Bug#1016059: DDPO,Package Tracking System: move to UDD as a data source for lintian?
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 09:50:50PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 26/07/22 at 17:24 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > > https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?dpkg , which DDPO and PTS could use as a > > > link target. > > > > Probably, I'll keep it for the future for now. > > However, may I suggest you make it use a proper querystring instead? > > Like, ?pkg=dpkg, so that it'll be extensible in the future if one wants. > > https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?packages=dpkg also works Great, so I'll go with that! > Regarding your comment on IRC: > > btw, I consider udd.d.o/lintian/ slow, IMHO. if you could see if some > > tuning could be done, that would likely be appreciated. > > The postgresql optimizer was doing something strange with a temporary > table. Fixed. Much better, thank you! > Also, this looks wrong: > https://salsa.debian.org/qa/qa/-/commit/6eb803b9965a1d97b2dd5eed4da22fc69124d3f0#cbc3b83fa697117813ee1ea10081d209b6d42d4f_1080_1079 > (missing '?' before the source package name) And thank you for spotting this as well… :| I manually deployed the change, and it looks good to me now ;) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1016059: DDPO,Package Tracking System: move to UDD as a data source for lintian?
On 26/07/22 at 17:24 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?dpkg , which DDPO and PTS could use as a > > link target. > > Probably, I'll keep it for the future for now. > However, may I suggest you make it use a proper querystring instead? > Like, ?pkg=dpkg, so that it'll be extensible in the future if one wants. https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?packages=dpkg also works Regarding your comment on IRC: > btw, I consider udd.d.o/lintian/ slow, IMHO. if you could see if some tuning > could be done, that would likely be appreciated. The postgresql optimizer was doing something strange with a temporary table. Fixed. Also, this looks wrong: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/qa/-/commit/6eb803b9965a1d97b2dd5eed4da22fc69124d3f0#cbc3b83fa697117813ee1ea10081d209b6d42d4f_1080_1079 (missing '?' before the source package name) Lucas
Bug#1016059: DDPO,Package Tracking System: move to UDD as a data source for lintian?
Control: clone -1 -2 Control: reassign -2 tracker.debian.org On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 11:39:45AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org cloning a copy for tracker. I'll do ddpo rsn! > UDD now has its own importer for lintian data. It also provides a Thank you for working on it! > https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?dpkg , which DDPO and PTS could use as a > link target. Probably, I'll keep it for the future for now. However, may I suggest you make it use a proper querystring instead? Like, ?pkg=dpkg, so that it'll be extensible in the future if one wants. > I suggest that DDPO and PTS move to using UDD as a data source for > lintian. > > https://udd.debian.org/lintian-qa-list.txt is refreshed on a regular > basis while the importer is running. So DDPO/PTS can sync for example > hourly. Great. > Minor caveat: the semantic for qa-list.txt was a bit poor: > 1) for packages both in unstable and experimental, lintian-qa-list.txt > show stats for packages in unstable. That's fair. > 3) it does not provide a column for tags of type 'information'. > I suppose it is OK to keep it like that. DDPO only uses errors and warning, so no interest in that. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1016059: DDPO,Package Tracking System: move to UDD as a data source for lintian?
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, lintian.debian.org has been out of date since end of 2021. The question of its future has been raised with DSA: https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2022/07/msg6.html UDD now has its own importer for lintian data. It also provides a drop-in replacement for https://lintian.debian.org/static/qa-list.txt as https://udd.debian.org/lintian-qa-list.txt, and a web interface to view detailed results per package at (e.g.) https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?dpkg , which DDPO and PTS could use as a link target. I suggest that DDPO and PTS move to using UDD as a data source for lintian. https://udd.debian.org/lintian-qa-list.txt is refreshed on a regular basis while the importer is running. So DDPO/PTS can sync for example hourly. Minor caveat: the semantic for qa-list.txt was a bit poor: 1) for packages both in unstable and experimental, lintian-qa-list.txt show stats for packages in unstable. 2) packages not in unstable are not listed. 3) it does not provide a column for tags of type 'information'. I suppose it is OK to keep it like that. For reference, the UDD code the generate the data is https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/rimporters/lintian.rb#L380 Lucas
