Bug#673942: SOme help

2012-06-02 Thread John Nelson
hi,
 I am using linux mint 13, and i am also being affected by this libreoffice 
bug. I hope this can be some help, here is a log from my kernel log.

Jun  2 22:36:08 john-K53E kernel: [  947.278850] soffice.bin[2135]: segfault at 
7f5913bfeef0 ip 7f5913bfeef0 sp 7fff50101228 error 14
Jun  2 22:36:46 john-K53E kernel: [  985.238492] soffice.bin[3253]: segfault at 
646959b0 ip 7f54933898d3 sp 7f547338e960 error 4 in 
libc-2.15.so[7f549334e000+1b3000]

Bug#369321: mondo: Tape catalog limited to 4096 entries

2006-06-30 Thread John Nelson
Hi Andree,

I've done some additional testing with the suggested change to my-stuff.h, 
changing the value for:


#define MAX_TAPECATALOG_ENTRIES 4096/// The maximum number of entries in 
the tape catalog

...to 8192.

For my purposes, the issue I've reported is resolved between the two parameter 
changes.

Thanks for your guidance in dealing with this issue.

John Nelson

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi John,
 
 Great stuff, thanks a lot for your testing and your feedback!
 
 So, it looks like we can work around the issues by changing some of the 
 hardcoded parameters.
 Hopefully, this keep us going until we can make this all dynmic.
 
 Obviously, I'll be most interest in any further test results you obtain.
 
 Keep it up  best regards,
 Andree
 
 PS: I'm away for the week and will thus only respond sporadically.
 
  John Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
  Hi Andree,
  
  This past weekend has been my first opportunity to work on a new build.
  
  I did a new package build with the following change to libmondo-tools.c:
  
  (IS_THIS_A_STREAMING_BACKUP(bkpinfo-backup_media_type) ? 16 : 16) * 1024;
  
  With that change only, I was able to run a complete backup, boot from the 
  CD created by Mindi,
 and
  successfully run a full verify in disaster recovery mode.
  
  I didn't note the exact number, but Mondo created ~1700 afio archives 
  containing 41794099k of
  data.
  
  I'm planning on trying some of the other changes that were discussed, but 
  it will take time.
  
  Thanks,
  
  John Nelson
  
  --- Andree Leidenfrost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Hi Bruno,
   
   Thanks a lot for your feedback!
   
   On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 18:44 +0200, Bruno Cornec wrote: 
Andree Leidenfrost said on Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 01:04:58AM +1000:

 [Bruno: Would be great if you could comment on this one. Looks to me
 like we may only have to bump up a number, but maybe there are
 implications that I'm not aware off...]

Ok.

 Thanks a lot for your bug report and your analysis of the problem. I
 don;t have any experience with tapes and Mondo Rescue, but I can 
 confirm
 that the following is still even in the latest SVN in
 mondo/common/my-stuff.h:
 
 #define MAX_TAPECATALOG_ENTRIES 4096  /// The maximum number of 
 entries
 in the tape catalog.
 
 So, the question would be what a reasonable value for this couldlook
 like. Would 65536 be ok?
 

The problem I see is that mondo will then create an array of 65k 
structuresi

./mondo/mondo/common/mondostructures.h: struct mountlist_line 
el[MAX_TAPECATALOG_ENTRIES];
./mondo/mondo/common/mondostructures.h: struct s_tapecat_entry
 el[MAX_TAPECATALOG_ENTRIES];
   
   Hm, I see what you mean, mountlist_line is 640 bytes + 1 long long int,
   that's certainly too big to go to 65k entries. (s_tapecat_entry is much
   smaller.)
   
that's where my new work on dynamic memory allocation will definitively
help. I know, but it's not ready for prime time yet :-(
   
   Yeah, no worries. I suppose we just need to figure out whether we can
   find an interim solution for now.
   
I fear that by increasing that way we consume a lot of memory which
wwill be most of the time useless, creating other types of bugs.
   
   Agreed.
   
Do we need to go from 4096 to 65k directly. Isn't there a middle point
which could solve the issue as well as limit the memeory consumed ?
   
   Maybe we double it to 8192 for starters? In that context, did you see my
   other message to this bug about the maximum filesize? Would increasing
   the filesize make it so that less entries in the tape catalog would be
   used because we'd have fewer archive files in the first place? Maybe
   doubling the filesize AND doubling MAX_TAPECATALOG_ENTRIES would be the
   way to go?
   
