Bug#1062072: marked as done (clamav: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition)
Please advise. Not sure what this means for me as a sole independant personal user for home use. Nick Mortel On 04/02/2024 12:03, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Your message dated Sun, 04 Feb 2024 12:00:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1062072: fixed in clamav 1.2.1+dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1062072, regarding clamav: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.)
Bug#1055494: marked as done (clamav-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces: clamav (<< 1.2))
same again.not sure ! On 04/02/2024 12:03, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Your message dated Sun, 04 Feb 2024 12:00:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1055494: fixed in clamav 1.2.1+dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1055494, regarding clamav-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces: clamav (<< 1.2) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.)
