Bug#1037567: abseil: ftbfs with GCC-13
Thank you for the patch, Aurelien! I’ve applied it to the 20220623.1 release and uploaded it to unstable as 20220623.1-2.
Bug#1037567: abseil: ftbfs with GCC-13
On 2023-08-04 08:53, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2023-08-03 21:33, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 2023-08-02 14:27, Benjamin Barenblat wrote: > > > I’ve been procrastinating on starting the transition because of some > > > lingering MIPS issues. I think they’ve all been sorted out, and I just > > > uploaded my latest work to experimental. If that passes the buildds, > > > I’ll request a transition slot and do the transition as quickly as > > > possible. > > > > > > If waiting on the transition is going to unacceptably delay the riscv64 > > > bootstrap, please let me know. I think I know which patches I would have > > > to backport to 20220623 to get it to build with GCC 13, so I may be able > > > to fix this in unstable before the transition completes. > > > > It was not clear when we're going to need abseil when sending the > > initial mail, but it's not clear that we'll need to really soon for > > After reading my email again, I noticed a typo that could lead to a > misunderstanding: "it's now clear that we'll need it really soon" The easiest and less risky way to make it build is probably to go back to using gcc-12. This is what the attached patch does. Regards Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net diff -Nru abseil-20220623.1/debian/control abseil-20220623.1/debian/control --- abseil-20220623.1/debian/control 2022-10-18 14:31:29.0 +0200 +++ abseil-20220623.1/debian/control 2023-08-05 11:20:36.0 +0200 @@ -18,7 +18,8 @@ Build-Depends: cmake (>= 3.5), debhelper-compat (= 12), - googletest (>= 1.12) [!mipsel !ppc64] + googletest (>= 1.12) [!mipsel !ppc64] , + g++-12 Rules-Requires-Root: no Standards-Version: 4.6.1 Section: libs diff -Nru abseil-20220623.1/debian/rules abseil-20220623.1/debian/rules --- abseil-20220623.1/debian/rules 2022-10-18 14:37:10.0 +0200 +++ abseil-20220623.1/debian/rules 2023-08-05 11:20:36.0 +0200 @@ -38,11 +38,11 @@ $(RM) -r $(CURDIR)/shared override_dh_auto_configure: - dh_auto_configure -Bstatic -- -DCMAKE_CXX_STANDARD=17 -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF + dh_auto_configure -Bstatic -- -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)-gcc-12 -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)-g++-12 -DCMAKE_CXX_STANDARD=17 -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF ifeq ($(ABSL_RUN_TESTS),ON) - dh_auto_configure -Bshared -- -DCMAKE_CXX_STANDARD=17 -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON -DBUILD_TESTING=ON -DABSL_BUILD_TESTING=ON -DABSL_USE_GOOGLETEST_HEAD=OFF + dh_auto_configure -Bshared -- -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)-gcc-12 -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)-g++-12 -DCMAKE_CXX_STANDARD=17 -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON -DBUILD_TESTING=ON -DABSL_BUILD_TESTING=ON -DABSL_USE_GOOGLETEST_HEAD=OFF else - dh_auto_configure -Bshared -- -DCMAKE_CXX_STANDARD=17 -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON + dh_auto_configure -Bshared -- -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)-gcc-12 -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)-g++-12 -DCMAKE_CXX_STANDARD=17 -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON endif override_dh_auto_build:
Bug#1037567: abseil: ftbfs with GCC-13
Source: abseil Followup-For: Bug #1037567 Dear Maintainer, I'm terribly sorry if I'm suddenly intruding on this thread. For riscv64, We need abseil more than anything else at this point in my view. Because there are several dependencies chains that even end up pointing to abseil. Ideally we should wait for the transition, but now it seems the abseil is our main blocker if without resolving other dependency loops. So I think if we can upload new version with patch which fixed the gcc-13 build issueu[0] that will speed up our riscv64 official porting. Thanks. [0]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037567#36 -- Regards, -- Bo YU signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1037567: abseil: ftbfs with GCC-13
On 2023-08-03 21:33, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Hi, > > On 2023-08-02 14:27, Benjamin Barenblat wrote: > > I’ve been procrastinating on starting the transition because of some > > lingering MIPS issues. I think they’ve all been sorted out, and I just > > uploaded my latest work to experimental. If that passes the buildds, > > I’ll request a transition slot and do the transition as quickly as > > possible. > > > > If waiting on the transition is going to unacceptably delay the riscv64 > > bootstrap, please let me know. I think I know which patches I would have > > to backport to 20220623 to get it to build with GCC 13, so I may be able > > to fix this in unstable before the transition completes. > > It was not clear when we're going to need abseil when sending the > initial mail, but it's not clear that we'll need to really soon for After reading my email again, I noticed a typo that could lead to a misunderstanding: "it's now clear that we'll need it really soon" -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net
Bug#1037567: abseil: ftbfs with GCC-13
Hi, On 2023-08-02 14:27, Benjamin Barenblat wrote: > I’ve been procrastinating on starting the transition because of some > lingering MIPS issues. I think they’ve all been sorted out, and I just > uploaded my latest work to experimental. If that passes the buildds, > I’ll request a transition slot and do the transition as quickly as > possible. > > If waiting on the transition is going to unacceptably delay the riscv64 > bootstrap, please let me know. I think I know which patches I would have > to backport to 20220623 to get it to build with GCC 13, so I may be able > to fix this in unstable before the transition completes. It was not clear when we're going to need abseil when sending the initial mail, but it's not clear that we'll need to really soon for building llvm-toolchain-XX through both libgrpc++-dev and libctypes-ocaml. Therefore it would be great if you can fix that in unstable before the transition. From what I understand it should be this patch: https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/commit/4eef16170014f75f4291ae335a271900f89eaedf Alternatively it could also be changing the compiler to gcc-12. Thanks Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net
Bug#1037567: abseil: ftbfs with GCC-13
I’ve been procrastinating on starting the transition because of some lingering MIPS issues. I think they’ve all been sorted out, and I just uploaded my latest work to experimental. If that passes the buildds, I’ll request a transition slot and do the transition as quickly as possible. If waiting on the transition is going to unacceptably delay the riscv64 bootstrap, please let me know. I think I know which patches I would have to backport to 20220623 to get it to build with GCC 13, so I may be able to fix this in unstable before the transition completes.
Bug#1037567: abseil: ftbfs with GCC-13
Hi, On 2023-06-26 12:55, Benjamin Barenblat wrote: > Control: fixed -1 20230125.3 > Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/issues/1366 > Control: owner -1 ! > Control: tags -1 upstream fixed-upstream fixed-in-experimental > > This has been resolved in the 20230125 series, which is currently in > experimental and will be included in trixie after it transitions. What are your plans with this transition? This bug will soon block the riscv64 bootstrap in the official archive, and thus we would be interested by a relatively quick fix in unstable. Thanks Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1037567: abseil: ftbfs with GCC-13
Control: fixed -1 20230125.3 Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/issues/1366 Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 upstream fixed-upstream fixed-in-experimental This has been resolved in the 20230125 series, which is currently in experimental and will be included in trixie after it transitions.
