Bug#1023628: www.debian.org: missing distribution name changes in releases/trixie/index.wml

[Rafa]

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainers,

It seems to me that in file releases/trixie/index.wml, as of commit
bd44c0367d403f4c6efaa83c6373a24a7991a1bb, there are some distribution
name changes missing.

As a consequence, the currently published HTML page incorrectly states
that:

  'The code name for the next major Debian release after bullseye is "trixie"'

I guess that the attached patch could fix this issue.

Regards,

Rafa.

From 0d7b92834f71838de9c116f16735d93c5ce7f663 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rafa 
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 18:38:38 +
Subject: [PATCH] Fix some missing distribution name changes

---
 english/releases/trixie/index.wml | 14 +++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/english/releases/trixie/index.wml b/english/releases/trixie/index.wml
index f2422bb20b1..05676c19877 100644
--- a/english/releases/trixie/index.wml
+++ b/english/releases/trixie/index.wml
@@ -64,12 +64,12 @@ release, even though it is declared stable. We've made
 credit for making this release happen.
 
 
-
+
 
 The code name for the next major Debian release after bullseye is trixie.
+href="../bookworm/">bookworm is trixie.
 
-This release started as a copy of bullseye, and is currently in a state
+This release started as a copy of bookworm, and is currently in a state
 called testing.
 This means that things should not break as badly as in unstable or
 experimental distributions, because packages are allowed to enter this
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ don't have any release-critical bugs filed against them.
 # https://lists.debian.org/debian-testing-security-announce/2008/12/msg00019.html";>announcement
 # of the Testing Security Team.
 You are encouraged to switch your
-sources.list entries from testing to bullseye for the time being if you
+sources.list entries from testing to bookworm for the time being if you
 need security support. See also the entry in the
 Security Team's FAQ for
 the testing distribution.
@@ -115,11 +115,11 @@ debian-devel-announce mailing list.
 
 
 
-
+
 
 The code name for the next major Debian release after bullseye is trixie. Currently,
-bullseye is not released yet. So trixie is still
+href="../bookworm /">bookworm is trixie. Currently,
+bookworm is not released yet. So trixie is still
 far away.
 
 
-- 
2.30.2



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#977733: www.debian.org: inconsistent info in repo regarding file english/News/2019/20190216.wml

[Rafa]

Dear Maintainers,

When we add the option --full-history to our "git log -- path/filename"
command we do get the commit we expected (the one with hash
9bd5a55d72acee622d9e25eecb70e1beb93d0ea4):

  $ git log --format=fuller --name-only --full-history \
-- english/News/2019/20190216.wml
  commit 9bd5a55d72acee622d9e25eecb70e1beb93d0ea4
  Author: Laura Arjona Reina 
  AuthorDate: Fri Dec 13 20:13:29 2019 +0100
  Commit: Laura Arjona Reina 
  CommitDate: Fri Dec 13 20:13:29 2019 +0100

  remove the tag for frontpage

  english/News/2019/20190216.wml

  [...]

So, the reported behaviour seems to be just a consequence of git log
command's default history simplification.

I think that this bug report can be closed now.

Regards,

Rafa.




signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#991147: www.debian.org: typo in News/2021/20210619.wml (DMs instead of DDs)

[Rafa]

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor

Dear Maintainers,

Page News/2021/20210619.wml, as of commit
2cb38f6ccb556cd943a6b281b6667e07cc0dcbb1, states in line 73:

"[...] make dcut dm work for non-uploading DMs; [...]"

I think that, instead of "DMs", it should read "DDs", according to
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1237374/accepted-dput-ng-125deb10u2-source-into-proposed-updates-stable-new-proposed-updates/:

"[ nicoo ]
 * Make `dcut dm` also accept non-uploading DDs, since they are nowadays
   treated the same as DMs when concerning upload permissions.
   Closes: #985618; MR: !16"

Regards,

Rafa.



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#977733: www.debian.org: inconsistent info in repo regarding file english/News/2019/20190216.wml

[Rafa]

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainers,

It seems that there is something odd in the webmaster-team/webwml.git
repository at salsa regarding file english/News/2019/20190216.wml.

We get inconsistent results when we issue the git log command using
different arguments.

