Bug#651270: hping3: Support for outputting unidirectional latencies
Package: hping3
Version: 3.a2.ds2-6
Severity: wishlist
I'd wish to get something like this included to debian hping3 package
[ytti@sci ~/hping3-3.a2.ds2/debian/patches]% cat
170_unidirectional_latency.diff
Added support for printing unidirectional latencies
[ytti@sci ~/hping3-3.a2.ds2]% ./hping3 -1 --icmp-ts ns.anylayer.com
HPING ns.anylayer.com (eth0 194.150.168.86): icmp mode set, 28 headers + 0 data
bytes
len=46 ip=194.150.168.86 ttl=56 id=997 icmp_seq=0 rtt=38.8 ms
ICMP timestamp: Originate=35412743 Receive=35412758 Transmit=35412758
ICMP timestamp RTT tsrtt=39 src-dst=15 dst-src=24
len=46 ip=194.150.168.86 ttl=56 id=998 icmp_seq=1 rtt=38.6 ms
ICMP timestamp: Originate=35413743 Receive=35413758 Transmit=35413758
ICMP timestamp RTT tsrtt=38 src-dst=15 dst-src=23
--- a/waitpacket.c
+++ b/waitpacket.c
@@ -185,15 +185,17 @@
void log_icmp_ts(void *ts)
{
struct icmp_tstamp_data icmp_tstamp;
+ long unsigned int timestamp = get_midnight_ut_ms();
memcpy(icmp_tstamp, ts, sizeof(icmp_tstamp));
printf(ICMP timestamp: Originate=%u Receive=%u Transmit=%u\n,
(unsigned int) ntohl(icmp_tstamp.orig),
(unsigned int) ntohl(icmp_tstamp.recv),
(unsigned int) ntohl(icmp_tstamp.tran));
- printf(ICMP timestamp RTT tsrtt=%lu\n\n,
- (long unsigned int) (get_midnight_ut_ms()
- - ntohl(icmp_tstamp.orig)));
+ printf(ICMP timestamp RTT tsrtt=%lu src-dst=%lu dst-src=%lu\n\n,
+ (long unsigned int) (timestamp - ntohl(icmp_tstamp.orig)),
+ (long unsigned int) (ntohl(icmp_tstamp.recv) -
ntohl(icmp_tstamp.orig)),
+ (long unsigned int) (timestamp - ntohl(icmp_tstamp.tran)));
}
void log_icmp_addr(void *addrptr)
[ytti@sci ~/hping3-3.a2.ds2/debian/patches]%
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages hping3 depends on:
ii libc6 2.13-21
ii libpcap0.8 1.1.1-10
ii tcl8.4 8.4.19-4
hping3 recommends no packages.
hping3 suggests no packages.
-- debconf-show failed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511564: ckermit: Is dependency to inetd really needed?
On (2009-02-27 02:57 +), Ian Beckwith wrote: tags 511564 + pending Thank you Ian! thanks Hi, On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:22:59AM +0200, Saku Ytti wrote: I feel it's rather odd that ckermit requires inetd. ckermit depends on inetd because IKSD needs it. However, I suspect most people don't use IKSD, so I'm going to weaken it to a Recommends. This requires adding a new debconf template, so I've put out a call for translations. I'll upload in 10 days or so, when the translations have come in. thanks, Ian. -- Ian Beckwith - i...@erislabs.net - http://erislabs.net/ianb/ GPG fingerprint: AF6C C0F1 1E74 424B BCD5 4814 40EC C154 A8BA C1EA Listening to: Mclusky - Day of the Deadringers -- ++ytti -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#516713: dovecot-common: Few problems after todays upgrade
Package: dovecot-common Version: 1:1.1.11-1 Severity: normal Starting IMAP/POP3 mail server: dovecotError: Error in configuration file /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf line 222: Unknown setting: default_mail_env Fatal: Invalid configuration in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf Had to change it from default_mail_env to mail_location, I guess it's been deprecated long time, but I still had it in working config before todays upgrade. Also 'listen = [::]' no longer listens to IPv4 socket, I haven't done kernel upgrades, only dovecot upgrade. 'mail_extra_groups = mail' is also deprecated and should be changed in debian default config. -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages dovecot-common depends on: ii adduser 3.110 add and remove users and groups ii libbz2-1.01.0.5-1high-quality block-sorting file co ii libc6 2.9-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcomerr21.41.3-1 common error description library ii libkrb53 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-6 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libldap-2.4-2 2.4.11-1 OpenLDAP libraries ii libmysqlclient15off 5.0.77-1 MySQL database client library ii libpam-runtime1.0.1-5Runtime support for the PAM librar ii libpam0g 1.0.1-5Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpq58.3.6-1PostgreSQL C client library ii libsqlite3-0 3.5.9-6SQLite 3 shared library ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8g-15 SSL shared libraries ii openssl 0.9.8g-15 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a ii ucf 3.0016 Update Configuration File: preserv ii zlib1g1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-12 compression library - runtime dovecot-common recommends no packages. Versions of packages dovecot-common suggests: pn ntp none (no description available) -- debconf-show failed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#516718: Freshly installed ejabberd fails to start
