Bug#747757: (no subject)

[Nathan Owens]

I tried opening like you mentioned. Try updating your system a bit and 
see if it still happens. I found a couple of your files older than the 
ones I have installed. I have no issues doing what you are reporting. I 
actually had three tabs open without any errors or crashes.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#745396: (no subject)

[Nathan Owens]

Seems it could be related to a different libglib version, will be 
looking into it



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#745396: (no subject)

[Nathan Owens]

There is no problem like this with the gtk3 version. dwb in the repo 
uses gtk3. I tried running dwb and type "dwb debian.org" while dwb is 
running and I don't have any error like reported.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#712541: Follow-up

[Nathan Owens]

I was playing with making the gtk2 version, and it fails to even start 
for some reason, I will be playing with it more and see if I can make it 
work.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#712541: (no subject)

[Nathan Owens]

I will be talking to my mentor about possibly making a gtk2 package so 
this would be concidered fixed. the dwb(main) package is a gtk3 package. 
I wouldn't mind creating a gtk2 package if it is concidered fine.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#719066: Will fix

[Nathan Owens]

I will fix this ASAP. I am in the current process of trying to package
the latest GIT version with gtk2 instead of gtk3


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#712541: (no subject)

[Nathan Owens]

tags 712541 wontfix
severity 712541 minor


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#712541: (no subject)

[Nathan Owens]

Tags: wontfix

Sponsor also suggested to use gtk3.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#545710: O:html2text

[Nathan Owens]

I have created a package fixing the build error relating to hardening 
support 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/html2text/html2text_1.3.2a-16.1.dsc


I am not sure if I really want to adopt this package, but this fixes 
some issues and cleaning of the package and of course the issue I 
mentioned above. I can't upload it, since I am not a DM but if anybody 
wants to check it out and upload it, then you are free to do so.


This package was once labeled as RFH, so I intended to help, but it 
seems to be up for adoption at the moment



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#706688: dwb: redundant call to update-menu in maintainer scripts

[Nathan Owens]

On 05/03/2013 07:05 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:

Copying my message to the bug. Forgot to CC it.

- Forwarded message from Sebastian Ramacher  -

Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 01:48:31 +0200
From: Sebastian Ramacher
To: Nathan Owens
Subject: Re: Bug#706688: dwb: redundant call to update-menu in maintainer 
scripts

Hi Nathan,

On 2013-05-03 17:55:53, Nathan Owens wrote:

K I have rebuilt the package and uploaded to Debian Mentors
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dwb/dwb_20130424hg-2.dsc
Just gotta get it uploaded

I'd be happy to do upload it. But some of the problems mentioned in my review of
20130424hg-1 in #705698 are still not fixed. I was about to fill bugs for them
too. In particular, please fix the following points:


  * Why did you add libjavascriptcoregtk-3.0-0 and libwebkitgtk-3.0-0 to dwb's
   Depends? They are added to ${shlibs:Depends} by dpkg-shlibdeps anyway.

Please remove them. There is no point in having them there.


* The postinstall and postrm script do not fail on errors. Please read the
   third paragraph of Policy 6.1.

Additionaly, shebangs start with #!. That's why lintian doesn't warn about the
missing set -e.


* The postrm script should be a prerm script. The shebang of both scripts can
   be /bin/sh. No need for bash here.
[...]
* The copyright years in debian/copyright are not up-to-date. Please correct
   them.

And now new in 20130424hg-2: is there a reson for the debhelper version bump?
compat is unchanged. debhelper also changed the versioning scheme, so that
should be a simple debhelper (>= 9) instead.

Regards
I have changed postrm to prerm because lintian gave error about the 
alternative link wouldn't exist anymore and it suggested to use prerm 
instead. I did that and it fixed that lintian error. There was no real 
reason I changed to debhelper to 9, just like to stay current I guess. I 
fixed the shebang, didn't notice the ! missing and also added set -e 
right before the update-alternatives command like this: set -e 
update-alternatives ...


Removed the un-needed Depends. I am currently applying the DEP-3. In the 
Author field, I put the guy that wrote the changes in the git repo since 
I am not the one that created the patch. That would be correct right



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#706688: dwb: redundant call to update-menu in maintainer scripts

[Nathan Owens]

On 05/03/2013 06:40 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:

Package: dwb
Version: 20130424hg-1
Severity: minor

The maintainer scripts now contain two calls to update-menu: one
inserted manually and one inserted by dh_installmenus. dwb's postinst script
looks like that:

# Update Menus

if [ -x /usr/bin/update-menus ] ; then update-menus ; fi

# Automatically added by dh_installmenu
if [ "$1" = "configure" ]&&  [ -x "`which update-menus 2>/dev/null`" ]; then
update-menus
fi
# End automatically added section

The manual invocation in postrm and postinst can be removed.

