Bug#878692: please drop transitional package mingw-ocaml
mingw-ocaml has been indeed of tremendous help in the past. Thank you for providing it. I don't use it anymore though because: > Le 16 oct. 2017 à 10:29, Romain Beauxisa écrit : > There's some work being done, though, on enabling cross-compiling in OCaml, > and just not for windows but I'm not sure what/when. There is now the opam repository https://github.com/whitequark/opam-cross-windows that allows you to get an ocaml 4.04 cross compiler! Cross compiling is not for everybody (and is useless inside debian itself). Therefore, providing the cross compiler only through an external pure developper channel (opam) seems reasonable to me. The counter argument to that is that github repositories are extremely volatile while debian packages are much more solid. Anyway, I won't fight to keep this package in debian. That being said, the existence of the repo means that the "high stack of patches" exists (for 4.04.0) and I'm pretty sure it would not take that long for someone interested (which I'm not really anymore) and fluent in debian packaging (which I'm not, sorry) to translate https://github.com/whitequark/opam-cross-windows/blob/master/packages/flexdll-windows.0.34/opam and https://github.com/whitequark/opam-cross-windows/blob/master/packages/ocaml-windows64.4.04.0/opam into the correct `rules`. Pierre B.
Bug#736322: libcoq-ocaml-dev: It should depend on ocaml-best-compilers
Package: libcoq-ocaml-dev Version: 8.4pl2dfsg-4 Severity: minor Dear Maintainer, please see https://coq.inria.fr/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3215 Authors of plugins for coq are encouraged to use coq_makefile to generate their Makefile. Makefiles generated by coq_makefile ask coqtop for the ocaml compilers it has been compiled with in order to use it too. (It is done by coqtop -config.) Therefore, ocamlc.opt and ocamlopt.opt have to be available under platforms where coqtop has been compiled with them ... All the best, Pierre B. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages libcoq-ocaml-dev depends on: ii camlp5 [camlp5-ejbq9]6.11-2 ii coq 8.4pl2dfsg-4 ii libc62.17-97 ii libcoq-ocaml [libcoq-ocaml-t09a6]8.4pl2dfsg-4 ii liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev [liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev-fwbz8] 2.16.0+dfsg-1 ii ocaml-nox [ocaml-nox-4.01.0] 4.01.0-3 libcoq-ocaml-dev recommends no packages. libcoq-ocaml-dev suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#726017: apt-xapian-index: Fails because it cannot fork
Package: apt-xapian-index Version: 0.46 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, Cron job fails on my computer with the message : /etc/cron.weekly/apt-xapian-index: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/sbin/update-apt-xapian-index, line 102, in module indexer.incrementalUpdate() File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/axi/indexer.py, line 670, in incrementalUpdate self.updateIndex(dbpath) File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/axi/indexer.py, line 629, in updateIndex db = xapian.WritableDatabase(pathname, xapian.DB_CREATE_OR_OPEN) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/xapian/__init__.py, line 4303, in __init__ _xapian.WritableDatabase_swiginit(self,_xapian.new_WritableDatabase(*args)) xapian.DatabaseLockError: Unable to get write lock on /var/cache/apt-xapian-index/index.1: Couldn't fork: Cannot allocate memory run-parts: /etc/cron.weekly/apt-xapian-index exited with return code 1 sudo /usr/sbin/update-apt-xapian-index --update --quiet has the exact same result sudo update-apt-xapian-index --force says Reading .desktop files from /usr/share/app-install/desktop/: done. Reading en translations from /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.fr.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_main_i18n_TranslaReading en translations from /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.fr.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_main_i18n_Translation-en: done. Reading en translations from /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.fr.