Bug#1072233: mosh: use wtmpdb to write wtmp entries

2024-05-30 Thread Alex Chernyakhovsky
block 1072233 by 1072237
thanks

I agree with Keith -- marking the relationship with the src:libutempter
but, but leaving this one open to track potentially doing a binary rebuild
if a binNMU doesn't happen automatically.

Sincerely,
-Alex


Bug#892058: debian-keyring: please automatically send reminder emails to people whose keys will expire soon

2020-11-23 Thread Alex Chernyakhovsky
> (replace user with the debian ID)
> $ finger user/k...@db.debian.org | gpg --list-options show-keyring 2>/dev/null

It was my understanding this is the confirmation the key had made it
to the keyring package. I was hoping to confirm the key had been
successfully received, and then later rolled out.

Sincerely,
-Alex



Bug#892058: Thank you for the reminder

2020-11-21 Thread Alex Chernyakhovsky
Thank you for implementing this service. It was a great reminder and
easy to follow the instructions. The only thing I may suggest is
perhaps mention how to verify that the keyring.debian.org server
received the update. It seems that doing --recv-keys a few minutes
later (but not immediately!) will show the updated key, with the new
expiry.

Sincerely,
-Alex



Bug#926816: yubikey-manager FTBFS in some common situations

2019-04-10 Thread Alex Chernyakhovsky
Package: yubikey-manager
Version: 2.1.0

Dear maintainer,

The package yubikey-manager currently appears to fail to build, using
a stretch host with an sbuild chroot for sid-amd64:

yubikey-manager-2.1.0$ lsb_release  -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Debian
Description:Debian GNU/Linux 9.8 (stretch)
Release:9.8
Codename:   stretch
yubikey-manager-2.1.0$ sbuild -A -c sid-amd64
dh clean --with python3 --buildsystem=pybuild
dh: Compatibility levels before 5 are no longer supported (level 1 requested)
debian/rules:6: recipe for target 'clean' failed
make: *** [clean] Error 25

If I then `echo 10 > debian/compat`, sbuild is able to proceed. The
package builds normally against a sid schroot.  If I try to use
debuild normally, the package FTBFS with
help2man -o debian/ykman.1 \
--no-info --version-string=2.1.0 \
--name 'YubiKey Manager' -- /tmp/tmp.3fY41n5LsH/bin/ykman
help2man: can't get `--help' info from /tmp/tmp.3fY41n5LsH/bin/ykman
Try `--no-discard-stderr' if option outputs to stderr
debian/rules:15: recipe for target 'override_dh_installman' failed

Interestingly enough, I cannot reproduce with a buster schroot; the
behavior seems to be dependent on debuild vs sbuild. Some further
investigation with with --no-discard-stderr shows a Python stacktrace
in python3-click, complaining about the locale. If we pass
--locale=C.UTF-8 to help2man, then everything builds properly, even
with debuild in this situation.

I've attached a debdiff that makes this package build more reliably.

Sincerely,
-Alex


yubikey-manager.debdiff
Description: Binary data


Bug#921468: ITS: byobu

2019-02-05 Thread Alex Chernyakhovsky
I am still willing to maintain this package am and in communication
with the Ubuntu maintainer and will be dcut'ing him privileges to do
both uploads simultaneously.

Sincerely,
-Alex

On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 4:57 PM Boyuan Yang  wrote:
>
> Package: byobu
> Version: 5.112-1.1
> Severity: important
> X-Debbugs-CC: acher...@mit.edu
>
> Dear byobu maintainers,
>
> I noticed that package byobu in Debian has received no maintainer activity for
> over 2 years and it's diverging from downstream Ubuntu's package [2]. As a
> result, I'm starting the package ITS process [1] as defined by Developers'
> Reference §5.12 in order to improve the maintenance status of byobu in Debian.
>
> Please let me know if you are still willing to maintain this package in
> Debian. Otherwise, I will upload an NMU for byobu 21 days onto DELAYED/7 to
> take over maintainership.
>
> Thank you very much for your understanding and looking forward to your reply.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Boyuan Yang
>
>
> [1] https://wiki.debian.org/PackageSalvaging
> [2] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/byobu



Bug#712398: Intent to NMU byobu to fix longstanding l10n bugs

2018-06-22 Thread Alex Chernyakhovsky
Hi Helge,

I am planning to do an upload within the next 2 weeks. If I have not
done so by then, by all means, please proceed with the NMU.

Sincerely,
-Alex

On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Helge Kreutzmann  wrote:
> Hello Alexander,
> I intend to NMU byobu early August to fix longstanding l10n
> bugs[1]. The changelog would be something like the following:
>
>   * Non-maintainer upload.
>   * Obvious lintian fixes:
> -possible-missing-colon-in-closes
> -script-needs-depends-on-sensible-utils
>   * Add Debconf translations:
> -pt_BR from Adriano Rafael Gomes (Closes: #804096)
> -nl from Frans Spiesschaert (Closes: #835134)
> -it from Beatrice Torracca (Closes: #712398)
>
> Please tell me if you are currently preparing a new release yourself
> and would like me to skip the NMU.
>
> Greetings
>
>  Helge
>
> [1] https://i18n.debian.org/nmu-radar/nmu_bypackage.html
> --
>
> --
>   Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
>Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
> 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
>Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/



Bug#825324: byobu: Byobu session closes on SSH disconnect

2016-05-29 Thread Alex Chernyakhovsky
tags 825324 -moreinfo -unreproducible
tags 825324 wontfix
thanks

Marking as wontfix as this is an issue due to tmux/screen and systemd
interactions, discussed in #825394.

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 2:17 AM, Ivan Frimmel  wrote:
> HI .. Thanks for your quick response. TBH .. I didn’t know where to
> start. It looks like nohup and screen are doing the same thing. And
> its only recent. I created a brand new user - enabled byobu and ran
> something simple .. disconnect .. and the session closes completely.
>
> Screen sadly does the same thing from what I can see. Just to repeat -
> byoby/screen and nohup  are all doing it - I love Byobu - so this is
> my first port of call ! :) ( please be gentle ) ..
>
> executing nohup /usr/bin/python /foo/pythonthing.py &  works fine
> while I am connected and then instantly terminates on disconnect of
> the SSH. It is only very recent. And I don't think its anything I
> did..
>
> the baffling thing is that ROOT is unaffected by this disconnection ..
> I wonder if their isn’t some new permission being pushd that makes
> persistence a "option ?" seems silly to do that.
>
> Please help!
> Tx
> Ivan.
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Chernyakhovsky [mailto:acher...@mit.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 1:46 AM
> To: Ivan Frimmel ; 825...@bugs.debian.org
> Cc: Debian Bug Tracking System ; 
> cont...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#825324: byobu: Byobu session closes on SSH disconnect
>
> tags 825324 moreinfo unreproducible
> thanks
>
> Hi Ivan,
>
> Did your apt-get dist-upgrade include an update to tmux and/or screen?
> byobu has not been pushed to sid or stretch recently, so I do not see
> how it can be at fault. It is likely that some change in the
> underlying tmux and/or screen backend you are using has changed. Try
> `tmux list-sessions` or `screen -ls` depending on which byobu backend
> you are using (tmux is currently the default) to see if the sessions
> are present. Additionally, please try reproducing with tmux/screen
> directly, without byobu.
>
> Sincerely,
> -Alex
>
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:19 AM, Ivan Frimmel  wrote:
>> Package: byobu
>> Version: 5.87-1
>> Severity: important
>>
>> Dear Maintainer,
>>
>> *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where
>> appropriate ***
>>
>>* What led up to the situation?
>> Did a apt-get dist-upgrade
>>* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
>>  ineffective)?
>> root sessions will persist for some reason, but regular account 
>> sessions that used to allow disconnect of ssh now terminate immediately on 
>> disconnect and do not persist at all. I am not sure if byobu is crashing, I 
>> looked for dump files but here arent any that I can see.
>>* What was the outcome of this action?
>> I can't fix the problem. I searched all the byobu an bash 
>> documentation and /etc/profile and /etc/skel etc and I can't find anything 
>> that would be causing this all of a suddent. I don't think it's anything I 
>> did specifically.
>>* What outcome did you expect instead?
>> The sessions would persist after ssh disconnect.
>> *** End of the template - remove these template lines ***
>>
>>
>> -- System Information:
>> Debian Release: stretch/sid
>>   APT prefers unstable
>>   APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
>> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
>>
>> Kernel: Linux 4.5.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
>> Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
>> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
>> Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
>>
>> Versions of packages byobu depends on:
>> ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.59
>> ii  gawk   1:4.1.3+dfsg-0.1
>> ii  gettext-base   0.19.7-2
>> ii  python 2.7.11-1
>> ii  python-newt0.52.18-3
>> ii  screen 4.3.1-3
>> ii  tmux   2.2-2
>>
>> Versions of packages byobu recommends:
>> pn  run-one  
>> ii  screen   4.3.1-3
>> ii  tmux 2.2-2
>>
>> Versions of packages byobu suggests:
>> pn  apport  
>> pn  ccze
>> ii  lsb-release 9.20160110
>> ii  po-debconf  1.0.19
>> pn  ttf-ubuntu-font-family  
>> pn  update-notifier-common  
>> pn  vim 
>> ii  w3m 0.5.3-28
>> pn  wireless-tools  
>>
>> -- debconf information:
>>   byobu/launch-by-default: false