Commit with hash 9bd5a55d72acee622d9e25eecb70e1beb93d0ea4 was made in
December 2019, and it corresponds to a modification of file
english/News/2019/20190216.wml according to the output of the "git log
... commit-hash" command:

  $ git log -n1 --format=fuller --name-only 
9bd5a55d72acee622d9e25eecb70e1beb93d0ea4

  commit 9bd5a55d72acee622d9e25eecb70e1beb93d0ea4
  Author: Laura Arjona Reina 
  AuthorDate: Fri Dec 13 20:13:29 2019 +0100
  Commit: Laura Arjona Reina 
  CommitDate: Fri Dec 13 20:13:29 2019 +0100

  remove the tag for frontpage

  english/News/2019/20190216.wml


On the other hand, if we ask for the commits that represent
modifications of the very same file via the "git log
-- path/filename" command, we get the following:

  $ git log --format=fuller --name-only -- english/News/2019/20190216.wml
  commit ea6a13e28f99e15f67ccfd6b74b4cc4bb185fdbd
  Author: Laura Arjona Reina 
  AuthorDate: Tue Apr 2 08:28:56 2019 +0200
  Commit: Laura Arjona Reina 
  CommitDate: Tue Apr 2 08:35:59 2019 +0200

  https://security.debian.org -> https://www.debian.org/security

  english/News/2019/20190216.wml

  commit fdc485a3cb59ae0b5ef29c7ff90f411b2444ed09
  Author: Donald Norwood 
  AuthorDate: Sat Feb 16 10:38:53 2019 -0500
  Commit: Donald Norwood 
  CommitDate: Sat Feb 16 10:38:53 2019 -0500

  Debian 9.8 release announcement

  english/News/2019/20190216.wml

As you can see, the output of the second command does not include the
commit with hash 9bd5a55d72acee622d9e25eecb70e1beb93d0ea4, Dec. 2019.
The first (most recent) commit shown was made in April 2019.

Note: we have found a similar behaviour regarding file
english/CD/faq/index.wml. If you think that it is better to submit a
separate bug report for it, please, let me know.

Regards,

Rafa.



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#962774: www.debian.org: bug number within webwml/english/security/2020/dsa-4698.wml not included in the final HTML page

[Rafa]

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainers,

Page webwml/english/security/2020/dsa-4698.wml contains, in line 230, the text 
"#952660)." in such a way that the whole text is treated as a wml comment 
and, as a consequence, it is not included in the final HTML page.

I guess that the attached PATCH could solve the issue by simply changing the 
position of the text.

Regards,

Rafa.

From 1534879b5722890f527baf618318d1b00a93b5c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rafa 
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 20:59:16 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix display of bug number

---
 english/security/2020/dsa-4698.wml | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/english/security/2020/dsa-4698.wml b/english/security/2020/dsa-4698.wml
index f381cd0001c..923c0fe7d3f 100644
--- a/english/security/2020/dsa-4698.wml
+++ b/english/security/2020/dsa-4698.wml
@@ -226,8 +226,7 @@ leaks.
 For the oldstable distribution (stretch), these problems have been
 fixed in version 4.9.210-1+deb9u1.  This version also fixes some
 related bugs that do not have their own CVE IDs, and a regression in
-the macvlan driver introduced in the previous point release (bug
-#952660).
+the macvlan driver introduced in the previous point release (bug #952660).
 
 We recommend that you upgrade your linux packages.
 
-- 
2.20.1



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#933534: www.debian.org: missing link to /security/2019/dsa-4483.es.html in /security/2019/dsa-4483.en.html

[Rafa]

Hi,

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 11:36:26AM +0200, Rafa wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> 
> Dear Maintainers,
> 
> [...]
> However, for some reason that escapes me, the page with the original
> english version (https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4483.en.html)
> does not cointain the usual link to the Spanish version in its footer.
> [...]

It is fixed. I don't know when or how it was fixed but, anyway, today (15
Aug 2019) I have noticed that the missing link is already in place.

So, I think that this bug can be closed.

Thanks,

Rafa.



