Bug#787945: Bad build of 0.83.3.1 for jessie
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 04:12:30PM +0200, Michael Vogt wrote: > Fix is uploaded. Thank you. There is also a duplicate of this bug, that can be merged: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788066 There seem to be several similar, still open bugs for older releases, so maybe you can close them or fix them with a similar upload to clean up the bug overview page a litte: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647883 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602107 and maybe: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597061 Regards Till -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#787945: Bad build of 0.83.3.1 for jessie
Hi, unattendend-upgrades-0.83.3.1 seems to have been built on a Ubuntu system instead of a Debian system, therefore it contains the Ubuntu config file: https://sources.debian.net/src/unattended-upgrades/0.83.3.1/data/50unattended-upgrades.Ubuntu/ instead of the Debian one: https://sources.debian.net/src/unattended-upgrades/0.83.3.1/data/50unattended-upgrades.Debian/ There are not logs at https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=unattended-upgrades&suite=jessie which indicates that the build did not happen on a clean Debian build system. Therefore please re-build the package with the proper Debian config file. Regards Till -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662960: Improved TLS validation (hostname validation still missing)
There is an improved patch in Fedora, that validates the CA but still not the hostname: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ssmtp.git/tree/ssmtp-validate-TLS-server-cert.patch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#743286: dynamic motd inconsistencies
Package: libpam-modules Version: 1.1.3-7.1 libpam-modules contains pam_motd, which should disaplay a motd and update it dynamically. The man page states, that there is an option noupdate to disable updating the motd, otherwise it is updated. By default /etc/pam.d/sshd contains lines like session optional pam_motd.so motd=/run/motd.dynamic noupdate session optional pam_motd.so The last entry makes pam_motd.so show /etc/motd - and makes it also update a third motd file (that is not mentioned anywhere except in the source code): /var/run/motd The latter path is hardcoded here: http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/pam/1.1.1-6.1+squeeze1/update-motd Also /run/motd.dynamic is updated by a init.d script, that only writes the output of uname into it, ignoring scripts in /etc/update-motd.d, that are used by pam_motd.so to update /var/run/motd. This is not a clean design and badly documented. Therefore I propose the following changes: 1) Make the motd init script use /etc/update-motd.d and the uname command to a script there 2) Fix pam_motd.so to update the motd file given in the motd option instead of always /var/run/motd 3) Change the sshd pam config to: session optional pam_motd.so motd=/run/motd.dynamic session optional pam_motd.so noupdate -> This will first show the dynamic motd and update it if required. Then it will show /etc/motd, that can contain static contents. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#732627: Acknowledgement (sftp DH 8192 support broken in proftpd-basic)
FYI: The patch in Fedora's openssh is backported from http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/ssh/dh.c?rev=1.53 Therefore it might appear in Debian as well. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#732627: sftp DH 8192 support broken in proftpd-basic
Package: proftpd-basic Version: 1.3.41-5+deb7u1 mod_sftp in proftpd-basic does not support diffie hellman with 8192 bits, which is used e.g. by Fedora for 256 bit symmetric keys. There are at least two issues: - the shipped dhparams.pem file does not contain respective params - Buffers in proftpd are to small References: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044586 http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4001 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#696144: 20_head_tests.cf: regex for illegal IP address contains valid network 5/8
Package: spamassassin Version: 3.3.1-1: all Severity: important Spamassassin contains a rule to identify 5/8 as a bad network despite it beeing allocated in 2010-11. Somehow this network was missed when the bug reported in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609006 was fixed. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.6 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: armel (armv5tel) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-kirkwood Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#564589: python-kid does not escape ]]> as ]]> in serialization.py
Package: python-kid Version: 0.9.6-1 Python-kid does not excape ]]> to ]]> in serialization.py as it is required by the XML standard. ]]> may only be used to end a CDATA section: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml11-20060816/#syntax A patch used in Fedora is available here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=382805 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#473667: [Vym-devel] vym: default web browser should be sensible-browser
On Tuesday 24 June 2008 10:57:54 Xavier Oswald wrote: > vym tries to use konqueror by default for opening URLs, even if > konqueror isn't installed. In cvs, there is a patch applied that makes xdg-open the default browser/pdf reader in vym. > It would be much better if it used sensible-browser to open URLs so it uses > the defaut configured browser. It seems to me that sensible-browser is a debian specific solution and does the same that xdg-open does, except that xdg-open can be used to open arbitrary files and urls. Therefore I guess you need to wait until there is a new vym release or use this patch: https://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/vym/devel/vym-1.10.0-xdg-open.patch?rev=1.1&view=log Regards, Till signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#454323: vim-latex
Hiyas, On Wed May 14 2008, martin f krafft wrote: > I see that you're making regular commits to vim-latex still. The > Debian package has been orphaned and as a heavy vim-latex user, I am > considering adopting it, but I need an upstream I can work with. I just started working on vim-latex and I do not have very much experience with writing vim plugins. My primary intention was to be a mediator between the vim-latex community and upstream, i.e. applying patches that are submitted or exist in distributions. I will also fix bugs that are trivial enough that I understand them. > Are you planning to make a new release any time soon? There have not yet been many changes to vim-latex, iirc I only applied one patch to the code and with all other commits I cleaned up the homepage. Once I applied or reviewed most of the patches I can find somewhere, I will probably create a new release. > Also, would you be willing to have a look through the bugs reported > at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=vim-latexsuite > and see which ones still apply to the current SVN revision? I guess everyone does still apply to the current SVN revision, but thank you for this URL, I will try to work through the list and see what I can do to fix the bugs. Regards, Till signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
