Bug#1009191: cctbx: please re-enable building on riscv64
Hi, On 2022-04-30 13:29, Neil Williams wrote: >> Neil, is there a particular reason riscv64 support was disabled in >> 2021.12+ds1-3? > I didn't see it as particularly likely that any real-world usage of > cctbx was manageable on any current RISCV64 hardware. Thanks for explanation. I usually disable only the explicitly unsupported architectures, or the ones that fail and would otherwise block migration. >> cctbx seems to build fine on riscv64 now. Can it be >> re-enabled? > Probably, yes. I won't have time to do an upload soon though. > > If someone else has time to do it as a team upload, go ahead. I will enable riscv64 and team upload. Best, Andrius
Bug#1009191: cctbx: please re-enable building on riscv64
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 10:18:35 +0300 Andrius Merkys wrote: > Hello, > > On 2022-04-08 17:57, Graham Inggs wrote: > > Building on riscv64 was silently disabled in 2021.12+ds1-3. > > 2021.12+ds1-2 built successfully in the past [1], and 2021.12+ds1-4 > > continues to build in Ubuntu. > > > > Please re-enable building on riscv64 as we would like to promote > > riscv64 to a release architecture. > > Neil, is there a particular reason riscv64 support was disabled in > 2021.12+ds1-3? I didn't see it as particularly likely that any real-world usage of cctbx was manageable on any current RISCV64 hardware. > cctbx seems to build fine on riscv64 now. Can it be > re-enabled? Probably, yes. I won't have time to do an upload soon though. If someone else has time to do it as a team upload, go ahead. -- Neil Williams li...@codehelp.co.uk https://linux.codehelp.co.uk pgpIzzuE3hnVQ.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1009191: cctbx: please re-enable building on riscv64
Hello, On 2022-04-08 17:57, Graham Inggs wrote: > Building on riscv64 was silently disabled in 2021.12+ds1-3. > 2021.12+ds1-2 built successfully in the past [1], and 2021.12+ds1-4 > continues to build in Ubuntu. > > Please re-enable building on riscv64 as we would like to promote > riscv64 to a release architecture. Neil, is there a particular reason riscv64 support was disabled in 2021.12+ds1-3? cctbx seems to build fine on riscv64 now. Can it be re-enabled? > [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=cctbx&arch=riscv64 Best, Andrius
Bug#1009191: cctbx: please re-enable building on riscv64
Source: cctbx Version: 2021.12+ds1-3 Hi Maintainer Building on riscv64 was silently disabled in 2021.12+ds1-3. 2021.12+ds1-2 built successfully in the past [1], and 2021.12+ds1-4 continues to build in Ubuntu. Please re-enable building on riscv64 as we would like to promote riscv64 to a release architecture. Regards Graham [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=cctbx&arch=riscv64