Bug#825324: byobu: Byobu session closes on SSH disconnect

2016-05-25 Thread Alex Chernyakhovsky
tags 825324 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks

Hi Ivan,

Did your apt-get dist-upgrade include an update to tmux and/or screen?
byobu has not been pushed to sid or stretch recently, so I do not see
how it can be at fault. It is likely that some change in the
underlying tmux and/or screen backend you are using has changed. Try
`tmux list-sessions` or `screen -ls` depending on which byobu backend
you are using (tmux is currently the default) to see if the sessions
are present. Additionally, please try reproducing with tmux/screen
directly, without byobu.

Sincerely,
-Alex


On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:19 AM, Ivan Frimmel  wrote:
> Package: byobu
> Version: 5.87-1
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
>
>* What led up to the situation?
> Did a apt-get dist-upgrade
>* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
>  ineffective)?
> root sessions will persist for some reason, but regular account 
> sessions that used to allow disconnect of ssh now terminate immediately on 
> disconnect and do not persist at all. I am not sure if byobu is crashing, I 
> looked for dump files but here arent any that I can see.
>* What was the outcome of this action?
> I can't fix the problem. I searched all the byobu an bash 
> documentation and /etc/profile and /etc/skel etc and I can't find anything 
> that would be causing this all of a suddent. I don't think it's anything I 
> did specifically.
>* What outcome did you expect instead?
> The sessions would persist after ssh disconnect.
> *** End of the template - remove these template lines ***
>
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: stretch/sid
>   APT prefers unstable
>   APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
>
> Kernel: Linux 4.5.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
>
> Versions of packages byobu depends on:
> ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.59
> ii  gawk   1:4.1.3+dfsg-0.1
> ii  gettext-base   0.19.7-2
> ii  python 2.7.11-1
> ii  python-newt0.52.18-3
> ii  screen 4.3.1-3
> ii  tmux   2.2-2
>
> Versions of packages byobu recommends:
> pn  run-one  
> ii  screen   4.3.1-3
> ii  tmux 2.2-2
>
> Versions of packages byobu suggests:
> pn  apport  
> pn  ccze
> ii  lsb-release 9.20160110
> ii  po-debconf  1.0.19
> pn  ttf-ubuntu-font-family  
> pn  update-notifier-common  
> pn  vim 
> ii  w3m 0.5.3-28
> pn  wireless-tools  
>
> -- debconf information:
>   byobu/launch-by-default: false



Bug#760431: byobu prevents inverted text from displaying and shows as italics instead

2014-11-18 Thread Alex Chernyakhovsky
Hi Jeff,

You've reached the Debian bugs list for byobu -- we're actually
*downstream* of Ubuntu in this case, and while I can take a look, the
Ubuntu maintainer is the author of byobu, and is likely to be able to
find it faster than I can.

