Bug#345207: solfege: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD
Thanks. I will include the patch when I upload 3.0.6. Tom Cato On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 05:48:03PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Package: solfege > Severity: important > Tags: patch > > Hi, > > solfege fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD because it unconditionaly > include a linux specific header, even if it is not need (because of > conditional code). As the check is done in the configure script, the fix > is just to add a simple #ifdef. > > You will find attached a patch to fix that. It would be nice if you > could apply it in the next upload. > > Thanks in advance, > Aurelien > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: testing/unstable > Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i686) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash > Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.4-1-686 > Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Status: in BTS > Author: aurel32 -- Tom Cato Amundsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.solfege.org/ GNU Solfege - free ear traininghttp://www.gnu.org/software/solfege/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300447: New upstream version available
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 11:44:58PM +0300, Dan Korostelev wrote: > Package: solfege > Severity: minor > > There's version 2.2.0 of GNU Solfege available. Please, update Debian > package. Thanks for maintaining it! I have uploaded 2.2.2 to experimental. You can apt-get it or download it from ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/solfege/ after the next dinstall run. (I think it is run at least once a day.) Let me know what you think about the package. We are sort of trying to make a release, so I'm not shure if I want to upload 2.2.2 to unstable. -- Tom Cato Amundsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.solfege.org/ GNU Solfege - free ear traininghttp://www.gnu.org/software/solfege/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#314994: O: python-slang
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I'm orphaning this because I don't have time/interest to fix it to rebuild it with slang2. The only package depending on it is woody (outliner/todo editor) which I also will orphan because I don't use it any more. IMO, we should just remove this package from the archive. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11tc1 Locale: LANG=no_NO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=no_NO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#314996: O: woody
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I'm orphaning woody because I don't use it, and it has not been any upstream activity since august 2000. It depends on python-slang that I also have orphaned. Woody is a hierarchical text editor/outliner. It allows you to group related bits of information together into a common meaningful category. It is similar to BrainForest for the Palm Pilot. The program is ideal for maintaining TODO files. The program stores the files in xml, but can export to plain text files. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11tc1 Locale: LANG=no_NO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=no_NO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#291760: woody: bad email address for upstream author
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 04:50:45PM -0800, Ross Boylan wrote: > Package: woody > Version: 0.1.6-10 > Severity: minor > > The README gives upstream maintainer's edress as > [EMAIL PROTECTED] That doesn't work anymore. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > host cheerful-com.mr.outblaze.com [205.158.62.33]: > 550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: User unknown > > As you've noticed, the project seems basically dead, though it has > moved to sourceforge. > http://sourceforge.net/projects/woody/ > > Apparently a few tweaks have been put in cvs; not sure if they are in > Debian. > > Any suggestions for a more active replacement? I noticed someone > suggested pdesk in the woody forum. pdesk doesn't seem to be packaged > for Debian. I don't know any good replacements for woody. I liked it because it was a console program and could be used fast and without a keyboard. Don't know if you have tried gtodo? > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: 3.1 > APT prefers testing > APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (40, 'experimental') > Architecture: i386 (i686) > Kernel: Linux 2.4.27adnvcd > Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > > Versions of packages woody depends on: > ii python 2.3.4-5 An interactive high-level > object-o > ii python-slang 0.2.0-7.1 Python bindings for S-LANG > > -- no debconf information > -- Tom Cato Amundsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.solfege.org/ GNU Solfege - free ear traininghttp://www.gnu.org/software/solfege/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#372805: gawk 3.1.5.dfsg-4 breaks txt2man, 3.1.4-2 is ok
Package: gawk Version: 1:3.1.5.dfsg-4 Severity: normal Upgrading gawk to 3.1.5.dfsg-4 make txt2man generate bad output. In the options section of the generated manpage, options should be written like this: .TP .B \-v, --version but when gawk is upgraded to 3.1.5.dfsg-4, the following is generated: .TP .B \\fB-v\fP, \fB--version\fP I'm not sure if this bug belongs to txt2man or gawk, so you got it... -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (600, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.16tc1 Locale: LANG=no_NO, LC_CTYPE=no_NO (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages gawk depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#374757: UNS: Bug#374757: Solfege and python
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 06:07:28PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: > I've been seeing this problem too for quite awhile, and would be glad > if it were fixed. I'll try to improve the packaging in a few weeks, when there is less to do at work. Lets hope the python-policy chaos settles down soon, because the current state is very frustrating. -- Tom Cato Amundsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.solfege.org/ GNU Solfege - free ear traininghttp://www.gnu.org/software/solfege/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379436: Time for removal of python-orbit?
