Bug#945917: jh_build: JH_JAR_EXTRA is ignored

2019-11-30 Thread Frédéric Perrin
Package: javahelper
Version: 0.72.9
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

Option JH_JAR_EXTRA is ignored by jh_build. When setting the script
variable from the environment, the code looks at the existing value,
rather than the env. IOW, it should be:

diff -U0 jh_build.orig jh_build
--- jh_build.orig   2019-12-01 00:25:24.162770395 +
+++ jh_build2019-12-01 00:35:58.528043183 +
@@ -121 +121 @@
-@JH_JAR_EXTRA = split(' ', $ENV{'JH_JAR_EXTRA'}) if @JH_JAR_EXTRA;
+@JH_JAR_EXTRA = split(' ', $ENV{'JH_JAR_EXTRA'}) if $ENV{JH_JAR_EXTRA};



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.2
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-debug'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-6-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB:en 
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages javahelper depends on:
ii  bsdmainutils 11.1.2+b1
ii  dctrl-tools  2.24-3
ii  debhelper12.1.1
ii  devscripts   2.19.5+deb10u1
ii  dpkg-dev 1.19.7
ii  libarchive-zip-perl  1.64-1
ii  perl 5.28.1-6

javahelper recommends no packages.

javahelper suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



Bug#524169: apticron: Uses non-standard -a option when invoking mailx

2009-04-15 Thread Frédéric Perrin
Package: apticron
Version: 1.1.27
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Hello,

Apticron uses the -a option, which for different mailx packages means different
things. With bsd-mailx, it means adding a header ; with heirloom-mailx, it
means attaching a file.

Since you are already depending on bsd-mailx, why don't you just do what you
want, that is invoking /usr/bin/bsd-mailx instead of /usr/bin/mailx which may
be a symlink to one or the other ? As in :

--- /usr/sbin/apticron  2009-01-31 16:18:46.0 +0100
+++ apticron2009-04-15 11:12:16.0 +0200
@@ -240 +240 @@
-   ) 21 | /usr/bin/mailx -a Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 -s 
$DISTRIB_ID package updates on $SYSTEM $EMAIL
+   ) 21 | /usr/bin/bsd-mailx -a Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 -s 
$DISTRIB_ID package updates on $SYSTEM $EMAIL

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.1
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages apticron depends on:
ii  apt0.7.20.2  Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  bsd-mailx  8.1.2-0.20071201cvs-3 A simple mail user agent
ii  debconf [debconf-2 1.5.24Debian configuration management sy
ii  ucf3.0016Update Configuration File: preserv

Versions of packages apticron recommends:
ii  apt-listchanges   2.83   package change history notificatio
ii  iproute   20080725-2 networking and traffic control too

apticron suggests no packages.

-- debconf information excluded



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#473791: Missing dependencies

2008-05-12 Thread Frédéric Perrin
Hello,

I saw two upgrades to texlive-* packages, the last one this morning,
but none addressed this bug. Do I need to provide more info ? Are you
goiing to add the dependencies I suggested, or do you think there are
not necessary ?

Regards,
-- 
Fred



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#473791: Missing dependencies

2008-04-01 Thread Frédéric Perrin
Package: texlive-pstricks
Version: 2007.dgfs.1-1

Hello,

pdftricks, which is part of this package, needs ps2eps(1) (from the
package which has the same name) and epstopdf(1) (from the package
texlive-extra-utils). However, texlive-pstricks doesn't depend on
those two packages ; as a result, documents using pdftricks don't
compile when installing only texlive-pstricks.

I suggest adding those two packages, at least as soft (Suggests or
Recommends) dependencies.

Regards,
-- 
Fred



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#473791: Missing dependencies

2008-04-01 Thread Frédéric Perrin
Le Tue, 1 Apr 2008 22:10:06 +0200, Norbert Preining
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
 On Di, 01 Apr 2008, Frédéric Perrin wrote:
  pdftricks, which is part of this package, needs ps2eps(1) (from
  the package which has the same name) and epstopdf(1) (from the
  package
 
 I suppose that this depends on the the use of pdftricks. Or does it
 happen in *any* case??? Can you provide a minimal example?