Package: ejabberd Version: freshly installed ejabberd fails to start Severity: normal [r...@hotelli.ip.fi ~]# ls -la /etc/ejab* zsh: no matches found: /etc/ejab* [1 r...@hotelli.ip.fi ~]# ps aux|grep -i ejab [1 r...@hotelli.ip.fi ~]# apt-get install ejabberd Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Suggested packages: libunix-syslog-perl The following NEW packages will be installed ejabberd 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/1209kB of archives. After this operation, 3445kB of additional disk space will be used. Preconfiguring packages ... Selecting previously deselected package ejabberd. (Reading database ... 50514 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking ejabberd (from .../ejabberd_2.0.3-2_amd64.deb) ... Processing triggers for man-db ... Setting up ejabberd (2.0.3-2) ... adduser: Warning: The home directory `/var/lib/ejabberd' does not belong to the user you are currently creating. Generating SSL certificate /etc/ejabberd/ejabberd.pem... Creating config file /etc/ejabberd/ejabberd.cfg with new version Starting jabber server: ejabberd. Starting jabber server: ejabberd failed. [r...@hotelli.ip.fi ~]# sh -x /etc/init.d/ejabberd start + ctl status + action=status + su ejabberd -c '/usr/sbin/ejabberdctl status' + test 3 = 1 + echo -n . .++ expr 59 + 1 + cnt=60 + '[' 60 -ge 60 ']' + echo -n ' failed' failed+ break + '[' 0 -eq 0 ']' + echo . . + exit 0 [r...@hotelli.ip.fi ~]# I just hit enter on the questions during apt-get install, so localhost and no admin user, just to keep it simple. I do have backup up real config, which broke down during dist-upgrade, but didn't want to have it here to add complexity to the issue. -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages ejabberd depends on: ii adduser3.110 add and remove users and groups ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.25Debian configuration management sy pn erlang-abi-11.b.3 none(no description available) pn erlang-nox none(no description available) ii libc6 2.9-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libexpat1 2.0.1-4 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libpam0g 1.0.1-5 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libssl0.9.80.9.8g-15 SSL shared libraries ii openssl0.9.8g-15 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a ii ucf3.0016Update Configuration File: preserv ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-12 compression library - runtime ejabberd recommends no packages. Versions of packages ejabberd suggests: pn libunix-syslog-perl none (no description available) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#515903: touch: setting times of `foo': Function not implemented
Package: coreutils Version: 6.12-1 Severity: normal Because touch returns error, several things fail, like installing libc6 update today. I suspect this broke with 6.12-1 update. Here is strace from machine in question, running debian touch open(foo, O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK, 0666) = 3 dup2(3, 0) = 0 close(3)= 0 utimensat(0, NULL, NULL, 0) = 280 Here same machine running touch from ubuntu (works normally) open(foo, O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE, 0666) = 0 utimensat(0, NULL, NULL, 0) = -1 ENOSYS (Function not implemented) utimes(/proc/self/fd/0, NULL) = 0 -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages coreutils depends on: ii libacl1 2.2.47-2 Access control list shared library ii libc6 2.9-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libselinux1 2.0.65-5 SELinux shared libraries coreutils recommends no packages. coreutils suggests no packages. -- debconf-show failed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#514960: 'Warning: Couldn't save certificate' - suddenly refuses to save my certificate