Sincerely,
-Alex


On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Jeffery To  wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently upgraded to Ubuntu 14.10 and ran into this issue; it does appear
> tmux is at fault (or rather, screen's terminfo description).
>
> The tmux FAQ (http://tmux.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/tmux/trunk/FAQ) has an
> entry "vim displays reverse video instead of italics, while less displays
> italics (or just regular text) instead of reverse. What's wrong?" which
> describes a fix involving creating a new terminfo file. The only wrinkle for
> byobu is the "default-terminal" command should go in ~/.byobu/.tmux.conf
> instead of ~/.tmux.conf.
>
> I suppose this may be too much for byobu to fix automagically, but it does
> seem to be a head-scratcher for users who don't investigate deep enough to
> find a fix in tmux.
>
> HTH,
> Jeff
>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#760431: byobu prevents inverted text from displaying and shows as italics instead

2014-09-03 Thread Alex Chernyakhovsky
Hi John,

Could you please provide $TERM inside and outside of byobu? I suspect
this is an issue with tmux/screen; if inside byobu it is not
screen-256color-bce, could you perhaps try setting it to that before
running less?

Sincerely,
-Alex

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:25 PM, John Gruenenfelder
 wrote:
> Package: byobu
> Version: 5.77-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Sometime in the last several weeks (four to eight, I think), many programs run
> in a shell under byobu no longer correctly display inverted text.  Instead,
> the text is displayed in an italics face.
>
> The easiest way to reproduce this is to run 'less' on some file.  The status
> line that less displays at the bottom of the screen (typically showing the
> file name and the position in the file) is normally displayed in an inverted
> style.
>
> It does not appear to be related to the choice of terminal.  If I run the less
> command in a bash shell spawned by byobu, I get the incorrect display.  If I
> run the same command in another terminal window which is not using byobu then
> the display is correct.
>
> Other than selecting a handful of status notifications, I have not altered the
> byobu configuration.  As per the defaults, it is using tmux as the back-end.
>
>
>
> --
> --John GruenenfelderSystems Manager, MKS Imaging Technology, LLC.
> Try Weasel Reader for PalmOS  --  http://weaselreader.org
> "This is the most fun I've had without being drenched in the blood
> of my enemies!"
> --Sam of Sam & Max
>
>
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: jessie/sid
>   APT prefers testing
>   APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> Foreign Architectures: i386
>
> Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
>
> Versions of packages byobu depends on:
> ii  cdebconf [debconf-2.0]  0.191
> ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]   1.5.53
> ii  gawk1:4.1.1+dfsg-1
> ii  gettext-base0.19.2-1
> ii  python  2.7.8-1
> ii  python-newt 0.52.17-1
> ii  screen  4.2.1-2
> ii  tmux1.9-6
>
> Versions of packages byobu recommends:
> pn  run-one  
> ii  screen   4.2.1-2
> ii  tmux 1.9-6
>
> Versions of packages byobu suggests:
> pn  apport  
> ii  lsb-release 4.1+Debian13
> ii  po-debconf  1.0.16+nmu3
> pn  ttf-ubuntu-font-family  
> pn  update-notifier-common  
> ii  vim 2:7.4.335-1+b1
> ii  w3m 0.5.3-17
>
> -- debconf information:
>   byobu/launch-by-default: false
>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#731928: missing man pages for mitmproxy and mitmdump

2014-06-16 Thread Alex Chernyakhovsky
tags 731928 patch
thanks

Dear Maintainer,

Please find attached a man page for mitmproxy, in both roff and ronn
formats. If you wish to use the ronn format, ruby-ronn as a build
dependency to generate the roff documentation. I am more than happy to
provide a debdiff with this change should you desire.

