Bug#811625: [pkg-firebird-general] Bug#811625: FTBFS with GCC 6: cannot convert x to y
Here is the patch applied already to 2.5.x branch http://sourceforge.net/p/firebird/mailman/message/34780657/ On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Package: firebird2.5 > Version: 2.5.5.26952.ds4-3 > Severity: important > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-6 gcc-6-cannot-convert > > This package fails to build with GCC 6. GCC 6 has not been released > yet, but it's expected that GCC 6 will become the default compiler for > stretch. > > Note that only the first error is reported; there might be more. You > can find a snapshot of GCC 6 in experimental. To build with GCC 6, > you can set CC=gcc-6 CXX=g++-6 explicitly. > > > sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.67.0 (26 Dec 2015) on dl580gen9-02.hlinux > ... > > g++ -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -DBOOT_BUILD -I../src/include/gen > -I../src/include -I../src/vulcan -DNAMESPACE=Vulcan -DNDEBUG -ggdb > -DFB_SEND_FLAGS=MSG_NOSIGNAL -DLINUX -DAMD64 -pipe -MMD -fPIC > -fmessage-length=0 -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -pthread -g -O2 > -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fno-rtti -c > ../src/common/utils.cpp -o ../temp/boot/common/utils.o > > ../src/gpre/sqe.cpp: In function 'gpre_nod* > par_primitive_value(gpre_req*, bool, USHORT*, bool*)': > > ../src/gpre/sqe.cpp:2532:86: error: cannot convert 'bool' to 'bool*' for > argument '4' to 'gpre_nod* par_primitive_value(gpre_req*, bool, USHORT*, > bool*)' > >return MSC_unary(nod_negate, par_primitive_value(request, false, > paren_count, false)); > > > ^ > > -- > Martin Michlmayr > Linux for HPE Helion, Hewlett Packard Enterprise > > ___ > pkg-firebird-general mailing list > pkg-firebird-gene...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-firebird-general >
Bug#769161: [pkg-firebird-general] Bug#769161: Bug#769161: ppc64el port is wrong
Seems that i have copied the prefix from trunk , now i fixed and added the lines OS_ServerFiles=inet_server.cpp EMBED_UTIL_TARGETS=gstat gds_relay gsec nbackup fb_lock_print fbguard fbsvcmgr fbtracemgr CLIENT_UTIL_TARGETS=gstat gds_relay gsec nbackup fb_lock_print fbguard fbmgr_bin fbsvcmgr fbtracemgr Physical_IO_Module=unix.cpp just a quick test /opt/firebird2.5/bin/isql employee.fdb Database: employee.fdb SQL> show version CON> ; ISQL Version: LI-V2.5.3.26799 Firebird 2.5 Server version: Firebird/linux PPC64EL (access method), version "LI-V2.5.3.26799 Firebird 2.5" on disk structure version 11.2 On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:48 PM, marius adrian popa wrote: > I have committed to both 3.0 and 2.5 branches > Here is the 2.5 list of patches (you can diff it with the release branch) > > https://sourceforge.net/p/firebird/code/60194/ > https://sourceforge.net/p/firebird/code/60195/ > https://sourceforge.net/p/firebird/code/60198/ > https://sourceforge.net/p/firebird/code/60201/ > > > In the last patch I have add an ARM64 define twice in common.h , but > corrected after that > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > >> Package: src:firebird2.5 >> Subject: firebird2.5: ppc64el built as bigendian >> Version: 2.5.3.26778.ds4-2 >> Severity: serious >> Justification: possible data corruption >> >> -=| marius adrian popa, 11.11.2014 15:57:19 +0200 |=- >> > From the build log i see that ppc64el is treated like a bigendian port >> > >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=firebird2.5&arch=ppc64el&ver=2.5.3.26778.ds4-3%2Bb1&stamp=1415464014 >> >> Good catch. Forwarding as a bugreport. >> >> In my understanding this would cause data corruption when transferring >> data between ppc64el client/server and a non ppc64-el system -- >> doubles and big integers would be swapped when there's no need to and >> won't be swapped when there is need to do so. >> >> > We need to create a new port for it >> >> Please let me know when the implementation ID/patch/commit is >> available. >> >> >> -- Damyan >> >> ___ >> pkg-firebird-general mailing list >> pkg-firebird-gene...@lists.alioth.debian.org >> >> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-firebird-general >> > > > ___ > pkg-firebird-general mailing list > pkg-firebird-gene...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-firebird-general >
