Bug#1023535: transition: protobuf
Hi Sebastian, On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 9:03 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2022-11-21 20:42:41 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Please go ahead > > protobuf's autopkgtests are failing. Could you please take a look at > them? Thanks Indeed, my bad. Fixed and uploaded. Regards, Laszlo/GCS
Bug#1023535: transition: protobuf
On 11/24/22 21:03, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: protobuf's autopkgtests are failing. Could you please take a look at them? Thanks Patch available in: https://bugs.debian.org/1024677 Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
Bug#1023535: transition: protobuf
Hi László On 2022-11-21 20:42:41 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 = confirmed > > On 2022-11-10 23:10:29 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Control: block -1 by 1022248 1018945 > > > > On 2022-11-06 09:08:57 +0100, László Böszörményi wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > Severity: normal > > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > > Usertags: transition > > > > > > Hi RMs, > > > > > > There's a long awaited transition of Protobuf. It clashes with the > > > ruby3.1-default transition, but as I know its rebuilds are just > > > starting[1]. > > > On the other hand I'm done with the rebuilds and patched all issues, > > > this transition may start immediately at your decision. The only > > > downside is that the Sid version of cura-engine is FTBFS and to fix > > > it, the libarcus transition (only affecting this package) will need to > > > be done. > > > > > > Failing packages and fixes in detail. > > > Level 2: > > > android-platform-frameworks-base has my patch already applied [2] for > > > experimental (not Sid!). > > > libarcus builds in Sid, but not the version in experimental for which > > > I provided a fix [3]. > > > target-factory changed library symbols [4], maintainer will need to > > > update that. > > > > > > Level 3: > > > cura-engine fails with the Sid version [5], with the libarcus > > > transition done it compiles fine. > > > grpc-java for which I provided the fix [6], the maintainer noted he > > > will be ready to update the package. > > > llvm-toolchain-13 for which I provided the fix [7], other problems > > > seem to be fixed with the upload just happened. > > > llvm-toolchain-14 for which I also provided the fix [8], its other > > > problem [9] might be wrongly closed by cross referenced > > > llvm-toolchain-15 package - but Sylvestre Ledru seems to be aware of > > > issues anyway. > > > > Let's wait until icu and libbpf are done. > > Please go ahead protobuf's autopkgtests are failing. Could you please take a look at them? Thanks Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1023535: transition: protobuf
Control: tags -1 = confirmed On 2022-11-10 23:10:29 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: block -1 by 1022248 1018945 > > On 2022-11-06 09:08:57 +0100, László Böszörményi wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > Hi RMs, > > > > There's a long awaited transition of Protobuf. It clashes with the > > ruby3.1-default transition, but as I know its rebuilds are just > > starting[1]. > > On the other hand I'm done with the rebuilds and patched all issues, > > this transition may start immediately at your decision. The only > > downside is that the Sid version of cura-engine is FTBFS and to fix > > it, the libarcus transition (only affecting this package) will need to > > be done. > > > > Failing packages and fixes in detail. > > Level 2: > > android-platform-frameworks-base has my patch already applied [2] for > > experimental (not Sid!). > > libarcus builds in Sid, but not the version in experimental for which > > I provided a fix [3]. > > target-factory changed library symbols [4], maintainer will need to update > > that. > > > > Level 3: > > cura-engine fails with the Sid version [5], with the libarcus > > transition done it compiles fine. > > grpc-java for which I provided the fix [6], the maintainer noted he > > will be ready to update the package. > > llvm-toolchain-13 for which I provided the fix [7], other problems > > seem to be fixed with the upload just happened. > > llvm-toolchain-14 for which I also provided the fix [8], its other > > problem [9] might be wrongly closed by cross referenced > > llvm-toolchain-15 package - but Sylvestre Ledru seems to be aware of > > issues anyway. > > Let's wait until icu and libbpf are done. Please go ahead Cheers > > Cheers > > > > > Thanks for considering, > > Laszlo/GCS > > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/1023495#5 > > [2] https://bugs.debian.org/1012572 > > [3] https://bugs.debian.org/1023497 > > [4] https://bugs.debian.org/1023496 > > [5] https://bugs.debian.org/1023498 > > [6] https://bugs.debian.org/1023500 > > [7] https://bugs.debian.org/1023532 > > [8] https://bugs.debian.org/1023532 > > [9] https://bugs.debian.org/1023444 > > > > -- > Sebastian Ramacher > -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1023535: transition: protobuf
