config:66 quake2-data/shareinst quake2-data -- config:70 quake2-data/fullinst -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388985: wvdial: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: wvdial Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in wvdial debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: wvdial -- config:66 wvdial/passphrases_mismatch -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388918: libsensors3: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: libsensors3 Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in libsensors3 debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: libsensors3 -- config:12 libsensors3/old2.6kernel libsensors3 -- config:20 libsensors3/nosensors_2.6 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388966: ssh-krb5: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: ssh-krb5 Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in ssh-krb5 debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: ssh-krb5 -- config:18 ssh/ssh2_keys_merged ssh-krb5 -- config:72 ssh/insecure_telnetd ssh-krb5 -- config:94 ssh/forward_warning -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388950: powertweakd: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: powertweakd Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in powertweakd debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: powertweakd -- config:23 powertweak/daemon_config -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388979: user-euro-es: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: user-euro-es Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in user-euro-es debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: user-euro-es -- config:10 user-euro-es/configure-euro-es -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388947: nvidia-cg-toolkit: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: nvidia-cg-toolkit Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in nvidia-cg-toolkit debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: nvidia-cg-toolkit -- config:20 nvidia-cg-toolkit/not_exist -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388963: snort-pgsql: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: snort-pgsql Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in snort-pgsql debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: snort-pgsql -- config:56 snort-pgsql/needs_db_config snort-pgsql -- config:66 snort-pgsql/config_parameters snort-pgsql -- config:75 snort-pgsql/please_restart_manually -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388897: f-prot-installer: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: f-prot-installer Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in f-prot-installer debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: f-prot-installer -- config:88 f-prot-installer/install_later f-prot-installer -- postinst:28 f-prot-installer/failed -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388908: interchange: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: interchange Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in interchange debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: interchange -- config:114 interchange/groupnoroot interchange -- config:172 interchange/cansoap interchange -- config:77 interchange/usernoroot -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388957: rssh: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: rssh Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in rssh debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: rssh -- config:17 rssh/update-config-pre-2.2 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388991: xsmbrowser: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: xsmbrowser Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in xsmbrowser debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: xsmbrowser -- config:19 xsmbrowser/etc_dir -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388910: isdnvboxserver: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: isdnvboxserver Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in isdnvboxserver debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: isdnvboxserver -- config:171 isdnvboxserver/doityourself isdnvboxserver -- config:66 isdnvboxserver/doityourself isdnvboxserver -- postinst:217 isdnvboxserver/spoolcreate isdnvboxserver -- postinst:260 isdnvboxserver/spoolcreate -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388883: ddclient: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: ddclient Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in ddclient debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: ddclient -- config:161 ddclient/newconfigfmt ddclient -- config:57 ddclient/modifiedconfig -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388943: nbd-server: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: nbd-server Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in nbd-server debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: nbd-server -- config:13 nbd-server/autogen -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388899: gtk2-engines-spherecrystal: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: gtk2-engines-spherecrystal Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in gtk2-engines-spherecrystal debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: gtk2-engines-spherecrystal -- config:22 gtk2-engines/restart_gtk_apps_for_svg -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388962: snort-mysql: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: snort-mysql Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in snort-mysql debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: snort-mysql -- config:57 snort-mysql/needs_db_config snort-mysql -- config:67 snort-mysql/config_parameters snort-mysql -- config:75 snort-mysql/please_restart_manually -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388946: openssh-server: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: openssh-server Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in openssh-server debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: openssh-server -- config:61 ssh/insecure_telnetd -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388974: tiger: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: tiger Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in tiger debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: tiger -- config:7 tiger/policy_adapt -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388921: libvpopmail-lmysql: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: libvpopmail-lmysql Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in libvpopmail-lmysql debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: libvpopmail-lmysql -- postinst:33 shared/vpopmail/enableplugin libvpopmail-lmysql -- postinst:34 shared/vpopmail/mysqlconf -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388903: harden-clients: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: harden-clients Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in harden-clients debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: harden-clients -- config:8 harden-clients/plaintext -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388914: lam-runtime: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: lam-runtime Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in lam-runtime debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: lam-runtime -- config:10 lam-runtime/lam4 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388976: twig: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: twig Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in twig debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: twig -- config:12 twig/db-update twig -- config:7 