Bug#526796: RFP: mitter -- Micro-blogging client with multiple interfaces
Mitter has just landed on mentors.d.n. Useful links: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mitter - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mitter/mitter_0.4.5-1.dsc -- Filip Chabik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#532282: RFP: mbpurple -- Microblogging plugin for libpurple
Mbpurple has just landed on mentors.d.n. Useful links: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mbpurple - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mbpurple/mbpurple_0.2.2-1.dsc -- Filip Chabik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#526796: RFP: mitter -- Micro-blogging client with multiple interfaces
Hello Ryan, Dnia 2009-07-13, pon o godzinie 11:52 -0700, Ryan Niebur pisze: > are you going to package this and mbpurple for Debian? If so, please > retitle these RFPs to ITPs and set yourself as the owner so that > people know that you are working on it. You will also need to send an > RFS mail to the debian-mentors list (you can get an example from > mentors.debian.net). Well, I made this package as an practice, to be honest. Daily I use Gwibber which should be in Debian Sid in few days, but... Mbpurple is pretty simple to package and maintain, so if there won't be any other person to maintain it, I will do it with pleasure (: I believe there's only one lintian warning, which complains about missing upstream changelog. -- Filip Chabik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#526796: RFP: mitter -- Micro-blogging client with multiple interfaces
Hello Andrea, Dnia 2009-07-13, pon o godzinie 23:36 +0200, Andrea Colangelo pisze: > I am wondering what is not clear about the words "Intent to package" > and "Owner of a bug". It's all clear, it's my bad! > A Request For Packaging was filed weeks ago, I declared my Intent To > Package a few days ago, set the owner of this bug to myself, and I > already started working on the packaging itself. You have uploaded > your own work without asking me about it and being definitely unfair. I'm very very sorry for my inconvenience. Shame on me, shame! I really didn't want to "steal" this package from you. My only explanation for such behavior is that I'm still new in maintaining packages and didn't read it carefully enough. Once more -- I'm very very sorry for this! If there's anything I can do to help (so I can buy by guilt) just drop me a line! > Please, remove your package from mentors.d.o, I will upload my package > in a few hours or days. It's out from mentors.d.n, it's all yours now! Very ashamed, -- Filip Chabik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#496326: Take over the ITP
I'd love to take over this ITP bug. There's Gwibber package for Debian already in mentors repository [1]. [1] http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=gwibber Regards -- Filip Chabik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#706522: ITP: pcs - Pacemaker/Corosync configuration system
Hello Martin, I have prepared test package, but unfortunately I have no cluster to test it on. If you are interested in playing with it, here's the link: * http://deb.ianod.es/debian/incoming/pcs_0.9.41-1_all.deb Rest of the files are present too, just explore incoming directory if you need them. Things worth noting: * I built latest available on GitHub version. * This packages depends on Pacemaker from experimental branch (currently it's 1.9.1 version). * Package itself is highly experimental too, so it's advised not to use it in production or even development branch. Side notes: * I will push the package to official Debian repositories once it had been tested thoroughly. * I wasn't sure how to handle Ruby gems on which this package depends, so I pushed their installation and uninstallation via postinst and prerm (respectively). I will get in touch with Ruby team to ask for their advise on this one. Kind regards, Filip -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org