Bug#600520: Squid requires restart after Network Manager made connection to network
Package: squid Version: 2.7.STABLE3-4.1lenny1 See Ubuntu Bug Tracker: https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/squid/+bug/97513 It describes the bug very well and even has a solution. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#600521: Squid3 should start up after NetworkManager has brought up the network interface
Package: squid3 Version: 3.0.STABLE8-3+lenny4 See Ubuntu Bug Tracker: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid3/+bug/661066 It describes the bug very well and even has a solution. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#369924: soffice in PATH missing - automatic soffice starting from jar not possible
Package: openoffice.org Version: 2.0.2-3 I created a jar with additional functionality for OpenOffice. OpenOffice provides some classes (delivered in package openoffice.org-dev) that automatically detect the OO installation for my jar. This functionality is described here: http://codesnippets.services.openoffice.org/Office/Office.BootstrapOpenOffice.snip But: these classes need soffice (or ooffice) in PATH environment or just a link to the soffice executeable. The current ooffice executeable doesn't work. Solutions: - add a link /usr/bin/soffice to /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice - don't add additional functionality to /usr/bin/ooffice and replace it with a link in first solution. Thanks, Tobias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#369924: soffice in PATH missing - automatic soffice starting from jar not possible
Hi Rene, Am Freitag, 2. Juni 2006 09:54 schrieb Tobias Krais: Solutions: - add a link /usr/bin/soffice to /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice - don't add additional functionality to /usr/bin/ooffice and replace it with a link in first solution. Would symlinking soffice to the current ooffice work, too? No. Please see following link: http://api.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=devmsgNo=14792 after adding the link to the soffice executable it worked out, altough I told in the link above it didn't work. Greetings, Tobias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#369924: soffice in PATH missing - automatic soffice starting from jar not possible
Hi Rene and also api.openoffice.org-list, short description for the API list (esp. Jürgen Schmid): in February you told me how to use the class loaders for bootstraping OO. You will remember it looking at this code snippet: http://codesnippets.services.openoffice.org/Office/Office.BootstrapOpenOffice.snip Now I reportet a Debian because linking the soffice executable solves the problem. We ask for your opinion. Solutions: - add a link /usr/bin/soffice to /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice - don't add additional functionality to /usr/bin/ooffice and replace it with a link in first solution. Would symlinking soffice to the current ooffice work, too? No. Please see following link: http://api.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=devmsgNo=14792 after adding the link to the soffice executable it worked out, altough I told in the link above it didn't work. There's no soffice executable, that's why I asked. soffice is a sh script calling soffice.bin. Which is similar to ooffice as perl script calling soffice. (Or, if we change to ooqstart-invocation completely in the future, just a sh script calling ooqstart (C-Program) calling soffice) If only the link to /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice makes sense. DAMN. Because a soffice binary might encourage normal users to run that instead of the oo*. Do you know exactly under which circumnstances it works and with which not? Not more as I did up to now. Removing the link from /usr/bin/soffice to /usr/lib/openoffice/programm/soffice stops the class loaders from working. API-List: What makes the soffice exec so special that it only works with the soffice exec? Your help is appreciated. Greetings, Tobias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#350564: Please upgrade to 1.9.20beta because several bugs are solved in it
Package: libchipcard2-tools Version: 1.9.15.99+1.9.16alpha-1 In following thread is my problem dicussed: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=9589318forum_id=601 With Version 1.9.20beta, this problem seems to be solved. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