Package: mutt Version: 1.5.18-6 Severity: normal I can't pinpoint what changed happened to trigger this. It happened before the latest mutt upgrade. I think it has been happening for 2-3 weeks now. I googled for it and other people seem to often see the same issue, eg: http://does-not-exist.org/mail-archives/mutt-users/msg04066.html But I really don't see anyone finding out what is causing it. I have strace of starting mutt in http://ytti.fi/mutt.strace -- Package-specific info: Mutt 1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Copyright (C) 1996-2008 Michael R. Elkins and others. Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv'. Mutt is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `mutt -vv' for details. System: Linux 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 (x86_64) ncurses: ncurses 5.7.20090207 (compiled with 5.7) libidn: 1.10 (compiled with 1.10) hcache backend: GDBM version 1.8.3. 10/15/2002 (built Aug 27 2008 08:41:43) Compile options: -DOMAIN +DEBUG -HOMESPOOL +USE_SETGID +USE_DOTLOCK +DL_STANDALONE +USE_FCNTL -USE_FLOCK +USE_POP +USE_IMAP +USE_SMTP +USE_GSS -USE_SSL_OPENSSL +USE_SSL_GNUTLS +USE_SASL +HAVE_GETADDRINFO +HAVE_REGCOMP -USE_GNU_REGEX +HAVE_COLOR +HAVE_START_COLOR +HAVE_TYPEAHEAD +HAVE_BKGDSET +HAVE_CURS_SET +HAVE_META +HAVE_RESIZETERM +CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_PGP +CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_SMIME -CRYPT_BACKEND_GPGME -EXACT_ADDRESS -SUN_ATTACHMENT +ENABLE_NLS -LOCALES_HACK +COMPRESSED +HAVE_WC_FUNCS +HAVE_LANGINFO_CODESET +HAVE_LANGINFO_YESEXPR +HAVE_ICONV -ICONV_NONTRANS +HAVE_LIBIDN +HAVE_GETSID +USE_HCACHE -ISPELL SENDMAIL=/usr/sbin/sendmail MAILPATH=/var/mail PKGDATADIR=/usr/share/mutt SYSCONFDIR=/etc EXECSHELL=/bin/sh MIXMASTER=mixmaster To contact the developers, please mail to mutt-...@mutt.org. To report a bug, please visit http://bugs.mutt.org/. patch-1.5.13.cd.ifdef.2 patch-1.5.13.cd.purge_message.3.4 patch-1.5.13.nt+ab.xtitles.4 patch-1.5.4.vk.pgp_verbose_mime patch-1.5.6.dw.maildir-mtime.1 patch-1.5.8.hr.sensible_browser_position.3 -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages mutt depends on: ii libc6 2.7-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcomerr21.41.3-1 common error description library ii libgdbm3 1.8.3-4GNU dbm database routines (runtime ii libgnutls26 2.4.2-6the GNU TLS library - runtime libr ii libidn11 1.10-3 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libkrb53 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-6 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libncursesw5 5.7+20090207-1 shared libraries for terminal hand ii libsasl2-22.1.22.dfsg1-23Cyrus SASL - authentication abstra Versions of packages mutt recommends: ii locales 2.7-18 GNU C Library: National Language ( ii mime-support 3.44-1 MIME files 'mime.types' 'mailcap ii postfix [mail-transport-agent 2.5.5-1.1 High-performance mail transport ag Versions of packages mutt suggests: ii ca-certificates 20080809 Common CA certificates ii gnupg 1.4.9-3 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep ii ispell 3.1.20.0-4.4 International Ispell (an interacti pn mixmaster none (no description available) ii openssl 0.9.8g-15Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a pn urlview none (no description available) Versions of packages mutt is related to: ii mutt 1.5.18-6 text-based mailreader supporting M pn mutt-dbg none (no description available) pn mutt-patched none (no description available) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#514630: ruby1.9: 1.9.1 final available
Package: ruby1.9 Version: 1.9.0.2-9 Severity: wishlist It would be grand to see this available. Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages ruby1.9 depends on: ii libc6 2.7-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libruby1.91.9.0.2-9 Libraries necessary to run Ruby 1. ruby1.9 recommends no packages. Versions of packages ruby1.9 suggests: ii rdoc1.9 1.9.0.2-9 Generate documentation from Ruby s ii ri1.9 1.9.0.2-9 Ruby Interactive reference (for Ru pn ruby1.9-examples none (no description available) pn rubygems1.9 none (no description available) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511564: ckermit: Is dependency to inetd really needed?
