Bug#1009269: Should sphinx-patchqueue be removed?
severity 1009269 normal reassign 1009269 ftp.debian.org retitle 1009269 RM: sphinx-patchqueue -- RoM; obsolete, no rdeps thx Am Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 06:42:45PM +1000 schrieb Dmitry Smirnov: > On Monday, 11 April 2022 4:28:40 AM AEST Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > Source: sphinx-patchqueue > > Version: 0.5.0-2 > > Severity: serious > > > > Your package came up as a candidate for removal from Debian: > > > > - Still depends on Python 2 and thus removed from testing since 2019 > > - No remaining reverse dependencies > > - Last upload in 2015 > > Yes, it would be great to remove the package please. > It should be trivial to update it for Python3 but I could never get to > do that due to lack of time. The package was originally introduced as a > dependency for something and I can't even remember what was that... > > IMHO safe to remove. Thanks. Ack, reassigning for removal. Cheers, Moritz
Bug#1009269: Should sphinx-patchqueue be removed?
On Monday, 11 April 2022 4:28:40 AM AEST Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Source: sphinx-patchqueue > Version: 0.5.0-2 > Severity: serious > > Your package came up as a candidate for removal from Debian: > > - Still depends on Python 2 and thus removed from testing since 2019 > - No remaining reverse dependencies > - Last upload in 2015 Yes, it would be great to remove the package please. It should be trivial to update it for Python3 but I could never get to do that due to lack of time. The package was originally introduced as a dependency for something and I can't even remember what was that... IMHO safe to remove. Thanks. -- Cheers, Dmitry Smirnov GPG key : 4096R/52B6BBD953968D1B --- Frederick Douglass, a former slave, witnessed and described that exact phenomenon among his fellow slaves, many of whom were proud of how hard they worked for their masters and how faithfully they did as they were told. From their perspective, a runaway slave was a shameful thief, having "stolen" himself from the master. -- Larken Rose, The Most Dangerous Superstition --- Corman-Drosten review report: understanding PCR testing fraud. -- https://cormandrostenreview.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#1009269: Should sphinx-patchqueue be removed?
Source: sphinx-patchqueue Version: 0.5.0-2 Severity: serious Your package came up as a candidate for removal from Debian: - Still depends on Python 2 and thus removed from testing since 2019 - No remaining reverse dependencies - Last upload in 2015 If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please just close this bug (and fix the open issues). If you agree with the removal, please reassign to ftp.debian.org by sending the following commands to cont...@bugs.debian.org: -- severity $BUGNUM normal reassign $BUGNUM ftp.debian.org retitle $BUGNUM RM: -- RoM; thx -- Otherwise I'll move forward and request it's removal in a month. Cheers, Moritz