   What do you reckon? ;-)
   
Bruno.
   
   Cheers,
   Andree
   -- 
   Andree Leidenfrost
   Sydney - Australia
   
   
  
  
  __
  Do You Yahoo!?
  Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
  http://mail.yahoo.com 
 
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369321: mondo: Tape catalog limited to 4096 entries

2006-06-26 Thread John Nelson
Hi Andree,

This past weekend has been my first opportunity to work on a new build.

I did a new package build with the following change to libmondo-tools.c:

(IS_THIS_A_STREAMING_BACKUP(bkpinfo-backup_media_type) ? 16 : 16) * 1024;

With that change only, I was able to run a complete backup, boot from the CD 
created by Mindi, and
successfully run a full verify in disaster recovery mode.

I didn't note the exact number, but Mondo created ~1700 afio archives 
containing 41794099k of
data.

I'm planning on trying some of the other changes that were discussed, but it 
will take time.

Thanks,

John Nelson

--- Andree Leidenfrost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Bruno,
 
 Thanks a lot for your feedback!
 
 On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 18:44 +0200, Bruno Cornec wrote: 
  Andree Leidenfrost said on Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 01:04:58AM +1000:
  
   [Bruno: Would be great if you could comment on this one. Looks to me
   like we may only have to bump up a number, but maybe there are
   implications that I'm not aware off...]
  
  Ok.
  
   Thanks a lot for your bug report and your analysis of the problem. I
   don;t have any experience with tapes and Mondo Rescue, but I can confirm
   that the following is still even in the latest SVN in
   mondo/common/my-stuff.h:
   
   #define MAX_TAPECATALOG_ENTRIES 4096  /// The maximum number of 
   entries
   in the tape catalog.
   
   So, the question would be what a reasonable value for this couldlook
   like. Would 65536 be ok?
   
  
  The problem I see is that mondo will then create an array of 65k structuresi
  
  ./mondo/mondo/common/mondostructures.h: struct mountlist_line 
  el[MAX_TAPECATALOG_ENTRIES];
  ./mondo/mondo/common/mondostructures.h: struct s_tapecat_entry 
  el[MAX_TAPECATALOG_ENTRIES];
 
 Hm, I see what you mean, mountlist_line is 640 bytes + 1 long long int,
 that's certainly too big to go to 65k entries. (s_tapecat_entry is much
 smaller.)
 
  that's where my new work on dynamic memory allocation will definitively
  help. I know, but it's not ready for prime time yet :-(
 
 Yeah, no worries. I suppose we just need to figure out whether we can
 find an interim solution for now.
 
  I fear that by increasing that way we consume a lot of memory which
  wwill be most of the time useless, creating other types of bugs.
 
 Agreed.
 
  Do we need to go from 4096 to 65k directly. Isn't there a middle point
  which could solve the issue as well as limit the memeory consumed ?
 
 Maybe we double it to 8192 for starters? In that context, did you see my
 other message to this bug about the maximum filesize? Would increasing
 the filesize make it so that less entries in the tape catalog would be
 used because we'd have fewer archive files in the first place? Maybe
 doubling the filesize AND doubling MAX_TAPECATALOG_ENTRIES would be the
 way to go?
 
 What do you reckon? ;-)
 
  Bruno.
 
 Cheers,
 Andree
 -- 
 Andree Leidenfrost
 Sydney - Australia
 
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369321: mondo: Tape catalog limited to 4096 entries

2006-06-12 Thread John Nelson
Hi Andree,

Thanks very much for getting back to me on this.

64k sounds like a reasonable number, with caveats, of course. 4096 was 
sufficient while using a
DDS-2 tape drive but not once I upgraded to a DDS-3 drive. What would happen 
with a high-capacity
drive, such as a DLT-S4?

If I could expand a little on the observed behavior, you might find the 
additional info useful. I
also have some questions, as I'm not a programmer/developer of any sort, and 
I'm still quite a
newbie WRT Linux.

