Bug#1021862: mupen64plus: Backport SDL_SetVideoMode fix to Salsa
On Sunday, 16 October 2022 17:56:23 CEST Brendon wrote: > Oops. Consider me blind then. You can close this now. Sorry if this came across that way. I just wanted to let you confirm that this is the fix you are talking about. But it sounds like it is. Thanks, Sven signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#1021862: mupen64plus: Backport SDL_SetVideoMode fix to Salsa
Oops. Consider me blind then. You can close this now. Cheers, Brendon sent with FairEmail Oct 16, 2022 03:40:03 Sven Eckelmann : > On Sunday, 16 October 2022 10:16:58 CEST you wrote: >> Package: mupen64plus >> Severity: important >> X-Debbugs-Cc: ed7-aspire4...@hotmail.com >> >> mupen64plus is currently unusuable with the latest SDL (at least in >> bookworm). > > This is impossible. This package is a meta-package without dependency to SDL > >> >> A fix has been patched into upstream: >> https://github.com/mupen64plus/mupen64plus-core/pull/970 >> >> There are discussions of a new release: >> https://github.com/mupen64plus/mupen64plus-core/issues/973 >> but it's best to backport the patch to salsa for now just in case the >> discussion goes nowhere. >> >> I don't know whether that alone fixes the problem though, but I'm pretty >> sure it should still build. > > Can you please tell me what the difference is there to the version 2.5-9 of > libmupen64plus2 [1] > > > Kind regards, > Sven > > https://tracker.debian.org/news/1372713/accepted-mupen64plus-core-25-9-source-into-unstable/
Bug#1021862: mupen64plus: Backport SDL_SetVideoMode fix to Salsa
On Sunday, 16 October 2022 10:16:58 CEST you wrote: > Package: mupen64plus > Severity: important > X-Debbugs-Cc: ed7-aspire4...@hotmail.com > > mupen64plus is currently unusuable with the latest SDL (at least in bookworm). This is impossible. This package is a meta-package without dependency to SDL > > A fix has been patched into upstream: > https://github.com/mupen64plus/mupen64plus-core/pull/970 > > There are discussions of a new release: > https://github.com/mupen64plus/mupen64plus-core/issues/973 > but it's best to backport the patch to salsa for now just in case the > discussion goes nowhere. > > I don't know whether that alone fixes the problem though, but I'm pretty sure > it should still build. Can you please tell me what the difference is there to the version 2.5-9 of libmupen64plus2 [1] Kind regards, Sven https://tracker.debian.org/news/1372713/accepted-mupen64plus-core-25-9-source-into-unstable/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#1021862: mupen64plus: Backport SDL_SetVideoMode fix to Salsa
Package: mupen64plus Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: ed7-aspire4...@hotmail.com mupen64plus is currently unusuable with the latest SDL (at least in bookworm). A fix has been patched into upstream: https://github.com/mupen64plus/mupen64plus-core/pull/970 There are discussions of a new release: https://github.com/mupen64plus/mupen64plus-core/issues/973 but it's best to backport the patch to salsa for now just in case the discussion goes nowhere. I don't know whether that alone fixes the problem though, but I'm pretty sure it should still build. -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.19.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled
