Bug#1007057: judy: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format

2023-10-28 Thread Bastian Germann 

I am uploading a NMU to DELAYED/10 in order to fix this.
The debdiff is attached.diff -Nru judy-1.0.5/debian/changelog judy-1.0.5/debian/changelog
--- judy-1.0.5/debian/changelog 2023-10-28 14:01:19.0 +0200
+++ judy-1.0.5/debian/changelog 2023-10-28 13:58:33.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+judy (1.0.5-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Convert to source format 3.0. (Closes: #1007057)
+
+ -- Bastian Germann   Sat, 28 Oct 2023 13:58:33 +0200
+
 judy (1.0.5-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Patch from Andrey Gursky , Remove
diff -Nru judy-1.0.5/debian/control judy-1.0.5/debian/control
--- judy-1.0.5/debian/control   2023-10-28 14:01:19.0 +0200
+++ judy-1.0.5/debian/control   2023-10-28 13:57:43.0 +0200
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Troy Heber 
 Uploaders:
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>=9), dh-autoreconf, quilt
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>=9), dh-autoreconf
 Standards-Version: 3.9.6
 
 Package: libjudy-dev
diff -Nru judy-1.0.5/debian/rules judy-1.0.5/debian/rules
--- judy-1.0.5/debian/rules 2023-10-28 14:01:19.0 +0200
+++ judy-1.0.5/debian/rules 2023-10-28 13:58:07.0 +0200
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 include /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk
 
 %:
-   dh $@ --with quilt --with autoreconf
+   dh $@ --with autoreconf
 
 override_dh_auto_configure:
dh_auto_configure -- --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
diff -Nru judy-1.0.5/debian/source/format judy-1.0.5/debian/source/format
--- judy-1.0.5/debian/source/format 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ judy-1.0.5/debian/source/format 2023-10-28 13:58:33.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+3.0 (quilt)

Bug#1007057: judy: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format

2022-03-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum 
Source: judy
Version: 1.0.5-5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: bookworm sid
Usertags: format1.0 format1.0-kp-nv

Dear maintainer,

This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in
bookworm.  Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many
advantages, as documented in https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 ; (2)
this contributes to standardization of packaging practices.

Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software
could maybe benefit from a refresh. It might be a good opportunity to
look at other aspects as well.

This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00074.html

Thanks

Lucas