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_non-free_i18n_TraReading en translations from /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.fr.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_non-free_i18n_Translation-en: done. Reading en translations from /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.fr.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_contrib_i18n_TranReading en translations from /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.fr.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_contrib_i18n_Translation-en: done. Reading en.IndexDiff translations from /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.fr.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_main_i1Reading en.IndexDiff translations from /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.fr.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_main_i18n_Translation-en.IndexDiff: done. Reading fr translations from /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.fr.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_main_i18n_TranslaReading fr translations from /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.fr.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_main_i18n_Translation-fr: done. Reading fr.IndexDiff translations from /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.fr.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_main_i1Reading fr.IndexDiff translations from /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.fr.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_main_i18n_Translation-fr.IndexDiff: done. Reading en.IndexDiff translations from /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.fr.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_non-freReading en.IndexDiff translations from /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.fr.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_non-free_i18n_Translation-en.IndexDiff: done. Reading en.IndexDiff translations from /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.fr.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_contribReading en.IndexDiff translations from /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.fr.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_contrib_i18n_Translation-en.IndexDiff: done. FATAL - Failed to fork. I don't know where the problem can be (and if it is on my side). at least ls -lRh /var/cache/apt-xapian-index/ /var/cache/apt-xapian-index/: total 4,0K drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4,0K sept. 6 08:18 index.1 /var/cache/apt-xapian-index/index.1: total 121M -rw-r--r-- 1 root root0 oct. 11 10:14 flintlock -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 28 déc. 15 2011 iamchert -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 822 sept. 6 08:18 postlist.baseA -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 827 août 30 08:58 postlist.baseB -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 52M sept. 6 08:18 postlist.DB -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 64 sept. 6 08:18 record.baseA -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 64 août 30 08:58 record.baseB -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3,0M sept. 6 08:18 record.DB -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 163 sept. 6 08:18 spelling.baseA -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 176 août 30 08:58 spelling.baseB -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11M sept. 6 08:18 spelling.DB -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14 sept. 6 08:18 synonym.baseA -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14 août 30 08:58 synonym.baseB -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 16K sept. 6 08:18 synonym.DB -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 907 sept. 6 08:18 termlist.baseA -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 907 août 30 08:58 termlist.baseB -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 56M sept. 6 08:18 termlist.DB seems OK. The first cron email about the failure is from sept. 13 (coherent with the date sept. 6 of the ls) The only python package I update during this week is python-numpy. All the best, Pierre B. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 3.10-3-powerpc Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages apt-xapian-index depends on: ii python 2.7.5-5 ii python-apt 0.8.9 ii python-debian 0.1.21+nmu2 ii python-support 1.0.15 ii python-xapian 1.2.15-4 apt-xapian-index recommends no packages. Versions of packages
