Bug#1010848: RFS: imwheel/1.0.0pre12-15 [ITA] -- add support to non-standard buttons on mouse in Linux
Am 18.05.22 um 15:02 schrieb Chin Ah Toh: Control tags -1 - moreinfo You forgot a colon after Control. Bastian, > I do not see the new upload. Please check if there is an issue. I re-uploaded the package. Can you see it now? Yes. Please note that there is an automation in place that closes your RFSs when you delete your package from mentors. Please just upload without deleting the old version (keep at least one of them). I reopened the RFS. > One more thing: Please provide your salsa username if you want to keep maintaining the pkg in the currently referenced repo, so I can grant you the access rights for it. Else, please remove the Vcs fields from d/control. My salsa username is: jtoh You should have received an invitation. Please push your changes.
Bug#1010848: RFS: imwheel/1.0.0pre12-15 [ITA] -- add support to non-standard buttons on mouse in Linux
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On Fri, 13 May 2022 18:35:41 +0200 Bastian Germann wrote: I do not see the new upload. Please check if there is an issue. Please untag moreinfo when you have uploaded.
Bug#1010848: RFS: imwheel/1.0.0pre12-15 [ITA] -- add support to non-standard buttons on mouse in Linux
Am 13.05.22 um 15:56 schrieb Chin Ah Toh: Thank you for pointing out that bug. I have applied the patch to bug #260091 and uploaded it to Debian Mentors. I do not see the new upload. Please check if there is an issue. One more thing: Please provide your salsa username if you want to keep maintaining the pkg in the currently referenced repo, so I can grant you the access rights for it. Else, please remove the Vcs fields from d/control.
Bug#1010848: RFS: imwheel/1.0.0pre12-15 [ITA] -- add support to non-standard buttons on mouse in Linux
On Wed, 11 May 2022 14:06:05 + Chin Ah Toh wrote: Changes since the last upload: imwheel (1.0.0pre12-15) unstable; urgency=medium . * debian/control: Updated maintainer (Closes: #766979) * debian/copyright: Added to debian copyright list You should really accomplish some more things on adopting the package so the sponsor can be convinced that you are going to care for it. Just replacing the maintainer field does not quite cut it. Did you have a look at #260091? That bug seems to be a good one to address.