Bug#1070051: xr-hardware: Add Appstream metainfo with hardware mappins

2024-06-04 Thread Rylie Pavlik
xr-hardware is literally just the udev rules, not any actual useful
software that can use that hardware. The packages that provide support
for that hardware are the ones that should have the metadata. I put
udev rules here in a separate package for separation of concerns and
because some hardware works with multiple software packages.

Rylie


On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 13:10:01 +0200 Petter Reinholdtsen  wrote:
>
> Package: xr-hardware
> Version: 1.1.1-1
> Tags: patch
>
> It would be very nice if programs using the Appstream metainfo to locate
> relevant package, would know which hardware is supported by this
> package.  This way programs like isenkram would propose the xr-hardwrae
> package when a relevant USB device is inserted.
>
> I started with the /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/70-xrhardware.rules file and
> used its listed USB IDs to generate the modalias entries in the metainfo
> XML.  There were a few entries I did not understand (the KERNELS==
> entries), so these are not represented in the XML.
>
> Please apply this to a future upload of xr-hardware.
>
> diff --git a/debian/copyright b/debian/copyright
> index 88fbd06..11ba17d 100644
> --- a/debian/copyright
> +++ b/debian/copyright
> @@ -52,6 +52,29 @@ Files: xrhardware/db.py
>  Copyright: 2019-2024, Collabora, Ltd. and the xr-hardware contributors
>  License: BSL-1.0
>
> +Files: debian/xr-hardware.metainfo.xml
> +Copyright: 2024 Petter Reinholdtsen
> +License: MIT
> + Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining
> + a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the
> + "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including
> + without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish,
> + distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to
> + permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to
> + the following conditions:
> + .
> + The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
> + included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
> + .
> + THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
> + EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF
> + MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND
> + NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS
> + BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN
> + ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN
> + CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
> + SOFTWARE.
> +
>  License: BSL-1.0
>   Boost Software License - Version 1.0 - August 17th, 2003
>   .
> diff --git a/debian/xr-hardware.install b/debian/xr-hardware.install
> index 59f1f7b..aa7a1ea 100644
> --- a/debian/xr-hardware.install
> +++ b/debian/xr-hardware.install
> @@ -1 +1,2 @@
>  70-xrhardware.rules ${env:deb_udevdir}/rules.d/
> +debian/xr-hardware.metainfo.xml usr/share/metainfo
> diff --git a/debian/xr-hardware.metainfo.xml b/debian/xr-hardware.metainfo.xml
> new file mode 100644



Bug#1045917: monado: Fails to build source after successful build

2024-03-13 Thread Rylie Pavlik

On Sun, 13 Aug 2023 21:20:59 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum  wrote:

Source: monado
Version: 21.0.0+git2905.e26a272c1~dfsg1-2
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-sab-20230813 ftbfs-source-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild

Hi,

This package fails to build a source package after a successful build
(dpkg-buildpackage ; dpkg-buildpackage -S).

This is probably a clear violation of Debian Policy section 4.9 (clean target),
but this is filed as severity:minor for now, because a discussion on
debian-devel showed that we might want to revisit the requirement of a working
'clean' target.

More information about this class of issues, included common problems and
solutions, is available at
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS/SourceAfterBuild

Relevant part of the build log:
> cd /<> && runuser -u user42 -- dpkg-buildpackage --sanitize-env 
-us -uc -rfakeroot -S
> 

> 
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source package monado

> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source version 21.0.0+git2905.e26a272c1~dfsg1-2
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source distribution unstable
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source changed by Ryan Pavlik 
>  dpkg-source --before-build .
>  debian/rules clean
> dh clean
>debian/rules override_dh_auto_clean
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> rm -f imgui.ini
> dh_auto_clean
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
>dh_clean
>  dpkg-source -b .
> dpkg-source: info: using source format '3.0 (quilt)'
> dpkg-source: info: building monado using existing 
./monado_21.0.0+git2905.e26a272c1~dfsg1.orig.tar.xz
> dpkg-source: info: using patch list from debian/patches/series
> dpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to 
src/xrt/ipc/shared/ipcproto/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-311.pyc: binary file 
contents changed
> dpkg-source: error: add 
src/xrt/ipc/shared/ipcproto/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-311.pyc in 
debian/source/include-binaries if you want to store the modified binary in the 
debian tarball
> dpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to 
src/xrt/ipc/shared/ipcproto/__pycache__/common.cpython-311.pyc: binary file 
contents changed
> dpkg-source: error: add 
src/xrt/ipc/shared/ipcproto/__pycache__/common.cpython-311.pyc in 
debian/source/include-binaries if you want to store the modified binary in the 
debian tarball
> dpkg-source: error: unrepresentable changes to source
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b . subprocess returned exit status 1
> 
> E: Command 'cd /<> && runuser -u user42 -- dpkg-buildpackage --sanitize-env -us -uc -rfakeroot -S' failed to run.



The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2023/08/13/monado_21.0.0+git2905.e26a272c1~dfsg1-2_unstable.log

If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects



For some reason I thought that the whole "python binary cache" thing was 
sorted automatically by dh. But it turns out I was able to fix this by 
just adding that directory to debian/clean, which seems simple enough. 
It is in git on salsa and will be in the next upload of the package: 
this did not seem substantial enough to merit a release.


Rylie Pavlik


OpenPGP_0x9045010AE5C2B9ED.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1062911: solvespace: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-03-12 Thread Rylie Pavlik

On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 17:03:41 + Benjamin Drung  wrote:

Source: solvespace
Dear maintainer,

Please find attached a final version of this patch for the time_t
transition.  This patch is being uploaded to unstable.

Note that this adds a versioned build-dependency on dpkg-dev, to guard
against accidental backports with a wrong ABI.

Thanks!


-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.5.0-21-generic (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: unable to detect



Thank you for the patch and NMU! I have imported the debdiff into the 
git repo on Salsa, so the NMU will be "acknowledged" in the next 
maintainer upload of SolveSpace.


Rylie Pavlik


OpenPGP_0x9045010AE5C2B9ED.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature