Bug#1068408: Kicad bundle broken

2024-05-01 Thread Carsten Schoenert

Hello,

Am 12.04.24 um 19:31 schrieb Javier Vilarroig:

I'm in the same situation.

Right now I can't use Kicad.


you all use Debian testing, you have always the option to pick obviously 
working versions from snapshot.debian.org. Or pull in required packages 
from unstable.
If you need to work with mission critical stuff please use Debian 
stable. For sure you know this.


The situation is a bit more complex, the situation in testing would not 
have happen if the time_64 transition would not have blocked a lot of 
arch related packages for good reason.


Also in the past KiCad was usable with older libraries, which seems not 
to be the case anymore. On the other hand the KiCad application could 
handle such version mismatches far better and give the user some 
feedback what happened.


Within Debian the problem is not within the kicad binary package, this 
is "usable" without the libraries, so the libraries packages need to be 
more strict now which version of kicad they are work with..


--
Regrads
Carsten



Bug#1070167: openrc: postinst fails with not executable script in /etc/init.d/

2024-05-01 Thread Lorenzo Puliti
Package: openrc
Version: 0.45.2-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: plore...@disroot.org

Hi,

it appears that, at least under certain conditions, openrc postinstall
script fails if a sysvinit script in /etc/init.d/ is not executable.

Note that recently debhelper started to chmod -x initscripts when a package is
removed but not purged, so openrc should deal whit non executebles files under
/etc/init.d/

Not sure if the bug is in openrc tools or in update-rc.d/invoke-rc.d's openrc 
bits 

See https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=6549
for some output of the problem

Best,
Lorenzo


-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.7.9-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: runit (via /run/runit.stopit)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages openrc depends on:
ii  insserv  1.24.0-2
ii  libaudit11:3.1.2-2.1
ii  libc62.37-18
ii  libcap2  1:2.66-5
pn  libeinfo1
ii  libpam0g 1.5.3-7
pn  librc1t64
ii  libselinux1  3.5-2+b2

openrc recommends no packages.

Versions of packages openrc suggests:
pn  policycoreutils  
pn  sysvinit-core



Bug#938934: ITA: freedink -- humorous top-down adventure and role-playing game

2024-05-01 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Dear Keiran,

What happened with your intention to adapt FreeDink?
-- 
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen



Bug#1070166: google-compute-engine-oslogin FTCBFS: uses the build architecture compiler

2024-05-01 Thread Helmut Grohne
Source: google-compute-engine-oslogin
Version: 20240415.00-1
Tags: patch
User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftcbfs

google-compute-engine-oslogin fails to cross build from source, because
it uses the build architecture compiler. Looking closer, this happens
during dh_auto_install where debhelper does not pass cross tools.
Apparently, it performs some of the build steps during dh_auto_install.
I tracked this down to not setting the VERSION variable during
dh_auto_build. Once setting it, make install doesn't build anything
anymore and the cross build succeeds. I'm attaching a patch for your
convenience.

Helmut
diff --minimal -Nru google-compute-engine-oslogin-20240415.00/debian/changelog 
google-compute-engine-oslogin-20240415.00/debian/changelog
--- google-compute-engine-oslogin-20240415.00/debian/changelog  2024-04-22 
09:01:53.0 +0200
+++ google-compute-engine-oslogin-20240415.00/debian/changelog  2024-05-01 
09:16:48.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+google-compute-engine-oslogin (20240415.00-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix FTCBFS: Build during dh_auto_build. (Closes: #-1)
+
+ -- Helmut Grohne   Wed, 01 May 2024 09:16:48 +0200
+
 google-compute-engine-oslogin (20240415.00-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * New upstream release. (closes: #1041130)
diff --minimal -Nru google-compute-engine-oslogin-20240415.00/debian/rules 
google-compute-engine-oslogin-20240415.00/debian/rules
--- google-compute-engine-oslogin-20240415.00/debian/rules  2024-04-22 
09:01:53.0 +0200
+++ google-compute-engine-oslogin-20240415.00/debian/rules  2024-05-01 
09:16:48.0 +0200
@@ -7,6 +7,10 @@
 %:
dh $@
 
+override_dh_auto_build:
+   dh_auto_build -- \
+   VERSION=$(DEB_VERSION_UPSTREAM)
+
 override_dh_auto_install:
dh_auto_install -- \
LIBDIR=/usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) \


Bug#1070122: apt-cache rdepends with an exact match name

2024-05-01 Thread Patrice Duroux
Control: close 1070122

Sorry, this was due to an additional sources.list.d file still active and
contributing to this result.
As the apt-cache result does not show information like for `apt list` (pkg/name
version arch), I was blind.