Sincerely,
-Alex


mitmproxy-manpages.patch
Description: Binary data


Bug#750792: rpcbind: rpcinfo segfaults

2014-06-12 Thread Alex Chernyakhovsky
reassign 750792 libtirpc1
retitle 750792 libtirpc authnone_marshal unlocks already unlocked mutex
severity 750792 serious
tags 750792 patch
thanks

Last bit of debugging; patch to fix this is attached. The underlying
bug is in libtirpc1, used by rpcinfo. I've verified this by building a
custom libtirpc1 and setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH. This fixes the crash on
TSX-bearing CPUs.]

Sincerely,
-Alex


libtirpc-mutex-lock.patch
Description: Binary data


Bug#750792: rpcbind: rpcinfo segfaults

2014-06-12 Thread Alex Chernyakhovsky
Was just thinking about this some more and was surprised at the
segmentation fault, as I was expecting a general protection fault if
the instruction is wrong, and sure enough, dmesg has:

[96649.067868] traps: rpcinfo[9287] general protection ip:7f07f4e59218
sp:7fff54e78cf8 error:0 in libpthread-2.19.so[7f07f4e48000+18000]

Sincerely,
-Alex



On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Alex Chernyakhovsky  wrote:
> I've done a bit of digging:
>  - rebuilding rpcbind has no effect
>  - rebuilding libtirpc has no effect
>
> The crash appears to be occuring inside of libpthread, on a TSX-only code 
> path:
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>
> __lll_unlock_elision (lock=0x77ddafe0 , private=0)
> at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86/elision-unlock.c:29
> 29  ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86/elision-unlock.c: No such
> file or directory.
> (gdb) bt
> #0  __lll_unlock_elision (lock=0x77ddafe0 ,
> private=0) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86/elision-unlock.c:29
> #1  0x77bbb9c1 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtirpc.so.1
> #2  0x77bc084b in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtirpc.so.1
> #3  0x00403cda in rpcbdump (dumptype=dumptype@entry=8,
> netid=netid@entry=0x0, argc=, argv=)
> at src/rpcinfo.c:849
> #4  0x00401a0b in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffe418) at
> src/rpcinfo.c:311
>
> elision-unlock.c:29 corresponds to an _xend() function call, which
> seems to inline to the xend opcode:
>
> (gdb) disas
> Dump of assembler code for function __lll_unlock_elision:
>0x779a7200 <+0>: mov(%rdi),%eax
>0x779a7202 <+2>: mov%rdi,%rdx
>0x779a7205 <+5>: test   %eax,%eax
>0x779a7207 <+7>: je 0x779a7218 
> <__lll_unlock_elision+24>
>0x779a7209 <+9>: lock decl (%rdx)
>0x779a720c <+12>:jne0x779a721e <_L_unlock_13>
>0x779a720e <+14>:xor%eax,%eax
>0x779a7210 <+16>:retq
>0x779a7211 <+17>:nopl   0x0(%rax)
> => 0x779a7218 <+24>:xend
>0x779a721b <+27>:xor%eax,%eax
>0x779a721d <+29>:retq
> End of assembler dump.
>
> My processor is a Intel E3-1240v3, which has TSX:
>
> $ grep -o rtm /proc/cpuinfo
> rtm
> rtm
> rtm
> rtm
> rtm
> rtm
> rtm
> rtm
>
> Unfortunately, it looks like eglibc currently in jessie is new enough
> to have TSX support, but not new enough for the environment variables
> to disable it, so I cannot disable it that way. However, making the
> binary setuid root causes it to work:
>
> sudo chown root:root rpcinfo
> sudo chmod +s rpcinfo
>
> ./rpcinfo
>program version netid addressserviceowner
> 104tcp6  ::.0.111   portmapper superuser
> 103tcp6  ::.0.111   portmapper superuser
> 104udp6  ::.0.111   portmapper superuser
> 103udp6  ::.0.111   portmapper superuser
> 104tcp   0.0.0.0.0.111  portmapper superuser
> 103tcp   0.0.0.0.0.111  portmapper superuser
> 102tcp   0.0.0.0.0.111  portmapper superuser
> 104udp   0.0.0.0.0.111  portmapper superuser
> 103udp   0.0.0.0.0.111  portmapper superuser
> 102udp   0.0.0.0.0.111  portmapper superuser
> 104local /run/rpcbind.sock  portmapper superuser
> 103local /run/rpcbind.sock  portmapper superuser
>
> At this point, I mildly suspect libc.
>
> Sincerely,
> -Alex