Regards
K I have rebuilt the package and uploaded to Debian Mentors 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dwb/dwb_20130424hg-2.dsc 
Just gotta get it uploaded



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#705698: RFS: dwb/20130409hg-4

[Nathan Owens]

Package: sponsorship-requests
  Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dwb"

 * Package name: dwb
   Version : 20130409hg-4
   Upstream Author : Stefan Bolte
 * URL : http://portix.bitbucket.org/dwb/
 * License : GPL-3
   Section : web

  It builds those binary packages:

dwb   - lightweight WebKit browser

  To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


http://mentors.debian.net/package/dwb


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this 
command:


dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dwb/dwb_20130409hg-4.dsc


This package is an update, it has already been put into the repo once by 
a sponsor, though I don't remember who it was.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#705185: RFS: dwb/20130409hg-1

[Nathan Owens]

Package: sponsorship-requests
  Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dwb"

 * Package name: dwb
   Version : 20130409hg-1
   Upstream Author : Nathan Owens
 * URL : http://portix.bitbucket.org/dwb/
 * License : GPL
   Section : web

 It builds those binary packages:

dwb   - lightweight webkit browser

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/dwb


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dwb/dwb_20130409hg-1.dsc


I am the maintainer of dwb, I have updated it to a newer version. It was
previously sponsored, though I don't remember who, but was wondering if
this version could be uploaded. I understand that testing is froze and
am requesting it to be included in sid/unstable, naturally.

Thanks


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#685152: (no subject)

[Nathan Owens]

I will upload the fix once the Debian freeze on testing is done.

Thanks


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#666243: RFS: peg/0.1.9-1 [ITP] -- recursive-descent parser generators for C

[Nathan Owens]

On the no relo issue try putting DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS = 1

include /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk in the debian/rules file

Jakub Wilk  wrote:

The current version appears to be at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/peg/peg_0.1.9-1.dsc

Lintian says:
P: peg source: package-lacks-versioned-build-depends-on-debhelper 7
W: peg: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/leg
W: peg: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/peg

blhc confirms that there's a problem with LDFLAGS:
LDFLAGS missing (-Wl,-z,relro): cc -g -O2 -fstack-protector 
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall -o peg-new 
peg.o tree.o compile.o
LDFLAGS missing (-Wl,-z,relro): cc -g -O2 -fstack-protector 
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall -o leg-new 
leg.o tree.o compile.o

The examples directory could act as a test suite. Please run it at build 
time.

In my opinion, the long description is a bit too… long. I would remove 
at least the citation, maybe something more, but I'm not sure what. You 
might want to ask debian-l10n-english@ for an advice.

Please merge changelog entries for 0.1.7-1, 0.1.8-1 and 0.1.9-1 into 
one.

It would be probably better not to compress examples. Compression makes 
playing with them a bit harder, whereas the space savings are minute.

Upstream makefile strips the binaries unconditionally. However, for 
Debian, binaries should be not stripped if the package was built with 
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip.

Please forward manpage_fixes.patch upstream.

I always feel uneasy about “Forwarded: not-needed” patches. I believe 
parts of makefile_configuration.patch could be forwarded upstream, and 
the rest of the logic could be moved to debian/rules:

> all : peg leg
>+ cp -a peg.1 leg.1

Wouldn't it be better to make leg manpage a symlink to peg one, instead 
of shipping two identical files? You could ask upstream to include the 
symlink directly in their tarball.

>-ROOT =
>+ROOT = $(DESTDIR)

This could be forwarded upstream.

>-PREFIX = /usr/local
>+PREFIX = /usr

Could be overridden in debian/rules.

> $(BINDIR)/% : %
>+ mkdir -p $(BINDIR)
> cp -p $< $@
> strip $@

Could be forwarded upstream.

> %.peg-c : %.peg compile.c
>- ./peg -o $@ $<
>+ #./peg -o $@ $<
>
> leg.o : leg.c
>
> leg.c : leg.leg compile.c
>- ./leg -o $@ $<
>+ #./leg -o $@ $<

Hmm, why?

