Bug#794453: systemd: System freezee when systemd starts

2015-08-03 Thread Jens Stavnstrup
Agree that the language was bad :(

You filed this bug against version 215-17, yet you talk about 220-7.
> Please clarify.
>

I have been unable to boot the machine with any version of systemd since
220-7 and which have been released to testing. The machine freezes as soon
as systemd is started. I am able to reinstall systemd 215-17, which works
just fine, which is the only version, where I can file a bug.


Second, your subject says "system freeze when systemd starts", yet the
> bug report talks about an install problem regarding udev.
> Please clarify.
>

I am able to install newer version of systemd (and the five packages
systemd depend on incl udev). For systemd 222-2 udev can not be installed
as already reported.


Bug#757207: systemd: Installation of systemd makes system unbootable

2014-08-06 Thread Jens Stavnstrup
As requested

content of /etc/fstab
===

# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
#
# Use 'blkid' to print the universally unique identifier for a
# device; this may be used with UUID= as a more robust way to name devices
# that works even if disks are added and removed. See fstab(5).
#
#
/dev/mapper/ares-root /   ext4errors=remount-ro 0   1
# /boot was on /dev/sda1 during installation
UUID=CS0IM3-x23c-6Iyg-vtLc-NPWI-FuS2-cSFvr8 /boot   ext2
defaults0   2
/dev/mapper/ares-swap_1 noneswapsw  0   0
/dev/sr0/media/cdrom0   udf,iso9660 user,noauto 0   0
/dev/sdb1   /media/usb0 autorw,user,noauto  0   0



content of /etc/crypttab
=

sda5_crypt UUID=08cb6482-b013-44a8-8158-3bb41812a7f4 none luks



Output ofls -la /dev/disk/by-uuid/
==

lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  10 Aug  7 07:30
08cb6482-b013-44a8-8158-3bb41812a7f4 -> ../../sda5
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  10 Aug  7 07:30
39eb5a09-2859-4891-a22f-ff844891f5cf -> ../../dm-1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  10 Aug  7 07:30
da9bc68a-a904-40aa-b8cc-26df3faf5c6d -> ../../dm-2

Regards

Jens


Bug#757207: systemd: Installation of systemd makes system unbootable

2014-08-06 Thread Jens Stavnstrup
Package: systemd
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system

The bug is properly related to #754059, but unlike Filippo, I was stupid enough 
to update to systemd, which resulted in the removal of sysvinit-core and 
resulted in an unbotable system.

Using emergency mode (which is also a problem due to #755581), I was able to 
re-add sysvinit-core, which subsequently removed

network-manager:i386 (0.9.10.0-1), kde-plasma-desktop:i386
(84), hplip:i386 (3.14.6-1), plasma-nm:i386 (0.9.3.3-4),
printer-driver-postscript-hp:i386 (3.14.6-1), systemd-sysv:i386
(208-6), kde-standard:i386 (84), polkit-kde-1:i386 (0.99.1-1),
packagekit:i386 (0.8.17-4), appstream-index:i386 (0.7.0-2),
task-kde-desktop:i386 (3.20), policykit-1-gnome:i386 (0.105-2),
listaller:i386 (0.5.8-2), plasma-widget-networkmanagement:i386
(0.9.3.3-4), gvfs:i386 (1.20.2-1), colord:i386 (1.2.1-1),
libpam-systemd:i386 (208-6), udisks2:i386 (2.1.3-2),
packagekit-tools:i386 (0.8.17-4), gvfs-daemons:i386 (1.20.2-1),
policykit-1:i386 (0.105-6.1), apper:i386 (0.8.2-3)

Have looked at the different bug reports, but have not found anyway to 
restablish my system.

What systemd packages should be added, it order for my system to work properly 
again? And do I need to modify anything else? Looked at the systemd wiki entry, 
but that seems a bit outdated with respect to the discussion taking place on 
the debian-devel mailing-list.

Adding systemd, systemd-shim and cgmanager did not help. 

Trying to add several of the packages in the above list .e.f. network-manager 
requires systemd and will remove sysvinit-core and make my system unbootable 
again. 


Since I am using a LVM2 encripted disk, this report may also be related to 
#678438 and/or #692120.