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#750792: rpcbind: rpcinfo segfaults

2014-06-12 Thread Alex Chernyakhovsky
I've done a bit of digging:
 - rebuilding rpcbind has no effect
 - rebuilding libtirpc has no effect

The crash appears to be occuring inside of libpthread, on a TSX-only code path:

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.

__lll_unlock_elision (lock=0x77ddafe0 , private=0)
at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86/elision-unlock.c:29
29  ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86/elision-unlock.c: No such
file or directory.
(gdb) bt
#0  __lll_unlock_elision (lock=0x77ddafe0 ,
private=0) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86/elision-unlock.c:29
#1  0x77bbb9c1 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtirpc.so.1
#2  0x77bc084b in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtirpc.so.1
#3  0x00403cda in rpcbdump (dumptype=dumptype@entry=8,
netid=netid@entry=0x0, argc=, argv=)
at src/rpcinfo.c:849
#4  0x00401a0b in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffe418) at
src/rpcinfo.c:311

elision-unlock.c:29 corresponds to an _xend() function call, which
seems to inline to the xend opcode:

(gdb) disas
Dump of assembler code for function __lll_unlock_elision:
   0x779a7200 <+0>: mov(%rdi),%eax
   0x779a7202 <+2>: mov%rdi,%rdx
   0x779a7205 <+5>: test   %eax,%eax
   0x779a7207 <+7>: je 0x779a7218 <__lll_unlock_elision+24>
   0x779a7209 <+9>: lock decl (%rdx)
   0x779a720c <+12>:jne0x779a721e <_L_unlock_13>
   0x779a720e <+14>:xor%eax,%eax
   0x779a7210 <+16>:retq
   0x779a7211 <+17>:nopl   0x0(%rax)
=> 0x779a7218 <+24>:xend
   0x779a721b <+27>:xor%eax,%eax
   0x779a721d <+29>:retq
End of assembler dump.

My processor is a Intel E3-1240v3, which has TSX:

$ grep -o rtm /proc/cpuinfo
rtm
rtm
rtm
rtm
rtm
rtm
rtm
rtm

Unfortunately, it looks like eglibc currently in jessie is new enough
to have TSX support, but not new enough for the environment variables
to disable it, so I cannot disable it that way. However, making the
binary setuid root causes it to work:

sudo chown root:root rpcinfo
sudo chmod +s rpcinfo

./rpcinfo
   program version netid addressserviceowner
104tcp6  ::.0.111   portmapper superuser
103tcp6  ::.0.111   portmapper superuser
104udp6  ::.0.111   portmapper superuser
103udp6  ::.0.111   portmapper superuser
104tcp   0.0.0.0.0.111  portmapper superuser
103tcp   0.0.0.0.0.111  portmapper superuser
102tcp   0.0.0.0.0.111  portmapper superuser
104udp   0.0.0.0.0.111  portmapper superuser
103udp   0.0.0.0.0.111  portmapper superuser
102udp   0.0.0.0.0.111  portmapper superuser
104local /run/rpcbind.sock  portmapper superuser
103local /run/rpcbind.sock  portmapper superuser

At this point, I mildly suspect libc.