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#933534: www.debian.org: missing link to /security/2019/dsa-4483.es.html in /security/2019/dsa-4483.en.html

[Rafa]

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainers,

The translation into Spanish for page /security/2019/dsa-4483.wml (i.e.
/spanish/security/2019/dsa-4483.wml) is in the repository since July 18
(commit 2ab53586a69722b353c7f56ca4dd800a6672b4c1) and it is correctly
served by the server
(https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4483.es.html).

However, for some reason that escapes me, the page with the original
english version (https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4483.en.html)
does not cointain the usual link to the Spanish version in its footer.

Regards,

Rafa.



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#932910: i2c-tools: Convenience of moving i2c* binaries form /usr/sbin to /usr/bin

[Rafa Couto]

Package: i2c-tools
Version: 3.1.2-3
Severity: minor

As regular user within the i2c system group, it is not possible to execute
i2cdetect directly (or any other i2c* binary) because i2c* binaries are located
in /usr/sbin directory. It should be convenient to move they to /usr/bin since
users in i2c group have permissions to use I2C buses and /dev/i2c-* are created
with 660 mode.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.9
  APT prefers oldstable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-9-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages i2c-tools depends on:
ii  adduser  3.115
ii  libc62.24-11+deb9u4
ii  perl 5.24.1-3+deb9u5
ii  udev 232-25+deb9u11

Versions of packages i2c-tools recommends:
ii  read-edid  3.0.2-1+b1

Versions of packages i2c-tools suggests:
pn  libi2c-dev
pn  python-smbus  

-- no debconf information

Bug#932057: www.debian.org: Modify text included by after relocating in /News/weekly/...?

[Rafa]

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainers,

/News/weekly/2019/01/index.wml has "" in a different
position than previous issues.

Up to /News/weekly/2018/04/index.wml, it was located just after
':

[...]



[...]

/News/weekly/2019/01/index.wml, however, contains the "newdpn" section
between '' and "":

[...]



[...]

But the text included by the tag "intro" ends with "Topics covered in
this issue include:". As a consequence, the resulting text in the
generated HTML now seems odd to me:

Debian Project News - July 1st, 2019

Welcome to this year's first issue of DPN, the newsletter for
the Debian community. Topics covered in this issue include:

Welcome to the Debian Project News!

We hope that you enjoy this edition of DPN.

For other news, ...

At the end of this ...

Welcome to the Debian Project News!
Security Advisories
Internal News
[...]
Quick Links from Debian Social Media
Want to continue reading DPN?


Wouldn't it be better to change the wording of the text included by
the ' tag?  

Regards,

Rafa.



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#932056: www.debian.org: incorrect link in /News/weekly/2019/01/index.wml

[Rafa]

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainers,

Page /News/weekly/2019/01/index.wml, as of commit
785f6077929e0177ff85480764f34f42a97cf3bc, contains in line #148 a link
to https://debconf19.debconf.org/about/cheese-and-wine-party/14th,
which returns a "page not found" message.

I guess the link is not correct; the correct one would probably be
https://debconf19.debconf.org/about/cheese-and-wine-party/ instead.

Regards,

Rafa.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#931348: www.debian.org: incorrect link in /News/weekly/2019/01/index.wml

[Rafa]

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainers,

Page /News/weekly/2019/01/index.wml, as of commit
1a3d48c9156309e3b45d40f072d9fce0ffc9a64e, contains in line #66 a link to
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/04/msg3.html.

I guess the link is not correct; the correct one would probably be
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/06/msg3.html
instead.

Regards,

Rafa.



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#931251: www.debian.org: /misc/laptops/ and /misc/related_links removed from repo but still served

[Rafa]

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainers,

I could be misinterpreting something but, taking into account that in
commit 00ee01a963076d499ecc72b4197a38bf69001e36 misc/laptops/ and
misc/related_links were removed from the repository (as one of bug
#924888-related tasks), I expected that, as of today, pages
https://www.debian.org/misc/laptops/index.html and
https://www.debian.org/misc/related_links.html would return a 404 error
code. However, those pages are still being served.

Is that correct?

Thanks.

Regards,

Rafa.



