Bug#366915: [uml-devel] Re: Bug#366915: user-mode-linux: fails when host kernel is linux-image-2.6.16-1-k7

2006-05-15 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 12 May 2006 22:08, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> Hello UML developers,
>
> I received the following bugreport for 2.6.16 UML running on a 2.6.16
> host (both are debian packages). I found a similar report on a french
> site[1], it seems to be the same problem.
>
> Can you help putting some light there?
> Thanks in advance
>
> [1]:
> http://forum.hardware.fr/hardwarefr/OSAlternatifs/UML-Debian-sujet-57017-1.
>htm

I also get a problem specific to host 2.6.16 kernels, but that's when I run 
x64 guests on x64 2.6.16 hosts (x86 32-bit guests work normally); I've not 
tested 32-bit 2.6.16 hosts.

The error message is different. However, I can't exclude there is the same 
root cause acting in a different way, but I've now debugged this a bit and 
this seems unlikely.

EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly.
Warning: unable to open an initial console.
Kernel panic - not syncing: handle_trap - failed to wait at end of syscall, 
errno = 0, status = 2943


Modules linked in:
Pid: 1, comm: init Not tainted 2.6.16.9-bs2
RIP: 0033:[<400101ba>]
RSP: 007f7f9ec358  EFLAGS: 0246
RAX: 0050a000 RBX:  RCX: 
RDX: 0026 RSI:  RDI: 
RBP:  R08:  R09: 4000
R10: 4a18 R11: 0246 R12: 
R13: 40001dd0 R14: 0008 R15: 00400040
Call Trace:
6031bc48:  [<6000fe8c>] panic_exit+0x27/0x42
6031bc58:  [<60034f15>] notifier_call_chain+0x1f/0x2f
6031bc78:  [<6002784a>] panic+0xcf/0x165
6031bcb8:  [<601791f9>] __libc_waitpid+0x39/0xc0
6031bcd8:  [<6001e7f6>] set_signals+0x26/0x53
6031bd08:  [<60021640>] move_registers+0x45/0x7e
6031bd58:  [<6002295f>] userspace+0x213/0x265
6031bdc0:  [<6000a17f>] init+0x0/0x13d
6031bdd8:  [<60010410>] new_thread_handler+0x121/0x12f
6031be38:  [<6016c9a0>] __restore_rt+0x0/0x10
6031bee8:  [<6016cc59>] kill+0x9/0x20

> > When user-mode linux is used with a host kernel of
> > linux-image-2.6.16-1-k7 (ie, the package in sid), it panics. When the
> > host kernel is linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7 (also from sid), it works
> > perfectly.

> > mapping mmap stub failed, errno = 12
> > Kernel panic - not syncing: start_userspace : expected SIGSTOP, got
> > status = 256

> > EIP: 0073:[] CPU: 0 Not tainted ESP: 007b:a7e29fa8 EFLAGS:
> > 00200246 Not tainted EAX:  EBX: 13f5 ECX: 0013 EDX:
> > 13f5
> > ESI: 13f1 EDI: 0011 EBP: a7e29fc4 DS: 007b ES: 007b
> > 08267af8:  [<0806f080>] show_regs+0xb4/0xb9
> > 08267b24:  [<0805e08c>] panic_exit+0x23/0x3d
> > 08267b38:  [<0807e495>] notifier_call_chain+0x1a/0x31
> > 08267b58:  [<08072ffb>] panic+0x4f/0xca
> > 08267b74:  [<0806c165>] start_userspace+0xce/0x11a
> > 08267b94:  [<0805e31a>] init_new_context_skas+0xfb/0x13e
> > 08267bb4:  [<080ad3f0>] do_execve+0x96/0x1df
> > 08267bd8:  [<080599b8>] execve1+0x28/0x52
> > 08267bfc:  [<080599f5>] um_execve+0x13/0x3f
> > 08267c18:  [<0805936a>] run_init_process+0x34/0x4f
> > 08267c38:  [<08059471>] init+0xec/0x117
> > 08267c48:  [<0806955b>] run_kernel_thread+0x42/0x4a
> > 08267cf8:  [<0805e49f>] new_thread_handler+0x7f/0xa9
> > 08267d1c:  [] _etext+0xf7e66406/0x0
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Paul.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -- System Information:
> > Debian Release: testing/unstable
> >   APT prefers unstable
> >   APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
> > Architecture: i386 (i686)
> > Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
> > Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-k7
> > Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
> >
> > Versions of packages user-mode-linux depends on:
> > ii  uml-utilities 20060323-3 User-mode Linux (utility
> > programs)
> >
> > user-mode-linux recommends no packages.
> >
> > -- no debconf information

-- 
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade






___ 
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB 
http://mail.yahoo.it



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#393263: [uml-devel] [Pkg-uml-devel] Re: [Pkg-uml-pkgs] Bug#393263: uml-utilities: New version uml_utilities_20060622 has humsify, please update

2006-11-10 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 22:11, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > About this, I'd have one question to pose to Jeff: when are you going to
> > include humfs in mainline? Last time I asked you this you said "ok", so I
> > can guess you'll send for next cycle (2.6.20). Is that right?
>
> Yeah, I was going to do it a couple of weeks ago, but then I decided to
> bang on it a bit.  I fixed the inode refcount bugs that turned up, but you
> still get still some interesting link counts when removing directories.
>
> See the gory details in yesterday's diary entry.

Compliments for your work on this, I'm favourably impressed by this 
improvements - I would also gather they apply to all externfs, i.e. both to 
new hostfs and humfs?

That would be exceptionally good, however even humfs alone would be already 
good for merging. And an earlier trip in -mm might help if somebody takes a 
look at it (Al Viro did review our fs work in the past so he might decide to 
give a look here too).
-- 
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! 
 http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#393263: [uml-devel] [Pkg-uml-devel] Re: [Pkg-uml-pkgs] Bug#393263: uml-utilities: New version uml_utilities_20060622 has humsify, please update

2006-10-31 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 08:52, Stefano Melchior wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 02:23:40PM +0200, Stefano Melchior wrote:
> Dear all,

> > I just started to work on porting the 2006-06-22 to svn and then I
> > think, accordingly with Mattia's agreement, it will be ready for Etch+1.

> I am also trying to write a quick man page for the humfsify tool and I am
> planning to release it as soon as the package seems to be ready.
> I tried to find if someone else already wrote it, but I could not find
> anyone, so I decided to proceed.

> When ready please check if it will be exhaustive enough

About this, I'd have one question to pose to Jeff: when are you going to 
include humfs in mainline? Last time I asked you this you said "ok", so I can 
guess you'll send for next cycle (2.6.20). Is that right?
-- 
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! 
 http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]