Package: ckermit Version: 211-10 Severity: minor I feel it's rather odd that ckermit requires inetd. -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages ckermit depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.24 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.7-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libncurses5 5.7+20090105-1 shared libraries for terminal hand ii libpam0g 1.0.1-5Pluggable Authentication Modules l pn libsocks4 none (no description available) ii openbsd-inetd [inet-super 0.20080125-2 The OpenBSD Internet Superserver Versions of packages ckermit recommends: ii openssh-client [ssh-client] 1:5.1p1-4 secure shell client, an rlogin/rsh ckermit suggests no packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#492447: ssh: (upstream) -o VisualHostKey suggestion
Package: ssh Version: 1:5.1p1-1 Severity: wishlist It might be interesting, if VisualHostKey would use more geometrically connecting characters. Such as, say if we printed character -, it could be followed to the right, by only \, /, -, ., ) etc. Anything that would make it appear as consistent picture to human eye. Also I'd like to believe most terminals are capable of ANSI colours, so that could add accuracy of the identification in very cheap manner, but the colours would need to be also locked to the neighbouring colours, so that it would produce consistent colour theme, instead of random cacophony. Perhaps it could be -o VisualHostKey=colour. Thanks, -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages ssh depends on: ii openssh-client1:5.1p1-1 secure shell client, an rlogin/rsh ii openssh-server1:5.1p1-1 secure shell server, an rshd repla ssh recommends no packages. ssh suggests no packages. -- debconf-show failed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#361253: so whats the status here?
Reading from the mails, it seem there was lot of forward momentum last year to get this packaged, and it seems like zenoss peeps fixed components that lacked proof of openness. But then things just quieted down, is it now only because lack of someone to actually package this or are there some outstanding policy issues which would make it impossible for packet to be included in main? -- ++ytti -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#361253: so whats the status here?
On (2008-07-18 11:08 +0200), Bernd Zeimetz wrote: the problem here is that Zenoss does not work on Zope 2.10 (it doesn't even work on 2.9 - it seems to run fine, but it doesn't...). The developers gave it a try to migrate it to Zope 2.10 but it was too much work so they stopped it. Their plan is to move to Zope 3 or some other Python framework, but there's no real progress unfortunately. Shipping Zope 2.8 in Debian is not an option, neither do we want to maintain such an old version, nor would the security team allow more Zope versions. It's a bit unfortunate as we spent a *lot* of time to get Zenoss into Debian, so I'm really waiting for them to move to a recent application framework. Thank you for for thorough explanation, haven't checked source out yet, but I gather using the framework is not nicely abstracted to set of small methods, so would be large chore. Going to take peek anyhow to get idea of the work needed. -- ++ytti -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#470642: libwww-mechanize-ruby1.8: uri scheme is case sensitive
Package: libwww-mechanize-ruby1.8
Version: 0.7.2-1
Severity: normal
I'm opening
'http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/Bugtool/bugnav2.pl?swver1=fset1=severity1=resultsperpage1=target1=train1=swver=%3Ftarget=%3Ftrain=%3Fmdf_label=Cisco+IOS+Releasesrneflag=0swver2=%3Ftarget2=%3Ftrain2=%3Ffset=%3Foperator=andresultsperpage=500severity=%3C%3D+6statusO=OstatusF=FstatusUC=UCstatusJ=JstatusD=DSubmit=+++Next+++cco_product=IOS'
which redirects to web form based authentication, when I authenticate,
mechanize raises exception:
/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/www/mechanize.rb:432:in `fetch_request': unsupported scheme
(RuntimeError)
This is because the scheme actually was HTTP. I made following change to
mechanize.rb which actually fixes the problem and provides better debug.