Bug#769161: [pkg-firebird-general] Bug#769161: ppc64el port is wrong
I have committed to both 3.0 and 2.5 branches Here is the 2.5 list of patches (you can diff it with the release branch) https://sourceforge.net/p/firebird/code/60194/ https://sourceforge.net/p/firebird/code/60195/ https://sourceforge.net/p/firebird/code/60198/ https://sourceforge.net/p/firebird/code/60201/ In the last patch I have add an ARM64 define twice in common.h , but corrected after that On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > Package: src:firebird2.5 > Subject: firebird2.5: ppc64el built as bigendian > Version: 2.5.3.26778.ds4-2 > Severity: serious > Justification: possible data corruption > > -=| marius adrian popa, 11.11.2014 15:57:19 +0200 |=- > > From the build log i see that ppc64el is treated like a bigendian port > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=firebird2.5&arch=ppc64el&ver=2.5.3.26778.ds4-3%2Bb1&stamp=1415464014 > > Good catch. Forwarding as a bugreport. > > In my understanding this would cause data corruption when transferring > data between ppc64el client/server and a non ppc64-el system -- > doubles and big integers would be swapped when there's no need to and > won't be swapped when there is need to do so. > > > We need to create a new port for it > > Please let me know when the implementation ID/patch/commit is > available. > > > -- Damyan > > ___ > pkg-firebird-general mailing list > pkg-firebird-gene...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-firebird-general >
Bug#634190: I have filled a RM request
Bug #695608 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#634190: python-kinterbasdb should be removed from debian
it is unmaintained and development is done on new driver : fdb http://wiki.python.org/moin/Firebird -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#663914: [pkg-firebird-general] Bug#663914: firebird2.5: Hardening flags partially missing
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Simon Ruderich wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 08:44:32PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: >> The two binaries that the patch fixes are used only during the build >> process and aren't shipped in the resulting binary packages. The first >> part of the patch is about the program that creates ibase.h header >> file, and the other is the custom-built syntax parser that is later >> used during the build. >> >> Both of these never see user input or any external data. Their only >> input is what the build system gives them. >> >> Is there any proof that the missing hardening flags are a real >> problem? > > In that case it's not a real (security) problem. Sorry for the > wrong severity, I didn't check if they are just used during the > build. > > But it should be fixed anyway to make automatic checks to detect > missing (hardening) flags of build logs possible and to prevent > problems in the future. I agree let's apply them if they do no harm I also send to firebird-devel to be applied upstream -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#654793: [pkg-firebird-general] Bug#654793: Hardening flags not fully enabled
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Source: firebird2.5 > Severity: important > > Hi, > I'm currently checking all packages, which had a DSA in the last > year to enable hardened build flags. firebird2.5 has already been > updated to use dpkg-buildflags, but I noticed that not all flags > are fully in effect. You can use the hardening-check scripts from > the package hardening includes: > > Out of the three hardening features from the Wheezy default set > (protected stack, fortified source and relro) not all are fully > applied, e.g. > > root@pisco:~# hardening-check /usr/sbin/fb_inet_server > /usr/sbin/fb_inet_server: > Stack protected: no, not found! > Fortify Source functions: unknown, no protectable libc functions used > Read-only relocations: yes > > root@pisco:~# hardening-check /usr/bin/fbsvcmgr > /usr/bin/fbsvcmgr: > Stack protected: yes > Fortify Source functions: no, no protected functions found! > Read-only relocations: yes > > root@pisco:~# hardening-check /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfbclient.so.2.5.2 > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfbclient.so.2.5.2: > Stack protected: yes > Fortify Source functions: no, no protected functions found! > Read-only relocations: yes > > The reason is likely that some parts of Firebird build system hardcode > specific flags, which nullify the hardened build flags? Weird that firebird2.5-superclassic in ubuntu lucid shows hardening-check /usr/sbin/fb_smp_server /usr/sbin/fb_smp_server /usr/sbin/fb_smp_server: Position Independent Executable: no, normal executable! Stack protected: yes Fortify Source functions: yes Read-only relocations: yes Immediate binding: no, not found! hardening-check /usr/bin/fbsvcmgr /usr/bin/fbsvcmgr: Position Independent Executable: no, normal executable! Stack protected: yes Fortify Source functions: yes Read-only relocations: yes Immediate binding: no, not found! And is build from Damyan repository filename: pool/main/f/firebird2.5/firebird2.5-superclassic_2.5.1.26351.ds4-2~bpo60+1ubuntu3_amd64.deb http://jimicompot.blogspot.com/2011/11/rebuilding-firebird-251-from-stable-to.html I will try to rebuild from testing also see what's happenning on another sid machine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#648218: [pkg-firebird-general] Bug#648218: firebird2.5-classic: fb_inet_server segfaults several time a day
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Chiefly Izzy wrote: > > On 13. 11. 2011, at 12:50, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > >> I have prepared packages from the current version in wheezy >> (2.5.1.26351), built for squeeze. >> >> ftp://ftp.modsoftsys.net/public/firebird2.5-backports/ >> >> If these improve the situation, then we at least know the bug is fixed >> in that version and can start looking for the exact fix, which would >> take about 10 iterations (and probably several weeks). > > Damyan, thanks, do you have source package too so I can rebuild it on my > machine? I've Squeeze running on Amd64 hardware, but installed as i686, > because I have lot of i386 binaries to run on this box. Here are the instructions to rebuild it on your machine , if you have it on 32bits http://jimicompot.blogspot.com/2011/11/rebuilding-firebird-251-from-stable-to.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#648218: [pkg-firebird-general] Bug#648218: Bug#648218: firebird2.5-classic: fb_inet_server segfaults several time a day
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > -=| Robert Vojta, 09.11.2011 18:02:08 +0100 |=- >> Package: firebird2.5-classic >> Version: 2.5.0.26054~ReleaseCandidate3.ds2-1+b1 >> Severity: important >> Tags: squeeze I also see that you are using ReleaseCandidate3 maybe we should prepare a backport -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#626931: [pkg-firebird-general] Bug#626931: Bug#626931: FTBFS on GNU/Hurd
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Samuel Thibault, le Sat 20 Aug 2011 17:58:33 +0200, a écrit : >> Samuel Thibault, le Sat 20 Aug 2011 17:56:14 +0200, a écrit : >> > Damyan Ivanov, le Mon 16 May 2011 21:12:27 +0300, a écrit : >> > > I seem to remember a Hurd porter said that there would be problems >> > > with semaphores or something like that, >> > >> > Yes. >> > >> > GNU/Hurd doesn't (yet) support semctl and memory-shared mutexes. >> >> That being said, could upstream apply the attached patch to at least fix >> the build? > > Oops, the patch wasn't up to date, here is my late version. I will review and send it upstream -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#626931: [pkg-firebird-general] Bug#626931: Bug#626931: FTBFS on GNU/Hurd
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > [Full CC for debiandevel] > > -=| Damyan Ivanov, Mon, May 16, 2011 at 09:12:27PM +0300 |=- >> -=| Ondřej Surý, Mon, May 16, 2011 at 05:27:53PM +0200 |=- >> > Hi Marius, >> > >> > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 16:39, marius adrian popa wrote: >> > > 2011/5/16 Ondřej Surý : >> > >> Package: firebird2.5 >> > >> Version: 2.5.0.26074-0.ds4 >> > >> Severity: normal >> > >> Tags: patch >> > >> >> > >> Firebird FTBFS on GNU/Hurd because MAXPATHLEN is not defined on that >> > >> platform. >> > >> >> > >> Attached is a patch which fixes that. Please apply, it is a simple >> > >> fix and it blocks php5 build on GNU/Hurd. >> > > >> > > I have commited to svn 2.5 release branch >> > > please test if is ok >> >> That was