Control: block -1 by 1022248 1018945 On 2022-11-06 09:08:57 +0100, László Böszörményi wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi RMs, > > There's a long awaited transition of Protobuf. It clashes with the > ruby3.1-default transition, but as I know its rebuilds are just > starting[1]. > On the other hand I'm done with the rebuilds and patched all issues, > this transition may start immediately at your decision. The only > downside is that the Sid version of cura-engine is FTBFS and to fix > it, the libarcus transition (only affecting this package) will need to > be done. > > Failing packages and fixes in detail. > Level 2: > android-platform-frameworks-base has my patch already applied [2] for > experimental (not Sid!). > libarcus builds in Sid, but not the version in experimental for which > I provided a fix [3]. > target-factory changed library symbols [4], maintainer will need to update > that. > > Level 3: > cura-engine fails with the Sid version [5], with the libarcus > transition done it compiles fine. > grpc-java for which I provided the fix [6], the maintainer noted he > will be ready to update the package. > llvm-toolchain-13 for which I provided the fix [7], other problems > seem to be fixed with the upload just happened. > llvm-toolchain-14 for which I also provided the fix [8], its other > problem [9] might be wrongly closed by cross referenced > llvm-toolchain-15 package - but Sylvestre Ledru seems to be aware of > issues anyway. Let's wait until icu and libbpf are done. Cheers > > Thanks for considering, > Laszlo/GCS > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/1023495#5 > [2] https://bugs.debian.org/1012572 > [3] https://bugs.debian.org/1023497 > [4] https://bugs.debian.org/1023496 > [5] https://bugs.debian.org/1023498 > [6] https://bugs.debian.org/1023500 > [7] https://bugs.debian.org/1023532 > [8] https://bugs.debian.org/1023532 > [9] https://bugs.debian.org/1023444 > -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1023535: transition: protobuf
Re: László Böszörményi > On the other hand I'm done with the rebuilds and patched all issues, > this transition may start immediately at your decision. The only > downside is that the Sid version of cura-engine is FTBFS and to fix > it, the libarcus transition (only affecting this package) will need to > be done. I'll take care of cura and deps when the transition starts. (Unfortunately the newest libarcus package doesn't work with the old protobuf, so we can't upload that yet.) Christoph
Bug#1023535: transition: protobuf
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi RMs, There's a long awaited transition of Protobuf. It clashes with the ruby3.1-default transition, but as I know its rebuilds are just starting[1]. On the other hand I'm done with the rebuilds and patched all issues, this transition may start immediately at your decision. The only downside is that the Sid version of cura-engine is FTBFS and to fix it, the libarcus transition (only affecting this package) will need to be done. Failing packages and fixes in detail. Level 2: android-platform-frameworks-base has my patch already applied [2] for experimental (not Sid!). libarcus builds in Sid, but not the version in experimental for which I provided a fix [3]. target-factory changed library symbols [4], maintainer will need to update that. Level 3: cura-engine fails with the Sid version [5], with the libarcus transition done it compiles fine. grpc-java for which I provided the fix [6], the maintainer noted he will be ready to update the package. llvm-toolchain-13 for which I provided the fix [7], other problems seem to be fixed with the upload just happened. llvm-toolchain-14 for which I also provided the fix [8], its other problem [9] might be wrongly closed by cross referenced llvm-toolchain-15 package - but Sylvestre Ledru seems to be aware of issues anyway. Thanks for considering, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://bugs.debian.org/1023495#5 [2] https://bugs.debian.org/1012572 [3] https://bugs.debian.org/1023497 [4] https://bugs.debian.org/1023496 [5] https://bugs.debian.org/1023498 [6] https://bugs.debian.org/1023500 [7] https://bugs.debian.org/1023532 [8] https://bugs.debian.org/1023532 [9] https://bugs.debian.org/1023444