432c432
raise unsupported scheme: #{uri.scheme} unless ['http',
'https'].include?(uri.scheme.downcase)
---
raise unsupported scheme unless ['http', 'https'].include?(uri.scheme)
442c442
raise unsupported scheme: #{uri.scheme} unless ['http',
'https'].include?(uri.scheme.downcase)
---
raise unsupported scheme unless ['http', 'https'].include?(uri.scheme)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages libwww-mechanize-ruby1.8 depends on:
ii libhpricot-ruby1.8 0.6-1 A fast, enjoyable HTML parser
ii libopenssl-ruby1.8 1.8.6.114-1 OpenSSL interface for Ruby 1.8
ii ruby1.8 1.8.6.114-1 Interpreter of object-oriented scr
libwww-mechanize-ruby1.8 recommends no packages.
-- debconf-show failed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#460656: libdb4.6: libdb-4.6 complains if services.db does not exists or if it exists but is not RW
Package: libdb4.6 Version: 4.6.21-5 Severity: normal [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]% whois ip.fi 1/dev/null /var/lib/misc/services.db: Permission denied [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]% sudo mv /usr/lib/libdb-4.6.so /usr/lib/libdb-4.6.so.ORG [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]% sudo ln -s /usr/lib/libdb-4.4.so /usr/lib/libdb-4.6.so [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]% whois ip.fi 1/dev/null [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]% Thanks, -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-rc4-xen Locale: LANG=en_GB.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages libdb4.6 depends on: ii libc6 2.7-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries libdb4.6 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#441624: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: libdb4.6: libdb-4.6 complains if services.db does not exists or if it exists but is not RW]
This change had following result on my system. Thanks, - Forwarded message from Saku Ytti [EMAIL PROTECTED] - From: Saku Ytti [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libdb4.6: libdb-4.6 complains if services.db does not exists or if it exists but is not RW Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:55:45 +0200 Package: libdb4.6 Version: 4.6.21-5 Severity: normal [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]% whois ip.fi 1/dev/null /var/lib/misc/services.db: Permission denied [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]% sudo mv /usr/lib/libdb-4.6.so /usr/lib/libdb-4.6.so.ORG [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]% sudo ln -s /usr/lib/libdb-4.4.so /usr/lib/libdb-4.6.so [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]% whois ip.fi 1/dev/null [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]% Thanks, -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-rc4-xen Locale: LANG=en_GB.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages libdb4.6 depends on: ii libc6 2.7-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries libdb4.6 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information - End forwarded message - -- ++ytti -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#422670: ruby1.9: Upgrade to latest CVS (one with YARV) would be appreciated
Package: ruby1.9 Version: 1.9.0+20060609-1 Severity: wishlist Subject should cover it all, thanks :). -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-rc4-xen Locale: LANG=fi_FI, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages ruby1.9 depends on: ii libc6 2.5-5GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libruby1.9 1.9.0+20060609-1 Libraries necessary to run Ruby 1. ruby1.9 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#420909: libwww-mechanize-ruby1.8: should depend to hpricot = 0.5
Package: libwww-mechanize-ruby1.8 Version: 0.6.8-1 Severity: important Lot of urls are broken, such as 'https://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/'. Without installing hpricot 0.5 from ruby gems. Error returned is this: /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/net/http.rb:567: warning: using default DH parameters. /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/mechanize/page_elements.rb:23:in `initialize': undefined method `inner_text' for #Hpricot::Elem:0x2b41011ab7e8 (NoMethodError) from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/mechanize/page.rb:87:in `new' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/mechanize/page.rb:87:in `parse_html' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/mechanize/page.rb:86:in `each' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/mechanize/page.rb:86:in `parse_html' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/mechanize/page.rb:38:in `initialize' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/mechanize.rb:478:in `new' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/mechanize.rb:478:in `fetch_page' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/net/http.rb:1050:in `request' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/net/http.rb:2133:in `reading_body' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/net/http.rb:1049:in `request' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/mechanize.rb:443:in `fetch_page' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/mechanize.rb:172:in `get' from ./moi.rb:17 -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-rc4-xen Locale: LANG=fi_FI, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages libwww-mechanize-ruby1.8 depends on: ii libhpricot-ruby1.80.4-1 A fast, enjoyable HTML parser ii libopenssl-ruby1.81.8.6-1+b1 OpenSSL interface for Ruby 1.8 ii ruby1.8 1.8.6-1+b1 Interpreter of object-oriented scr libwww-mechanize-ruby1.8 recommends no packages. -- debconf-show failed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#416765: postfix: daemon does not start
AOLme too/AOL AMD64 system with 2.6.16-rc4-xen -- ++ytti -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#411108: VPNC Rekeying supported in =SVN-r126
Hear hear. Here's another polite petition to get this in debian as fast as possible. Thank you, -- ++ytti -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404672: rtorrent 0.7.0 is available
Package: rtorrent Version: 0.6.4-1 Severity: wishlist pim -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-rc4-xen Locale: LANG=fi_FI, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages rtorrent depends on: ii libc62.3.6.ds1-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcomer 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-1 common error description library ii libcurl3 7.15.5-1Multi-protocol file transfer libra ii libgcc1 1:4.1.1-21 GCC support library ii libidn11 0.6.5-1 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libkrb53 1.4.4-5 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libncurs 5.5-5 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libsigc+ 2.0.17-2type-safe Signal Framework for C++ ii libssl0. 0.9.8c-4SSL shared libraries ii libstdc+ 4.1.1-21The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libtorre 0.10.4-1a C++ BitTorrent library ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime rtorrent recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#386369: locales not installable?