Since the compilation fails because pdflatex can't find the tools it
needs in order to convert between the different formats, I would say
it is going to happen in all cases. Oh, and by the way, the example
file in /u/s/d/texlive-pstricks-doc/latex/pdftricks/test.tex.gz can't
compile (I can't find, nor 'apt-file search' can, the pst2pdf script).

Actually, I ran into this while trying to draw Markov chain. Here is
a simple example :

8--

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{pdftricks}
\begin{psinputs}
  \usepackage{pst-all}
\end{psinputs}

\begin{document}
Une chaine de Markov toute simple :

\begin{pdfdisplay}
  \psmatrix[mnode=circle]
1
  \endpsmatrix
  \psset{arrows=-}
  \nccircle{1,1}{0.4cm}\taput{1}
\end{pdfdisplay}

\end{document}

---8

When trying to compile it with neither ps2eps nor
texlive-extra-utils, compilation fails with :

sh: ps2eps: command not found
rm: ne peut enlever `a-fig1.eps': Aucun fichier ou répertoire de ce
type

(rm : cannot remove `a-fig1.eps': no such file or directory).

The same error happens with the test.tex.gz included as an example by
the package.

I can provide the full logs, if you need them.

Note that the Markov chain is correctly built (and is staying in
a-fig1.ps), but hasn't been converted to a suitable format and
hasn't been included in the final PDF document.

After installing ps2eps (and, just in case, moving a.tex to another,
clean directory), compilation fails with :

Creating output file a-fig1.eps...ready.
sh: epstopdf: command not found

After installing texlive-extra-utils, the document is built as
expected.

  I suggest adding those two packages, at least as soft (Suggests or
  Recommends) dependencies.
 
 That could be an option (suggest)
 
 Best wishes
 
 Norbert

OK. I actually thought of a Recommends, but Suggests is fine. Maybe
also a comment in the description ?

-- 
Fred




Bug#413253: Canon S300 shrinks content

2007-07-17 Thread Frédéric Perrin
Le Sunday 15 July 2007 18:26:04 Roger Leigh, vous avez écrit :
 Frédéric Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  With the PPD file generated for the Canon S300 printer, content is
  printed on approximately a quarter of the page.

 Please could you try the new version of Gutenprint in testing and
 unstable, version 5.0.1, to verify if this has been fixed?  This new
 version has had much improvement to the Canon driver.

Yes, it is fixed. My apologies for not having read upstream's 
changelog; this bug report can be closed now.

  As suggested on linuxprinting.org[0], using the PPD for the Canon
  S800 gives the expected result, that is, the whole page is used.
  You only have to adjust the print density -- I set it to 1.5, with
  good results, for both black and colours.

 Which PPD and driver?

In CUPS' web interface, in Modèle/Pilote pour $my_printer 
(Model/Driver for $my_printer?) I selected Canon S800 - 
CUPS+Gutenprint v5.XX (en), where XX was the version number at the 
time.
The top of /etc/cups/ppd/$my_printer.ppd reads :
  *ModelName: Canon S800

 Thanks,
 Roger

Thank you ; I'm closing the bug now.




Bug#425277: Problem fixed ?

2007-05-22 Thread Frédéric Perrin
Hello,

Thanks for the quick reaction, but are you sure you fixed the mismatch in 
libraries names ? (Maybe it is just me failing to understand the diversion 
system.)