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#927805: www.debian.org: number of developers in webwml/english/vote/2019/vote_001_quorum.txt looks incorrect

[Rafa]

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainers,

File webwml/english/vote/2019/vote_001_quorum.txt, as of commit
c6a0c8..., states:

Current Developer Count = 901
Q ( sqrt(#devel) / 2 ) = 15.8350876221131

I guess that the "Current Developer Count" value should be 1,003
instead of 901, because 1,003 is the number of developers in
vote_001_quorum.log (as of commit 88d434...) and it is the
number than makes "Q ( sqrt(#devel) / 2 ) = 15.8350876221131"
true.

If my calculations are correct:

sqrt(901)/2  = 15.0083310198036
sqrt(1003)/2 = 15.8350876221131

Regards,

Rafa.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#926260: debian-history: DebConf2 mistakenly referred to as the second DebConf

[Rafa]

Package: debian-history
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainers,

File project-history.en.dbk, as of commit 176f60e3, refers to DebConf2
as the "second" Debconf in line 814. It is my understanding that it 
should be referred to as the "third" Debconf instead.

Also, only the starting date is given (July 5th). I would suggest to
mention the ending date as well (July 7th).

Regards,

Rafa.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#926258: debian-history: DebConf1 mistakenly referred to as the first DebConf

[Rafa]

Package: debian-history
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainers,

File project-history.en.dbk, as of commit 176f60e3, refers to DebConf1
as the "first" Debconf in line 811. It is my understanding that it 
should be referred to as the "second" Debconf instead.

Regards,

Rafa.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#925367: debian-history: DebConf12 mistakenly referred to as the 12th DebConf

[Rafa]

Package: debian-history
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainers,

File project-history.en.dbk, as of commit 176f60e3, refers to DebConf12
as the "12th" Debconf in line 428. It is my understanding that it 
should be referred to as the "13th" Debconf instead.

Please note that in line 1101 it is (correctly, in my opinion) referred
to as the "13th" one.

Regards,

Rafa.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#925341: debian-history: DebConf10 mistakenly referred to as the 10th DebConf

[Rafa]

Package: debian-history
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainers,

File project-history.en.dbk, as of commit 176f60e3, refers to DebConf10
as the "10th" Debconf in lines 407 and 979. It is my understanding that
it should be referred to as the "11th" Debconf instead.

Please note that in line 946 it is (correctly, in my opinion) referred
to as the "11th" one.

Regards,

Rafa.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#925152: debian-history: disagreement in number of developers when Sarge was released

[Rafa]

Package: debian-history
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainers,

File project-history.en.dbk, as of commit 176f60e3, contains information
about the number of Debian developers by the time Sarge was released in
(at least) two places: in chapter 3 (line number 347) and in chapter 4
(line number 841). The number of developers is quite different in both
places, though. In chapter 3 it is stated that there were about 900 of
them, whereas in chapter 4 the number is 1,500.

Maybe I am missing something and there is a difference in the meaning of
those two figures that escaped me. Sorry if that is the case.

Regards,

Rafa.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#925147: debian-history: links to alioth no longer valid

[Rafa]

Package: debian-history
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainers,

File project-history.en.dbk, as of commit 176f60e3, contains, in lines
341 and 840, links to the no longer available alioth.debian.org server.

Regards,

Rafa.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#925093: debian-history: links to libresoft.es no longer valid

[Rafa]

Package: debian-history
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainers,

The two links to debian-counting.libresoft.es present in lines 742 and
744 of file project-history.en.dbk as of commit 176f60e3 seem to be
no longer valid.

Regards,

Rafa.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#924091: www.debian.org: News/2019/20190308.wml points to www.debian.org using HTTP instead of HTTPS

[Rafa]

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor

Dear Maintainers,

Page News/2019/20190308.wml, as of commit
ce517877a62210aca2c6dcfa4431f2ccb43c22da, points, in the "Contact
Information" section, to www.debian.org using http://. I guess it should
use https:// instead.

Regards,

Rafa.



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#913396: www.debian.org: adding code for Spanish in webwml/english/template/debian/projectnews/footer.wml

[Rafa]

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainers,

Script webwml/english/template/debian/projectnews/footer.wml includes
code for several languages (but not for Spanish) when dealing with the
"translator" and "editor" tags. In case the text for any of those tags
includes at least a comma, an appropiate term, which depends on the
language, is substituted for the last comma.

