Bug#1028124: Bug#1028132: transition: hunspell

2023-01-08 Thread Rene Engelhard

[CCing hunspell-kos maintainer ]

Hi,

Am 08.01.23 um 19:24 schrieb Rene Engelhard:

Hi,

Am 07.01.23 um 16:45 schrieb Rene Engelhard:

r-cran-hunspell included a copy of those internal headers and thus
breaks when built against the newer ones. (And I assume will do so when
built against the new ones against the old one.)

See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028124 for the
gory details.
I added Breaks: to hunspell 1.7.2+really1.7.2-5 and added a shlibs.local
to my proposed solution to #1028124


Given the R team and thus this package is in 
https://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdNmu I can upload hunspell and 
r-cran-hunspell together in one go (the latter as a NMU if required).


Nevermind for now, even with the upstream fix for korean applied, some 
parts of hunspell-ko still fail...


(see 
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/h/hunspell-dict-ko/30142014/log.gz 
and https://github.com/hunspell/hunspell/issues/903, the original patch 
is applied in 1.7.2+really1.7.2-4)



Will write again when this was sorted out somehow.

Rgards,


Rene



Bug#1028124: Bug#1028132: transition: hunspell

2023-01-08 Thread Rene Engelhard

Hi,

Am 07.01.23 um 16:45 schrieb Rene Engelhard:

r-cran-hunspell included a copy of those internal headers and thus
breaks when built against the newer ones. (And I assume will do so when
built against the new ones against the old one.)

See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028124 for the
gory details.
I added Breaks: to hunspell 1.7.2+really1.7.2-5 and added a shlibs.local
to my proposed solution to #1028124


Given the R team and thus this package is in 
https://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdNmu I can upload hunspell and 
r-cran-hunspell together in one go (the latter as a NMU if required).


Regards,

Rene