Bug#353307: dovecot: 1.0.beta2-1 doesn't include deliver, previous version did
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Jacob Elder wrote: Package: dovecot Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The previos version of this package included /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver. This version does not. There was no warning of any kind that deliver would be removed. Anyone using deliver as a local deliver agent will lose all incoming mail. 2006-01-08 22:47 Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * configure.in: Removed deliver until it's working again You're right there should have been a warning about this though. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#353404: dovecot-imapd: wrong depends: should depend on dovecot-common=1.0.beta2-1
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006, Tom Fernandes wrote: Package: dovecot-imapd Version: 1.0.beta2-1 Severity: important After upgrading from 1.0.alpha5-1 to 1.0.beta2-1 I got the following error: Warning: imap-login: Waiting for SSL parameter file /var/run/dovecot/ssl-parameters.dat and wasn't able to login via imaps anymore. This file should be automatically generated by /usr/sbin/dovecot. With the dovecot binary of 1.0.alpha5-1 it's not possible to create the appropriate file. /usr/sbin/dovecot version 1.0.alpha5-1 doesn't support --build-ssl-parameters - the binary of 1.0.beta2-1 does though. Running both - dovecot-imapd and dovecot-common version 1.0.beta2-1 works. btw. --build-ssl-parameters has been dropped again in beta3. Thanks for the report but as the next upload (in a couple of days) is going to be beta3 the issue is moot really. I'll keep this bug report open until then. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#353341: CVE-2006-0730: Two DoS vulnerabilities in dovecot
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006, Marc Haber wrote: tags #353341 patch thanks On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 04:53:17PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Patches are available at http://dovecot.org/patches/1.0-auth-crashfix.diff http://dovecot.org/patches/1.0-login-crashfixes.diff dpatch attached. Thanks but we already have this in our arch repository. A new upload will be made very soon. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#353441: drac needs PIC library
Package: drac-dev Version: 1.12-3 Severity: important drac-dev does not include an .so or a .a compiled with -fPIC this is causing us problems with dovecots' drac plugin. Can you update the package please? If you are busy let me know and I'll do an NMU. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#333962: Bug#353307: dovecot: 1.0.beta2-1 doesn't include deliver, previous version did
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Fabio Tranchitella wrote: Il giorno ven, 17/02/2006 alle 16.59 +, Alex Pimperton ha scritto: I second the part about having dovecot-lda packaged, I'd really like the seive support it introduces. I've prepared the packages with both dovecot-lda and drac support, but considering that I don't use these things I'd prefer if somebody could try them and give me some feedback. http://people.debian.org/~kobold/dovecot/ Has anyone had a chance to test Fabios packages yet? We would really like to get this version uploaded ASAP. btw, we will probably have to drop the drac support for the time being as Debians' drac package is a bit broken. Hopefully that will get resolved soon. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#333962: Bug#353307: dovecot: 1.0.beta2-1 doesn't include deliver, previous version did
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Jacob Elder wrote: The sieve component is working for me so far in my limited test. Here is the ~/.dovecot.sieve I am using. That's good enough for me! :-) I am uploading 1.0beta3-1 now and it will be available in unstable tomorrow evening. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347838: vpopmail support : missing build depends
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, kaouete wrote: it is really a problem, isnt there any way to have it compiled with vpopmail without moving it to contrib ? It might be possible at some point to have a seperate dovecot-vpopmail source package in contrib containing just a module but at the moment it has to be compiled within the dovecot source tree. And having a duplicate dovecot-imapd, dovecot-pop3d just for one feature would...not be optimal. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#348813: ITP: libdatetime-format-mail-perl -- Convert between DateTime and RFC2822/822 formats
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libdatetime-format-mail-perl Version : 0.2901 Upstream Author : Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://datetime.perl.org/ * License : GPL/Artistic Description : Convert between DateTime and RFC2822/822 formats RFCs 2822 and 822 specify date formats to be used by email. This module parses and emits such dates. (I will maintain this module as part of the pkg-perl group. I need it as a dependency of XML::Feed which I will also be packaging.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#348816: ITP: libdatetime-format-w3cdtf-perl -- Parse and format W3CDTF datetime strings
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libdatetime-format-w3cdtf-perl Version : 0.04 Upstream Author : Kellan Elliott-McCrea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://datetime.perl.org/ * License : GPL/Artistic Description : Parse and format W3CDTF datetime strings This module understands the W3CDTF date/time format, an ISO 8601 profile, defined at http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime. This format is the native date format of RSS 1.0. (I will maintain this module as part of the pkg-perl group. I need it as a dependency of XML::Feed which I will also be packaging.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#348818: ITP: libfeed-find-perl -- Syndication feed auto-discovery
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libfeed-find-perl Version : 0.06 Upstream Author : Benjamin Trott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Feed-Find/ * License : GPL/Artistic Description : Syndication feed auto-discovery Feed::Find implements feed auto-discovery for finding syndication feeds, given a URI. It (currently) passes all of the auto-discovery tests at http://diveintomark.org/tests/client/autodiscovery/. . Feed::Find will discover the following feed formats: * RSS 0.91 * RSS 1.0 * RSS 2.0 * Atom (I will maintain this module as part of the pkg-perl group. I need it as a dependency of XML::Feed which I will also be packaging.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351384: Acknowledgement (dovecot cannot be stopped, consumes >90% CPU)
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006, Lukas Ruf wrote: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-04 16:48]: today, dovecot calmed down. Now, everything seems to work as expected. Sorry for my impatience. Does this mean the bug can be closed now? Btw, was NFS involved at all? Stale NFS handles can cause this type of behavior. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351384: Acknowledgement (dovecot cannot be stopped, consumes >90% CPU)
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006, Fabio Tranchitella wrote: Uh? I don't understand.. is this a real bug or something else happend? Could you please help me in digging into to problem? Fabio, See <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on the dovecot list. Quote: "DH parameters are now set for SSL to get forward secrecy, and Dovecot doesn't really start until it sees them for the first time. The first generation may take minutes, or even longer if you have an old computer." Timo, Do you recommend we include pregenerated parameters? How would we do that? Lukas, in /var/log/mail.log do you see anything about generating SSL parameters at the time dovecot started going crazy? If not it was probably NFS related. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351828: dovecot-imapd: known bug in dovecot's IDLE handler
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Clive Menzies wrote: I'll try to find some time to try the unstable dovecot package some where else. Another alternative is to use a backport from www.backports.org. In the next couple of days, I'll provide a backport of 1.0beta2 -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#352043: dovecot-imapd: logcheck rules miss some lines
reassign 352043 logcheck retitle 352043 Please provide a backport of logcheck thanks On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Pierre Habouzit wrote: my logs contain a lot of lines like that one : Feb 8 18:12:10 olympe dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, secured those messages are completely normal and should be ignored by logcheck. please update the logcheck files accrdingly. Hi Pierre, I'm sorry but I don't know how logcheck works. Could you please explain me what should we do to solve the problem? Isn't this report related to logcheck package instead of dovecot? oh, you're right. the dovecot ignores are in the logcheck package, that is right up2date in unstable, but since I use a backport of dovecot, and not a backport of logcheck, I miss rules specific to dovecot 1.0. That could be a better idea to have the logcheck file of dovecot to be shipped with dovecot-common instead, to avoid such problems. It was decided a long time ago that logcheck rules should be in the logcheck package and that's where they'll stay. I guess the correct answer is for there to be an updated logcheck backport. logcheck maintainer(s): Please see http://www.backports.org/ and consider making a backport of the latest package from unstable. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#352228: dovecot-common: Overwrites config files
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Hans Fugal wrote:
On upgrade, overwrites configuration files in /etc/dovecot, specifically
(in my case) /etc/dovecot/dovecot{,-ldap}.conf.