The lack of a specific treatment for Spanish implies that the Spanish
translations get the default treatment, which means that the term
"and" is subsituted for the last comma.

We would like the Spanish case to be incorporated into the script. We
have discussed the issue briefly in the debian-l10n-spanish mailing
list, and we see two possible approaches to this:

1. Substitute the term "y" or "e" (whichever is correct in each case)
for the last comma.
2. Do not perform any substitution.

While the first approach would be the preferred one, it would probably
be quite hard to implement, as the Spanish rules that define whether the
term to use is "y" or "e" are, by no means, simple.

So, if the first approach were not practical, the second one (which is,
of course, much easier to implement) would be good enough. Moreover, in
this case the translator would have the chance to write in the wml page
the correct term ("y" or "e"), which is, I think, a most natural action
for a translator to perform.

In case the second approach is the one implemented, I provide a patch
that could, probably, do the job.

Regards,

Rafa.

From 53f1114811355a5a9bfaf86ca10a537113405d70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rafa 
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 14:03:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Leave 'translator' and 'editor' unmodified when translating
 to Spanish

---
 english/template/debian/projectnews/footer.wml | 4 
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/english/template/debian/projectnews/footer.wml b/english/template/debian/projectnews/footer.wml
index 8297ae8d4b2..1f1f05416b8 100644
--- a/english/template/debian/projectnews/footer.wml
+++ b/english/template/debian/projectnews/footer.wml
@@ -97,6 +97,8 @@
 } elsif ($CUR_ISO_LANG eq 'it') {
   $translator =~ s/,([^,]+)$/ e $1/;
   $translator =~ s/,/, /g;
+} elsif ($CUR_ISO_LANG eq 'es') {
+ $translator =~ s/,/, /g;
 } else {
  # Fallback to the english style if there's no translation yet
  $translator =~ s/,([^,]+)$/ and $1/;
@@ -181,6 +183,8 @@
} elsif ($CUR_ISO_LANG eq 'it') {
  $editor =~ s/,([^,]+)$/ e $1/;
  $editor =~ s/,/, /g;
+   } elsif ($CUR_ISO_LANG eq 'es') {
+ $editor =~ s/,/, /g;
} else {
  # Fallback to the english style if there's no translation yet
  $editor =~ s/,([^,]+)$/ and $1/;
-- 
2.11.0



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#910467: www.debian.org: security/2018/dsa-4309.wml points twice to CVE-2018-16151

[Rafa]

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor

Dear Maintainers,

Page security/2018/dsa-4309.wml points twice to CVE-2018-16151. It probably
should point to CVE-2018-16151 and to CVE-2018-16152, instead.

Regards,

Rafa.



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#885864: evince: MIME type in evince.desktop

[Rafa Couto]

Package: evince
Version: 3.22.1-3+deb9u1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream

Dear Maintainer,

This error is shown while executing update-desktop-database:

# update-desktop-database 
Error in file "/usr/share/applications/evince.desktop": "" is an invalid
MIME type ("" does not contain a subtype)


It is because the double ';' in /usr/share/applications/evince.desktop
(just before 'application/oxps'):

MimeType=application/pdf;application/x-bzpdf;application/x-gzpdf;application/x-xzpdf;application/x-ext-pdf;application/postscript;application/x-bzpostscript;application/x-gzpostscript;image/x-eps;image/x-bzeps;image/x-gzeps;application/x-ext-ps;application/x-ext-eps;application/x-dvi;application/x-bzdvi;application/x-gzdvi;application/x-ext-dvi;image/vnd.djvu;image/vnd.djvu+multipage;application/x-ext-djv;application/x-ext-djvu;image/tiff;application/x-cbr;application/x-cbz;application/x-cb7;application/x-ext-cbr;application/x-ext-cbz;application/vnd.comicbook+zip;application/x-ext-cb7;;application/oxps;application/vnd.ms-xpsdocument;