When Mondo fails on me, I believe it's backing up my MP3 collection, as the 
file sizes are about
what would be expected for those files. It appears to be putting, 1 or perhaps 
2 MP3 files per
afio archive, and since my collection is in excess of 5900, it runs out of 
catalog entries. Also,
this was my first attempt at a multi-tape backup after upgrading to a DDS-3 
tape drive. I never
had trouble while using a DDS-2 drive, but I was not trying to backup as much 
data either.

Is there a limitation on the size of the afio archives? I've noticed that the 
afio archives are
staged in /tmp/shm before being written to the backup media, so perhaps there's 
a limitation to
accommodate systems that don't have much resources?

Does Mondo use a single pool of catalog entries, or is it 'per media'? I've 
never had to restore
from a multi-tape backup set with Mondo, so I don't know how it behaves under 
that circumstance.

I would also have to ask where Mondo allocates space to store the catalog while 
it's running? I
would surmise that increasing the size of the catalog may significantly change 
the resource
requirements of the package.

If I may be of any further assistance, please don't hesitate to contact me.

Thanks,

John Nelson

--- Andree Leidenfrost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 [Bruno: Would be great if you could comment on this one. Looks to me
 like we may only have to bump up a number, but maybe there are
 implications that I'm not aware off...]
 
 Hi John,
 
 Thanks a lot for your bug report and your analysis of the problem. I
 don;t have any experience with tapes and Mondo Rescue, but I can confirm
 that the following is still even in the latest SVN in
 mondo/common/my-stuff.h:
 
 #define MAX_TAPECATALOG_ENTRIES 4096  /// The maximum number of entries
 in the tape catalog.
 
 So, the question would be what a reasonable value for this couldlook
 like. Would 65536 be ok?
 
 Cheers,
 Andree
 
 
 On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 20:26 -0700, John Nelson wrote:
  Package: mondo
  Version: 2.04-4
  Severity: important
  
  
  Mondo fails due to a 4096 entry limitation in the tape catalog. This causes
  /dev/shm to fill up and the task hangs when afio reports Ready for volume 
  2.
  
  -- Package-specific info:
  /var/log/mindi.log and /var/log/mondo-archive.log provided in attachment.
  
  
  =
  Fileystem information:
  Filesystem   1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
  /dev/hda3 36869072   2663656  32332552   8% /
  tmpfs   518260 0518260   0% /dev/shm
  /dev/hda150233  6715 40924  15% /boot
  /dev/hdb1118729904  33986324  78712380  31% /home
  tmpfs10240   804  9436   8% /dev
  /dev/shm256000256000 0 100%
 /tmp/tmp.mondo.29578/tmp.mondo.29937/tmpfs
  
  -- System Information:
  Debian Release: 3.1
  Architecture: i386 (i686)
  Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-3-k7
  Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
  
  Versions of packages mondo depends on:
  ii  afio  2.5-3  archive file manipulation 
  program
  ii  binutils  2.15-6 The GNU assembler, linker and 
  bina
  ii  buffer1.19-7 Buffering/reblocking program 
  for t
  ii  cdrecord  4:2.01+01a01-2 command line CD writing tool
  ii  dosfstools2.11-2 Utilities to create and check 
  MS-D
  ii  gawk  1:3.1.4-2  GNU awk, a pattern scanning 
  and pr
  ii  libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22   GNU C Library: Shared 
  libraries an
  ii  libnewt0.51   0.51.6-20  Not Erik's Windowing Toolkit - 
  tex
  ii  lzop  1.01-3 fast compression program
  ii  mindi 1.04-4 creates boot/root disks based 
  on y
  
  Versions of packages mindi depends on:
  ii  bzip2 1.0.2-7high-quality block-sorting 
  file co
  ii  file  4.12-1 Determines file type using 
  magic
  ii  gawk  1:3.1.4-2  GNU awk, a pattern scanning 
  and pr
  ii  mindi-busybox 1.00-4 Collection of shell utilities 
  in a
  ii  mindi-kernel  2.4.27-2sarge1 failsafe Linux kernel for 
  Mindi/Mo
  ii  mindi-partimagehack   0.6.2-4disk partition imaging utility 
  for
  ii  mkisofs

Bug#314214: Package: debian-installer

2005-06-15 Thread John Nelson
Package: installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 r0a Sarge - Official i386 
Binary-1 CD
uname -a: Linux maaslx 2.6.8-2-386 #1 Thu May 19 17:40:50 JST 2005 i686 
GNU/Linux
Date: Mon 13 Jun 2005/Tue 14 Jun 2005 (Multiple Attempts Required)
Method: How did you install?From CDs built from ISO Images downloaded from 
various mirrors.
What did you boot off?  IDE CD-ROM (hdc)