Hmm, I find this a little difficult to believe. The Debian package system
doesn't overwrite conffiles unless you specifically ask it to. Which
version were you upgrading from? Did the entire configuration get
overwritten or only certain settings?
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#352228: dovecot-common: Overwrites config files
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Hans Fugal wrote: The entire config was rewritten with the default, and my config was moved to dovecot.conf.dpkg-old. I know debian conffiles are supposed to keep changes, and that's why I filed a bug report. It did this to me last time I upgraded as well, but at that juncture the config file format had changed so drastically I figured it was on purpose. Was your original config in /etc or /etc/dovecot? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#352228: dovecot-common: Overwrites config files
tag 352228 unreproducible severity 352228 normal thanks On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Hans Fugal wrote: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf and /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf I'm sorry I see absolutely no way dpkg could have just decided to overwrite your config. You must have some setting somewhere that tells it to do this. I'm not going to close the bug report because there may be something I'm missing but I'm reducing the severity. Dovecot will not be able to enter testing otherwise. I would appreciate it if you would keep me informed on any new info you find about this bug and I'm sorry we cannot come to a definitive resolution yet. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#353039: dovecot-imapd: please include module DRAC
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: Package: dovecot-imapd Version: 0.99.14-1 Severity: wishlist http://www.dovecot.org/patches/drac.c this would allow dovecot to be used with drac, a pop(&imap)-before-smtp daemon. drac exists as a debian package, however (i think) it can currently only be used with courier Ok, I'll include it in the next version. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#352043: Please provide a backport of logcheck
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Jamie L. Penman-Smithson wrote: The dependencies for logcheck are satisfied in stable, so I don't really see a need for a backport? It's just a convenience so people don't have to rebuild the package themselves. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343446: [Debian-in-workers] (forw) Bug#343446: [g-i] Missing Bengali fonts
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Christian Perrier wrote: > We need people with skills regarding fonts in the Debian Installer > development list. Please come on the debian-boot mailing list at > lists.debian.org...or, at the minimum please followup to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > just the bug cc'ed for now. I'm suffering from list overload. > > Package: cdebconf-gtk-udeb > > Current g-i iso (i.e [1] for the i386 version built on 20051130) has problems > whith > Bengali ([2]); I tried to see what is going on and found two problems: > > * there are no Bengali specific fonts (there are ttf-devanagari-fonts > and ttf-punjabi-fonts which do not cover Bengali) > > * freefonts are used as default font for Bengali even if you include > a specific font package such as ttf-bengali-fonts ([3]) > Soumyadip said something to me about the situation with freefont improving but I've forgotten what it is. Soumyadip? ... > I also would like to know if we need all those font files or we can > use just a minimal subset (LikhanNormal.ttf is ok?) Each font has the entire set of glyphs needed for a particular script so you would only need one. > which could be > packaged in an udeb in the future. > We (Debian-IN) discussed this topic in the past. Assuming we can't rely on freefont doing the right thing, our choices are 1. A single udeb containing one font for each script. 2. One seperate udeb for each script 3. A single udeb containing a "superfont" containing all the glyphs for all the scripts. does the installer team have any preference? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343897: ftp.debian.org: Please remove all webmin related packages
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: wishlist I am asking for the immediate removal of the following source packages and all their binaries: usermin usermin-contrib webmin webmin-cluster webmin-contrib webmin-exim webmin-extra webmin-optional webmin-snort webmin-virtual-server It should be blindingly obvious that these packages are not really being maintained anymore. I have always been more or less the only person looking after them. I have had a lot of positive feedback from users (and even some money on occasion) but I'm finding less and less time and motivation to keep at it. It is better to drop them now rather than perpetrate the cruel joke that these are Debian-quality packages; especially because newbies often rely on webmin to administer their systems and keep them secure. And we owe it to Jamie Cameron, the author of webmin, not to besmirch his name and product with buggy crap. Why don't I just orphan them? Well I already tried that and I'm sure like then, there will be an initial flurry of interest and offers to help but they almost never pan out. I ended up doing all the work anyway. If someone really, really wants webmin in Debian, they should prove it by doing an ITP and reintroducing it themselves. There is one current security problem in sarge which I will assist the security team with resolving but other than that, as of this day I wash my hands of webmin. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-xenU-p4-e1000 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344169: pgp4pine: after 3 wrong passwords sends email plaintext instead of aborting
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Ville Reijonen wrote: Pine accesses pgp4pine as a filter when selected for sending: "Send message (filtered thru "pgp4pine" as "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>")?" Yes ([EMAIL PROTECTED] substituted in examples) Next appears pgp4pine appears asking: - - You know all recipient keys. You may: a) Sign and encrypt the message ...etc - - selecting "a" appears: - - You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for user: "First Last <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" 1024-bit DSA key, ID 6F4E7E16, created 2005-11-01 - - entering wrong passphrase: - - gpg: Invalid passphrase; please try again ... You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for user: "First Last <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" 1024-bit DSA key, ID 6F4E7E16, created 2005-11-01 - - this repeats three times, but on third time with wrong password pgp4pine returns the message back to pine without an error so pine then sends it as "filtered" - but in this case as uncrypted mail to receiver. Error should be reported to pine same way as when aborting pgp4pine by pressing ctrl-c. Hi, sorry I didn't reply to this bug for so long. I finally had some time to look at it and I believe I have fixed the problem. -2 was just uploaded to the archive and should be available tomorrow. If there is still an issue let me know. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#350054: ITP: libxml-feed-perl -- Syndication feed parser and auto-discovery
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libxml-feed-perl Version : 0.07 Upstream Author : Six Apart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~btrott/ * License : GPL/Artistic Description : Syndication feed parser and auto-discovery XML::Feed is a syndication feed parser for both RSS and Atom feeds. It also implements feed auto-discovery for finding feeds, given a URI. . XML::Feed supports the following syndication feed formats: . * RSS 0.91 * RSS 1.0 * RSS 2.0 * Atom . The goal of XML::Feed is to provide a unified API for parsing and using the various syndication formats. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#350850: libxml-atom-perl: New upstream version available
Package: libxml-atom-perl Version: 0.09-1 Severity: wishlist The package has gotten out of date again. Can you package the latest version, 0.16? Or if you are busy, let me know and I can do an NMU. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-xenU-p4-e1000 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#350850: NMU of libxml-atom-perl
Sorry Tim, I urgently needed an updated version so I did an NMU. The only changes are that it is a new upstream version. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336476: dovecot-imapd: Permission denied when locking mbox
