Bug#1035795: [Debian-astro-maintainers] Bug#1035795: libricohcamerasdk: does not ship SONAME link /usr/lib//libRicohCameraSDKCpp.so -> libRicohCameraSDKCpp.so.1.1.0

2023-05-18 Thread Thorsten Alteholz 

Hi Andreas,

On 09.05.23 12:17, Andreas Beckmann wrote:


during a test with piuparts I noticed your package does not ship the
SONAME link for its library (Policy 8.1).


I am a bit at a loss here.
If you look at the binary packages, libricocamerasdk contains:
-rw-r--r-- root/root   1255128 2023-05-18 11:30 
./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libRicohCameraSDKCpp.so.1.1.0
-rw-r--r-- root/root   1156392 2023-05-18 11:30 
./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmtpricoh.so.9.3.0
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2023-05-18 11:30 
./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libRicohCameraSDKCpp.so.1 -> 
libRicohCameraSDKCpp.so.1.1.0
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2023-05-18 11:30 
./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmtpricoh.so.9 -> libmtpricoh.so.9.3.0


and libricocamerasdk-dev contains:
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2023-05-18 11:30 
./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libRicohCameraSDKCpp.so -> 
libRicohCameraSDKCpp.so.1
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2023-05-18 11:30 
./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmtpricoh.so -> libmtpricoh.so.9



From my point of view all these links for both libraries look good.
I have no clue where the link:
   /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libRicohCameraSDKCpp.so -> 
libRicohCameraSDKCpp.so.1.1.0

that is mentioned in your log, comes from.

Also I have no idea why this only happens for libRicohCameraSDKCpp.so 
and not libmtpricoh.so, which is in the same package and should not be 
handled differently!?


Do you have any idea?

Best regards
Thorsten

Bug#1035795: libricohcamerasdk: does not ship SONAME link /usr/lib//libRicohCameraSDKCpp.so -> libRicohCameraSDKCpp.so.1.1.0

2023-05-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann 
Package: libricohcamerasdk
Version: 1.1.0-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package does not ship the
SONAME link for its library (Policy 8.1).
That link got created later by ldconfig.

The SONAME of this library is, well, unusual. But there is probably
nothing we can do about it as it resides in non-free.

>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

0m20.4s DEBUG: Starting command: ['nsenter', 
'--net=/run/netns/piuparts-netns-9', 
'--uts=/srv/piuparts/tmp/tmpTP2K8k/ns-uts', 'chroot', 
'/srv/piuparts/tmp/tmpTP2K8k/chroot', 
'tmp/scripts/pre_remove_40_find_unowned_lib_links']
0m21.1s DUMP:
  UNOWNED SYMLINK /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libRicohCameraSDKCpp.so -> 
libRicohCameraSDKCpp.so.1.1.0
0m21.1s DEBUG: Command ok: ['nsenter', '--net=/run/netns/piuparts-netns-9', 
'--uts=/srv/piuparts/tmp/tmpTP2K8k/ns-uts', 'chroot', 
'/srv/piuparts/tmp/tmpTP2K8k/chroot', 
'tmp/scripts/pre_remove_40_find_unowned_lib_links']

After removal of the package a broken symlink remains:

0m24.4s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks:
  /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libRicohCameraSDKCpp.so -> 
libRicohCameraSDKCpp.so.1.1.0


libRicohCameraSDKCpp.so is probably part of the -dev package, so you
need to remove it from there and add
  Breaks+Replaces: libricohcamerasdk-dev (<< 1.1.0-4~)


Andreas


libricohcamerasdk_1.1.0-3.log.gz
Description: application/gzip