Regards,
Rafa



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.3
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages evince depends on:
ii  dconf-gsettings-backend [gsettings-backend]  0.26.0-2+b1
ii  evince-common3.22.1-3+deb9u1
ii  gsettings-desktop-schemas3.22.0-1
ii  libatk1.0-0  2.22.0-1
ii  libc62.24-11+deb9u1
ii  libcairo-gobject21.14.8-1
ii  libcairo21.14.8-1
ii  libevdocument3-4 3.22.1-3+deb9u1
ii  libevview3-3 3.22.1-3+deb9u1
ii  libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0   2.36.5-2+deb9u1
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.50.3-2
ii  libgnome-desktop-3-123.22.2-1
ii  libgtk-3-0   3.22.11-1
ii  libnautilus-extension1a  3.22.3-1+deb9u1
ii  libpango-1.0-0   1.40.5-1
ii  libsecret-1-00.18.5-3.1
ii  shared-mime-info 1.8-1

Versions of packages evince recommends:
ii  dbus-user-session [default-dbus-session-bus]  1.10.24-0+deb9u1
ii  dbus-x11 [dbus-session-bus]   1.10.24-0+deb9u1

Versions of packages evince suggests:
ii  gvfs 1.30.4-1
ii  nautilus-sendto  3.8.4-2+b1
ii  poppler-data 0.4.7-8
pn  unrar

-- no debconf information

Bug#801959: Tag mariadb packages with debtags

[Rafa Hernandez]

Hi Otto,

I’m adding the following tags, for example, to mariadb-server.10.0 package

In the coming days I'll add the missing tags

mariadb-server-10.0  -- 
MariaDB database server binaries
devel::lang:c++ made-of::font works-with::db role::app-data role::data 
protocol::db:mysql <>

Bug#549594: ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.5/lib-dynload/operator.so: undefined symbol: _Py_ZeroStruct

[rafa]

Package: system-config-printer-kde
Version: 4:4.3.1-1
Severity: important


The module don't load.
Error from console:

/usr/bin/kcmshell4 system-config-printer-kde
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File 
"/usr/share/kde4/apps/system-config-printer-kde/system-config-printer-kde.py", 
line 32, in 
import locale
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/locale.py", line 167, in 
import re, operator
ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.5/lib-dynload/operator.so: undefined symbol: 
_Py_ZeroStruct


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages system-config-printer-kde depends on:
ii  python-cupsutils  1.0.0-6Python utility modules around the 
ii  python-kde4   4:4.2.2-3  Python bindings for the KDE 4 libr
ii  python-qt4-dbus   4.4.4-6DBus Support for PyQt4

system-config-printer-kde recommends no packages.

system-config-printer-kde suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#491089: p3scan: Unable to free memory not previously allocated

[rafa]

Package: p3scan
Version: 2:2.3.2-7
Severity: important


The problem happens when a virus is received, no problem receiving clean 
emails.


>From the logs:

Jul 16 11:22:55 diamante p3scan[16232]: POP3 Connection from 
10.10.203.70:3581
Jul 16 11:22:55 diamante p3scan[16232]: Real-server address is 
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:110
Jul 16 11:22:55 diamante p3scan[16232]: Ignoring servers PIPELINING 
capability...
Jul 16 11:22:57 diamante p3scan[16232]: POP3 from 10.10.203.70:3581 to 
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:110 from Rafael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] user: (null) virus: Worm.SomeFool.D file: 
/p3scan.5Iltub
Jul 16 11:22:57 diamante p3scan[16232]: ERR: Critical error opening file 
'', Program aborted.

Jul 16 11:22:57 diamante p3scan[16232]: ERR: Exiting now...
Jul 16 11:22:57 diamante p3scan[16232]: ERR: Unable to free memory not 
previously allocated:  '^I^Dڷ '^I '^I  CB>F
Jul 16 11:22:57 diamante kernel: [10122.723789] p3scan[16232]: segfault 
at 4 ip 0804ddc2 sp bf879b60 error 4 in p3scan[8048000+3]
Jul 16 11:22:57 diamante p3scan[15201]: ERR: Attention: child with pid 
16232 died with abnormal termsignal (11)! This is probably a bug. Please 
report to the author. numprocs is now 3



-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages p3scan depends on:
ii  adduser 3.108add and remove users and groups
ii  libc6   2.7-10   GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libpcre37.4-1+lenny2 Perl 5 Compatible Regular 
Expressi

ii  libssl0.9.8 0.9.8g-10.1  SSL shared libraries

p3scan recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#241911: Pink and perfect lips