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Timothy Baldwin wrote: Package: dovecot-imapd Version: 1.0.alpha3-2 Severity: important Attepting to connect with Outlook Express results in errors and the following in syslog: Oct 30 14:50:40 bfg dovecot: Dovecot v1.0.alpha3 starting up Oct 30 14:50:43 bfg dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN, rip=192.168.60.117, lip=192.168.60.4 Oct 30 14:50:43 bfg dovecot: imap(alan): open(/var/mail/.temp.bfg.5234.19a65a6e264728f0) failed: Permission denied Oct 30 14:50:43 bfg dovecot: imap(alan): file_lock_dotlock() failed with mbox file /var/mail/alan: Permission denied Oct 30 14:50:43 bfg dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN, rip=192.168.60.117, lip=192.168.60.4 Oct 30 14:50:43 bfg dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN, rip=192.168.60.117, lip=192.168.60.4 Oct 30 14:50:43 bfg dovecot: imap(alan): open(/var/mail/.temp.bfg.5238.15f19b6917cbea9a) failed: Permission denied Oct 30 14:50:43 bfg dovecot: imap(alan): file_lock_dotlock() failed with mbox file /var/mail/alan: Permission denied Oct 30 14:50:44 bfg dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN, rip=192.168.60.117, lip=192.168.60.4 Oct 30 14:50:44 bfg dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN, rip=192.168.60.117, lip=192.168.60.4 Do you have: mail_extra_groups = mail in your /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf? That should fix the problem I believe. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336569: Dovecot with nss_ldap - different uid received form getpwnam
severity 336569 grave thanks On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Pawel Jarosz wrote: This bug has been reported here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=154314 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=154315 So please change priority on upgrades to critical, since this bug leads to cross-user mail fetch. In alpha3 - there is work-around, which detects such situation, and disconnects user. As I know from author, in previous releases this work-around has been added too. Pawel, can you give me some information on this workaround? Is it a code change or just in the configuration file? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336569: Dovecot with nss_ldap - different uid received form getpwnam
severity 336569 normal
thanks
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Pawel Jarosz wrote:
Hi,
yes, it's code change, see in:
./dovecot-1.0.alpha3/src/auth/userdb-passwd.c:
24 if (strcasecmp(pw->pw_name, auth_request->user) != 0) {
25 /* try to catch broken NSS implementations (nss_ldap) */
26 i_fatal("BROKEN NSS IMPLEMENTATION: "
27 "getpwnam() lookup returned different user than was "
28 "requested (%s != %s).",
29 pw->pw_name, auth_request->user);
30 }
I did'nt grep on other releases sources, but feeling this bug, I relayed on
mail form author.
Actually this code is in testing release, but upgrade priority from 0.9x to
1.0 is set to low,
and I hope, lot of users considered to wait with upgrade, and they shoudn't.
Ah I'm sorry, I misunderstood what you were saying. The way Debian
releases work, code once frozen, is never upgraded except for security
problems and I don't think this quite counts. I'll ask about it though.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336476: dovecot-imapd: Permission denied when locking mbox
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Timothy Baldwin wrote: On Sunday 30 Oct 2005 17:42, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: mail_extra_groups = mail Fixes it. IMO that should be the default. It is but it looks like somehow it got undefaulted in the last release. Thanks for the report. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337715: dovecot messes with my certificates
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005, Scott Dier wrote: Package: dovecot-common Version: 1.0.alpha3-2 I symlink in certificates that I pay for to make my ssl services work. Packages should not remove user data in root and the dovecot-common package overwrote my ssl key and certificate files. It appears that the postinst tries to be cute and handle making new certificates and migrating from imapd. This is far too much automated handholding and must be disabled to prevent data loss. See #330519 for an opposing view. Something must be done but we still haven't decided exactly what. Lars suggested on debian-devel that there should be some uniform way of handling the installation and removal of certificates and people generally agreed that it was a good idea but noone has actually gotten around to doing anything about it yet. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336036: dovecot-imapd: user's inbox corruption
severity 336036 normal thanks On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Al Nikolov wrote: Package: dovecot-imapd Version: 0.99.14-1 Severity: critical Justification: causes serious data loss Hopefully, this was happen with only one user's inbox. I'm not sure about where to look for true cause if this effect. My guess is the mbox is indeed corrupt. Can you check for e.g. double from (minus the colon) header lines? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#324877: libdevice-serialport-perl still tries to find serial port
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Daniel Schepler wrote: package libdevice-serialport-perl found 324877 1.002-0.2 tag 324877 - fixed thanks I'm still seeing the original build failure for libdevice-serialport-perl with the latest upload, using pbuilder: Are you sure you are using the latest upload? I cannot reproduce this and in fact, make test is commented out so I can't even imagine how this could happen. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336036: dovecot-imapd: user's inbox corruption
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Al Nikolov wrote: I'm so sorry for my misunderstanding, could you explain the question? This article explains the format of an mbox: http://searchcio.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,290660,sid19_gci927656,00.html My guess is somewhere in it, you have a double from line which is why it seems to be corrupt. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#310088: Bug #31088: docbook-xsl: Unacceptable regression at this point in release process
Franz, Martin, I'm not going to play severity ping-pong with you but I think you are wrong about this issue. First of all sorry to be harsh but the installation manual wouldn't have problems if you had used this package properly in the first place. You were ALWAYS supposed to use css for styling. It is the hard coded shading for verbatim, background which were regressions. They were causing docbook-xsl users to have to use workarounds and upstream has been diligently fixing them. True 1.68.1 didn't fix any > grave bugs, but it did fix a lot of other reported bugs. You may have not have come across these bugs when doing the installation manual but believe me many users found them to be quite irritating. Bear in mind the version released in sarge is the one users will have to live with for upto 3 years. I tell you what, refer any problems with the Installation manual to me and I will fix them without delay. But please close this bug or atleast reduce it to e.g. minor. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302157: dovecot: corrupted mailboxes
On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 11:10 +, Thilo Pfennig wrote: > > I do get quite often broken mailboxes of my users: > > > > hostname pop3(username): Corrupted index file > > /home/username/Maildir/.INBOX/.imap.index: index.next_uid (85) > > > uid_rec.uid (80) > > > > I can solve the problem by completely deleting .imap.index.* > > > > The users can not read their email via IMAP if this error occurs. (no > > index). This is very annoying. The phenomenon seems to switch between users. > > Are those users using procmail? And in MH mode instead of in maildir > mode? That would be the most likely problem. > Thilo was this the problem? Can I close the bug? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302447: [Webmin-maintainers] Bug#302447: webmin-bind installs in bind subdir not in bind8
reopen 302447 reassign 302447 webmin-bind retitle 302447 Rename bind8-lib.pl to bind8-lib.pl thanks On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, elias humbolt wrote: > the bug is not resolved yet! > you forgot to rename a file > > webmin-virtual-server is requires > /usr/share/webmin/bind/bind-lib.pl > > but there is no such file only the one called > /usr/share/webmin/bind/bind8-lib.pl > You're right. This will be fixed in an upcoming upload of webmin-bind. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#303778: [Webmin-maintainers] Bug#303778: webmin-core: A Suggested package is wrong.