Sincerely,
-Alex


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#750771: RFS: python-fysom/1.0.15-1 [ITP] (bootstrap-vz dependency)

2014-06-07 Thread Alex Chernyakhovsky
Sorry, I forgot to state earlier that I am only a Debian Maintainer
and cannot upload this package.

Sincerely,
-Alex


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#750771: RFS: python-fysom/1.0.15-1 [ITP] (bootstrap-vz dependency)

2014-06-07 Thread Alex Chernyakhovsky
tags 750771 confirmed
thanks

Hi Marcin,

I've looked at your packaging, and have the following comments:

sbuild reports:
pyversions: missing X(S)-Python-Version in control file, fall back to
debian/pyversions
pyversions: missing debian/pyversions file, fall back to supported versions

Per
https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-module_packages.html#s-specifying_versions,
please specify X-Python-Version: (>= 2.6) [as per the module's
documentation of being tested on 2.6-3.3).

The files in the debian/ directory look good, and the package is
lintian clean. I've noticed you're using debhelper, and specify a
compat level of 8. As far as I can tell, you're only using debhelper 7
features; perhaps consider setting the compat level to 7 (and
depending on debhelper >= 7) to ease backporting?

Sincerely,
-Alex


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#745679: Processed: affects 745631, cloning 745631, reassign -1 to byobu, tagging -1 ...

2014-04-23 Thread Alex Chernyakhovsky
Hi Axel,

Thanks for the notification. I'll prepare an upload tomorrow, as I'm
quite busy today.

Sincerely,
-Alex


On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Axel Beckert  wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>>
>> > affects 745631 - byobu
>> Bug #745631 [screen] screen: byobu >= 5.77 can crash screen server process
>> Removed indication that 745631 affects
>> > # byobu fixed what triggered this issue in it's 5.78 release
>> > clone 745631 -1
>> Bug #745631 [screen] screen: byobu >= 5.77 can crash screen server process
>> Bug 745631 cloned as bug 745679
>> > reassign -1 byobu 5.77-1
>> Bug #745679 [screen] screen: byobu >= 5.77 can crash screen server process
>> Bug reassigned from package 'screen' to 'byobu'.
>> No longer marked as found in versions screen/4.2.0-1, 
>> screen/4.1.0~20120320gitdb59704-9, and screen/4.1.0~20120320gitdb59704-7.
>> Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #745679 to the same values 
>> previously set
>> Bug #745679 [byobu] screen: byobu >= 5.77 can crash screen server process
>> Marked as found in versions byobu/5.77-1.
>> > tags -1 + fixed-upstream
>> Bug #745679 [byobu] screen: byobu >= 5.77 can crash screen server process
>> Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
>> > retitle -1 byobu: Using screen-style Ctrl-A in byobu 5.77 can crash screen 
>> > server process
>> Bug #745679 [byobu] screen: byobu >= 5.77 can crash screen server process
>> Changed Bug title to 'byobu: Using screen-style Ctrl-A in byobu 5.77 can 
>> crash screen server process' from 'screen: byobu >= 5.77 can crash screen 
>> server process'
>
> Upstream fixed in byobu what triggered this crash in Screen.
>
> So far the issue only surfaced with byobu 5.77 and it has been fixed
> with byobu 5.78 which was released just now.
>
> Since the issue seems to affect to all byobu users, which use the
> screen backend and use Ctrl-A as escape sequence (and only byobu users
> but not pure screen users), please upload byobu 5.78 soonish.
>
> Regards, Axel
> --
>  ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert , http://people.debian.org/~abe/
> : :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
> `. `'   |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
>   `-|  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#724858: PATCH for sbuild-createschroot

2013-09-28 Thread Alex Chernyakhovsky
Hi,

Please find attached a patch for sbuild-createschroot which allows it
to work on jessie/sid.

Sincerely,
-Alex


sbuild-createschroot-jessie.patch
Description: Binary data