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 04:48:49PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > Package: python-orbit > Severity: important > > Hi, > > This package seems useless as no other package Depends or Recommends > it. I think it's time to remove python-orbit. Would you mind if I > request removal of python-orbit to the ftpmasters? No I wouldn't, please do so. > > python-gnome is already pending removal, see #368515, so python-orbit > will probably be quite useless soon. > >Bye, > -- > Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- Tom Cato Amundsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.solfege.org/ GNU Solfege - free ear traininghttp://www.gnu.org/software/solfege/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#389524: solfege: unable to upgrade to 3.4.1
I can see why you get this problem, but my update-python-modules scripts does not complain as yours does. Which version of python-support do you have installed? -- Tom Cato Amundsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.solfege.org/ GNU Solfege - free ear traininghttp://www.gnu.org/software/solfege/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#389524: solfege: unable to upgrade to 3.4.1
Please test solfege 3.5.2-0.1 from http://tcamundsen.net/testsolfege/ It includes code that adds the missing solfege.dirs file if we are upgrading from a version where it is missing. Let me know if this works ok. -- Tom Cato Amundsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.solfege.org/ GNU Solfege - free ear traininghttp://www.gnu.org/software/solfege/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#428483: O: gnomermind
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I'm orphaning this. I suggest we remove this from the archive unless someone want to maintain this. This is a GNOME 1 package. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (700, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-486 Locale: LANG=nb_NO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nb_NO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#428485: O: gnome-breakout
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I'm orphaning this. I suggest we remove it from the archive if nobody want to maintain this. This is a GNOME 1 package. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (700, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-486 Locale: LANG=nb_NO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nb_NO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#399214: solfege: Fails to upgrade (3.0.6-1 -> 3.6.3-1); cannot remove it as well
Hello, can you please send me the file /var/lib/dpkg/info/solfege.prerm ? Tom Cato -- Tom Cato Amundsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.solfege.org/ GNU Solfege - free ear traininghttp://www.gnu.org/software/solfege/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#399214: Re: Bug#399214: solfege: Fails to upgrade (3.0.6-1 -> 3.6.3-1); cannot remove it as well
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 03:01:36PM -0700, Ron Jensen wrote: > Not the original reporter, but I see it too: First, do you still have the .deb for 3.0.6 lying around somewhere? For example in /var/cache/apt/archives? If so, can you send it to me (no need to cc the bts.)? I don't have the binary package around any longer, and there are no guarantee that rebuilding the package create the exact same package. Does the file /usr/share/python-support/solfege.dirs exist? If not, does it help if you create the file by running # echo "/usr/share/solfege" > /usr/share/python-support/solfege.dirs as root. I am not sure what is causing this bug, but I think it is my fault doing stupid things with python-support while trying to learn the new python policy. -- Tom Cato Amundsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.solfege.org/ GNU Solfege - free ear traininghttp://www.gnu.org/software/solfege/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351145: Please stop build modules for python2.1/python2.2
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 07:17:12PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote: > I'm going to NMU that, because it blocks the amd64 archive rebuild, > and because of [1]. Thank you! I forgot to fix this. Tom Cato > > I've also make the package build python2.4 modules. new diff for the > package is attached. > > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2006/04/msg5.html > > uploaded in delayed/7 > > -- > ·O· Pierre Habouzit > ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] > OOO http://www.madism.org -- Tom Cato Amundsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.solfege.org/ GNU Solfege - free ear traininghttp://www.gnu.org/software/solfege/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#314412: have you loaded softfonts?
I think your sound card need to load some softfonts before the seqencer can play sounds. Have you done this? -- Tom Cato Amundsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.solfege.org/ GNU Solfege - free ear traininghttp://www.gnu.org/software/solfege/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