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Martin Mewes wrote: > Well, ok we should go away with this in sarge/sid. > These would be better ;-) > > mdctl - Dummy package for transition to 'mdadm'. > mdadm - Manage MD devices aka Linux Software Raid > ok I'll change it in the next webmin upload. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307412: ITP: dbxml -- a native XML database
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > I'm not entirely surely this is the same package, It looks like the same one. > but I seem to recall > Jaldhar Vyas may have been working on this. Just FYI in case there's > some duplication of effort. This has come up in some xerces-related > discussions before. > Yes off and on I was working on it but I never filed an ITP so Tomas is welcome to it. I'd be happy to help if help is needed. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307412: ITP: dbxml -- a native XML database
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Tomas Fasth wrote: > My plan is to build dbxml using the Berkeley DB and Xerces libraries > as provided in debian. I am not sure though, what to do about pathan > and xquery. I could build them as separate binary packages and make > them visible to other developers. Or, I could just hide them within > the dbxml package. What do you think? > Ideally they should be seperate packages. That way if they are ever packaged seperately for Debian (dbxml uses forked versions doesn't it?) you can just remove them from your package. (Btw, I think we can remove Jay from this conversation now. Unless he is still interested.) -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308802: [Webmin-maintainers] Bug#308802: webmin: 1.200 is out Please ship a new package
On Thu, 12 May 2005, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: Package: webmin Version: 1.180-3 Severity: wishlist Hi, 1.200 was released one month ago. Please consider building a new package. Please consider joining the webmin maintainers team. It's currently only me and I actually orphaned the package. I only work on it now in order to prepare it for sarge. Thanks.Hi, 1.200 was released one month ago. Please consider building a new package. Thanks. Please consider joining the webmin maintainers team. It's currently only me and I actually orphaned the package. I only work on it now in order to prepare it for sarge. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#305848: [Webmin-maintainers] Bug#305848: Still Problem after config modification
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, MEDIAFOREST Technical Contact wrote: > The default path for sendmail.cf file is bad : /etc/sendmail.cf instead of > /etc/mail/sendmail.cf > the default path for Sendmail M4 base directory is bad too. > The wrong config was being installed. I fixed that in -4 (which Iuploaded earlier today.) The bind problem was fixed too. After installing -4, can you check if bug #259708 is also fixed? It's been open a long time but I don't use sendmail myself so I can't check. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312057: [Webmin-maintainers] Bug#312057: webmin-core depends on webmin-firewall ?
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: webmin-core Version: 1.200-1 Followup-For: Bug #312057 webmin-bandwidth depends on webmin-firewall. Now that webmin-core include webmin-bandwidth should not webmin-core depends on webmin-firewall ? webmin-core should not include webmin-bandwidth. That was a packaging mistake on my part. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312057: [Webmin-maintainers] Bug#312057: webmin-core: webmin-core conflict with webmin-bandwidth <= 1.200-1
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, Remi Vanicat wrote: When upgrading (today) to 1.210-1 from 1.200-1 dpkg complain that: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/webmin-core_1.210-1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/etc/webmin/bandwidth/admin.acl', which is also in package webmin-bandwidth The package webmin-bandwidth is at version 1.200-1. When removed, the upgrading goes with no problem. That was a mistake on my part. webmin-bandwidth should still be a seperate package. 1.210a-1 of webmin (contains webmin-core) and webmin-optional (contains webmin-bandwidth) which I uploaded earlier today and which should be available in the archive later today should fix the problem. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312893: dovecot-imapd: Update to version 1 with imap namespaces
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Andrew Maier wrote: Package: dovecot-imapd Version: 0.99.14-1 Severity: wishlist Hi, is there a time estimate when we can start seeing version 1.0 of dovecot-imap in Debian?. It appears to have nice features like namespaces, or changing the folder seperator for the imap folders from . to / Now that sarge is released that will be my next step. But there are a couple of library transitions going on or about to begin in sid at the moment so I'm waiting. Let's say a week or two would be a good estimate. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#271505: RFA: webmin and usermin packages
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Martin Mewes wrote: > I am an Webmin-"Official" and am co-ordinating the translators of this > software. If you need any help in packaging this software I would > gladly join the team as a sub-maintainer. > > In the end I do need advice in packaging, but I do have experience with > end-users of the software. We have formed a group to do joint maintenance of the webmin packages and we would be glad to have you aboard. Please see the Debian-webmin website at http://webmin.alioth.debian.org/ and join the mailing list at http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/webmin-maintainers Today I'm going to do a small update of the current packages and ask the list whether we should go to 1.190 or stick with 1.180 for the upcoming sarge release. (probably the latter.) In either case, there are many open bugs which need to be fixed or which need further information from the submitter. If you could help with that kind of thing it would be great. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302447: [Webmin-maintainers] Bug#302447: webmin-bind installs in bind subdir not in bind8
reassign 302447 webmin-virtual-server > Or however, you take over maintainership of webmin-virtual-server and > change the package to fit to your changes. > Yes, I just uploaded a webmin-virtual-server package today that makes the Debian Webmin maintainer group, the maintainer, and hopefully we'll see the bugs in this package fixed (and an upgrade to the latest version) soon. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#317749: [Webmin-maintainers] Bug#317749: Network Interfaces: Please support multiple logical interfaces and mapping
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Thomas Hood wrote: Package: webmin-core Severity: wishlist (I requested this before as part of a bug report that got closed.) The current Network Configuration|Network Interfaces screen presumes that users have one logical interface per physical interface. If the user has multiple logical interfaces defined then the page is rather misleading. Yeah, now that sarge is behind us, we should look at overhauling this whole module. Btw, we also need to add the resolveconf support again as I had to drop it due to incompatible internal code changes. Hopefully I can get some time to work on it after I come back from Finland. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336140: dovecot-common: does not start - "login process died too early"
reassign 336140 libssl0.9.8 merge 336140 334180 thanks On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Andy Grover wrote: Package: dovecot-common Version: 1.0.alpha3-2.0.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Oct 27 23:06:48 tabla dovecot: Dovecot v1.0.alpha3 starting up Oct 27 23:06:49 tabla dovecot: Login process died too early - shutting down Oct 27 23:06:49 tabla dovecot: pop3-login: Can't load certificate file /etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem: error:25066067:DSO support routines:DLFCN_LOAD:could not load the shared library Oct 27 23:06:49 tabla dovecot: pop3-login: Can't load certificate file /etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem: error:25066067:DSO support routines:DLFCN_LOAD:could not load the shared library Oct 27 23:06:49 tabla dovecot: child 5056 (login) returned error 89 Oct 27 23:06:49 tabla dovecot: child 5057 (login) returned error 89 Tried reinstalling etc, same error. dovecot.pem is there. Thanks -- Andy This is a known problem with the current libssl. See bug #334180 for details. In the meantime, revert to dovecot 1.0alpha3-2 which can be found at http://snapshot.debian.net/archive/2005/10/08/debian/pool/main/d/dovecot/ -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334180: Dovecot problems on Debian
If you have been bitten by bug #334180 and dovecot 1.0alpha3-2.0.1 rest assured the problem is being worked on. In the meantime you should downgrade to -2 which can be found at: http://snapshot.debian.net/archive/2005/10/08/debian/pool/main/d/dovecot/ -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#324470: dovecot-imapd works for me