I had experimental(?) version 2.3.999.2, but not experiemental locales. I rolled back to 2.3.6.ds1-4, and it worked fine (as expected). Thanks, -- ++ytti -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#386369: locales not installable?
Package: locales Version: 2.3.6.ds1-4 Severity: normal [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# apt-get install locales Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: locales: Depends: glibc-2.3.6.ds1-1 E: Broken packages [100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# apt-get install locales-all Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: locales-all: Depends: glibc-2.3.6.ds1-1 E: Broken packages [100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-rc4-xen Locale: LANG=fi_FI, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI (charmap=locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages locales depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.3 Debian configuration management sy pn glibc-2.3.6.ds1-1 none (no description available) locales recommends no packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#385950: libpam-ldap: Broken regexp in postinst script
Package: libpam-ldap Version: 180-1.1 Severity: important perl -i -p -e s/$replacestring/$parameter $value/i doesn't go well with 'ldaps://127.0.0.1/', some other separator must be used, or /'s need to be escaped. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-rc4-xen Locale: LANG=fi_FI, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages libpam-ldap depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.3Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libldap22.1.30-13+b1 OpenLDAP libraries ii libpam0g0.79-3.2 Pluggable Authentication Modules l libpam-ldap recommends no packages. -- debconf information: * shared/ldapns/base-dn: dc=ytti,dc=fi libpam-ldap/override: true * shared/ldapns/ldap_version: 3 * libpam-ldap/dblogin: false * shared/ldapns/ldap-server: ldaps://127.0.0.1/ * libpam-ldap/pam_password: md5 libpam-ldap/binddn: cn=proxyuser,dc=example,dc=net * libpam-ldap/rootbinddn: cn=admin,dc=ytti,dc=fi * libpam-ldap/dbrootlogin: true -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#383886: rtorrent 0.6.1 is available
Package: rtorrent Version: 0.6.0-1 Severity: wishlist . -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-rc4-xen Locale: LANG=fi_FI, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages rtorrent depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcomerr2 1.39-1common error description library ii libcurl3 7.15.5-1 Multi-protocol file transfer libra ii libgcc11:4.1.1-11GCC support library ii libidn11 0.6.5-1 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libkrb53 1.4.4~beta1-1 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libncurses55.5-2 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libsigc++-2.0-0c2a 2.0.16-3 type-safe Signal Framework for C++ ii libssl0.9.80.9.8b-2 SSL shared libraries ii libstdc++6 4.1.1-11 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libtorrent80.10.0-1 a C++ BitTorrent library ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13compression library - runtime rtorrent recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#271051: Bug#342249: Help proposal :) [u]
On (2006-02-12 23:46 -0800), Jeremy T. Bouse [c] wrote: Cheers everyone! I'm currently dealing with password recovery for Alioth at this time. I expect to get that dealt with in short order as soon as I get the email. After doing so I'm going to begin working towards setting up an Alioth project for Xen packaging. I've got two i386 and one amd64 machines running locally to work on Xen with and frankly I'm tired of the absence of any decent packaging and the total void that is called the current maintainership of the package. The list of unresolved bugs range from over 60 days to a year and a half. The last upload was almost 6 months ago for 2.0.6 which has since had 2.0.7, 3.0.0 and 3.0.1 released since then. I'll begin the work and welcome those wanting to assist, which will give Adam more time to decide whether he wishes to finally make an appearance and respond to the maintaining of Xen before I begin to deal with attempting a hostile take-over of maintainership which I would rather not do but in the void of any response seems the only course for the benefit of Xen within Debian. I've CC'd Ralph Passgang, he's previously expressed his will to help packaging XEN to debian. He's done unofficials packages which work very nicely, although do not comply 100% to debian standards. Thanks in advance for taking steps to bring updated XEN to debian. And if at all possible, I'd