/tmp$ cp /var/cache/apt/archives/nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx_1.0.7185-2_i386.deb ./
/tmp$ mkdir nvidia
/tmp$ dpkg -e nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx_1.0.7185-2_i386.deb nvidia
/tmp$ cd nvidia
/tmp/nvidia$ grep dpkg-divert preinst |grep -v ^#
dpkg-divert --add --rename --package 
nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx --divert /usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.xlibmesa 
/usr/lib/libGL.so.1 
 /dev/null
dpkg-divert --add --rename --package 
nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx --divert /usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.2.xlibmesa 
/usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 
 /dev/null
dpkg-divert --add --rename --package 
nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx --divert /usr/lib/nvidia/libGLcore.a.xlibmesa 
/usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a 
 /dev/null
dpkg-divert --add --rename --package 
nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx --divert /usr/lib/nvidia/libglx.a.xlibmesa 
/usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.a 
 /dev/null
dpkg-divert --add --rename --package 
nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx --divert /usr/lib/nvidia/libglx.so.xlibmesa 
/usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so 
 /dev/null
/tmp/nvidia$ grep dpkg-divert postrm |grep -v ^#
dpkg-divert --remove --rename --package 
nvidia-glx-legacy --divert /usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.xlibmesa 
/usr/lib/libGL.so.1 
 /dev/null
dpkg-divert --remove --rename --package 
nvidia-glx-legacy --divert /usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.2.xlibmesa 
/usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 
 /dev/null
dpkg-divert --remove --rename --package 
nvidia-glx-legacy --divert /usr/lib/nvidia/libGLcore.a.xlibmesa 
/usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a 
 /dev/null
dpkg-divert --remove --rename --package 
nvidia-glx-legacy --divert /usr/lib/nvidia/libglx.a.xlibmesa 
/usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.a 
 /dev/null
dpkg-divert --remove --rename --package 
nvidia-glx-legacy --divert /usr/lib/nvidia/libglx.so.xlibmesa 
/usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so 
 /dev/null


Also, for further comments, please CC this address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
instead of the initial reporter's one : when entering my address in 
reportbug, it failed to understand that when I type @voila.fr, I actually 
mean @wanadoo.fr ...



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#425277: nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx: Can't be uninstalled

2007-05-20 Thread Frédéric Perrin
Package: nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx
Version: 1.0.7185-1
Severity: normal

When trying to uninstall the package nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx, dpkg fails 
with the following error :

chameau:~# aptitude remove nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx
Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait
Construction de l'arbre des dépendances... Fait
Lecture de l'information d'état étendu
Initialisation de l'état des paquets... Fait
Écriture de l'information d'état étendu... Fait
Construction de la base de données des étiquettes... Fait
Les paquets suivants ont été conservés :
  claws-mail-doc claws-mail-i18n claws-mail-tools
Les paquets suivants seront ENLEVÉS :
  nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx
0 paquets mis à jour, 0 nouvellement installés, 1 à enlever et 3 non mis 
à jour.
Il est nécessaire de télécharger 0o d'archives. Après dépaquetage, 
9908ko seront libérés.
Écriture de l'information d'état étendu... Fait
(Lecture de la base de données... 216994 fichiers et répertoires déjà 
installés.)
Suppression de nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx ...
rm: ne peut enlever `/usr/lib/libGL.so': Aucun fichier ou répertoire de 
ce type
dpkg-divert: erreur de correspondance sur paquet
  lors de la suppression de « diversion of /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 to 
/usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.xlibmesa by nvidia-glx-legacy »
  « diversion of /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 to 
/usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.xlibmesa by nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx » trouvé
dpkg : erreur de traitement de nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx (--remove) :
 le sous-processus post-removal script a retourné une erreur de sortie 
d'état 2
Des erreurs ont été rencontrées pendant l'exécution :
 nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Échec de l'installation d'un paquet. Tentative de réparation :
chameau:~#


It looks like the postrm script for this package tries to remove 
libraries with the old, nvidia-glx-legacy name, although libraries have 
the new, -71xx suffixed name. Indeed, the 
/var/lib/dpkg/info/nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx.postrm script contains the 
following lines: 

dpkg-divert --remove --rename --package nvidia-glx-legacy --divert 
/usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.xlibmesa /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 /dev/null
dpkg-divert --remove --rename --package nvidia-glx-legacy --divert 
/usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.2.xlibmesa /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 /dev/null