severity 324470 normal thanks On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Michael R Head wrote: I had prevented myself from upgrading to the latest version of dovecot due to this grave bug. I've upgraded and haven't had a problem with Maildir delivery. Thanks for the report Mike. Olivier, can you confirm if 1.0.alpha3 solves your problem? Because other people have it working I suspect this is a local configuration problem at your end but I don't immediately notice anything in the config you posted that could cause it. Let me know if it still doesn't work and we can investigate further. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330519: dovecot-common: doesn't remove certificates on purge
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > Package: dovecot-common > Version: 0.99.20050712-2 > > When dovecot-common is purged, it leaves the SSL certificates behind on > the system (see below for piuparts log snippet). I think they should be > removed, upon purge, like other configuration files. In the past I have been specifically asked not to do that. The problem is someone may have got themselves a real certificate from e.g. verisign and they would be very annoyed if I destroyed it. Is the Debian conffile handling tech capble of dealing with this type of situation or should I implement some kind of method of detecting whether the cert was generated by the package or not? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#324470: dovecot-imapd works for me
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Olivier LARRIGAUDIERE wrote: > If you need more test or if you want my configuration file, you can ask. > > I've downgraded to the version 0.99.14-1 who works perfectly. > Yes please send your 0.99.14 configuration to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think you already sent your 1.0 configuration. I am pretty sure this is only a local problem so we should be able to sort it out quickly. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#324470: dovecot-imapd works for me
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Olivier LARRIGAUDIERE wrote: > Here is my configuration file for the 0.99.14 version: > I think you've already sent this one. Can you send you 1.0alpha3 version too? But it might not be necessary. first tell me did you set this option: mail_extra_groups = mail when you upgraded to 1.0alpha3? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#324470: Any clues about Debian bug 324470
Hi Timo, Could you take a look at this bug report? Do you have any ideas as to why moving mails is not working for Olivier? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330519: dovecot-common: doesn't remove certificates on purge
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > It would thus make sense to me to creates some helper commands to take > care of this properly. Something like: > > openssl-autocreate-certificate $PACKAGENAME > openssl-autoremove-certificate $PACKAGENAME > > plus other options, if necessary. Gnutls may want its own versions, I > don't know. > > The first command would create a self-signed certificate with sensible > parameters and place it in the correct locations, named after the > package. It also stores the MD5 checksum (or full copy) of the key > in /var/lib/something. If such a certificate already exists, the command > obviously does nothing. > > The second command would check that the certificate to be removed > matches the checksum (or full key) in /var/lib/something, and if so, > removes it, and if not, does nothing. > > Does this sound sensible to you? > I remember thinking the same thing a long time ago and I may have even got as far as discussing it on debian-devel or IRC. But I didn't feel comfortable doing it myself. (To tell you the truth, the cert-generating code is just cut-and-pasted from other packages) Nobody else ran with it and so it just fell by the wayside. It is definitely a good idea though. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330978: dovecot-common: Duplicate 'userdb' section in default config
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Jan Medlock wrote: > Package: dovecot-common > Version: 1.0.alpha3-1 > Severity: minor > > The 'userdb' subsection of 'auth default' is repeated twice. The > actual configurations are identical but the comments above each are > different. > You're referring to the bit that says userdb passdb right? Actually 1.0alpha can support multiple userdbs so its harmless but I've commented it out in -2 anyway. Thanks for the report. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325968: dovecot-common: installation changes permission for SSL key
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Andreas van Cranenburgh wrote: > Package: dovecot-common > Version: 0.99.20050712-2 > Severity: normal > > Upon installing dovecot the permissions for the SSL key get changed. I > have the following permssions to allow non-root daemons to read it: > > -rw-r- 1 root adm 2359 Apr 2 19:35 /etc/ssl/key.pem > > And it gets changed to rw--- without any notice. > > This resulted in my Jabber server suddenly being down, for unknown > reasons. In my opinion the package should either ask, or leave the ssl > key alone altogether. > Something else is happening here. dovecot installs its certificate into /etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem Are you sure you didn't do anything else which could have changed this permission? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334180: dovecot-imapd does not load shared libraries or ssl certs
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005, Michael Perry wrote: Package: dovecot-imapd Version: 1.0.alpha3-2.0.1 On a dist-upgrade this evening this package will not load my ssl certs with the following error: Oct 15 16:53:44 orion dovecot: imap-login: Can't load certificate file /etc/ssl/dovecotcert.pem: error:25066067:DSO support routines:DLFCN_LOAD:could not load the shared library Apparently someone did a non-maintainer upload and botched something in the process. I went back to the dovecot-imapd and dovecot-common in testing and I can login and get my certs seen with no problems. Yeah, I'd stick with testing for now. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334209: (no subject)
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Michael Wardle wrote:
It turns out the configuration file syntax has changed between 0.99.x and
1.0. I had to migrate to a new format last month and already it's changed
again.
And silly me, I forgot to include a note warning you of this fact.
The following section appears to be equivalent to the old one.
Note that:
1. the braces are mandatory, even for an empty block
2. the end brace must be on the following line
auth default {
mechanisms = plain
passdb pam {
}
userdb passwd {
}
user = root
}
The documentation refers to a dovecot-example.conf, but no Debian Dovecot
package seems to provide this file. Would you be able to include this in
dovecot-common?
The default /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf provided in the dovecot-common
package is the same as dovecot-example.conf. That's another thing I ought
to document.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#92571: wnpp: webmin-debconf
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, Drew Scott Daniels wrote: I would certainly be interested in a web front end for package management and/or configuration. I don't know of any other alternatives. If there was any progress on this package, where can I find it? The work I had done previously was unfortunately lost in a hard disk crash lasy year. I do still have ambitions of creating something like this but I don't know if I can get to it any time soon. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327062: ITP: scim-sinhala -- Input Method plug-in for Sinhala
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, NIIBE Yutaka wrote: scim-sinhala is the input method plug-in for Sinhala language. Homepage: http://scim-imengine.sourceforge.jp/index.cgi?cmd=view;name=SCIMSinhala You will need some Sinhala fonts to go with that but we don't currently have any afaik. There are some at http://www.fonts.lk/down.html (free but exact license unknown) and http://sinhala.linux.lk/pub/fonts/ (GPL) It would be nice if you could package those too. Or we could add them to ttf-indic-fonts -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327141: [Webmin-maintainers] Bug#327141: Package: webmin-software
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Richard Forster wrote: Package: webmin-software Version: 1.220-1 Error Message: HTTP/1.0 500 Perl execution failed Server: MiniServ/0.01 Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 22:20:35 GMT Content-type: text/html Connection: close Error - Perl execution failed Undefined subroutine &main::ui_subheading called at /usr/share/webmin/software/index.cgi line 10. Yep its a bug alright. If you add this line: require './ui-lib.pl'; to index.cgi under where it says: require './software-lib.pl'; it should work. I've just uploaded a fixed package and I've alerted the author of webmin so he can fix it in his next version. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#324877: libdevice-serialport-perl: FTBFS: Trying to find a serial port for testing...
