Bug#750756: closed by Tobias Frost ()

2015-11-29 Thread Stanislav German-Evtushenko
Hi Tobi,

The problem is that it is not possible just to disable recommends for this
particular package when I do automated installation with preseeding or any
other way.

Best regards,
Stanislav

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 2:09 AM, Debian Bug Tracking System <
ow...@bugs.debian.org> wrote:

> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the smartmontools package:
>
> #750756: smartmontools: mailx should be in suggests rather than recommends
>
> It has been closed by Tobias Frost .
>
> Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
> If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
> better one in a separate message then please contact Tobias Frost <
> t...@debian.org> by
> replying to this email.
>
>
> --
> 750756: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750756
> Debian Bug Tracking System
> Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Tobias Frost 
> To: 750756-d...@bugs.debian.org
> Cc:
> Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 18:07:20 +0100
> Subject:
> Dear Stanislav,
>
> You can install any package that provides mailx, if you want.
> Also, you can configure apt not to pull in Recommends.
>
> Otherwise, "Recommends" as per Policy defines
> "The Recommends field should list packages that would be found together
> with this one in all but unusual installations."
>
> and this is here the case.
>
> Closing.
>
> --
> tobi
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Stanislav German-Evtushenko 
> To: mainto...@bugs.debian.org
> Cc:
> Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 18:48:56 +0400
> Subject: smartmontools: mailx should be in suggests rather than recommends
> Package: smartmontools
> Version: 6.2+svn3841-1.2
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> smartmontools installs mailx by default as it is in recommends. It seems
> not a proper behaviour.
>
> So if I install smartmontools it also installs not only mailx but also
> mail-transport-agent which is not required in most cases.
>
> Best regards,
> Stanislav
>
>


Bug#755992: does this happen on wheezy to

2014-07-28 Thread Stanislav German-Evtushenko
> on which?
I have tested on Debian Wheezy and Ubuntu Trusty. The same error on both.


On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Holger Levsen 
wrote:

> Hi Stanislav,
>
> On Montag, 28. Juli 2014, Stanislav German-Evtushenko wrote:
> > I have checked a binary on the only one distribution
>
> on which?
>
> > however I have
> > compared the source code on different distributions and it's completely
> the
> > same.
>
> different library versions might be the culprit...
>
>
> cheers,
> Holger
>



-- 
www.helplinux.ru - Найди себе Гуру


Bug#755992: does this happen on wheezy to

2014-07-27 Thread Stanislav German-Evtushenko
Hi Holger,

I have checked a binary on the only one distribution however I have
compared the source code on different distributions and it's completely the
same.

Cheers,
Stanislav




On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Holger Levsen 
wrote:

> control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> does "proftpd-mod-clamav: error: Can not stat file (9): Bad file
> descriptor"
> also happen on wheezy or "just" on sid or jessie?
>
>
> cheers,
> Holger
>
>


-- 
www.helplinux.ru - Найди себе Гуру


Bug#755992: proftpd-mod-clamav: error: Can not stat file (9): Bad file descriptor

2014-07-25 Thread Stanislav German-Evtushenko
Package: proftpd-mod-clamav
Version: 0.10-1
Severity: critical

Dear Maintainer,

mod_clamav.c doesn't work and reports "error: Can not stat file (9): Bad
file descriptor" on a new file coming to ftp folder. As I discovered with
strace it closes a file descriptor before it tries to "stat" that
descriptor.

Best regards,
Stanislav