twig/minimal-setup -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388960: slrnpull: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: slrnpull Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in slrnpull debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: slrnpull -- config:49 slrnpull/run_manual -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388912: karrigell: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: karrigell Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in karrigell debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: karrigell -- config:12 karrigell/note -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388945: nut: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: nut Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in nut debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: nut -- config:29 nut/change_system_user -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388901: gwhois: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: gwhois Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in gwhois debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: gwhois -- config:7 gwhois/oldfiles -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388977: tpctl: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: tpctl Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in tpctl debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: tpctl -- config:7 tpctl/need-thinkpad-modules tpctl -- config:8 tpctl/apmiser-installed -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388933: mgetty-fax: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: mgetty-fax Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in mgetty-fax debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: mgetty-fax -- config:9 mgetty-fax/new_security_scheme -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388932: mga-vid-common: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: mga-vid-common Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in mga-vid-common debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: mga-vid-common -- config:6 mga-vid-common/device_node_warning -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388954: radioclk: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: radioclk Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in radioclk debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: radioclk -- config:20 radioclk/configure_ntp -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388986: xapple2: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: xapple2 Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in xapple2 debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: xapple2 -- config:8 xapple2/suid -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388941: mysql-server-5.0: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: mysql-server-5.0 Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in mysql-server-5.0 debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: mysql-server-5.0 -- config:15 mysql-server-5.0/mysql_install_db_notes -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388973: tex-common: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: tex-common Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in tex-common debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: tex-common -- config:48 tex-common/cnf_name -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) Versions of packages tetex-base depends on: ii ucf 2.0015 Update Configuration File: preserv Versions of packages tetex-bin depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.5 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 2.17.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii dialog1.0-20060221-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe ii dpkg 1.13.22package maintenance system for Deb ii ed0.2-20 The classic unix line editor ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-4GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libfontconfig12.4.1-2generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.2.1-5FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.1.1-13 GCC support library ii libice6 1:1.0.1-2 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg62 6b-13 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libkpathsea4 3.0-18 path search library for teTeX (run ii libpaper1 1.1.20 Library for handling paper charact ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-5.2 PNG library - runtime ii libpoppler0c2 0.4.5-4.1 PDF rendering library ii libsm61:1.0.1-3 X11 Session Management library ii libstdc++64.1.1-13 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libt1-5 5.1.0-2Type 1 font rasterizer library - r ii libx11-6 2:1.0.0-9 X11 client-side library ii libxaw7 1:1.0.2-4 X11 Athena Widget library ii libxext6 1:1.0.1-2 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxmu6 1:1.0.2-2 X11 miscellaneous utility library ii libxpm4 1:3.5.5-2 X11 pixmap library ii libxt61:1.0.2-2 X11 toolkit intrinsics library ii mime-support 3.37-1 MIME files 'mime.types' 'mailcap ii perl 5.8.8-6.1 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii sed 4.1.5-1The GNU
Bug#388931: mediawiki1.7: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: mediawiki1.7 Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in mediawiki1.7 debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: mediawiki1.7 -- config:29 mediawiki/upgrade-1d4 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388885: dhcp3-client: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: dhcp3-client Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in dhcp3-client debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: dhcp3-client -- postinst:22 dhcp3-client/dhclient-script_moved dhcp3-client -- postinst:25 dhcp3-client/dhclient-needs-restarting -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388928: masqmail: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: masqmail Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in masqmail debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: masqmail -- config:176 masqmail/you_are_not_finished masqmail -- config:29 masqmail/note_moved_tpl -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388913: kbedic: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: kbedic Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in kbedic debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: kbedic -- postinst:34 kbedic/failed_download -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388980: vtun: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: vtun Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in vtun debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: vtun -- config:8 vtun/passwords -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388948: phpgacl: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: phpgacl Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in phpgacl debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: phpgacl -- config:13 phpgacl/setup -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388975: trn4: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: trn4 Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in trn4 debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: trn4 -- config:89 trn4/whoami-change -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388959: slrn: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: slrn Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in slrn debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: slrn -- config:72 slrn/manual_getdescs -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388981: webmin-ldap-user-simple: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: webmin-ldap-user-simple Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in