Whereas the /var/lib/dpkg/diversions file contains the following:

/usr/lib/libGL.so.1
/usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.xlibmesa
nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx
/usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2
/usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.2.xlibmesa
nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx
/usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a
/usr/lib/nvidia/libGLcore.a.xlibmesa
nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx
/usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.a
/usr/lib/nvidia/libglx.a.xlibmesa
nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx
/usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so
/usr/lib/nvidia/libglx.so.xlibmesa
nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx


In cast this helps, here is the output of « ls -l /usr/lib/*GL* » (after 
re-installing nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx) :
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7626156 2007-05-01 06:34 /usr/lib/libGLcore.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  21 2007-05-20 17:48 /usr/lib/libGLcore.so.1 
-libGLcore.so.1.0.7185
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7626156 2007-05-01 06:34 /usr/lib/libGLcore.so.1.0.7185
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  17 2007-05-20 17:48 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 
-libGL.so.1.0.7185
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  488960 2007-05-01 06:34 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.0.7185
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  20 2007-05-20 12:14 /usr/lib/libGLU.so.1 
-libGLU.so.1.3.060502
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  521080 2007-05-18 14:22 /usr/lib/libGLU.so.1.3.060502

And « ls -l /usr/lib/nvidia » :
total 812
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 384668 2007-05-18 14:22 libGL.so.1.2.xlibmesa
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2007-05-20 12:14 libGL.so.1.xlibmesa - 
libGL.so.1.2
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 424173 2007-05-16 15:44 libglx.so.xlibmesa
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   2004 2007-05-01 06:34 libnvidia-tls.so.1.0.7185
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   3220 2007-05-01 06:34 tls_test
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   3384 2007-05-01 06:34 tls_test_dso.so



-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx depends on:
ii  libc62.5-7   GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libx11-6 2:1.0.3-7   X11 client-side library
ii  libxext6 1:1.0.3-2   X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  nvidia-kerne 1.0.7185-1+2.6.18.dfsg.1-12 NVIDIA binary kernel module for Li
ii  x11-common   1:7.2-3 X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc

nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information




Bug#420449: xserver-xorg-core update breaks the nvidia-legacy driver

2007-04-28 Thread Frédéric Perrin
 Hi,
 
 I just had the same problem. I tried to fix this by renaming the 
 nvidia_drv.o to nvidia_drv.so, but then I got this error:

Oh, you're right, I didn't notice the difference in the suffix. I tried
to rename nvidia_drv.o to nvidia_drv.so too, but I get the same error
as you.

I also tried to rebuild my drivers (removing nvidia-* packages,
deleting /usr/src/nvidia-*.deb files, and starting over the procedure),
with no luck.

I also forgot to mention what video card I have : it is an nvidia
Geforce 2 MX/MX 400. Like yours, it is supported by the 9631 drivers,
but I don't want to try them.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#420449: xserver-xorg-core update breaks the nvidia-legacy driver

2007-04-22 Thread Frédéric Perrin
Package: nvidia-kernel-legacy-source
Version: 1.0.7184-3
Severity: important

Justification: the package is unusable

Hello,
I'm not sure whether the bug is in X or in the nvidia driver,
please reassign if necessary.

I'm using nvidia-kernel-legacy-source, following the instructions on
wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers (method 1, with module-assistant).

The latest upgrade of xserver-xorg-core (2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-1) broke the
nVidia display driver: X failed, complaining about being unable to
find the nvidia module. Moreover, «dpkg-reconfigure
xserver-xorg» didn't allow one to select nvidia as a driver.
Nevertheless, the free nv driver works fine.

Today's update of xserver-xorg-core (2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-2) made nvidia
available as a driver, but X still fails to start.