[Rafa Haig]

Leave her begging and desperate for more of you in her.

http://www.woepphgl.com/
Pink and perfect lips



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339442: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#339442: octave2.9: error at startup: __gnuplot_init__ undefined

[Rafa Rodriguez Galvan]

El mié, 16-11-2005 a las 16:48, Rafael Laboissiere escribió:
> Thanks for the extra-info.  What do you get for this:
> 
> echo "which gplot" | octave-2.9.4 -q

Hi, I've installed octave-2.9.4 in my sid chroot and reproduced the
same error messages. Here you have some information: 


[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian$ octave --version
GNU Octave, version 2.9.4 (i486-pc-linux-gnu).
Copyright (C) 2005 John W. Eaton.
This is free software; see the source code for copying conditions.
There is ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; not even for MERCHANTIBILITY or
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Additional information about Octave is available at http://www.octave.org.

Please contribute if you find this software useful.
For more information, visit http://www.octave.org/help-wanted.html

Report bugs to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (but first, please read
http://www.octave.org/bugs.html to learn how to write a helpful report).
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian$ echo LOADPATH | octave -qf
error: `__gnuplot_init__' undefined near line 141 column 1
error: near line 141 of file 
`/usr/lib/octave/2.9.4/oct/i486-pc-linux-gnu//PKG_ADD'
error: source: error sourcing file 
`/usr/lib/octave/2.9.4/oct/i486-pc-linux-gnu//PKG_ADD'
LOADPATH = :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian$ echo LOADPATH | octave -qf
error: `__gnuplot_init__' undefined near line 141 column 1
error: near line 141 of file 
`/usr/lib/octave/2.9.4/oct/i486-pc-linux-gnu//PKG_ADD'
error: source: error sourcing file 
`/usr/lib/octave/2.9.4/oct/i486-pc-linux-gnu//PKG_ADD'
LOADPATH = :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian$  echo "which gplot" | octave-2.9.4 -q
error: `__gnuplot_init__' undefined near line 141 column 1
error: near line 141 of file 
`/usr/lib/octave/2.9.4/oct/i486-pc-linux-gnu//PKG_ADD'
error: source: error sourcing file 
`/usr/lib/octave/2.9.4/oct/i486-pc-linux-gnu//PKG_ADD'
error: near line 10 of file `/usr/share/octave/2.9.4/m/startup/octaverc'
gplot is the dynamically-linked function from the file
/usr/lib/octave/2.9.4/oct/i486-pc-linux-gnu/gplot.oct


-- 
J. Rafael Rodríguez Galván.
Departamento de Matemáticas. Universidad de Cádiz.
Tlf: 956015478


signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada	digitalmente

Bug#290922: Status of wxmaxima

[Rafa Rodríguez Galván]

El vie, 07-10-2005 a las 18:31, Rafa Rodríguez Galván escribió:
> Hi, Marco.
> 
> Some time ago, Javier Viñuales (vigu), Debian Developer, 
> promised me that, If I was going to maintain the wxmaxima
> Debian package, he will help sponsor me. I continued packaging 
> different versions of wxmaxima, but they were not "official"
> Debian packages, so I have been delayed with the last one.
> 
> Today, I asked Javier again, he replied that he continues interested 
> in sponsoring the package and requested me to send him the sources. 
> I acceded to the wxmaxima web page, but I found that the 0.6.2 
> version have been packaged by you.
> 
> Then, I read your message to Bug#290922:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> >I am also interested to push wxmaxima into Debian archive.
> >I have prepared an updated package (last version, built against
> >libwxgtk2.6), here:
> >deb http://people.debian.org/~zufus/ wxmaxima/
> >deb-src http://people.debian.org/~zufus/ wxmaxima/
> >If you are still interested, please let me know, and in case, we
> >can co-maintain this package (otherwise I would like
> >to take this package).
> >Regards
> >Marco
> 
> The key is that I'm still interested: I would like to continue packaging
> wxmaxima, because I was using it as a first package to start contributing 
> to the Debian community. Anyway, if you wish we can co-maintain the package, 
> or Javier and you can "co-sponsor" me, or we can use any other way we find
> adequate.
> 
> Regards,
> Rafa.
-- 
J. Rafael Rodríguez Galván.
OSLUCA -- Oficina de Software Libre, Universidad de Cádiz.
http://softwarelibre.uca.es

Bug#290922: Status of wxmaxima

[Rafa Rodríguez Galván]

Hi, Marco.

