Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

2019-02-12 Thread Petri Hintukainen
Hello,

On 2019-02-11 21:28, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Thanks for working on this issue. What's the status of the release?
> Will it be available soon?

1.1.0 release has been tagged and should appear in downloads soon.

I've tested a lot of BD-J apps with OpenJDK 11, and it seems to work
just well. I'd still expect some new issues when people start using it,
but we can fix those later.

Looking at the diff between 1.0.2 and 1.1.0 I wouldn't expect much of
other regressions than those related to OpenJDK 11; there are no other
"significant" changes. I left out some other pending changes due to the
tight schedule.

No changes to applications are required. ABI minor version has been
bumped because of there's one new field at the end of one libbluray-
allocated public struct.

- Petri



Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

2019-01-22 Thread Petri Hintukainen
Hello,

On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 7:14 AM Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Looking at the commit history, it seems that there have been some
> changes wrt java
> compatibility, mostly by you. I wonder whether you'd expect libbluray
> to work with
> openjdk-11. If not, is this something on your roadmap, or do you
> consider this a 
> stretch goal for the forseeable future?

Build issues should be fixed in git. OpenJDK 11 can be used to build
the package, and resulting Java binary code is compatible with OpenJDK
6...11.

There are still few runtime issues, so libbluray does not try to load
JVM 9 ... 11 yet. But these remaining issues are more or less trivial,
and just need some testing.

I've switched to use OpenJDK 11. OpenJDK 9 and 10 are still more or
less untested, but 11 seems more important version to support.

What kind of schedule do you have ? We could have libbluray release
with OpenJDK 11 support in couple of weeks. Even earlier if we fix the
remaining issues and OpenJDK 9/10 issues in later releases. Anyway, I'd
expect some new issues when people start using libbluray with OpenJDK
9..11.

- Petri



Bug#656732: vdr-plugin-xineliboutput: PLS playlists are parsed wrongly so that equal (=) sign remains

2012-01-29 Thread Petri Hintukainen
On 21.01.2012 12:39, Eric Lavarde wrote:

> when I use a .pls playlist to play a web radio, the vdr-plugin-imonlcd
shows
> "=Radio ZET" (in the attached example).

Fixed upstream today.
Thanks for reporting this!


- Petri




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org