Here is the relevant part of Xorg.0.log:

X Window System Version 1.3.0
Release Date: 19 April 2007
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 1.3
Build Operating System: Linux Debian
Current Operating System: Linux chameau 2.6.18-4-686 #1 SMP Mon Mar 26
17:17:36 UTC 2007 i686 Build Date: 21 April 2007
Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Module Loader present
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log, Time: Sun Apr 22 12:07:48 2007
(==) Using config file: /etc/X11/xorg.conf
[...]
(II) LoadModule: glx
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions//libglx.so
(II) Module glx: vendor=NVIDIA Corporation
compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.7184
Module class: XFree86 Server Extension
ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.1
(II) Loading extension GLX
[...]
(II) LoadModule: nvidia
(WW) Warning, couldn't open module nvidia
(II) UnloadModule: nvidia
(EE) Failed to load module nvidia (module does not exist, 0)
[...]
(EE) No drivers available.

Fatal server error:
no screens found


As far as I can tell, this post on nvidia's forums is about this
problem, and suggests that the problem is with X:
 http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=3D72490
 The 1.3 series of the X.org server has a bug where the version
 reported changed from 7.2.* to 1.*. This confuses
 nvidia-installer into thinking that your X server is very old and
 it installs the X modules in the wrong place. To work around this
 problem, use the following options:
 
 # sh NVIDIA-Linux-version.run --x-module-path=3D`X
 -showDefaultModulePath 21 | cut -d, -f1` --x-library-path=3D`X
 -showDefaultLibPath 21`

As root, «X -showDefaultLibPath» outputs /usr/lib and
«X -showDefaultModulePath» prints /usr/lib/xorg/modules.

Before upgrading to 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-2, I couldn't find a file whose
name suggests anything about nvidia in the latter location. With
today's update of xserver-xorg-core, there is a
modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so file, yet X still fails to start.

Bug #420239 seems related, however the second comment says that the
culprit is the proprietary driver. Besides, a new version of the
nvidia-legacy driver (7185) is available on nVidia's web site, and
claims to improve compatibility with newer X.org servers.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages nvidia-kernel-legacy-source depends on:
ii  debhelper  5.0.49 helper programs for debian/rules
ii  dpatch 2.0.21 patch maintenance system for Debia
ii  make   3.81-3 The GNU version of the make util
ii  sed4.1.5-1The GNU sed stream editor

Versions of packages nvidia-kernel-legacy-source recommends:
ii  devscripts 2.10.3 Scripts to make the life of a Debi
pn  kernel-package none (no description available)
ii  nvidia-glx-legacy  1.0.7184-3 NVIDIA binary Xorg driver (legacy

-- no debconf information





Bug#413253: Canon S300 shrinks content

2007-03-03 Thread Frédéric Perrin

Package: cupsys-driver-gutenprint
Version: 5.0.0-3

Hello,

With the PPD file generated for the Canon S300 printer, content is
printed on approximately a quarter of the page.

As suggested on linuxprinting.org[0], using the PPD for the Canon S800
gives the expected result, that is, the whole page is used. You only
have to adjust the print density -- I set it to 1.5, with good results,
for both black and colours.



[0] http://www.linuxprinting.org/show_printer.cgi?recnum=Canon-S300

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (800, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages cupsys-driver-gutenprint depends on:
ii  cupsys1.2.7-4Common UNIX Printing  
System(tm) -
ii  libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13   GNU C Library: Shared  
libraries
ii  libcupsimage2 1.2.7-4Common UNIX Printing  
System(tm) -
ii  libcupsys21.2.7-4Common UNIX Printing  
System(tm) -
ii  libgnutls13   1.4.4-3the GNU TLS library -  
runtime libr
ii  libgutenprint25.0.0-3runtime for the Gutenprint  
printer
ii  libjpeg62 6b-13  The Independent JPEG  
Group's JPEG

ii  libpng12-01.2.15~beta5-1 PNG library - runtime
ii  libtiff4  3.8.2-7Tag Image File Format  
(TIFF) libra
ii  perl  5.8.8-7Larry Wall's Practical  
Extraction
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3-13 compression library -  
runtime


cupsys-driver-gutenprint recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


--
Frédéric Perrin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]