Bug#1070103: libnode-dev: Version bump of NODE_MODULE_VERSION makes node-gyp build broken modules

2024-05-01 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le mer. 1 mai 2024 à 10:11, Matijs van Zuijlen  a écrit :

> On 30/04/2024 09:33, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
> > On 30/04/2024 08:53, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> >> To solve both, you should do `pkgjs-install` next to package.json, so
> >> that your system-installed
> >> modules are symlinked to the local node_modules directory.
> >> Then "npm install" shouldn't remove the symlinks and install just the
> >> missing ones.
> >
> > There is no package.json, because I am using npm -g install renovate,
> > not installing from a checked-out repository. Is npm -g install not
> > supposed to work?
> >
> > I will now try installing from the repository and let you know if that
> > works.
>
> I tried this and I can now run renovate from inside its repository, but
> I don't know how to then install the renovate tool for general use. So
> this is not (yet) a replacement for npm -g install.
>

npm -g install is not a good tool anyway...


Bug#1070103: libnode-dev: Version bump of NODE_MODULE_VERSION makes node-gyp build broken modules

2024-05-01 Thread Matijs van Zuijlen

On 30/04/2024 09:33, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:

On 30/04/2024 08:53, Jérémy Lal wrote:
To solve both, you should do `pkgjs-install` next to package.json, so 
that your system-installed

modules are symlinked to the local node_modules directory.
Then "npm install" shouldn't remove the symlinks and install just the 
missing ones.


There is no package.json, because I am using npm -g install renovate, 
not installing from a checked-out repository. Is npm -g install not 
supposed to work?


I will now try installing from the repository and let you know if that 
works.


I tried this and I can now run renovate from inside its repository, but 
I don't know how to then install the renovate tool for general use. So 
this is not (yet) a replacement for npm -g install.


Kind regards,
Matijs van Zuijlen



Bug#1069989: bmusb: Add Appstream metainfo announcing HW support

2024-05-01 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 09:35:46AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> It would probably be more useful I package v4l2proxy, which has been part
> of bmusb for a while; it would allow “anything” to go use it, although
> with some local setup. I believe Nageru is the only other software that
> uses bmusb right now.

This is now waiting in NEW (for the new binary package).

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: https://www.sesse.net/



Bug#1069740: kitty: incorrectly acts like mouse button is pressed

2024-05-01 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi Russell,

On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 07:31:02AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> Package: kitty
> Version: 0.33.1-1
> Severity: normal
> 
> I routinely run kitty with between 4 and 16 terminals in one kitty window.
> When moving the mouse across the screen it's a common occurance (multiple
> times per hour) for one terminal to act like the mouse button is pressed
> and try to make it a swipe to select operation.
> 
> This happens on my laptop running Unstable and my workstation running
> Bookworm.

As per upstream discussion this should be fixed in the latest release which I
will dpu ts shortly. Hence I am marking it in the d/ch as such. Feel free to
re-open the bug report if the issue persists.

Best,
Nilesh


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1070165: RM: libapache2-mod-auth-pgsql -- RoQA; RC-buggy, unmaintained, not in stable

2024-05-01 Thread Niels Thykier

Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove

The RC bug #947039 was filed against libapache2-mod-auth-pgsql 4½ years 
ago and remains both unfixed and unanswered.


Best regards,
Niels



Bug#1070164: DDPO: color coding the Excuses links

2024-05-01 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

would it be possible to color-code the Excuses links based on the
migration status? I'd think about
* green -> "Will attempt migration"
* red -> "BLOCKED"
* (default) -> "check later"

Maybe the "red" flag could further be distinguished between "inherited"
and "local".

Andreas



Bug#1069945: Acknowledgement (rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux 6.7.12, 6.1.85: rapiddisk-cache.c:198:16: error: too few arguments to function 'dm_io')

2024-05-01 Thread Andreas Beckmann

On 29/04/2024 09.59, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
A possible solution (which also handles all kernels that got the patch 

Merged in dm-writeboost as
https://github.com/akiradeveloper/dm-writeboost/commit/1967beb97d63044043383721759c8928bc6353c6

Andreas



Bug#1070161: ITS: ramond

2024-05-01 Thread Nicolas Dandrimont
On Wed, May 1, 2024, at 04:50, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Source: ramond
> Version: 0.5-4.2
> Severity: important
> Tags: sid trixie
> X-Debbugs-CC: nicolas.dandrim...@crans.org
>
> Dear package ramond maintainer in Debian,
>
> After looking into the package you maintain (ramond, 
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ramond), I found that this package
> received no maintainer updates in the past 12 years and is not in good
> shape. As a result, I am filing an ITS (Intent to Salvage) request
> against your package to take over package maintenance according to
> section 5.12 in Debian's Developers' Reference [1].
>
> [...]

Hi,

Thank you for picking up this package. You should feel free to go ahead with 
immediate adoption[1].

[1] https://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdAdoption

In this day and age, most managed switches are able to block unwanted IPv6 
router advertisements, so before spending much effort on a project that, last I 
checked, was dormant upstream, you should assess whether ramond is still 
relevant.

Thanks again,
-- 
Nicolas Dandrimont



Bug#1065273: manpages-de-dev: link /usr/share/man/de/man3/sscanf .3.gz (to scanf.3.gz) is misssing

2024-05-01 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
tags 1065273 + pending
thanks

Hello Manfred,
the translation is now completed and will be shipped in the next
upstream version slated for mid June, most likely shortly followed by
a new Debian version (both unstable and backport).

Greetings

   Helge
-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


<    1   2