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, Kurt Roeckx wrote: found 324877 1.002-0.1 thanks Hi, It's now failing to build with: mknod debian/ttyS47 c 4 111 mknod: `debian/ttyS47': Operation not permitted mknod() is a privileged system call, you need root/CAP_MKNOD for this. I built this package under pbuilder 0.128 and the standard 2.6.8 kernel on sarge so it must be a permissions (or capabilities) problem of some sort. Another possibility is you could have tried to build it on a partition mounted nodev. I have to wonder why it failed to build in the first place, every system really should have something like a /dev/ttyS1 or /dev/tty1, and I think the problem was on the submitters setup rather than a bug in the package. If pbuilder does not have those thing in /dev, I'd say it's a problem with pbuilder. It does but it would cause output to the real /dev/ttyS1 which could be a bad thing if you have e.g. a modem hanging off it. Perhaps the only foolproof solution is to disable the tests. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#318414: [Webmin-maintainers] Bug#318414: Webmin has problems installing third-party modules
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Misu Moldovan wrote: > The webmin modules that are installed manually through webmin's > interface (and not via the apt system) are placed by default in > /usr/local/share/webmin. However, in that directory the symlinks seem > broken, they all point to the same script: ../../../share/webmin/web-lib.pl > Aargh! I have this correct on my own machine but the package I uploaded is wrong. I've uploaded -3 which fixes this. It should be available in the archive today. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#319465: wrong dependency of dovecot-imapd and dovecot-pop3d
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Benjamin Berg wrote:
Package: dovecot-imapd
Version: 0.99.20050712-1
Severity: important
Today and yesterday I had a problem with dovecot, because dovecot-imapd was
updated, and dovecot-common was not. Well, I guess a simple change in the
debian/control file, could prevent this from happening.
The dependeny on dovecot-common is (>= 0.99.12-1) I suggest that the it
should say:
dovecot-common (= ${Source-Version})
So that dovecot-common, dovecot-imapd, and dovecot-pop3 have to be the same
version.
But you see, dovecot-common doesn't have to be the same version. Or so I
think. What kind of problem did dovecot-imapd have with an older
dovecot-common? It might justify bumping up the version in the
dependency.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#319455: dovecot-common: All messages marked as "old but not deleted"
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Steaphan Greene wrote: Package: dovecot-common Version: 0.99.14-1 Severity: important It seems that Dovecot marks every message served up by its pop and imap servers as "Status: O" if downloaded with certain clients (like fetchmail), which, according to RFC 2076 means "message is old but not deleted" - though this is non-standard. This makes mail readers that use this field (like mutt) think all new mail is just old unread mail. There also seems to be no way to disable this in the current version's configuration, making these clients unable to function correctly when used with dovecot. Can you check to see if this problem still exists in 0.99.20050712 which is in sid? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#319413: dovecot-common: ssl cipher negotiation fails
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Krzysztof Gałązka wrote: MUA couldn't connect to imaps server becouse of ssl cipher negotiation fail. Problem disapeard after change in config file: default config: ssl_cipher_list = all:!low should be: ssl_cipher_list = ALL:!LOW Thanks. This will be fixed in the next upload. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
Bug#319465: wrong dependency of dovecot-imapd and dovecot-pop3d
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Benjamin Berg wrote: Ok, maybe it is not necessary, for them to have the same version. After the last update of dovecot from 0.99.14-1 to 0.99.20050712-1 dovecot went into an infinite loop. [...] When I stopped dovecote my syslog was already 38MB big ... After updating dovecot-common everything is working fine again. Hmm I see, Ok, the next version of dovecot-imapd and dovecot-pop3d will depend on dovecot-common (>= 0.99.20050712-1) -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#319504: Bug in 0.99.14 mbox handling - mail UIDs are renumbered without bumping UIDVALIDITY
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, David McBride wrote: Package: dovecot-imapd Version: 0.99.14-1 Severity: important Hi, I think I've identified a bug in Dovecot 0.99.14 as packaged and distributed by Debian Sarge. I believe the bug lies in the original Dovecot source, not with any modifications made by Debian. Specifically, this bug deals with Dovecot's handling of message unique identifiers (UIDs) for IMAP clients when using the mbox mailbox storage format. David, can you check if the problem persists with 0.99.20050712-1 which is in sid? This is actually the 1.0stable branch of dovecot and has many fixes not included in 0.99.x The package should work correctly on sarge (a proper sarge backport is forthcoming) but you will also need libpq4 from sid and you'll need to make sure dovecot-common is also upgraded to 0.99.20050712-1 also. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#320388: dovecot: crashes when using LDAP as userdb/passdb
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Vedran Fura�~M wrote: Package: dovecot Version: 0.99.20050712-1 Severity: important Allmost immediately after starting it crashes and I get this in log: Jul 29 00:18:52 pollux dovecot: Dovecot v1.0-stable starting up Jul 29 00:18:56 pollux dovecot: Auth process died too early - shutting down Jul 29 00:18:56 pollux dovecot: child 24186 (auth) killed with signal 11 Strace output: http://www.riteh.hr/~vedranf/linux/dovecot.strace Version 0.99.14 worked fine. Are /var/run or your lockfiles on an NFS-mounted partition? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
Bug#323001: dovecot-imapd: IMAP assertion failure and crash (istream_raw_mbox_get_body_size)
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Timo Sirainen wrote: This problem most likely is caused by CR characters in linefeeds in the mbox file. 1.0-stable releases don't handle that, latest 1.0-test does.. I'll try to put out 1.0alpha release out soon, maybe Debian will start using that too :) As soon as we can get our hands on it! -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323873: [Webmin-maintainers] Bug#323873: some third party modules require /usr/local/share/webmin/web-lib-funcs.pl link
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Ryan Nowakowski wrote: Package: webmin Version: 1.210a-3 Severity: normal The 3rd party "Certificate Manager" module requires this link: sesv02:/usr/local/share/webmin# ls -l web-lib-funcs.pl lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 38 2005-08-18 19:03 web-lib-funcs.pl -> ../../../share/webmin/web-lib-funcs.pl That link is not created during "apt-get install webmin". Alright. When I package 1.220 (soon) I'll add that in. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#319558: libnet-imap-perl: Debug output of "fetch" that cannot be disabled.