Relevant version numbers for the systemd packages are

systemd 208-6
systemd-shim 6-4
cgmanager 0.28.3



-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages systemd depends on:
ii  acl  2.2.52-1
ii  adduser  3.113+nmu3
ii  initscripts  2.88dsf-53.2
ii  libacl1  2.2.52-1
ii  libaudit11:2.3.7-1
ii  libblkid12.20.1-5.8
ii  libc62.19-7
ii  libcap2  1:2.24-3
ii  libcap2-bin  1:2.24-3
ii  libcryptsetup4   2:1.6.4-4
ii  libdbus-1-3  1.8.6-1
ii  libgcrypt11  1.5.3-5
ii  libkmod2 18-1
ii  liblzma5 5.1.1alpha+20120614-2
ii  libpam0g 1.1.8-3
ii  libselinux1  2.3-1
ii  libsystemd-daemon0   208-6
ii  libsystemd-journal0  208-6
ii  libsystemd-login0208-6
ii  libudev1 208-6
ii  libwrap0 7.6.q-25
ii  sysv-rc  2.88dsf-53.2
ii  udev 208-6
ii  util-linux   2.20.1-5.8

Versions of packages systemd recommends:
pn  libpam-systemd  

Versions of packages systemd suggests:
pn  systemd-ui  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#311776: Please, close this bug

2005-06-07 Thread Jens Stavnstrup
Please close this bug.

Although apache failed to upgrade my configuration from
1.3.26.1+1.48-0woody3 to 1.3.26-6 (stable Woody to Sarge), with my very
simple configuration, a port of my configuration to the new config
file removed the unknown problem.

Regards,

Jens


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#291203: Debian configuration of postfix fails

2005-06-05 Thread Jens Stavnstrup

An error slipped into my previous mail, what I meant to say was that:

I do NOT see the comment regard an extra blank line
in a parameter, but DebConf stops at the same place.


Regards,

Jens



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#291203: Debian configuration of postfix fails

2005-06-05 Thread Jens Stavnstrup

Package: postfix
Version: 2.1.5-9
Followup-For: Bug #291203


Debian just plain refuse to install on my testing distribution. Maybee
due to unknown dependicy on a package.

A few days ago, I upgraded another host with a minimal stable woody to current 
testing (almost
Sarge) and afterwards installed Postfix without any problem.

Is there anyway I can debug the reason that Debconf stops as mentioned in the
original #291203 report. I do see the comment regard an extra blank line
in a parameter, but DebConf stops at the same place.

Regards,

Jens


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.6
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages postfix depends on:
ii  adduser 3.63 Add and remove users and groups
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]   1.4.30.13Debian configuration management sy
ii  dpkg1.10.28  Package maintenance system for Deb
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdb4.24.2.52-18Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [
ii  libgdbm31.8.3-2  GNU dbm database routines (runtime
ii  netbase 4.21 Basic TCP/IP networking system


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#311776: apache-ssl: Basic Authentication does not work

2005-06-03 Thread Jens Stavnstrup
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Thom May wrote:

> Severity 311776 normal
> kthxbye
>
> Hi,
> it's likely that you have an erroneous config, rather than this being a bug
> in apache. If basic auth was broken, I assure you that we'd have noticed by
> now.

Well from my experience with Debian. I tend to agree,

> The problem you're reporting is often a symptom of having multiple auth
> providers loaded; have a look at /etc/apache-ssl/modules.conf or attach it
> here and check you don't have mod_auth_sys or mod_auth_system installed.
> Cheers,
> -Thom
>

I have upgraded a stable Woody to Sarge keeping my original config
file (that might be my problem). In that config file only mod_auth_ssl is
enabled - modules.conf is never loaded.

I will port my 1.3.26 configuration to the new 1.3.36-6 config file and
see what happens.

Regard

Jens



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#311776: apache-ssl: Basic Authentication does not work

2005-06-03 Thread Jens Stavnstrup
Package: apache-ssl
Version: 1.3.33-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Basic authentication does not work. Users are not recognized, and in the
logfile it states "user  not found" <-- notice the extra space between "user"
and "not", indicating that apache-ssl seem to think the user is identified by
an empty string.

This bug seem not related related to to bug #266218 or #288424, but is
considered critical considering this version is going to be the default package 
in
Sarge 



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.18-bf2.4
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages apache-ssl depends on:
ii  apache-common   1.3.33-6 support files for all Apache webse
ii  debconf 1.4.30.13Debian configuration management sy
ii  dpkg1.10.27  Package maintenance system for Deb
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdb4.24.2.52-18Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [
ii  libexpat1   1.95.8-3 XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  libmagic1   4.12-1   File type determination library us
ii  libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries
ii  logrotate   3.7-5Log rotation utility
ii  mime-support3.28-1   MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
ii  openssl 0.9.7e-3 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a
ii  perl5.8.4-8  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  ssl-cert1.0-11   Simple debconf wrapper for openssl

-- debconf information:
  apache-ssl/server-admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* apache-ssl/enable-suexec: false
  apache-ssl/init: true
  apache-ssl/server-name: novo.ddre.dk
  apache-ssl/document-root: /home/webs/novo/htdocs


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]