Machine: GigaByte GA7NF-RZ nVidia nForce 2 chipset based system (user-assembled)
Processor: AMD Duron 950
Memory: 1024MB DDR Dual-Channel
Root Device: IDE hda1
Root Size/partition table: 
  cfdisk 2.12p

  Disk Drive: /dev/hda
Size: 20519411200 bytes, 20.5 GB
  Heads: 255   Sectors per Track: 63   Cylinders: 2494

NameFlags  Part Type  FS Type  [Label]Size (MB)
 --
hda1BootPrimary   Linux ext3   [/]  5568.52
hda5Logical   Linux swap / Solaris   674.48
hda6Logical   Linux ext3   [/home] 14270.87

Output of lspci and lspci -n:

maaslx:/# lspci
:00:00.0 Host bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 AGP (different version?) 
(rev a2)
:00:00.1 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 1 (rev 
a2):00:00.2 RAM
memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 4 (rev a2):00:00.3 RAM 
memory: nVidia
Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 3 (rev a2):00:00.4 RAM memory: nVidia 
Corporation
nForce2 Memory Controller 2 (rev a2):00:00.5 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation 
nForce2 Memory
Controller 5 (rev a2):00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 ISA 
Bridge (rev a4)
:00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation nForce2 SMBus (MCP) (rev a2)
:00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4)
:00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4)
:00:02.2 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4)
:00:06.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 AC97 Audio 
Controler (MCP)
(rev a1)
:00:08.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 External PCI Bridge (rev 
a3):00:09.0 IDE
interface: nVidia Corporation nForce2 IDE (rev a2)
:00:1e.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 AGP (rev a2)
:01:0a.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905C-TX/TX-M [Tornado] 
(rev 74)
:02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV280 [Radeon 9200 
PRO] (rev 01)
:02:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 5940 (rev 
01)

maaslx:/# lspci -n
:00:00.0 0600: 10de:01e0 (rev a2)
:00:00.1 0500: 10de:01eb (rev a2)
:00:00.2 0500: 10de:01ee (rev a2)
:00:00.3 0500: 10de:01ed (rev a2)
:00:00.4 0500: 10de:01ec (rev a2)
:00:00.5 0500: 10de:01ef (rev a2)
:00:01.0 0601: 10de:0060 (rev a4)
:00:01.1 0c05: 10de:0064 (rev a2)
:00:02.0 0c03: 10de:0067 (rev a4)
:00:02.1 0c03: 10de:0067 (rev a4)
:00:02.2 0c03: 10de:0068 (rev a4)
:00:06.0 0401: 10de:006a (rev a1)
:00:08.0 0604: 10de:006c (rev a3)
:00:09.0 0101: 10de:0065 (rev a2)
:00:1e.0 0604: 10de:01e8 (rev a2)
:01:0a.0 0200: 10b7:9200 (rev 74)
:02:00.0 0300: 1002:5960 (rev 01)
:02:00.1 0380: 1002:5940 (rev 01)

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:[E]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [E]

Comments/Problems:

Preface: I'm a WIntel Idiot who's trying to reform, so have patience.

Initial boot from ISO/Install CD would hang at various places. Required noapic 
nolapic arguments
to get installer to run with reasonable stability. Boot menu help WAS helpful.

Reboot semi-worked, but system was unable to start GDM. I have a 
GigaByte-branded ATI Radeon 9250
display adapter (GigaByte p/n: GV-R925128T), and selecting ati as my video 
adapter type broke
X11. Being Linux ignorant, I wiped the hard drive and started again. Repeat 2x. 
After 3rd install
and failure, ran Apt from cmdline, uninstalled X11 and re-installed X11. 
Re-install forced
selection of Generic Video Card, and X11 started successfully and GDM started 
successfully.
800x600 desktop resolution was intolerable, so search began for info on how to 
correct, which
culminated with manually editing 
/etc/X11/XF86Config-4. 

Since it may help others, I'm including relevant sections of my 
/etc/X11/XF86Config-4. The
necessary information to resolve this was not obviously located and required a 
fair amount of
searching with