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Morten B�geskov wrote: Package: libnet-imap-perl Version: 0.02-3 Severity: minor When running $imap->fetch(...) there is debug output on stdout. It's the extracted stringdata from the response before it gets passed on to the corresponding class. I suggest it is only printed when the debug flag is set. Thanks Morten. I've applied your (corrected patch) and uploaded a new version of this package. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
Bug#320388: dovecot: crashes when using LDAP as userdb/passdb
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Vedran Furac wrote: Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Vedran Furač wrote: Package: dovecot Version: 0.99.20050712-1 Severity: important Allmost immediately after starting it crashes and I get this in log: Jul 29 00:18:52 pollux dovecot: Dovecot v1.0-stable starting up Jul 29 00:18:56 pollux dovecot: Auth process died too early - shutting down Jul 29 00:18:56 pollux dovecot: child 24186 (auth) killed with signal 11 Strace output: http://www.riteh.hr/~vedranf/linux/dovecot.strace Version 0.99.14 worked fine. The ldap configuration is now done from /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf . Is this file configured correctly? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
Bug#292195: dovecot-common: init.d script should look in inetd.conf, but not in dovecot.conf
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > Dovecot can be run from inetd. In that case, /etc/init.d/dovecot > shouldn't try to start anything. That script looks for the protocols > setting in dovecot.conf. However, the default value is "imap imaps", Actually, the default value is empty. Which is why we need the test. Read on: > meaning that if it is absent, dovecot should still be started. The problem is the debian package is split up. The init.d script is in dovecot-common. Both dovecot-imapd and dovecot-pop3d depend on dovecot-common but both can be installed independently. So if the user only has dovecot-pop3d and dovecot-common installed, startup will still fail with "imap imaps" Another scenario is he could install dovecot-imapd and then remove it later but still keep dovecot-common. > Moreover, the protocols setting is still needed when dovecot is run from > inetd. Therefore I suggest that the current test > > if grep protocols /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf | sed 's/#.*$//' | tr -d > '"' \ > | egrep -q '[^#]*(\bpop3s?\b|\bimaps?\b)'; > then > > be replaced with a test similar to the one the exim init.d script, like so: > > if [ -f /etc/inetd.conf ] && grep -E -q "^ *([0-9.]+:)?(pop3s?|imaps?)" > \ >/etc/inetd.conf > then > exit 0 > else > > so it looks like the second test should be in addition to the first, not replacing it. I'll include it in the next version. Btw, did Timo ever respond to you about your other patch? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#292195: dovecot-common: init.d script should look in inetd.conf, but not in dovecot.conf
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > Yes, but the script doesn't deal with that anyway. It just checks for a > protocols setting which mentions at least one of the four protocols, > then checks that at least one of the two login handlers are present. It > doesn't check for a valid combination. (If we're talking about the same > version.) > Ok I'll look into that again. It used to die horribly which is why I put in the test. > > Btw, did Timo ever respond to you about your other patch? > > > No. Maybe I should send a reminder to him directly. > Yes. Like I said, if he agrees, I'll include it in the Debian package. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#292344: dovecot-common: upgrade fails
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Adrian Zaugg wrote: > Please tell me, if you need more information! > Please open /var/lib/dpkg/info/dovecot-common.postinst in an editor and replace the line that says set -e with set -x then run it and send me the output. Then we can see exactly where it is failing. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290985: [Fwd: Re: [Dovecot] STARTTLS and inetd]
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > Looks like Timo approved at last. > Excellent. I am planning to do an upload today. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290516: webmin-cluster-useradmin: RPC error trying to add a new server
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Juergen Kosel wrote: > Package: webmin-cluster-useradmin > Version: 0.94-7woody3 > Severity: normal > > Hallo, > as in bug 136154 reported Feb 28 06:36:08 2002 by Chris Halls > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, I can't add any server to the webmin cluster > for useradmin (and for software). > It just reports > "Failed to add server: RPC error :" > > I have seen > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=136154&archive=yes > > The file /usr/share/webmin/defaultacl mentioned in the above bugreport > is missing again. > If I add it manually it works. > > It also seems, that the patch to web-lib.pl is missing. > So the reported RPC error is an empty string. > At this point the woody webmin packages are beyond repair. I advise you to use the ones from sarge instead. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290403: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#290403: Problem found with dovecot. One User was not able to get eMail)
> The reason why I didn't mentioned any MUA is because all used MUA here > showed the problem. (kmail, evolution, thunderbird, mutt, pine) > I still don't think the problem is on the server end. Does the user have the MAIL environment variable set? What does it contain? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290985: STARTTLS (STLS) doesn't work when running from inetd
tags 290985 -security thanks > > I posted this to the Dovecot mailing list a couple of days ago. Most > people probably don't run Dovecot from inetd, but I still think it needs > to be fixed one way or another. After all, it's a bug. The patch seems ok to me but I'd like to wait and see what Timo has to say about it. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290991: ITP: libmail-mboxparser-perl -- Perl5 module for fast, object-oriented UNIX mailbox reading
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Joshua Kwan wrote: > * Package name: libmail-mboxparser-perl How is this different from libmail-mbox-messageparser-perl? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290985: STARTTLS (STLS) doesn't work when running from inetd
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > I should have pointed out that the reason that I tagged it "security" > was that it breaks disable_plaintext_auth. > The security tag is to alert the security team that there is a problem that needs their attention. (Could cause a compromise, requires an update to stable etc..) So it doesn't really apply here. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293348: dovecot-imapd: New inetd.conf check doesn't work for all configurations.
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Michael R Head wrote: > Package: dovecot-imapd > Version: 0.99.13-4 > Severity: important > > The new inetd.conf check doesn't work on my sister. Condolences to your sister. > This causes dovecot to simply not start anymore on my system. > > I run a pops server, but it's not dovecot, but my imaps server is > dovecot. when dovecot looks to see if I'm running a pops server, it > finds one, and decides not to start my dovecot imap server. > Doh! I did not think of this possibility. > I've just removed the new checks from my /etc/init.d/dovecot, and things > are working again, but I think the check needs to be reworked just a > little. > > Perhaps it should only check inetd for the protocols that it finds in > dovecot.conf? > The check was put in because some people run dovecot from inetd not standalone. So they may not have the right entries. What I can do however is check that the pop3 or imap server started in inetd.conf is actually dovecot. Hmm I suppose there may be some weirdos out their who run dovecot-imapd standalone and dovecot-pop3d from inetd or vice-versa. I'll have to think about what to do for them :-) thanks for the report. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#273361: dovecot-auth hangs with IO leak
tag 273361 upstream thanks On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Alan wrote: > > I think dovecot has some problem dealing with the pam_unix + pam_ldap > configuration. I don't know if it really happens between 0.99.10 to > 0.99.11. Shall we report it upstream? > Yes please. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293688: ITP: ttf-tibetan -- A Unicode OpenType font for Tibetan, Dzongkha and Ladakhi
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > A freely available Tibetan Machine Uni font from the THDL project > (http://www.thdl.org/). The font contains almost 4,000 glyphs and can generate > over 20,000 different combinations with full support for the Sanskrit > combinations found in chos skad texts. > Do you need a sponsor? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293348: dovecot-imapd: New inetd.conf check doesn't work for all configurations.
