Bug#636003: libvigraimpex: FTBFS with libpng 1.5

2011-08-03 Thread Joachim Schleicher
Hi Ralf,
you could apply the upstream patch instead: 
https://github.com/ukoethe/vigra/commit/7f7b24
That uses #ifdef to build with both 1.2 and 1.5 png versions.

Best regards
Joachim
commit 7f7b24e78ff56d66239e4a34ca66a85bdd2f44fb
Author: Ullrich Koethe ullrich.koe...@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de
Date:   Fri Mar 11 14:55:42 2011 +0100

update for libpng 1.5 (fix by Mark Brand, mingw-cross-env)

diff --git a/src/impex/png.cxx b/src/impex/png.cxx
index e525fc6..5b7e84a 100644
--- a/src/impex/png.cxx
+++ b/src/impex/png.cxx
@@ -320,7 +320,11 @@ namespace vigra {
 #if (PNG_LIBPNG_VER  10008)  defined(PNG_READ_iCCP_SUPPORTED)
 char * dummyName;
 int dummyCompType;
+#if (PNG_LIBPNG_VER  10500)
 char * profilePtr;
+#else
+png_byte * profilePtr;
+#endif
 png_uint_32 profileLen;
 if (png_get_valid( png, info, PNG_INFO_iCCP )) {
 png_get_iCCP(png, info, dummyName, dummyCompType, profilePtr, profileLen) ;
@@ -593,7 +597,11 @@ namespace vigra {
 // set icc profile
 if (iccProfile.size()  0) {
 png_set_iCCP(png, info, (png_charp)(icc), 0,
+#if (PNG_LIBPNG_VER  10500)
  (png_charp)iccProfile.begin(), (png_uint_32)iccProfile.size());
+#else
+ (png_byte*)iccProfile.begin(), (png_uint_32)iccProfile.size());
+#endif
 }
 #endif


Bug#609722: is still there

2011-01-27 Thread Joachim Schleicher
Hello Rainer,
you're right: If the rest of the installation works well with netboot
from USB-Stick, grub-install should do his job, too.
And this image should *then* be a valid alternative.
But I am unsure, if that can be fixed before the release so it's perhaps
something for the errata - state that netboot can't be used on usb sticks.

Ben Armstrong said, the mini.iso is not suitable:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2011/01/msg00899.html
(and follow-ups) so please use a netinst.iso

To test the installer from a usb-Stick I used
hd-media/boot.img.gz (yes you can also use initrd.gz and linux
separately) together with the ISO

debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso from

http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/

Or you could try the hybrid CD alternative and dd the netinst.iso
directly to the stick.

By the way: You can find the new installation manual at:
http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/i386/index.html.en

In my eyes the documentation concerning USB-Installs is still very
confusing or even inconsistent!

Best Regards
Joachim





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#609722: is still there

2011-01-23 Thread Joachim Schleicher
Hello Reiner,

Am 23.01.2011 18:55, schrieb Rainer Dorsch:
 The installation files from

 http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/squeeze/main/installer-
 i386/current/images/netboot/

 I used are from Jan-17.

In your first report there is no hd-media image mounted.
Did you boot 'netboot' images from a usb-Stick?
The link you provide points to the images for a network installation.
As far as I understand those files should not be used for usb-stick 
installations.

Best Regards
Joachim

Am 21.01.2011 17:34, schrieb Ben Armstrong:
 On 01/21/2011 11:35 AM, Christophe Schockaert wrote:
 So, I followed what's here for a network install:
 http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/ch04s03.html

 Please don't confuse netboot with netinst. The former boots an image
 from a properly configured server (usually located on your LAN). The
 latter boots an image from media attached to the machine which includes
 a base system that then fetches remaining packages from a Debian archive
 over the network. You are attempting a netinst and should ignore doc
 that deals with netboot.




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#609722: installation-reports: USB Memory Stick Booting wrote Bootsector on USB Stick

2011-01-14 Thread Joachim Schleicher
reassign 609722 grub-installer 1.58
severity 609722 serious
merge 568529 609722
thanks

Another report of installing grub to usb stick instead of hard-drive.


 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=568529




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#603942: Grub installed to wrong disk

2011-01-03 Thread Joachim Schleicher

found 603942 1.57
merge 568529 603942
thanks

Hello Christian Perrier,
I found this bug still beeing present in beta2 installer using grub-installer 
1.57 (See #605562).
Bug 603942 seems to be another duplicate of #568529, so I merge them.

Best Regards
Joachim



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#605562: installation-report: Installation from usb stick lead, to unbootable system (und unbootable usb stick)

2011-01-03 Thread Joachim Schleicher

severity 568529 serious
tags 568529 - moreinfo
thanks

Hello,
now we have five different people reporting that bug. Most of them set a 
severity of serious or above.
Therefore I increased the severity: Makes package unfit for release in my 
opinion.

Some more additional information from the installer environment; I ran a shell 
before installing grub
(Expert install; another empty hard-drive as in the report above):
ash
BusyBox v1.17.1 (Debian 1:1.17.1-8) built-in shell (ash)
Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands.

~ # mount
rootfs on / type rootfs (rw)
none on /proc type proc (rw,relatime)
none on /sys type sysfs (rw,relatime)
tmpfs on /dev type tmpfs (rw,relatime,mode=755)
none on /dev/prs type devpts (rw,relatim,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000)
/dev/sda1 on /hd-media type vfat 
(ro,relatime,fmask=0022,dmask=0022,codepage=cp437,iocharset=utf8,shotname=mixed,errors=remount-ro)

/dev/loop0 on /cdrom type iso9660 (ro,relatime)
/dev/sdb1 on /target type ext3 (rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,data=ordered)
/dev/sdb6 on /target/home type ext3 (rw, relatime,errors=continue,data=ordered)
/dev/sdb1 on /dev/.static/dev type ext3 
(rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,data=ordered)
tmpfs on /target/dev/ type tmpfs (rw,relatime,mode=755)
/dev/loop0 on /target/media/cdrom0 type iso9660 (ro,relatime)

~ # chroot /target grub-mkdevicemap --no-floppy -m -
(hd0)   /dev/disk/by-id/usb-SanDisk_Cruzer_Blade_20053349610A41A2F01B-0:0
(hd1)   /dev/disk/by-id/ata-FUJITSU_M1623TAU_08316741

~ # readlink -f $(chroot /target grub-mkdevicemap --no-floppy -m - | head -n1 | 
cut -f2)
/dev/sda
ash

Do you need addional information?

My interpretation (grub-installer Line 538-570):
grub-installer uses the first device and double-checks that this is not /cdrom.
But that check is false, because /cdrom is /dev/loop0.
We should additionally check the device-to-disk() of /hd-media in the same 
manner as /cdrom.
That would install grub on the right device. Is it a problem when after reboot at an update the usb-stick is 
no longer present and the hard drive is named /dev/sda then?

What do you think?

Best Regards
Joachim



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org