-- 
Jakub Wilk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120716152417.ga...@jwilk.net

Bug#615548: (no subject)

[Nathan Owens]

Development of cssed seems to have stopped a long time ago. Roughly 
eight years ago according to CVS. Bug should be closed as it no longer 
is being developed.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#670589: RFS: newlisp/10.4.0-4 ITP

[Nathan Owens]

On 04/27/2012 07:27 AM, David Bremner wrote:

David Bremner  writes:


Nathan Owens  writes:


Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
   * Package name: newlisp
 Version : 10.4.0-4
 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
   * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
   * License : [fill in]
 Section : lisp

I hope you put more care into the packaging than you did into filling
out this template.

OK, I admit that sounds a little harsh. But the questions are there for
a reason, and without them filled in, the message is pretty much content
free. So please think about the time of your many readers as well.

Cheers,

David.
Sorry I didn't even notice that the details wasn't filled in. I was 
worring about a issue that arised and it sliped my mind.


Here is the filled out version:

Package: sponsorship-requests
   Severity: normal
  * Package name: newlisp
Version : 10.4.0-4
Upstream Author : Lutz Mueller l...@nuevatec.com
  * URL : http://newlisp.org
  * License : GPL-3
Section : lisp




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#670589: RFS: newlisp/10.4.0-4 ITP

[Nathan Owens]

Package: sponsorship-requests
  Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "newlisp"

 * Package name: newlisp
   Version : 10.4.0-4
   Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
 * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
 * License : [fill in]
   Section : lisp

  It builds those binary packages:

newlisp- general-purpose scripting language

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/newlisp


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/newlisp/newlisp_10.4.0-4.dsc

  More information about hello can be obtained from http://newlisp.org

  Changes since the last upload:
newlisp (10.4.0-4) unstable; urgency=low

  * Fixed hyphen-used-as-minus-sign error and missing patch descriptions


  Regards,
   Nathan Owens




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#425456: (no subject)

[Nathan Owens]

Currently the package is in Debian mentors.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#425456: (no subject)

[Nathan Owens]

I am currently working on packaging newlisp-10.4.0



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#651911: (no subject)

[Nathan Owens]

Decided not to package Code Browser anymore. There are some issues like 
resource leaks and also doesn't build cleanly on a 64bit system.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#651911: ITP: code-browser

[Nathan Owens]

Updated release, so new address to get the package:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/code-browser/code-browser_3.23-3.dsc



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#651911: Code Browser

[Nathan Owens]

I am adding a description to Code Browser

Description: fold-able text editor
 It is designed to hierarchically structure any text file and 
especially source code.  It makes the navigation

 through source code easier and faster.
 Helps give overview of code, including large ones, organized. Supports 
syntax highlighting for popular
 programming languages, including the option for custom syntax 
highlighting.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#651911: RFP: Code Browser

[Nathan Owens]

Currently I have submitted this package to mentors.debian.org for a sponsor.

Currently you can use dget to get the package, or atleast be able to 
build the package.


dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/code-browser/code-browser_3.23-2.dsc





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#590818: (no subject)

[Nathan Owens]

I don't see a reason why Ubuntu's documents would be packaged in Debian, 
though you could create a debian package file for it and carry it with 
you to install on the PC(s).




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#426891: (no subject)

[Nathan Owens]

Upstream URL listed seems to be no longer be available



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603492: (no subject)

[Nathan OWENS]

I get the same bug. Interestingly I get 
the exact same fault when I compile from 
source rather than using the Debian 
binary. Hmmm...


I'm using the onboard GPU (VIA 
DeltaChrome K8M890CE/K8N890CE [Chrome 9 
rev 11]) of my M2V-MX SE motherboard.


Here's the graphics driver information 
from Xorg.0.log:


[19.155] (II) LoadModule: "openchrome"
[19.155] (II) Loading 
/usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/openchrome_drv.so
[19.219] (II) Module openchrome: 
vendor="http://openchrome.org/";
[19.219] compiled for 1.10.1, 
module version = 0.2.904
[19.219] Module class: X.Org 
Video Driver
[19.219] ABI class: X.Org Video 
Driver, version 10.0

[19.219] (II) LoadModule: "vesa"
[19.219] (II) Loading 
/usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.so
[19.225] (II) Module vesa: 
vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[19.225] compiled for 1.10.1, 
module version = 2.3.0
[19.225] Module class: X.Org 
Video Driver
[19.225] ABI class: X.Org Video 
Driver, version 10.0