like to see unstable packaged too. Guido Trotter wrote: On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 03:59:21PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote: Hi Everybody! Since I really would like official Xen 3.0 packages, I am just offering help about packaging this. Adam, I don't know if you have time for this or not, but if you can at least let me know if you need help, and how I can help, it would be great ! Yeah, I agree we should do something on Xen's status? How about the idea of starting a project on Alioth as Jeremy said, and going to group maintenance? Adam, can you please comment on this... Even a fine with me, go ahead or a no, please, don't would be nice... If nobody hears from you probably someone will just end up doing it anyway, so it's better if you can speak up, please! :) Thanks, Guido -- ++ytti -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347348: please include dovecot-lda
Package: dovecot Severity: wishlist dovecot-lda allows, eg. you to use sieve. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14 Locale: LANG=fi_FI, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342249: AOLme too/AOL
Hello Adam! (CC'd Guido, please let me know if you don't want to be CC in any further correspondence) I'd greatly appreciate XEN3.0 packages too, I know Ralph Passgang has done some great work on this, but unfortunately he lacks access to AMD64 machine to build binary packages to it, which I'd need and apparently quite a few other users in debian community. Also he hasn't packaged xen-unstable, which should(?) work with newer kernels than 2.6.12. So my humble feature request would be: xen64 binary packages for xen3.0 and xen unstable linux-xen-patch package for amd64 for xen3.0 and xen unstable, which kernel-package integration. (to run as recent kernel as possible) Thank you ever so much, -- ++ytti -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#345144: add usagi modules to iptables package, or just even libip6t_state.so
Package: iptables Version: 1.3.3-2 Severity: wishlist Would be greatly appreciated. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14 Locale: LANG=fi_FI, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages iptables depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries an iptables recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#345214: zsh: %m and %M are expanded identically to hostname, %m regardless of numeric parmeter
Package: zsh Version: 4.3.0-dev-2-1 Severity: minor -foo- PS1=-%M- -foo- PS1=-%m- -foo- PS1=-%2m- -foo- PS1=-%-1m- -foo- Tried on two debian/unstable boxes, same results. On freebsd box: zsh 4.2.6 (i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) I have no problem with above. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14 Locale: LANG=fi_FI, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages zsh depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.66 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.5-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libncurses5 5.5-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand Versions of packages zsh recommends: ii libcap1 1:1.10-14 support for getting/setting POSIX. ii libpcre3 6.4-1.1Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi -- debconf information excluded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#345214: same with zsh, zsh30 and zsh-beta
All zsh packages seem to suffer from same issue, so may not be zsh's problem, but something else, like utmp. -- ++ytti -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#345214: zsh: %m and %M are expanded identically to hostname, %m regardless of numeric parmeter
On (2005-12-29 12:47 -0500), Clint Adams wrote: Tried on two debian/unstable boxes, same results. On freebsd box: zsh 4.2.6 (i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) I have no problem with above. What is the value of $HOST in each of these cases? On the freebsd that works, FQDN. On the debian/unstable boxes hostname (everything before first dot) -foo- PS1=-%M- -foo- echo $HOST foo I noticed same behaviour in all zsh packages, so it's indeed probably not zsh's problems. -- ++ytti -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#345214: zsh: %m and %M are expanded identically to hostname, %m regardless of numeric parmeter
