Bug#592988: apache: Messages about incorrect version appear in /var/log/apache2/error.log

2011-11-27 Thread Mike Perry
I have noticed this error in my apache2 error log as well. The version of
libapache2-mod-python still appears to be 3.3.1-9+b1. This was installed by
default with tasksel when installing a webserver on Squeeze. The error does
appear to be benign but may be confusing for some users. It will appear int
he error log with each restart of apache2.

kthxbye

/*
 * Mike Perry
 * m...@cogsmos.com
 */


Bug#608850: Unable to continue without a bootloader

2011-01-03 Thread Mike Perry
Package: live-installer

While testing an install of squeeze_live_beta2 I was unable to
continue without a bootloader. When selecting Continue without boot
loader or going directly to Finish the installation then selecting
Continue without boot loader you are brought back to the menu. You
cannot finish the installation until you select either grub (or
potentially lilo although I did not test that).

kthxbye

~Mike



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#588839: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#588839: Bug#588839: pv-grub removed ?

2010-10-01 Thread Mike Perry
I believe that pv-grub chainloads grub on the guest, where as py-grub
is 100% python and just reads the config.

/*
 * Mike Perry
 * m...@cogsmos.com
 */



On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr wrote:
 Ian Campbell wrote:
 On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 02:49 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
 Philipp Kern wrote:
 On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 03:56:13PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
 Now, I hope someone from the release team will answer this: if we build
 a new xen-pv-grub package, will it be accepted by the RT, even if we are
 late, as the lack of pv-grub in the xen-utils can be considered a
 regression in Squeeze (as Lenny had the feature)?
 AFAICS there was no pv-grub in Lenny:

 pk...@franck:~/ftp/ftp/dists/lenny$ zgrep pv-grub Contents-amd64.gz 
 Contents-i386.gz
 pk...@franck:~/ftp/ftp/dists/lenny$

 If this is the case, there's no regression.  Furthermore this is a bug of
 severity:wishlist, so no, it would be too late for this.

 Kind regards,
 Philipp Kern
 Considering that here:

 http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/PvGrub

 it's written that PvGrub is replacing pygrub,

 Replacing is rather strong. They serve similar purposes but its entirely
 up to user preference and/or requirements which one is used. They
 certainly aren't mutually exclusive or anything like that and pygrub is
 not going away upstream any time soon.

 Replacing isn't my wording. Should the wiki be changed?

 What's the advantages/differences of pv-grub compared to pygrub then?
 What is the point in having 2 p*grub that do the same thing?

 and that in Lenny (unless there's still pygrub in Squeeze,

 pygrub _is_ in squeeze:
 $ dpkg -S /usr/lib/xen-*/bin/pygrub
 xen-utils-4.0: /usr/lib/xen-4.0/bin/pygrub

 I haven't seen any suggestion, from Bastian or otherwise, that it will
 be removed.

 I don't believe pvgrub was in Lenny.

 Ian.

 Cool, thanks for clarifying this. I run outdated self-backported version
 of Bastian's packages (shame on me...), which is why I wasn't sure.

 Thomas



 ___
 Pkg-xen-devel mailing list
 pkg-xen-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-xen-devel




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org