Some time ago, Javier Viñuales (vigu), Debian Developer, 
promised me that, If I was going to maintain the wxmaxima
Debian package, he will help sponsor me. I continued packaging 
different versions of wxmaxima, but they were not "official"
Debian packages, so I have been delayed with the last one.

Today, I asked Javier again, he replied that he continues interested 
in sponsoring the package and requested me to send him the sources. 
I acceded to the wxmaxima web page, but I found that the 0.6.2 
version have been packaged by you.

Then, I read your message to Bug#290922:

> Hi,
>
>I am also interested to push wxmaxima into Debian archive.
>I have prepared an updated package (last version, built against
>libwxgtk2.6), here:
>deb http://people.debian.org/~zufus/ wxmaxima/
>deb-src http://people.debian.org/~zufus/ wxmaxima/
>If you are still interested, please let me know, and in case, we
>can co-maintain this package (otherwise I would like
>to take this package).
>Regards
>Marco

The key is that I'm still interested: I would like to continue packaging
wxmaxima, because I was using it as a first package to start contributing 
to the Debian community. Anyway, if you wish we can co-maintain the package, 
or Javier and you can "co-sponsor" me, or we can use any other way we find
adequate.

Regards,
Rafa.

-- 
J. Rafael Rodriguez Galvan.
--
Universidad de Cádiz.  OSLUCA, Oficina de Software Libre de la UCA
Departamento de Matemáticas.   http://softwarelibre.uca.es

Bug#293235: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#293235: octave2.1-emacsen: hangs Emacs

[Rafa Rodriguez Galvan]

El mar, 01-02-2005 a las 23:06, Francesco Potorti` escribió:
> Package: octave2.1-emacsen
> Version: 2.1.64-1
> Severity: important
> 
> Simply does not work.  When I call M-x run-octave RET, Emacs just
> hangs.  This has happened since I upgraded to the current version.

Strange problem... I have compiled and tested the last version (2.1.64-3)
and all is right with Emacs and M-x run-octave. I'm using emacs21 
21.3+1-7, debianutils 2.8.4, kernel 2.6.5-mppe - i686.

-- 
J. Rafael Rodriguez Galvan.
--
Cadiz University (UCA). OSLUCA (Free Software Office, UCA)
Department of Mathematics. [1] http://softwarelibre.uca.es


signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada	digitalmente

Bug#293235: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#293235: octave2.1-emacsen: hangs Emacs

[Rafa Rodriguez Galvan]

El mar, 01-02-2005 a las 23:06, Francesco Potorti` escribió:
> Package: octave2.1-emacsen
> Version: 2.1.64-1
> Severity: important
> 
> Simply does not work.  When I call M-x run-octave RET, Emacs just
> hangs.  This has happened since I upgraded to the current version.

Strange... I have compiled and tested the last version (2.1.64-3)
and have no problem in Emacs with M-x run-octave. I'm using emacs21 
21.3+1-7, debianutils 2.8.4, kernel 2.6.5-mppe - i686.

-- 
J. Rafael Rodriguez Galvan.
--
Cadiz University (UCA). OSLUCA (Free Software Office, UCA)
Department of Mathematics. [1] http://softwarelibre.uca.es


signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada	digitalmente

Bug#290922: ITP: wxmaxima -- wxWindows interface for maxima

[Rafa Rodríguez Galván]

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: wxmaxima
  Version : 0.5.4
  Upstream Author : Andrej Vodopivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://wxmaxima.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
  Description : wxWindows interface for maxima

wxmaxima provides a wxWindows interface for maxima, including a menu
system, browsable help and formated output. Features as symbolic
manipulation of polynomials, rational functions, matrices, integration
and
graphics are as easy as point and click.
GNU maxima is a free and powerful common lisp implementation based
of the original computer algebra system Macsyma, originally developed at
MIT in the 1970's.

System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-mppe
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored:
LC_ALL set to es_ES)


signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada	digitalmente