[19.225] (II) LoadModule: "fbdev"
[19.225] (II) Loading 
/usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.so
[19.234] (II) Module fbdev: 
vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[19.234] compiled for 1.10.1, 
module version = 0.4.2
[19.234] ABI class: X.Org Video 
Driver, version 10.0
[19.234] (II) OPENCHROME: Driver for 
VIA Chrome chipsets: CLE266, KM400/KN400,
K8M800/K8N800, PM800/PM880/CN400, 
VM800/P4M800Pro/VN800/CN700,
CX700/VX700, K8M890/K8N890, P4M890, 
P4M900/VN896/CN896, VX800/VX820,

VX855/VX875, VX900
[19.234] (II) VESA: driver for VESA 
chipsets: vesa
[19.234] (II) FBDEV: driver for 
framebuffer: fbdev

[19.234] (++) using VT number 7


And here is the backtrace:

Program: /usr/games/warzone2100(warzone2100)
Command line: "warzone2100"
Version: Version 2.3.7
Distributor: Debian
Compiled on: Mar 16 2011 10:01:05
Compiled by: GCC 4.5.2
Compiled mode: Release build
Executed on: Tue May 17 13:46:42 2011
Operating system: Linux
Node name: nate-office
Release: 2.6.38-2-amd64
Version: #1 SMP Sun May 8 13:51:57 UTC 2011
Machine: x86_64

Pointers: 64bit

Compiled against PhysicsFS version: 2.0.2
Running with PhysicsFS version: 2.0.2

Misc Data:

Dump caused by signal: SIGSEGV: Invalid 
memory reference: Address not mapped to 
object



GLIBC raw backtrace:
warzone2100[0x5a95b0]
/lib/libc.so.6(+0x32450)[0x7f03a8419450]
/usr/lib/libGL.so.1(XF86DRIQueryVersion+0xae)[0x7f03a9be6dce]
/usr/lib/libGL.so.1(XF86DRIQueryExtension+0x79)[0x7f03a9be6f69]
/usr/lib/libGL.so.1(+0x6287c)[0x7f03a9be687c]
/usr/lib/libGL.so.1(+0x3d78f)[0x7f03a9bc178f]
/usr/lib/libGL.so.1(+0x39c31)[0x7f03a9bbdc31]
/usr/lib/libGL.so.1(glXChooseVisual+0x3e)[0x7f03a9bbde4e]
/usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0(+0x3db1d)[0x7f03aaf5eb1d]
/usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0(+0x42ef2)[0x7f03aaf63ef2]
/usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0(+0x43047)[0x7f03aaf64047]
/usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0(SDL_SetVideoMode+0x1cf)[0x7f03aaf5282f]
warzone2100(screenInitialise+0x234)[0x58e584]
warzone2100(frameInitialise+0x309)[0x59aef9]
warzone2100(main+0xaa4)[0x4ca944]
/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd)[0x7f03a8405ead]
warzone2100[0x43fc19]

GDB extended backtrace:
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.2-debian
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software 
Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or 
later 
This is free software: you are free to 
change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent 
permitted by law.  Type "show copying"

and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as 
"x86_64-linux-gnu".

For bug reporting instructions, please see:
...
Reading symbols from 
/usr/games/warzone2100...Reading symbols 
from 
/usr/lib/debug/usr/games/warzone2100...done.

done.
Attaching to program: 
/usr/games/warzone2100, process 8354
Reading symbols from 
/usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0...(no debugging 
symbols found)...done.

Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0
Reading symbols from 
/usr/lib/libphysfs.so.1...(no debugging 
symbols found)...done.

Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libphysfs.so.1
Reading symbols from 
/lib/libpng12.so.0...(no debugging 
symbols found)...done.

Loaded symbols for /lib/libpng12.so.0
Reading symbols from 
/usr/lib/libvorbisfile.so.3...(no 
debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for 
/usr/lib/libvorbisfile.so.3
Reading symbols from 
/usr/lib/libvorbis.so.0...(no debugging 
symbols found)...done.

Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libvorbis.so.0
Reading symbols from 
/usr/lib/libogg.so.0...(no debugging 
symbols found)...done.

Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libogg.so.0
Reading symbols from 
/usr/lib/libtheora.so.0...(no debugging 
symbols found)...done.

Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libtheora.so.0
Reading symbols from 
/usr/lib/libopenal.so.1...(no debugging 
symbols found)...done.

Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libopenal.so.1
Reading symbols from 
/usr/lib/libGLC.so.0...(no debugging 
symbols found)...done.

Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libGLC.so.0
Reading symbols from 
/usr/l