On (2005-12-29 19:53 +0200), Saku Ytti wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# hostname foo.ytti.fi hostname: the specified hostname is invalid After this, even though it complains, it works. So apparently sethostname is ran regardless of the 'error' in hostname. Dunno where the bug should be, definitely not in zsh. On (2005-12-29 12:47 -0500), Clint Adams wrote: Tried on two debian/unstable boxes, same results. On freebsd box: zsh 4.2.6 (i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) I have no problem with above. What is the value of $HOST in each of these cases? On the freebsd that works, FQDN. On the debian/unstable boxes hostname (everything before first dot) -foo- PS1=-%M- -foo- echo $HOST foo I noticed same behaviour in all zsh packages, so it's indeed probably not zsh's problems. -- ++ytti -- ++ytti -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#345214: zsh: %m and %M are expanded identically to hostname, %m regardless of numeric parmeter
On (2005-12-29 21:21 +0200), Saku Ytti wrote: There seems to be another bug on this issue: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=341763 while this probably isn't only place the bug should be, yes 'hostname' shouldn't complain, but still debian/unstable installation is doing something wrong, as all fresh debian/unstable installations will return only hostname (up until first dot) part when 'hostname' command is issued. Very complex, as you'd really expect hostname to return hostname not FQDN, but it doesn't seem to be proper way. On (2005-12-29 19:53 +0200), Saku Ytti wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# hostname foo.ytti.fi hostname: the specified hostname is invalid After this, even though it complains, it works. So apparently sethostname is ran regardless of the 'error' in hostname. Dunno where the bug should be, definitely not in zsh. On (2005-12-29 12:47 -0500), Clint Adams wrote: Tried on two debian/unstable boxes, same results. On freebsd box: zsh 4.2.6 (i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) I have no problem with above. What is the value of $HOST in each of these cases? On the freebsd that works, FQDN. On the debian/unstable boxes hostname (everything before first dot) -foo- PS1=-%M- -foo- echo $HOST foo I noticed same behaviour in all zsh packages, so it's indeed probably not zsh's problems. -- ++ytti -- ++ytti -- ++ytti -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#341763: further more it breaks things like zsh
In redhat and freebsd 'hostname' will print FQDN, which will result zsh to have FQDN in '$HOST', which makes it possible to use %M and %m in eg. prompt/xterm title to print either hostname or FQDN. As debian/unstable only accepts host not FQDN, $HOST will end up having only hostname, and thus %M and %m in zsh will return same string, and returning FQDN in PS1/xterm title is impossible. I do have to say that this is quite confusing, to more confuse this, 'hostname' actually _does set_ 'foo.bar.baz' happily, will just complain. So I'm not 100% sure where the error is, every debian/unstable installation will return only hostname part (before first dot) when 'hostname' is issued, thus in all debian/unstable installations %M and %m will only return up until first dot. -- ++ytti -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#339363: 1.5.0RC1 out, new experimental or time for unstable?
RC1 was released 19th day, would this be acceptable for unstable? If not, could we get new experiemental release. Thanks, -- ++ytti -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#339363: 1.5.0RC1 out, new experimental or time for unstable?
On (2005-12-21 12:43 +0100), Jonas Smedegaard wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:06:35 +0200 Saku Ytti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RC1 was released 19th day, would this be acceptable for unstable? If not, could we get new experiemental release. Sure - I'll post it to unstable this time! Well that was fast reply :) Thanks alot. Thanks for noticing! Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDqT/an7DbMsAkQLgRAr2QAKCdpTzCTGh8cFAfQMYQHytX5/QR6gCfZI1m c6JLH4+fUMMvxweouqFcOZM= =2TcE -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ++ytti
Bug#332384: dovecot-imapd: Please include zlib-plugin with debian deb
Package: dovecot-imapd Version: 1.0.alpha3-1 Severity: wishlist http://www.dovecot.org/patches/1.0/zlib-plugin.tar.gz This allows dovecot to read gzpipped mboxes. Debian was one of the firsts to include support for gzipped mboxes to mutt before it was offically supported, I'd hope that dovecot would do the same. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-rc4 Locale: LANG=fi_FI, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages dovecot-imapd depends on: ii dovecot-common 1.0.alpha3-1 secure mail server that supports m ii libc6 2.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7g-3 SSL shared libraries dovecot-imapd recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