quick! :) >> >> > Unfortunatelly I am not able to test it as I don't use hurd myself. >> >> I asked the admin of strauss.debian.net (hurd porterbox) to install >> the needed build dependencies for firebird2.5 and will try building it >> there. >> >> > But generally speaking (from my experience of fixing >> > cyrus-imapd-2.x) >> > it should work. I am Ccing debian-hurd list, maybe somebody there >> > could help us with testing. If not I would suggest you go ahead and >> > upload if you have other stuff to release... >> >> I seem to remember a Hurd porter said that there would be problems >> with semaphores or something like that, but I can't find it. Anyway, >> we'll see how the build goes on the porterbox. In the worst case php >> would have to omit the firebird dependency/support for Hurd. > > The build fails with the following error: > > g++ -ggdb -O3 -DNDEBUG -DLINUX -pipe -MMD -fPIC -DFB_SEND_FLAGS=MSG_NOSIGNAL > -I. > ./src/include/gen -I../src/include -I../src/vulcan -DNAMESPACE=Vulcan > -pthread - > g -O2 -DBOOT_BUILD -fno-rtti -c ../src/jrd/gds.cpp -o > ../temp/boot/jrd/gds.o > In file included from ../src/jrd/../jrd/../jrd/ThreadData.h:35, > from ../src/jrd/../jrd/jrd.h:74, > from ../src/jrd/gds.cpp:148: > ../src/jrd/../jrd/../jrd/../common/classes/rwlock.h: In member function 'void > Fi > rebird::RWLock::init()': > ../src/jrd/../jrd/../jrd/../common/classes/rwlock.h:199: error: > 'PTHREAD_RWLOCK_ > PREFER_WRITER_NONRECURSIVE_NP' was not declared in this scope > ../src/jrd/../jrd/../jrd/../common/classes/rwlock.h:199: error: > 'pthread_rwlocka > ttr_setkind_np' was not declared in this scope > make[5]: *** [../temp/boot/jrd/gds.o] Error 1 > > Sending a copy to firebird-devel for oppinion. We need a new define for hurd afther we undefine LINUX that part compiles but i hit another issues that i found it to be in haikuos too g++ -I../src/include/gen -I../src/include -I../src/vulcan -DNAMESPACE=Vulcan -gg db -p -Wall -Wno-switch -DLINUX -pipe -MMD -fPIC -DFB_SEND_FLAGS=MSG_NOSIGNAL -D DEV_BUILD -pthread -DBOOT_BUILD -pthread -fno-rtti -c ../src/jrd/os/posix/isc_ip c.cpp -o ../temp/boot/jrd/isc_ipc.o ../src/jrd/os/posix/isc_ipc.cpp: In function 'bool isc_signal2(int, FPTR_VOID, v oid*, ULONG)': ../src/jrd/os/posix/isc_ipc.cpp:187:31: error: 'SA_SIGINFO' was not declared in this scope ../src/jrd/os/posix/isc_ipc.cpp: In function 'void ISC_signal_cancel(int, FPTR_V OID_PTR, void*)': http://mapopa.blogspot.com/2010/06/firebird-database-porting-progress-on.html ps here is one kvm-linux, qemu image that can be used wget http://people.debian.org/~sthibault/hurd-i386/debian-hurd.img.tar.gz tar -xz < debian-hurd.img.tar.gz kvm -net nic,model=rtl8139 -net user debian-hurd-*.img in my case i didn't had x so kvm -curses -net nic,model=rtl8139 -net user debian-hurd-20110323.img apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade apt-buildep firebird2.5 then checkout from svn/debian or git http://mapopa.blogspot.com/2010/09/howto-checkout-firebird-25-release.html tip add --enable-system-icu --enable-debug by default is detected as i686-unknown-gnu0.3 i have exeperimented with some platform defaults but i still need some work and research to do > > > > ___ > pkg-firebird-general mailing list > pkg-firebird-gene...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-firebird-general -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#626931: [pkg-firebird-general] Bug#626931: FTBFS on GNU/Hurd
2011/5/16 Ondřej Surý : > Package: firebird2.5 > Version: 2.5.0.26074-0.ds4 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > Firebird FTBFS on GNU/Hurd because MAXPATHLEN is not defined on that > platform. > > Attached is a patch which fixes that. Please apply, it is a simple > fix and it blocks php5 build on GNU/Hurd. I have commited to svn 2.5 release branch please test if is ok > > O. > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: 6.0.1 > APT prefers stable-updates > APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > > ___ > pkg-firebird-general mailing list > pkg-firebird-gene...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-firebird-general > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#550342: [pkg-firebird-general] Bug#550342: Bug#550342: firebird2.1 - FTBFS: error: #error "Define SWAP_DOUBLE for your platform correctly !"
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 06:12:45PM +0300, marius adrian popa wrote: >> from google i see the machine is s390 >> i think we forgot the patch for xdr >> if i compare the patch for debian with the one from fedora >> http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/firebird2.1/2.1.3.18185-0.ds1-2/port-s390.patch > > Please compare it to my patch from #415668. It lacks several parts, > including the application of -fsigned-char to > builds/posix/prefix.linux_generic. all patches seems to be applied upstream maybe damian can modify it quickly in firebird 2.1 git too I have added the forgoten undef for SWAP_DOUBLE in the s390 and s390x port http://firebird.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/firebird/firebird2/src/remote/xdr.cpp?r1=1.26.4.8&r2=1.26.4.9&pathrev=B2_1_Release Only the -fsigned-char is not included yet , I have to put a question on firebird-devel list first > > Bastian > > -- > The heart is not a logical organ. > -- Dr. Janet Wallace, "The Deadly Years", stardate 3479.4 > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#550342: [pkg-firebird-general] Bug#550342: Bug#550342: firebird2.1 - FTBFS: error: #error "Define SWAP_DOUBLE for your platform correctly !"
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:07 PM, marius adrian popa wrote: > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Bastian Blank wrote: >> Source: firebird2.1 >> Version: 2.1.3.18185-0.ds1-2 >> Severity: serious >> >> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: >> >>> sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.58.2 (15 Jun 2009) on lxdebian.bfinv.de >> [...] >>> g++ -g -O2 -DTERMINATE_IDLE_LOCK_MANAGER -Werror=write-strings >>> -DBOOT_BUILD -I../src/include/gen -I../src/include -I../src/vulcan >>> -DNAMESPACE=Vulcan -DNDEBUG -ggdb -DFB_SEND_FLAGS=MSG_NOSIGNAL -DLINUX >>> -pipe -MMD -fPIC -fmessage-length=0 -fsigned-char -O3 >>> -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-builtin -DPROD_BUILD -c ../src/remote/xdr.cpp >>> -o ../temp/boot/remote/xdr.o >>> ../src/remote/xdr.cpp:51:2: error: #error "Define SWAP_DOUBLE for your >>> platform correctly !" >>> In file included from ../src/remote/../remote/../remote/remote_def.h:43, >>> from ../src/remote/../remote/remote.h:33, >>> from ../src/remote/xdr.cpp:29: >>> ../src/remote/../remote/../remote/../remote/protocol.h:87: warning: large >>> integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type >>> make[4]: *** [../temp/boot/remote/xdr.o] Error 1 >>> make[3]: *** [libfbstatic] Error 2 >>> make[2]: *** [../gen/firebird/bin/gpre_static] Error 2 >>> make[1]: *** [firebird] Error 2 >>> make: *** [build-super-stamp] Error 2 > > what type of cpu is that ? from google i see the machine is s390 i think we forgot the patch for xdr if i compare the patch for debian with the one from fedora http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/firebird2.1/2.1.3.18185-0.ds1-2/port-s390.patch http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/secure/attachment/11476/firebird-2.1.2-s390x.patch > >> >> >> >> ___ >> pkg-firebird-general mailing list >> pkg-firebird-gene...@lists.alioth.debian.org >> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-firebird-general >> > > > > ___ > pkg-firebird-general mailing list > pkg-firebird-gene...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-firebird-general > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#550342: [pkg-firebird-general] Bug#550342: firebird2.1 - FTBFS: error: #error "Define SWAP_DOUBLE for your platform correctly !"
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Bastian Blank wrote: > Source: firebird2.1 > Version: 2.1.3.18185-0.ds1-2 > Severity: serious > > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > >> sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.58.2 (15 Jun 2009) on lxdebian.bfinv.de > [...] >> g++ -g -O2 -DTERMINATE_IDLE_LOCK_MANAGER -Werror=write-strings -DBOOT_BUILD >> -I../src/include/gen -I../src/include -I../src/vulcan -DNAMESPACE=Vulcan >> -DNDEBUG -ggdb -DFB_SEND_FLAGS=MSG_NOSIGNAL -DLINUX -pipe -MMD -fPIC >> -fmessage-length=0 -fsigned-char -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-builtin >> -DPROD_BUILD -c ../src/remote/xdr.cpp -o ../temp/boot/remote/xdr.o >> ../src/remote/xdr.cpp:51:2: error: #error "Define SWAP_DOUBLE for your >> platform correctly !" >> In file included from ../src/remote/../remote/../remote/remote_def.h:43, >> from ../src/remote/../remote/remote.h:33, >> from ../src/remote/xdr.cpp:29: >> ../src/remote/../remote/../remote/../remote/protocol.h:87: warning: large >> integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type >> make[4]: *** [../temp/boot/remote/xdr.o] Error 1 >> make[3]: *** [libfbstatic] Error 2 >> make[2]: *** [../gen/firebird/bin/gpre_static] Error 2 >> make[1]: *** [firebird] Error 2 >> make: *** [build-super-stamp] Error 2 what type of cpu is that ? > > > > ___ > pkg-firebird-general mailing list > pkg-firebird-gene...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-firebird-general > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#549062: [pkg-firebird-general] Bug#549062: firebird 2.0 pending obsoletion
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > Package: firebird2.0 > Version: 2.0.5.13206-0.ds2-4 > Severity: serious > > I intent to phase firebird2.0 out of the archive. firebird2.5 is to be > released > soon, and having three versions in squeeze is too much. Even in 2.5 doesn't > make it to squeeze, the current recommended version is 2.1, which makes it > pointless to support 20 for another release cycle. I agree 2.5 RC1 is on the way and i feel the urge to use it already I didn't touched firebird 2.0 anymore for years > > I am filing the bug to let people know about the intention. > > Also, some bugs shall be filed against packages build-depending on > firebird2.0-dev, to make them build-depend on firebird2.1-dev or even > firebird2.5-dev (if it is available at the time). Blocking this bug on them > will help keeping the progress under control. > > Presently, the following packages build-depend on firebird2.0-dev: > > - flamerobin (uploaded today with B-D of firebird2.1-dev) No problem here :) > - gambas2 this should be asked on the gambas maintainers but is just an api bump > - gnugk don't know here we should ask maintainer > - python-kinterbasdb Here anyway the recomended version is the one 3.3.0 from firebirdsql.org with 2.1 so it's OK to put 2.1 in required > - qt4-x11 I only buildeded from source the qt but i use it only with firebird 2.1 so i vote that it's Ok > > > > ___ > pkg-firebird-general mailing list > pkg-firebird-gene...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-firebird-general > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#545925: [pkg-firebird-general] Bug#545925: firebird2.1: sh4 port
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > Hi, > > 2009/9/25 Damyan Ivanov : >> -=| Nobuhiro Iwamatsu, Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 05:31:36PM +0900 |=- >>> 2009/9/16 Damyan Ivanov : >>> > Firebird uses itself during the build process, which serves as >>> > a smoke >>> > test. If the build completes, chances are big the resulting >>> > server/client will work ok. >>> > >>> OK, If a test is over, I contact you. >> >> Are there any news? >> >> Upstream has applied the s390 patches, so the way is clear for sh4. >> > > Sorry, replay is late. > > firebird/HEAD depends on libatomic-ops. > libatomic-ops yet does not completely port to sh4. > Therefore, I cannot build. Ok i see that you have some patches to it http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=547136 Tell us if/how it works > > Best regards, > Nobuhiro > > -- > Nobuhiro Iwamatsu > > > > ___ > pkg-firebird-general mailing list > pkg-firebird-gene...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-firebird-general > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#415668: [pkg-firebird-general] Bug#415668: Bug#415668: NMU