Bug#725879: lives 2.0.6 fails to start in jessie because of libmjpegutils
Package: lives Version: 2.0.6~ds0-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, I'm following debian testing but I have installed by hand lives version from sid (this morning after the end of libav transition, I wanted to get rid of old binary version of libs) LIVES fails to start since then with the message : /usr/lib/lives/lives-exe: error while loading shared libraries: libmjpegutils-2.1.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory It is coherent because I have libmjpegutils v1:2.0.0+debian-2 installed that gives libmjpegutils-2.0.so.0 Installing libmjpegutils v1:2.1.0+debian-1 from sid solves the problem but isn't there some mess here ? I mean why the lib has changed its name without the package changing it name or maybe you may add a dependency libmjpegutils (=2.1). All the best, Pierre B. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.10-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages lives depends on: ii frei0r-plugins1.1.22git20091109-1.2 ii imagemagick 8:6.7.7.10-6 ii libasound21.0.27.2-1 ii libatk1.0-0 2.10.0-2 ii libavc1394-0 0.5.4-2 ii libavcodec54 6:9.8-2+b1 ii libavformat54 6:9.8-2+b1 ii libavutil52 6:9.8-2+b1 ii libc6 2.17-93 ii libcairo-gobject2 1.12.16-2 ii libcairo2 1.12.16-2 ii libdv41.0.0-6 ii libgcc1 1:4.8.1-10 ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-02.28.2-1 ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1] 9.1.6-2+b1 ii libglee0d15.4.0-2 ii libglib2.0-0 2.36.4-1 ii libglu1-mesa [libglu1]9.0.0-2 ii libgtk-3-03.8.4-1 ii libjack-jackd2-0 [libjack-0.116] 1.9.9.5+20130622git7de15e7a-1 ii libmjpegutils-2.0-0 1:2.0.0+debian-2 ii libogg0 1.3.1-1 ii liboil0.3 0.3.17-2 ii libpango-1.0-01.32.5-5+b1 ii libpangocairo-1.0-0 1.32.5-5+b1 ii libpng12-01.2.49-4 ii libpulse0 4.0-6+b1 ii libraw1394-11 2.1.0-1 ii libsdl1.2debian 1.2.15-7 ii libstdc++64.8.1-10 ii libswscale2 6:9.8-2+b1 ii libtheora01.1.1+dfsg.1-3.1 ii libunicap20.9.12-2 ii libweed0 2.0.6~ds0-1 ii libx11-6 2:1.6.1-1 ii libxrender1 1:0.9.8-1 ii lives-data2.0.5~ds0-1 ii mplayer 2:1.0~rc4.dfsg1+svn34540-1+b2 ii ogmtools 1:1.5-3+b1 ii perl 5.18.1-4 ii procps1:3.3.4-2 ii python2.7.5-5 ii sox 14.4.1-3 ii zlib1g1:1.2.8.dfsg-1 Versions of packages lives recommends: ii dvgrab 3.5-2 ii icedax 9:1.1.11-2 ii libtheora-bin 1.1.1+dfsg.1-3.1 ii mencoder 2:1.0~rc4.dfsg1+svn34540-1+b2 ii mkvtoolnix 6.4.1-1 ii pulseaudio 4.0-6+b1 ii x11-utils 7.7+1 pn youtube-dl none Versions of packages lives suggests: pn ffmpeg none pn libdv-bin none pn mjpegtools none -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#715317: gstreamer1.0-plugins-good: shout2send cannot send webm streams
Package: gstreamer1.0-plugins-good Version: 1.0.7-1 Severity: wishlist Hi, gstreamer1.0-plugins-good has been build using libshout 2.2.2-8. So #define SHOUT_FORMAT_WEBM (2) /* video/webm */ was not there and $ gst-launch v4l2src ! video/x-raw,width=320,height=240 ! vp8enc ! webmmux ! shout2send ip=icecast.server port=8000 password=secret mount=/test.webm still answers WARNING: erroneous pipeline: could not link webmmux0 to shout2send0 Now that libshout 2.3.1 is in sid (and testing), is it possible to ask for a rebuild of gstreamer1.0-plugins-good in order to allow such pipelines ? All the best, Pierre B. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 3.9-1-powerpc Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages gstreamer1.0-plugins-good depends on: ii gstreamer1.0-plugins-base 1.0.7-1 ii libaa1 1.4p5-40 ii libavc1394-00.5.4-2 ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.6-4 ii libc6 2.17-7 ii libcaca00.99.beta18-1 ii libdv4 1.0.0-6 ii libflac81.3.0-1 ii libgcc1 1:4.8.1-2 ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.28.2-1 ii libglib2.0-02.36.1-2build1 ii libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0 1.0.7-1 ii libgstreamer1.0-0 1.0.7-1 ii libiec61883-0 1.2.0-0.1 ii libjack0 [libjack-0.116]1:0.121.3+20120418git75e3e20b-2.1 ii libjpeg88d-1 ii liborc-0.4-01:0.4.17-2 ii libpng12-0 1.2.49-4 ii libraw1394-11 2.1.0-1 ii libshout3 2.3.1-3 ii libsoup-gnome2.4-1 2.42.2-6 ii libsoup2.4-12.42.2-6 ii libspeex1 1.2~rc1-7 ii libstdc++6 4.8.1-2 ii libtag1c2a 1.8-2 ii libv4l-00.8.9-3 ii libvpx1 1.2.0-2 ii libwavpack1 4.60.1-3 ii libx11-62:1.6.0-1 ii libxdamage1 1:1.1.4-1 ii libxext62:1.3.1-2+deb7u1 ii libxfixes3 1:5.0-4+deb7u1 ii libxv1 2:1.0.7-1+deb7u1 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-1 Versions of packages gstreamer1.0-plugins-good recommends: ii gstreamer1.0-x 1.0.7-1 gstreamer1.0-plugins-good suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#686433: live-build: cannot build i386 live-cd under ppc
Package: live-build Version: 3.0~a58-1 Severity: normal On a ppc computer, the command list mkdir foo cd foo lb config -a i386 lb build fails. Here is the log: --8- root@coutosuisse:/home/pirbo# mkdir temppp root@coutosuisse:/home/pirbo# cd temppp root@coutosuisse:/home/pirbo/temppp# lb config -a i386 --verbose [2012-09-01 15:32:49] lb config -a i386 --verbose P: Considering defaults defined in /etc/live/build.conf P: Creating config tree for a debian/i386 system root@coutosuisse:/home/pirbo/temppp# lb build --verbose [2012-09-01 15:32:58] lb build --verbose [2012-09-01 15:32:58] lb bootstrap --verbose P: Setting up cleanup function [2012-09-01 15:32:59] lb bootstrap_cache restore --verbose W: skipping /usr/lib/live/build/bootstrap_cache, foreign architecture(s). [2012-09-01 15:32:59] lb bootstrap_copy --verbose [2012-09-01 15:32:59] lb bootstrap_cdebootstrap --verbose [2012-09-01 15:32:59] lb bootstrap_debootstrap --verbose W: skipping /usr/lib/live/build/bootstrap_debootstrap, foreign architecture(s). [2012-09-01 15:33:00] lb bootstrap_cache save --verbose W: skipping /usr/lib/live/build/bootstrap_cache, foreign architecture(s). P: Begin unmounting filesystems... P: Saving caches... chroot: impossible de changer le répertoire racine vers chroot: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type [2012-09-01 15:33:00] lb chroot --verbose P: Setting up cleanup function [2012-09-01 15:33:00] lb chroot_cache restore --verbose [2012-09-01 15:33:00] lb chroot_devpts install --verbose [2012-09-01 15:33:00] lb testroot P: Begin mounting /dev/pts... [2012-09-01 15:33:01] lb chroot_proc install --verbose [2012-09-01 15:33:01] lb testroot P: Begin mounting /proc... [2012-09-01 15:33:02] lb chroot_selinuxfs install --verbose [2012-09-01 15:33:02] lb testroot [2012-09-01 15:33:02] lb chroot_sysfs install --verbose [2012-09-01 15:33:02] lb testroot P: Begin mounting /sys... [2012-09-01 15:33:03] lb chroot_debianchroot install --verbose P: Configuring file /etc/debian_chroot /usr/lib/live/build/chroot_debianchroot: 50: /usr/lib/live/build/chroot_debianchroot: cannot create chroot/etc/debian_chroot: Directory nonexistent P: Begin unmounting filesystems... P: Saving caches... chroot: failed to run command `/usr/bin/env': No such file or directory --8- I've tried using ~a51 and ~a58 versions and with debootstrap and cdebootstrap. -- Package-specific info: -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-powerpc Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages live-build depends on: ii cdebootstrap 0.5.9 ii debootstrap 1.0.42 Versions of packages live-build recommends: ii cpio2.11-8 ii gnu-fdisk 1.2.4-3.1 ii live-boot-doc 3.0~a35-1 ii live-config-doc 3.0~a43-1 ii live-manual-html [live-manual] 1:3.0~a13-1 Versions of packages live-build suggests: ii dosfstools 3.0.13-1 ii fakeroot1.18.4-2 ii genisoimage 9:1.1.11-2 ii git 1:1.7.10.4-1 pn memtest86+ | memtest86 none ii mtools 4.0.17-1 pn parted none pn squashfs-tools | mtd-tools none ii sudo1.8.5p2-1 pn syslinux | grub none pn uuid-runtimenone pn win32-loadernone -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#673835: liblablgtksourceview2-ocaml: Could debian package provides upstream unreleased META file instead of wrong ad hoc one ?
Package: liblablgtksourceview2-ocaml Version: 2.14.2+dfsg-2+b1 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, I want to be able to compile an Ocaml file that uses GSourceview2 using ocamlfind. I use recently bind function in lablgtk but I can't check that it is lablgtk 2.14.2 that is installed because the META file says it is 2.14.0. Upstream proposes now a much more complete META file that fixes several issues but no new version with it has been released. Using this file is not completely transparent because ocamlfind -pkg lablgtksourceview2.gtksourceview2 foo.ml has to be transformed in ocamlfind -pkg lablgtk2.sourceview2 foo.ml. I want to argue anyway in order to use this file because it will be consistent with the future. Could we imagine that ? All the best, Pierre B. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages liblablgtksourceview2-ocaml depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 2.4.0-2 ii libc62.13-32 ii libcairo21.12.2-1 ii libfontconfig1 2.9.0-3 ii libfreetype6 2.4.9-1 ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.26.1-1 ii libglib2.0-0 2.32.2-1 ii libgtk2.0-0 2.24.10-1 ii libgtksourceview2.0-02.10.4-1 ii liblablgtk2-ocaml [liblablgtk2-ocaml-yfv67] 2.14.2+dfsg-2+b1 ii libpango1.0-01.30.0-1 ii ocaml-base-nox [ocaml-base-nox-3.12.1] 3.12.1-2 liblablgtksourceview2-ocaml recommends no packages. liblablgtksourceview2-ocaml suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#614933: camldebug doesn't work with a pristine emacs installation
Package: tuareg-mode Version: 1:2.0.4-3 Followup-For: Bug #614933 Dear Maintainer, I have the same problem. I fix it by adding -tuareg after camldebug on (autoload 'camldebug camldebug-tuareg Run the Caml debugger t) in /etc/emacs/site-start.d/51tuareg-mode.el as seen above to be sure to load tuareg version of camldebug and not the ocaml-mode one. I do not know how wrong this fix is but having a correct fix would be great ;-) All the best, Pierre -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages tuareg-mode depends on: ii emacs [emacsen]23.4+1-2 ii emacs23 [emacsen] 23.4+1-2 Versions of packages tuareg-mode recommends: ii ocaml-interp 3.12.1-2 ii ocaml-mode3.12.1-2 tuareg-mode suggests no packages. -- Configuration Files: /etc/emacs/site-start.d/51tuareg-mode.el changed: ;;; ;; append-tuareg.el - Tuareg quick installation: Append this file to .emacs. (add-to-list 'auto-mode-alist '(\\.ml\\w? . tuareg-mode)) (autoload 'tuareg-mode tuareg Major mode for editing Caml code t) (autoload 'camldebug camldebug-tuareg Run the Caml debugger t) (dolist (ext '(.cmo .cmx .cma .cmxa .cmi)) (add-to-list 'completion-ignored-extensions ext)) (setq load-path (cons (concat /usr/share/ (symbol-name flavor) /site-lisp/tuareg-mode) load-path)) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#467563: camlp5 strict mode?
Hi, I'm sorry but I do not see an answer to that question in the thread: Why do we keep a camlp5 in transitionnal mode ? For packages, Coq and ledit support strict mode. The only remaining question is about ulex. Pierre Le 28 févr. 12 à 23:16, Hendrik Tews a écrit : Hi, I looked at how camlp5 is compiled and I believe to build transitional _and_ strict camlp5 executables and libraries from one source package will require quite a bit of work. The reason is that the names of executables and libraries are hardcoded in the makefiles and that these names are identical for strict and transitional mode. One way to work around this would be that the build target in rules does: configure -strict make world.opt rename all executables and libraries make clean configure -transitional make world.opt Everything would of course be much simpler, if one could build the strict camlp5 binary package from a different source package, say camlp5-strict, which of course shares the upstream sources with the source package for transitional camlp5. Bye, Hendrik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20301.21069.854276.618...@blau.inf.tu-dresden.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#467563: camlp5 strict mode?
ssreflect and aactactics are OK ulex does NOT depend anymore on camlp5 since v1.0: CHANGES: 1.0 * Update to the new Camlp4 and to ocamlbuild (release for OCaml 3.10 only), by Nicolas Pouillard. geneweb has the same uptream author than camlp5 and works in strict. Le 29 févr. 12 à 10:19, Hendrik Tews a écrit : Pierre Boutillier writes: Why do we keep a camlp5 in transitionnal mode ? I assumed somebody needs transitional mode. Supporting only strict mode is of course much simpler. For packages, Coq and ledit support strict mode. The only remaining question is about ulex. How about ssreflect? Bye, Hendrik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20301.60853.135902.545...@blau.inf.tu-dresden.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#641016: emacs-calfw: forbid xemacs21 removal
Package: emacs-calfw Version: 1.2-1 Severity: normal Hi, removal of xemacs21 fails with the message : remove/emacs-calfw: purging ... rmdir: failed to delete /usr/share/xemacs21/site-lisp/emacs-calfw: No sush file or directory It appears that in install/emacs-calfw, you've got a list of if [ ${FLAVOR} = unrelevant stuff ]; then exit 0; fi that are not in the remove/emacs-calfw ... All the best, Pierre Boutillier pierre.boutill...@laposte.net -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages emacs-calfw depends on: ii emacs23 23.3+1-1 The GNU Emacs editor (with GTK+ us emacs-calfw recommends no packages. Versions of packages emacs-calfw suggests: pn emacs-calfw-howm none (no description available) pn org-mode none (no description available) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org