webmin-ldap-user-simple debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: webmin-ldap-user-simple -- config:18 webmin-ldap-skolelinux/no-auto-config -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388929: mcelog: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: mcelog Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in mcelog debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: mcelog -- postinst:21 mcelog/unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388990: zhcon: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: zhcon Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in zhcon debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: zhcon -- config:8 zhcon/rebuild_kernel -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388917: libsctp1: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: libsctp1 Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in libsctp1 debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: libsctp1 -- config:43 lksctp-tools/nosctp -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388982: wflogs: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: wflogs Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in wflogs debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: wflogs -- config:145 wflogs/email_more_questions -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388890: ejabberd: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: ejabberd Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in ejabberd debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: ejabberd -- config:14 ejabberd/nomatch -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388971: teapop-pgsql: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: teapop-pgsql Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in teapop-pgsql debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: teapop-pgsql -- config:38 teapop/already-passwd -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388955: reiser4progs: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: reiser4progs Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in reiser4progs debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: reiser4progs -- config:9 reiser4progs/new_disk_format -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388961: snort: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: snort Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in snort debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: snort -- config:105 snort/please_restart_manually snort -- config:114 snort/config_parameters -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388969: teapop-ldap: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: teapop-ldap Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in teapop-ldap debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: teapop-ldap -- config:38 teapop/already-passwd -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388958: shaper: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: shaper Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in shaper debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: shaper -- config:33 shaper/kernel-modules -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388942: nbd-client: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: nbd-client Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in nbd-client debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: nbd-client -- config:17 nbd-client/no-auto-config -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388909: ipppd: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: ipppd Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in ipppd debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: ipppd -- config:22 ipppd/wrongif -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388936: msttcorefonts: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: msttcorefonts Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in msttcorefonts debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: msttcorefonts -- config:73 msttcorefonts/blurb -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388926: logtool: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: logtool Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in logtool debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: logtool -- config:76 logtool/error-multiple -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388987: xplanet: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: xplanet Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in xplanet debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: xplanet -- config:11 xplanet/Stable_Release -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388922: libvpopmail-mysql: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: libvpopmail-mysql Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in libvpopmail-mysql debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: libvpopmail-mysql -- postinst:33 shared/vpopmail/enableplugin libvpopmail-mysql -- postinst:34 shared/vpopmail/mysqlconf -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388937: mtop: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: mtop Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in mtop debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: mtop -- config:81 mtop/mismatch mtop -- config:86 mtop/info -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388989: xvmount: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: xvmount Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in xvmount debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: xvmount -- config:27 xvmount/wrong_format xvmount -- postinst:112 xvmount/generate_succeeded xvmount -- postinst:114 xvmount/generate_failed xvmount -- postinst:82 xvmount/convert_failed xvmount -- postinst:84 xvmount/convert_succeeded -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388924: logcheck: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: logcheck Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in logcheck debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: logcheck -- config:14 logcheck/install-note logcheck -- config:17 logcheck/changes -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388935: mp3info: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Package: mp3info Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the abuse of debconf templates of type note. First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the bug report...or just close it yourself. One or more template(s) has/have been identified in mp3info debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are displayed to users at low or medium priority. The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the note type should be used only for important notes that the user really should see. On the other hand, the low priority is meant for very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases. The medium priority is meant for normal items that have reasonable defaults. As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist. Please consider one of the following options: - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, this is indeed not a very strong drawback - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file is only displayed when users upgrade the package - change the template type to error in case this note is meant to be displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details - raise the priority to high. This should be the last option to consider. It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT if not reading the note. A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-) Template(s) identified in your package: mp3info -- config:12 mp3info/newmp3info -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