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > Hey! Now you broke *my* configuration! ;-) Aargh! > > for p in \ > `sed -r "s/^ *(([^:]+|\[[^]]+]|\*):)?(pop3s?|imaps?)[ \t].*/\3/;t;d" \ > /etc/inetd.conf` >do >for q in \ > `sed -r "s/^ *protocols[ \t]*=[ \t]*(([^\"]*)|\"(.*)\")/\2\3/;t;d" \ > /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf` >do > if [ $p = $q ]; then >exit 0 > fi >done > done > > I've made a new upload with this fix. (I just noticed that I hadn't patched the stop action previously. So I've moved things around a bit.) Hopefully this finally solves the problem. Let me know if it doesn't. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294284: dovecot-imapd: Corrupted index file
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Frank Hart wrote: > Package: dovecot-imapd > Version: 0.99.13-3 > Severity: important > > The index file gets corrupted regularly: > > Feb 8 21:23:16 hive imap(hart): Corrupted index file > /home/hart/Maildir/.INBOX/.imap.index: index.next_uid (129) > > uid_rec.uid (128) > > The workaround I use is to move the new message in Maildir/cur from > msg.nC:2, to msg.nC:2,S. This way I can see the mails in my inbox again > but the new mail is marked as old. > Ok I'll look into it. You should report this to the dovecot list too. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297149: aspell-bn: FTBFS: Cannot find is13194-bn.cset
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > jaldhar: I'm cc'ing you since you've made the last couple of > versions/uploads and might have a clue about finding the missing > is13194-bn.cset file. > > Not knowing any Bengali whatsoever, I don't know if this is helpful, but > ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/bn/ has a tarball that contains > u-beng.cmap and u-beng.cset that can be copied to the aspell-bn source > directory as is13194-bn.cmap and is13194-bn.cset (the latter may need to > be edited to contain "= is13194-bn" instead of "= u-beng" at the top). > With these files, the package will build, but I don't know if it works. > > (Hoping to be helpful here, sorry if I'm on a wild goose chase.) Actually this file should be created by the build process. Unfortunately neither Soumyadip nor I know a lot about aspell. Our working theory is that it was the recent API change in aspell which caused the file to stop being created. Soumyadip is following up with Brian Nelson about all this. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298874: dovecot-common: default path for mysqld.sock is incorrect
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Mike O'Connor wrote: > Package: dovecot-common > Severity: minor > > the installed /etc/dovecot/dovecot-mysql.conf contained this line: > > #db_unix_socket = /var/tmp/mysql.sock > > I think that should be changed to /var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock which is > the default path for this socket on debian. > I agree. I'll make this change in my next upload. > Possibly this line should be uncommented as well since by default > networking is disabled on a default install of mysql-server, but that > would also be making the assumption that the mysql-server and dovecot > are running on the same system. > It is probably best left commented out. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#340008: Upgrading dovecot overwrites installed SSL keys
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Andrew Maier wrote: I think I worked around the problem by giving the ssl keys a different name from the self created ones and I think this worked. Do you remember if at the time, the self created one was named imapd.pem or dovecot.pem? Hello, haven't heard back from either of you. If this isn't such a big deal I'll downgrade the severity again. In any case I've been told this bug doesn't qualify to be fixed in sarge. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#340008: Upgrading dovecot overwrites installed SSL keys
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Andrew Maier wrote: Hi, Sorry for not replying. (Monday was a holiday in Geneva, so I was out). To be honest I cannot recall correctly. But I do know, that my certificate is called impad.pem (in /etc/ssl/certs) in dovecot.conf and that I have commented out the lines to /etc/ssl/private/dovecot.pem, so the file looks like this: Thanks, it does help. This problem was fixed in later versions of the dovecot package. Now I'll just wait to see if Dominic has anything to add and then downgrade the bug. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#369359: Fix for the escaping patch
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Martin Pitt wrote: > reopen 369359 > thanks > > Hi Jaldhar! > > I'm terribly sorry, but during backporting the upstream patch I made a > mistake. Can you please apply the attached debdiff on top of the > current package to unbreak mysql auth? > > Please see https://launchpad.net/bugs/49601 for details. > Thanks Martin. It's applied and a new package is on its way. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#373227: dovecot: child 7590 (auth-worker) killed with signal 11
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Stijn Tintel wrote: > Package: dovecot > Version: 1.0.beta8-3 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > After doing aptitude update / dist-upgrade tonight, I cannot > authenticate to my dovecot mailserver anymore. I enabled debugging both > for mail and auth, but I didn't find anything useful in the logs. > You are using mysql right? There was a problem with the security patch applied in -3 and mysql. It will be fixed in the next update. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370385: [Indlinux-group] ttf-indic-fonts bug -- update
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > I wanted to give a status update on this bug[1]. Sunil Mohan has > uncovered the real reason why the lang fields for ttf-telugu-fonts > and ttf-kannada-fonts are not being recognized by fontconfig (see > below). We should relay this information to the font authors and > have them fix the fonts accordingly. > > > Re: ttf-telugu-fonts and ttf-kannada-fonts ignored due to missing > lang field in fonts.cache-1 Posted by Sunil Mohan Adapa at > 2006-06-08 13:10:18 UTC > > I found out why "lang=" is empty in the font cache file. Fontconfig > assumes that a font covers a langauge only if *all* the code points > in the corresponding script are covered. Pothana2000 was not > covering 0C55 Unicode codepoint. I tried adding some rubbish for > that codepoint and fc-cache obtained from the changed font file had > lang=te. > > Kedage font was not covering 2 code points: 0C8C and 0CBD. > Does this mean corrected versions of the fonts will be provided? If so what is the time frame? Please remember to cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] on any further correspondence. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#377918: Adopting apt-dpkg-ref
retitle 377918 ITA: apt-dpkg-ref -- APT, Dpkg Quick Reference sheet owner 377918 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 21:48:53 +0100, Matej Vela wrote: On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:17:27 -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Matej Vela wrote: Do you still intend to adopt apt-dpkg-ref? (This is just a ping, I'm not interested in adopting it myself.) Yes. I am preparing a new version which I will upload in a few days. Is this still the case? I haven't heard back from you, so I'm assuming you're no longer interested. If you are, feel free to retitle the bug again. I know I'm dragging my feet on this but I really, really do intend to adopt this package and have (slowly) been working on it. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#405393: Other weired occurrences
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Christoph Burgmer wrote: Hi, same problem over here. Most annoying Kopete and Konsole. I don't even blame skim for stopping keyboard input completly (though notably stopping when hitting return in konsole), but even "eating" keystrokes like "ctrl-shift-XXX", XXX being a key that definitely worked before. This effect is even worse in Inkscape, and other non-KDE programs, Java-apps... Scrolling through hitting keys though still works, even if normal text can't be input any more. Maybe this helps to track down the bug. What are your environment settings (if any) for scim/skim? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#340008: Upgrading dovecot overwrites installed SSL keys
On Mon, 29 May 2006, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: severity 340008 grave thanks I have increased the severity of this bug as overwriting the SSL key is data loss. This affects the recent security upgrade in sarge which makes it especially visible. I'd asked the original reporter about the circumstances in which this occurs but didn't get a reply. Actually now I don't even see that message in the bug report so he may never have received it. If so Andrew, sorry I've ignored this bug for so long. Is this the same problem as in #337715? If so it has been dealt with in etch and sid but is still an issue in sarge. It is perhaps worth reissuing this erratum having fixed this problem. If there is interest in this I am happy to provide the fix. Yes please send me any information you have ASAP so we can deal with this promptly. There is another security issue which has to be dealt with (#369359) so the chances are very good a fix for this problem will be accepted for sarge. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#340008: Upgrading dovecot overwrites installed SSL keys
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Andrew Maier wrote: I think I worked around the problem by giving the ssl keys a different name from the self created ones and I think this worked. Do you remember if at the time, the self created one was named imapd.pem or dovecot.pem? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#405393: Input randomly breaks in KDE applications with Skim running.
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Daniel Palmer wrote: Package: skim Version: 1.4.4-2 I have a multilingual system that's English with Skim used on top of scim to provide input for Japanese and Chinese. My locale is en_gb.UTF8 With Skim running applications randomly refuse to take input from the keyboard and have to be restarted to get them to work again. The biggest offender seems to be kopete, I'll be chatting away and out the blue the keyboard stops working. However I can input text into another application and manually paste it into the broken one. The only non-kde application this happens to is Skype (QT based?). With Skype it almost always happens if I'm in a chat with someone and something takes the window focus away from that chat i.e. a chat started by another Skype user. Cheers, Are you using sid? If so can you try 1.4.5-1 which will be available in the next archive update and see if it helps any? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