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > -=| Bastian Blank, Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 10:38:26AM +0200 |=- >> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 11:41:06PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: >> > It would be best if you make sure the ports appear in upstream CVS >> > first. >> >> This is your job as maintainer. > > Point taken, will submit the patch upstream soon. > > What I want to say is that I am against a NMU (or MU) that diverges > from upstream in this regard. > >> > Otherwise once they implement them with a different >> > implementation IDs, the databases created with "official" >> > firebird engine will not be openable on Debian on the same >> > architecture and vice versa. >> >> Well, as database admin I assume that I have to dump and load a database >> anyway while moving them to another machine. > > This is not necessary with Firebird if the two machines share the same > architecture (implementation ID in Firebird-speak). I consider this > a feature and a non-synchronized port would break it when one moves > the database between packages and non-packaged firebirds. They can > even be on the same machine. For example If I want to try both > upstream and packaged Firebird, they shall be able to run whth the > same database without any dump/restore. > >> > How different are s390 and s390x? Are the pointer sizes different >> > or native integers or alignment rules? Is the s390x port enough >> > for Debian? >> >> s390x is the 64bit variant of 31bit s390. Debian still only supports >> s390. > > So they are sufficiently different and require separate implementation > IDs. Thanks. The id for s390x is now fixed by upstream isc_info_db_impl_linux_s390x = 78 .. http://gitorious.org/firebird-head-mirror/firebird-head-mirror/blobs/master/src/jrd/pag.cpp http://gitorious.org/firebird-head-mirror/firebird-head-mirror/blobs/master/src/jrd/inf_pub.h and now we must request new upstream value for s390 (32 bits) We need to open a bug in firebird tracker , add the patch with new IDs patch for 64 bit version should be rewritten ps:related port issues for 64bit version but on fedora http://www.firebirdnews.org/?p=3155 > > -- > dam > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkqk2FgACgkQHqjlqpcl9jvhCwCeOQfvWMGeMuwKDHxt1mLaCCjW > Y4IAn3IQIkggT11SYhH6eXFi3iAb9T7F > =de1b > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > ___ > pkg-firebird-general mailing list > pkg-firebird-gene...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-firebird-general > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#537437: [pkg-firebird-general] Bug#537437: (firebird2.1_2.1.2.18118-0.ds1-3/avr32): FTBFS: Outdated config.{sub, guess}
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 1:27 PM, wrote:
> Package: firebird2.1
> Version: 2.1.2.18118-0.ds1-3
> Severity: wishlist
> User: bradsm...@debian.org
> Usertags: avr32
>
> Hi,
>
> Whilst building your package on AVR32, the build failed due to outdated
> config.{sub,guess} files.
>
> Full build logs available:
>
> http://buildd.debian-ports.org/build.php?pkg=firebird2.1&arch=avr32&ver=2.1.2.18118-0.ds1-3
you need to do an new port for it
so it needs to be decided on firebird devel list (the new port id )
i can give you the s390 example for new port and patch
http://www.firebirdnews.org/?p=3155
>
> Regards,
> Bradley Smith
>
> --
> Bradley Smith b...@brad-smith.co.uk
> Debian GNU/Linux Developer bradsm...@debian.org
> GPG: 0xC718D347 D201 7274 2FE1 A92A C45C EFAB 8F70 629A C718 D347
>
>
>
> ___
> pkg-firebird-general mailing list
> pkg-firebird-gene...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-firebird-general
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
